Nothing more disgusting then a Dhimmi that strikes premptivily.

Posted by: Elric66 at April 10, 2007 1:41 PM

Allergic to Jesus!

(and the Dhimmi protects them)

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at April 10, 2007 1:42 PM

Correction:

Allergic to the Atonement!

(and the Dhimmi is clueless)

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at April 10, 2007 1:43 PM

They could always be offered a crescent roll!

Posted by: MP at April 10, 2007 1:50 PM

Posted by MP:
"They could always be offered a crescent roll!"

LOL!! I'm Jewish; where's my Magen David roll?! This is beyond insanity! Alas, a nice warm, buttery bun - and it's Passover :( You can bet when Passover is over, I'll be eating bread no matter what shape it's made in!

Posted by: Constantinople at April 10, 2007 2:06 PM

What needs to be learned here is that if enough people raise a ruckus, the PC creatures will relent and reverse themselves.

Posted by: Pelayo at April 10, 2007 2:10 PM

I did not expect pieces from The Onion to leap out of the computer monitor, or Monty Python skits to do the same out of the TV screen. Apparently we have reached the day that they do, with maddening regularity. Pray that the dhimwits will be removed from their positions of power soon, otherwise we will have the scenes from Friday the 13th or Nightmare on Elm Street leaping out of the cinema canvas, G-d forbid.

Posted by: ZionistYoungster at April 10, 2007 2:45 PM

I say remove it as it serves no healing purposes. It only invites the anger of God. When I am sick, it He who heals me.

Posted by: Abdullah at April 10, 2007 2:59 PM

hospital services offered:

Acute Stroke Unit
Antenatal Clinics
Blood Tests
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service
Breast Screening Unit
Cancer Care
Cardiology
Child Health
Critical Care
Day Surgery
Dermatology
Diabetes
Elderly Medicine
Emergency
Endoscopy
ENT (Ear, Nose and Throat)
Forest Holme (Palliative Care)
Gastroenterology
Gynaecology
Intensive Care Unit
Maternity
Medical Investigations Unit
Medicine and Elderly Care
Neo-natal Intensive Care (NICU)
Nutrition and Dietetics
Obstetrics
Occupational Therapy
Oncology
Oral and Maxillofacial
Orthotics
Pain Clinic
Palliative Care
Pathology
Pharmacy
Physiotherapy
Radiology
Radiotherapy
Rheumatology
Stroke services
Surgery
Therapy Services
Women’s Services
X-Ray

.....I did not find Muslim ass kissing....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 10, 2007 3:00 PM

Remove islam as it serves no healing purposes.

Posted by: Elric66 at April 10, 2007 3:04 PM

Rather interesting. The people who are most against preemptive strikes seem to advocate preemptive surrender.

Posted by: Balrog at April 10, 2007 3:12 PM

Rather interesting. The people who are most against preemptive strikes seem to advocate preemptive surrender.

Posted by: Balrog at April 10, 2007 03:12 PM

Well trained Dhimmis. They dont even wait for the Muslims to seethe.

Posted by: Elric66 at April 10, 2007 3:13 PM

Now this atheist-pagan-hindu type person is really annoyed ... I guess I should go riot or something and do some seething and whining - because I love hot-cross buns ...

Posted by: drk at April 10, 2007 3:13 PM

“What needs to be learned here is that if enough people raise a ruckus, the PC creatures will relent and reverse themselves.”

Yes, and the good thing is that this is happening more and more in Britain today. I wonder when the PC/multiculti zealots will finally come round to the idea that they’ll get more stick from the enraged natives than offended Muslims, so won’t attempt dhimmitude in the first place. I like to think William Blake was right – “If a fool persists in his folly he will become wise”.

Posted by: JFGR at April 10, 2007 3:37 PM

There is a rumour that the BBC banned hot cross buns in its canteen years ago so posters will not be surprised at the following “joke” on a BBC Radio 4 programme on Easter Saturday evening.

In a discussion programme the presenter reminded listeners that it was the second anniversary of the death of the great Dave Allen. This was an Irish comedian resident in Britain and renowned for lampooning Christianity and his own Roman Catholicism in particular. The presenter then told one of his jokes as follows,

“Christ arrives in heaven and is looking for his father as never having seen him he does not know what he looks like. He meets an old man who is very concerned who says he is looking for his son, so Christ asks him what does he look like?

Well says the old man “He has holes in his hands and feet.”

“That's me!” says Christ

The old mans face lights up and he cries, “Pinocchio!””

I SENT THEM THE FOLLOWING E MAIL

Sir/Madam

I was listening to Saturday Review last night which ended with a topical Easter joke of /in memory of/ Dave Allen. It concerned Christ getting to heaven and being mistaken for Pinocchio. I would not dream of complaining that this is grossly offensive to Christians particularly at Easter as that would mark me down as the lowest form of life for people like yourselves; a humourless bigot.

I would however like to ask two questions. The first is - I assume you anticipated some complaints about this and will list all people who do complain. Would I be correct in assuming the longer this list, more satisfaction you will get and the more you will laugh at the complainants? Secondly. Have you got similar appropriate jokes that you could run at the start Ramadan and/or Eid? For some strange reason the comic potential of some aspects of Islam is seldom exploited.

