| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Jihad Watch | Robert Spencer | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog |  |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Kathy Shaidle puts it best: "Life really is so simple: 1. Separate already 2. Stay home with your kids and feed 'em your own damn self 3. Go back where you came from 4. 'Panels' must die."
"Quebec day-care lunch menu discriminates: panel," from Canadian Press:
MONTREAL -- The ongoing debate in Quebec over accommodation of religious minorities has flared up again over a day-care lunch menu.A day-care centre in the east end of Montreal is taking issue with a human rights commission ruling suggesting it not serve meat to a Muslim child, in accordance with Islamic dietary rules.
Lawyers for the publicly funded day care say staff were asked to remove pork from the lunchtime menu and serve the Muslim child only halal meat -- actions they won't take.
But Quebec's human rights commission says it never asked the day care to make such accommodations.
It says the parents simply wanted their child not to be served any meals with meat, as the day care does for another child who is allergic....
The case will now go before a human rights tribunal.
Posted by Robert at April 4, 2007 1:12 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
"Lawyers for the publicly funded day care say staff were asked to remove pork from the lunchtime menu and serve the Muslim child only halal meat -- actions they won't take."
....the menu should not be changed...just don't put the "objectionable food" on the childs plate...or just inform the Muslim parents to have the child bring acceptable food from home....
...quit bowing down to Muslim demands...
...you do not want these people in your neighborhood...ban Muslim Immigration...
Posted by: exsgtbrown![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/nav-commenters.gif)
at April 4, 2007 1:29 PM
The funny thing (if there is such a thing anymore) is that we serve pork in our DFACs here in Iraq and none of the many Iraqis who eat with us care one bit. We tell them what it is and that they may not want it. They thank us and get the beef or chicken or turkey. They could care less about what we eat.
Oh, wait.... Can't let the truth out.... Must believe the dhimmis....
Dhimmi="useful idiot"=fascist/totalitarian enabler.
at April 4, 2007 1:32 PM
Its only the beginning
Posted by: Elric66 at April 4, 2007 1:32 PM
So this is what "Human Rights" has degenerated too. The same "Human Rights" Commission of course will be appalled by what Robert stands for, but will push for inane nonsense like this. Apparently, true human rights aren't worth defending in the cause of the "Human Rights" Commission/Council/Blah
Posted by: Tushar Saxena at April 4, 2007 1:45 PM
I have a neighbor, a muslim lady, who absolutely hates all things halal. Her husband only wants halal from the muslim grocery store, but she sneaks over to the local grocery to buy the non halal, since it is so much cheaper. She even loves bacon....shhh, don't tell the old man. She has to tell her kids not to say anything to the old man about eating a cheeseburger at Mickey Ds. Tsk. She is so insensitive.
at April 4, 2007 1:45 PM
The case will now go before a human rights tribunal.This case will go before a human rights tribunal, but not the dozens of cases documented monthly in the Muslim world, involving slavery and slavetrading, physical and emotional abuse of Muslim women and children, rape and abduction of non-Muslim women and children, confiscation and/or destruction of non-Muslim property, and the intimidation, mutilation and murder of non-Muslims.
The evil abominations that take place in the darkness of dar al islam are off limits to international scrutiny or critique. The various international groups that seek "justice" conveniently pick on the easiest targets---open societies in Western nations. What a bunch of hypocritical phonies.
Posted by: US_infidel at April 4, 2007 1:55 PM
This is SUCH BS! My family is Jewish and you know what my kids do at school? They just don't eat meat they don't recognize. The responsibility falls on the parents and the kids to adhere to religious guidelines, not every other tax-payer who doesn't practice your religion! Damn! Publicly funded organizations are only supposed to provide the basic framework needed for universal operation, the specific details are left to the individuals to satisfy their needs. Muslims need to stop playing the victim in every instance where they don't get their way. It seems the principles of responsibility and accountability escape them.
Posted by: Constantinople at April 4, 2007 2:05 PM
Name something in a western society that does not discriminate against Muslims. Everything does - women's rights, religious accomodation, gay rights, compound interest, legal gambling, miniskirts, halter tops, fun, picnics, sausage and egg biscuits, movies, television, women's basketball, and three cheers for the Lady Volunteers. The point is everything we take for granted is un-Islamic, discriminatory, and a potential target of jihad. Halal food in a day care center is just the tip of the camel's nose.
Posted by: Pelayo at April 4, 2007 2:14 PM
Here's the big picture - In islamic food rules, if a server uses a spatula to serve a pork chop, that spatula is "contaminated" and causes everything it touches to become halal. One dispenser of Islamic opinion stated that heat does not render the utensil "clean." The griddle on which the ham is cooked (fried?)cannot be used to cook the other food.