One does not of course need to restrict your humour to specific festivals. A joke or two about Muslim martyrs arriving in paradise and querying the selection of their 72 perpetual virgins could be used at any time. Except of course immediately after a bomb has gone off but I expect you would be sensitive about that.

As an after thought. You must have anticipated complaints about this but did you consider that you might increase the amusement of the contributors and production team by running a sweepstake on the number received?

THEY HAVE SINCE REPLIED

Thank you for your message, but I think you must have got the wrong programme. Saturday Review did not carry any such joke as you suggest “at the end of it”.

NOTE!

I thought it was told “at the end of it.” But it was almost certainly told in the course of the programme. This is the kind of “Conditional truth” now common in British MSM and government.

Did any other JW poster catch it between 6.30 & 8.00pm Easter Saturday?

MY COMMENT

This is an indication of the extent of the contempt the British intelligentsia has for Christians and Christianity and is in direct contrast to their attitude to Islam. Hot cross buns banned - why not?

Posted by: Fred at April 10, 2007 3:48 PM

The Brits are giving up a set of testicals a day it seems.

How about Hot Allah Fallafels?

Posted by: Schratboy at April 10, 2007 4:00 PM

I find Islam offensive -- it's offensive to reason and human decency. I’m still waiting for Moslems to accommodate me.

Posted by: JasonP at April 10, 2007 4:30 PM

@ Fred

BBC never misses a trick when it comes to ridiculing other faiths as long as its not islam. Christianity is regulary lampooed by the characters in their flagship soap EastEnders. Wasn't there a case recently when one of its news pesenters was denied to wear a cross around her neck?

However, when it comes to islam, they go all weak at the knees and readily offer up their derier for a quick islamic satisfaction.

But this happened in Poole Hospital in Dorset! How many muslims actually live there? Not ANY, I suspect. This is a pure case of officials exaggerating their own self importance.

Posted by: Hermit at April 10, 2007 4:41 PM

So, when will croissants be banned. At least according to some stories, they were first baked in Vienna to celebrate the defeat of the Ottomans. Surely they are offensive to muslims.

Posted by: schwaben at April 10, 2007 4:50 PM

No one expects The Spanish Inquisition!

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at April 10, 2007 4:59 PM

Is it true that iranians do not wear a necktie because they see it as a symbol of Christianity?

If anything, it should be the Christians who should be offended. Imagine, a symbol of Christ's suffering, nailed to a Roman cross, dying a slow, tortureous and agonising death for all of humanity, being offered up as a hot pastry!

Posted by: Hermit at April 10, 2007 5:07 PM

Who is the host and who is the guest in the UK, anyway? Confusing times.

Posted by: US_infidel at April 10, 2007 5:36 PM

No Star of David donuts?

How about Hindu Swastika breadsticks?

Or Buddha-tooth toast points?

(But 'Roses of Mohammad' buns -formerly known as The Danish- would probably start a riot. Which is what Islam tends to descend to: a [non-laugh] riot.)

Posted by: profitsbeard at April 10, 2007 5:37 PM

Hermit, a silk tie is verboten as would be a paisley or a brightly colored one, not just for Shiites but all Mohammedans. I presume black, brown, or dog crap color would be OK. Mohammed had a thing for earth tones.

Posted by: Pelayo at April 10, 2007 5:41 PM

In a funny kind of way the PC Neville Chamberlains are acting like unwitting agent provocateurs. They succeed best at anoying the natives and simultaneously giving credence to the idea that Muslims are increasingly small-minded and periennially upset.

We now know that they eschew alcohol even when used for hygienic reasons. They don't like pigs whether they're porcelain money-boxes or nursery rhyme characters. And those lovable and hard-working guide-dogs are also unwelcome.

Bizarre though, that Muslims can preach hatred and scream for murder on the high streets with impunity but denying someone a seasonal bun is intolerable.

Posted by: zaltys at April 10, 2007 6:17 PM

zaltys

INTOLERABLE! NEVER!!!

It's a rich diverse multi-cultural society!

Posted by: Fred at April 10, 2007 6:28 PM

Britain has lost its mind. First it was changing the name the "Three Little Pigs", because it might've offended Muslims (thankfully overturned), then the teaching of the Holocaust in schools was dropped to avoid offending Muslims, and now this. Britain's got a long way to go if it wants to cease entirely offending Muslims--nothing less than the whole country converting to Islam and replacing the government with Sharia would probably solve that problem--but these small issues will grow into larger ones in time.

Posted by: staff_of_magius at April 10, 2007 6:29 PM

Staff of Magius - If everyone converted, half of them would probably be the wrong flavor of muslim, and you'd still have....wait for it...angry muslims!

Posted by: MP at April 10, 2007 7:16 PM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/staffordshire/6541967.stm

what is this about???

Police have launched an investigation after violent clashes involving up to 200 people outside a mosque.
Crowds gathered outside the Central Mosque in the Uxbridge area of Burton in Staffordshire on Monday evening.