The next step is to force the day care center to become certified as preparing halal food. Thus, adding more cost to our daily lives.
Posted by: Pelayo at April 4, 2007 2:24 PM
The next step is to force the day care center to become certified as preparing halal food. Thus, adding more cost to our daily lives.
Posted by: Pelayo at April 4, 2007 02:24 PM
Its just the beginning, the Canadians havent seen anything yet.
at April 4, 2007 2:26 PM
The menu at a day-care center in Canada is being framed in terms of a 'human rights issue'?
For the sake of all that is right with the world - stop the insanity!!!!!!!!
Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at April 4, 2007 2:41 PM
There seem to be several stories inside this story. One story line follows that the day care center was asked to take pork off the menu and serve halal meals to the Muslim child. The other story line is that the Muslim parents merely asked that meat not be served to their child, presumably the child would then receive only veggies, fruits or a piece of bread. Which is the correct story? I suspect that story number one is closer to the truth. The Muslim parents had a list of dietary demands, not just a request to withhold meat from their child's plate. In any case, what ever happened to something that I did for years with my large family...I made sack lunches every day. That seems like such a simple solution for any problem with a parent might have with school food, whether the reason is religious, medical or whatever. Of course, that solution would take the "We are Muslims and we are victims of the infidel lunchroom" out of the equation.
Posted by: maryrose at April 4, 2007 2:54 PM
palayo asked:
"Name something in a western society that does not discriminate against Muslims."
Sorry. No can do.
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at April 4, 2007 2:56 PM
"Its just the beginning, the Canadians havent seen anything yet."
....remodel all existing bathrooms in order for the Muslims to urinate in the proper direction. (I say give them a bucket to use is any direction they want)..
....private prayer rooms...
....multiple prayer times....
....the banning of crucifixes, religious paintings and any other Non Muslim religious item...
....schools will have to provide special prayer mats...
....teachers will be required to wear burkah..
....only halal food allowed...
....boys will have to separated from girls...
....no music allowed, no co-ed sports allowed
....any news regarding Islamic conflicts will be outlawed...
....any dogs within a five mile radius will be removed...
....only Muslim books depicting Muslim curriculum will be allowed....
....all Canadian flags and/or symbols of independence will be removed....
....children must learn arabic and be required to recite passages from memory from the Qur'an
....all female teachers must be accompanied by male escorts....
....children will be taught CAIR is a really good organization and that the PLO and Hamas are really a bunch of nice guys...
....children will be taught that Pakistan, Yeman, and Darfur are really fun vacation spots...
....female children will be taught that they can expect their future husband to have multiple wives (all at the same time)....not to worry..
....Females will undergo FGM....immediately....
....yes they do have a lot to look forward to...
at April 4, 2007 3:00 PM
All these governments and nations should be given guide books or leaflets on what to expect if you allow Muslims in your country so that at least the they are aware of the problems they will cause and see if its worth changing the constitution for them too because that where it will lead next and has.
You either stand up for what you have or go back to the ancient 700AD if not 4000 year old reinvented tribal laws and wait another1400 years before you get to where you are now before the Muslims changed it all after the year Millennium 2000. Is it me or does the intolerance lie with Muslims as taught in their religion, if so we should not bow down to it but set up walls against it because if Canada did not evolve from Islam its because it did well without it and chose not to in the first place.
Posted by: jesusisthelamb at April 4, 2007 3:03 PM
Maryrose - You are quite right. These people do not want a "simple solution". They want a victory. allahu-akbar y'all!
Posted by: MP at April 4, 2007 3:19 PM
Jesusisthelamb - It should be the responsibility of the immigrant to adjust to the culture of the land they have chosen to live in. We should refuse to adjust to theirs. They can do anything that is legal (female circumcison anyone?) in their own homes, but should not expect anyone, anywhere to take action to make them feel at home.
Posted by: MP at April 4, 2007 3:25 PM
"Its just the beginning, the Canadians havent seen anything yet."
Canada has a problem alrighty but we have a much smaller population of Muslims than US or UK, and a Coservative government which is well aware and well on their way to gaining a majority government.
Even small l liberals like myself will vote conservative.
Lefty
Posted by: lefty at April 4, 2007 3:28 PM
MP - I agree but the immigrants are naive of what democracy is they have never known it. They have the mentality to over come the infidel even a hidden one, which we would not understand even if they said it in their language in front of us.
These are victories the same way the Devil likes to play his victories against God's elect, as long as he can reel in more people into the fire its even more bitter for God a victory over the infidel is exactly the same conquest. Of course other things act this way too but this is blatant.
at April 4, 2007 3:38 PM
People, OT but is it really true that England will not be teaching the Holocaust anymore because it offends Muslims? This was referred to in Michelle Malkin's column today. I can't believe it. Can someone refer me to an article about it on either J Watch or Dhimmi W?
Posted by: darcy at April 4, 2007 3:45 PM
Is anything more boringly predictable than Islam? It is interesting, from a sociological point of view, how Muslims in different parts of the world do the exact same things, say the exact same things, and act in the exact same ways.
It would be laughable if the danger wasn't to significant.
Posted by: JSobieski at April 4, 2007 3:58 PM
so significant
Posted by: JSobieski at April 4, 2007 3:58 PM
If they don't like it, then why don't they go to another daycare... I am sure there are Muslim only daycares. If Muslims cannot intertwine with our culture, why don't they lucking feave!
Posted by: The Resistance at April 4, 2007 4:03 PM
'why don't they lucking feave!'
....BECAUSE, they want your land....
at April 4, 2007 4:10 PM
Darcy--the article on the Holocaust not being taught in Britain is here:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/015892.php
Posted by: staff_of_magius at April 4, 2007 4:18 PM
I don't think they should feed them anything. They'll only grow up and try to kill us.
Posted by: Seymour Paine at April 4, 2007 4:32 PM
Thank You, "staff_of_magius." I did go to the London Times and read the brief article of April 2. Shocking. I also read all of the following 197 Comments! NOBODY APPROVED OF THIS INSANE CENSORSHIP, AS THAT'S WHAT IT IS. George Orwell's name mentioned numerous times.
The Muslims have cowed once-great Britain. England is so over.
Posted by: darcy at April 4, 2007 4:54 PM
Really, I agree with you, "Seymour Paine." The child Muslim becomes the adult Jihadist.
Posted by: darcy at April 4, 2007 4:56 PM
Darcy:
People, OT but is it really true that England will not be teaching the Holocaust anymore because it offends Muslims? This was referred to in Michelle Malkin's column today. I can't believe it. Can someone refer me to an article about it on either J Watch or Dhimmi W?
I cant refer you to JW/DW article but it is here
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6517359.stm
But it is "Some schools", not official guidelines.
Again it is liberal clap-trap:
"The fear that you might offend someone", so lets leave certain subjects not discussable.
at April 4, 2007 5:26 PM
RE:"Its just the beginning, the Canadians havent seen anything yet."
Canada has a problem alrighty but we have a much smaller population of Muslims than US or UK, and a Coservative government which is well aware and well on their way to gaining a majority government.
Even small l liberals like myself will vote conservative.
Lefty
Lefty, voting conservative won't solve our woes to Islam in our country. Remember Harper bowing to Arar? $10,000,000 of our tax money Lefy! Arar is a multi-millionaire off the backs of Canadian tax payers. Compliments of Harper...
I wish there was a party in Canada like the BNP. The problem is the the Conservative government does not have the guts to resist Muslim demands...
Posted by: The Resistance at April 4, 2007 5:32 PM
Our religions and culture is so diametrically opposing Islam that no matter what we have or do will offend Muslims. Muslims will tie up our legal, appeal and human rights systems to overflowing.
Insanity.
Posted by: sounder at April 4, 2007 5:38 PM
By Lorne Gunter
National Post
Monday, April 02, 2007:
"...the ADQ's Dumont was the only leader to say plainly that Quebec's famously tolerant culture was already tolerant enough."
"It didn't need to make more concessions to the demands, desires and creeds of minorities and newcomers. Indeed, if it made more concessions, it might imperil its renowned tolerance."
"Most current minority demands are for illiberal rule changes, such as segregated male-female swim times at public pools to accommodate Muslim swimmers, or banning men from prenatal classes in order to avoid scandalizing Muslim mothers-to-be, or for only male police officers to be dispatched to disputes involving Hasidic men or only male motor-vehicles employees to administer driving tests to Hasids."
"Boisclair's response to voters' rising disquiet over rampant multiculturalism was a legalistic explanation of the need for everyone to accommodate everyone else, which many Quebecois seemed to think meant they would be the ones doing all the accommodating of everyone else."
AIN'T IT THE TRUTH. WELL SAID.
at April 4, 2007 5:48 PM
Halal food in a day care center is just the tip of the camel's nose.
Posted by: Pelayo
Yep.. the head of the camel is in the tent! CHOP IT OFF before the boody follows!!
I wish I were a cook in one of these places. I'd give them something 'halal' in their food.
The lazy demanding bastards are trying to establish bridgeheads within or lands. The realize we've gone PC and Liberal and they can go in for the kill.. the Liberals and the PC brigades holding back the righteous Patriots among us.
Yes, we ARE fighting them in our streets already, George Dhimya! Time to call home the troops and send back the Mos!
Posted by: Allahfanculo at April 4, 2007 6:42 PM
I wish there was a party in Canada like the BNP. The problem is the the Conservative government does not have the guts to resist Muslim demands...
Posted by: The Resistance
Ditto the USA. In europe you can at least vote Patriotic. If the Euros don't start a Crusade at the Ballot Box then they deserve what they are getting.
Here in the US we have Dhimmicrats and Moneycans. The two-party "system" serves only to hamper real change.
Posted by: Allahfanculo at April 4, 2007 6:45 PM
Resistance- Harper's hands were tied by human rights legislation put in by the Liberal government and liberal judges. I'm sure he was awakened with a jolt by the Ontario goons who threatened to behead him on the steps of parliament. Not much he could do with a minority government. He is a smart man and is working towards a majority- hopefully then he can begin dismantling our outmoded human rights laws. As for a Western BNP I would say we have enough dictators on the Jihad side no use setting up future wars until the Middle East threst is over.
Posted by: lefty at April 4, 2007 7:53 PM
muslims don't deserve any more freedoms than we have, the courts have shown that, get a grip people!!!!
Posted by: OLD SARGE at April 4, 2007 8:13 PM
Offer the kid sheeps eyeballs or nothing.
That's not "meat", -technically.
And it's culturally appropriate for all followers of the pedophile Arab warlord of Islam.
In French, it is even poetic:
Laissez-les manger des globes oculaires."
Posted by: profitsbeard at April 4, 2007 8:37 PM
If the lawyers for the rax funded daycar are seen to be right that the Human Rights Commision stated that meat ie pork must be removed then that comision is to be charged with discrimination against a protected minority francophones , Who will chargew the Human Rights Commision with discrimiation Who ? and How? When the Human Rights Commision is a chanel for discrimination against Francophones what can be done?
Posted by: mark52 at April 4, 2007 10:30 PM
I wish there was a party in Canada like the BNP. The problem is the the Conservative government does not have the guts to resist Muslim demands...
Posted by: The Resistance
Here in the US we have Dhimmicrats and Moneycans. The two-party "system" serves only to hamper real change.
Posted by: Allahfanculo
Surely there must be a minority party in either Canada or the USA which is opposed to Muslim immigration. We've got the Christian Democratic Party in Australia which endorses a 10 year moratorium on Muslim immigration. It's not a complete ban, they want to halt the immigration of Muslims so the Australian population can study & learn about Islam, and decide if they want it here.
It's not a racist BNP type organisation, they encourage the continued immigration of mid-eastern Christians.
http://www.cdp.org.au/fed/mr/0703013f.asp
Posted by: Ozi_bloke at April 5, 2007 8:23 AM
"It's not a complete ban, they want to halt the immigration of Muslims so the Australian population can study & learn about Islam, and decide if they want it here."
....tell them to review the rise in violent crime anywhere Muslims appear, tell them to review the disappearance of any other religion anywhere Muslims appear, tell them to review the intimidation of Non Muslims in anywhere Muslims appear, tell them to review the increased cases of rape, executions, vandalism, murder, etc anywhere Muslims appear....
...it should not take 10 years...
..Ban Muslim Immigration now...
at April 5, 2007 11:11 AM
Just as a note. There are only 1.4million US Service members total. Even if we were brought home, unless martial law is declared, Title 10, USC (Possi Commattatus) forbids us from doing anything about the situation. We are NOT Police. We intervene only when the situation is dire. I pray it never gets to that level and I pray some dhimmi does not side with the islamofascists over the American People.
But we CAN do stuff outside the USA and that is what we are doing in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Horn of Africa, and several other places. We kill terrorists/islamofascists by the thousands here.
Or would you rather my M1 be on your front lawn shooting down the street? That is what life here is like for the Iraqis who want nothing to do with the jihadists. The jihadists consider them aposates and kill them more than they try to kill us. Simply stated, it is easier to kill civilians than trained US troops.
As one friend said to me "maybe martyr should translate from Arabic as 'coward'".
Posted by: Freedom and Honor at April 5, 2007 12:02 PM
Here's the thing about filing a complaint with the Human Rights Commission of Canada: you don't have to pay legal fees but the organization you're suing does have to pay to defend itself.
http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/faq/page4-en.asp#11
"Must I pay to file a complaint with the Commission?
"Filing a complaint is free of charge, and complainants do not need a lawyer to file a complaint with the Commission. However, complainants and respondents can choose to be represented by a lawyer at any time during the complaint process. If the parties involved in a complaint choose to hire a lawyer, the costs will not be covered by the Commission, as it does not provide funding for private legal representation."
Posted by: Josephine at April 5, 2007 12:25 PM
This is the footage from an anti-American/anti-Israel/anti-semitic rally at Wayne State University in Detroit last Thursday:
Part I:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqbfZqX7LWU
Part II:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxeweTTLqII
Part III:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1BlPhbW5tw
Here is a story that aired about the rally on Fox 2 News (Detroit):
Here are two rally organizers (Mike Staunch and Shemon Salam) trying to defend themselves, but they ended up being really offensive:
There is also a story posted on littlegreenfootballs about the rally.
THE OFFENSIVE GROUP WHO ORGANIZED THE RALLY, "ANTI-RACIST ACTION" (ARA), IS MADE UP MOSTLY OF NON-STUDENTS, AND THE GROUP OPENLY CALLS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL AND AMERICA.
Anti-Racist Action can be contacted for interviews at wsu_ara@yahoo.com.
at April 5, 2007 12:45 PM
From two postings above:
'why don't they lucking feave!'
....BECAUSE, they want your land....
And if you keep feaving the lucking up to them, there'll soon be enough of them to take it.
at April 5, 2007 4:01 PM
"Simply stated, it is easier to kill civilians than trained US troops."
.....yes, it is......Muslims love to attack unarmed civilians.....they do it every day.....
at April 5, 2007 4:54 PM
...it should not take 10 years...
..Ban Muslim Immigration now...
Posted by: exsgtbrown
Sgt. Brown (not ex - you haven't retired yet),
100% agreement from me, but a start must be made somewhere. Aren't we much better off starting with a 10 year moratorium on Muslim immigration into our lands instead of shouting the obvious point you make (total ban now), and getting nowhere?
Not everyone agrees with us because they don't have our understanding of the dangers our societies face. Many would view a total immediate ban as "racist", or "facist", or something similar simply because they don't understand the dangers which large scale Muslim immigration presents us with.
Most folk however feel disquiet and uneasy about Muslim immigration, though they don't know the full implications and dangers large scale Muslim immigration presents them with. Most of these folk would support a policy which aims to halt the immigration for a period of time to examine the implications and effects of the immigration, these same folk may not support an immediate ban now.
The two opinion poll results in the article I posted http://www.cdp.org.au/fed/mr/0703013f.asp show that the majority of people support a 10 year moratorium on Muslim immigration. I believe that the same result would apply in Canada, USA & Britain based on my own travels and discussions with "the average bloke" anywhere in the English speaking world.
I say go for a 10 year moratorium, which can be acheived now, than hold out for a full ban which probably wouldn't meet with success in the polling booths in our lands.
Posted by: Ozi_bloke at April 5, 2007 10:28 PM
Ozi bloke the BNP in no way is racist. Islam is not a race but an ideology like communism ans fascism. It is an ideology disguised as a religion. When a country is exploited by a special interest minority group, something must be done to prevent the further spread of cancer. Sometimes you must fight back!
Posted by: The Resistance at April 5, 2007 11:03 PM
If you want to call Islam a race than so be it. They are at a "race" to dominate the world.
Posted by: The Resistance at April 5, 2007 11:04 PM
'why don't they lucking feave!'
....BECAUSE, they want your land....
Posted by: exsgtbrown
They want your land they want my land they want our land. And the Left simply doesn't get it. Everyone is asleep at the wheel.
They're like agiant octopus.. sucking and squeezing.. ever more tightly.. until the last gasp.. until the very last breath..
Posted by: Allahfanculo at April 5, 2007 11:16 PM
"Ozi bloke the BNP in no way is racist."
Posted by: The Resistance
I'm not sure that I would agree with that. As I understand the situation (from a long way off), the BNP is against all immigration, it doesn't target Muslim immigration in particular. This is not my business though, perhaps Britain needs a total immigration ban, that's for you guys to decide.
"Islam is not a race but an ideology"
Agreed. I was pointing out that some folk, in their ignorance, may hesitate to support a policy which calls for the immediate banning of Muslim immigration as "racist", yet they may support a policy which calls for a moratorium instead.
Islam is a race though in a round about way - citizens of the Umma - or members of the "master race".
Posted by: Ozi_bloke at April 6, 2007 12:27 AM
"Everyone is asleep at the wheel."
....one step away from being graveyard dead....
at April 6, 2007 8:00 AM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dhimmi Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)