The clashes, which lasted five hours, followed tensions among people who use the mosque and is the second such incident in two years, police said.

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at April 10, 2007 7:28 PM

aaahhh

http://www.westernresistance.com/

just found this on the mosque violence.

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at April 10, 2007 7:30 PM

staff_of_magius:
Britain has lost its mind. First it was changing the name the "Three Little Pigs", because it might've offended Muslims (thankfully overturned), then the teaching of the Holocaust in schools was dropped to avoid offending Muslims, and now this.

Britain has not lost its mind
99% if Britons have contempt for such values, it is just that people occupying positions of power, fall over themselves to display Political Correctness and Dhimmitude.

Councils, Schools, the BBC, some left-wing newspapers, the current Government all do this.

Thankfully, the Daily Mail, Times, Sun (a lot of Murdoch newspapers) all fight this. But so far, we dont seem to have

When Robert/Hugh posts these articles, it is NOT representative of how most Britons think, not by a long way.

But we do need to challenge the PC attitudes prevalent in many of our institutions.
And there have been numerous cases where a School adopts a non-politically correct position, only to cave in on threat of lawyers and court.

The key is the Government. If they are sending the wrong messages, other institutions take their cue. We need to signify that since Britain has been heavily influenced by Protestant Christainity, the dice will be loaded towards that in terms of cultural outlook.

Posted by: UK Infidel Lover at April 10, 2007 7:31 PM

"Officers believe a long-standing tussle for control of the mosque lay behind the violence - the second such incident in the town in two years."

but i'm told that islam is the religion of peace? how can they "fight" over a mosque?

maybe abdullah the paedophile can tell us?

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at April 10, 2007 7:32 PM

UK Infidel Lover

but pigs are not offensive to muslims, even abdullah the paedophile whom posts on JW stated this, muslims believe its only bad to eat them.

if we end socialism in the west we will end islam.

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at April 10, 2007 7:49 PM

solution is simple if Muslims don't want to eat hot cross buns don't serve them and this is the West where Christianity is still the dominant religion and if Muslims don't like that go back to the seventh century village he came from

Posted by: godisnotallha at April 10, 2007 7:59 PM

Remember it was Muslims who insisted on having their own Muslim-only hospitals, using only treatment that was halal and in accordance with Qur'anic teaching. They believe that Islam and modern hospitals are incompatible. That belief should be encouraged.

Posted by: special_guest at April 10, 2007 8:14 PM

Leonthepigfarmer, The prohibition against pigs goes far beyong just eating them. I have seen Islamic opinions that state that even pigskin shoes are haram. Muslims are forbidden to use anything made from pigs.

Posted by: Pelayo at April 10, 2007 10:18 PM

They do this kind of stuff in the USA too. The difference is that Muslims aren't the motivating factor (usually) (yet).

Britain may be father along, but it's only a matter of time till this sort of thing becomes common in America.

Posted by: Cheeky Human at April 10, 2007 10:26 PM

Pelayo-

I guess those pigskin Korans I ordered are out, then?

Posted by: profitsbeard at April 10, 2007 10:28 PM

Muslim organization called themselves "Canadian Federation of Students" found "discrimination" and "islamofobia" in Canadian university campuses. They demand more prayer space, availability of halal meals, special gym hours for Muslim women, interest-free student loans and much more. Read an article about their report and readers feedback.

‘Islamophobia’on campus, report finds

Posted by: vn at April 10, 2007 11:13 PM

Well trained Dhimmis. They dont even wait for the Muslims to seethe.

Cuz nowadays, a Moslem need only scowl. Now that's power.

Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer at April 10, 2007 11:36 PM

vote for the american loyalist party, we can end this islamic war in the USA.
http://www.loyalistparty.com/

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at April 10, 2007 11:43 PM

loyalistparty. Thanks for the information. I was hoping there might be an alternative party out there. Hadn't heard of them before but looks interesting.

Posted by: pigtails not veils at April 10, 2007 11:56 PM

great, they go out of their way to give them their food in prisons but take away our food in hospitals.

Posted by: kelisw at April 11, 2007 1:51 AM

Re: the "Necktie" thing

Yes it is true that they regard it a symbol of christianity - I regard it more like a NOOSE

I have blogged about this ridiculous fatwa before:

http://p10.hostingprod.com/@spyblog.org.uk/blog-mt/mt-search.fcgi?IncludeBlogs=7&search=neckties

.. and I recommend seeing what "our glorious leader" over in Iran has to say http://www.leader.ir/ about the subject ..

Posted by: drk at April 11, 2007 4:20 AM

I forgot to mention - I *hate* neckties - *but* they are a necessary evil - I now own enough to cycle an entire working month without repeating ..

Best yet - I used to only wear the same skinny black necktie to work for months - when I changed my necktie - my manager took one look at me and said "who died?"

Posted by: drk at April 11, 2007 4:23 AM

Hot-cross buns! What about Croissants!

Not only are croissants shaped like the Islamic crescent, which is offensive to non-Muslims, but croissants are also a favourite breakfast staple for millions of French surrender-monkeys.

In the cause of religious harmony, I hope the hospital will soon be banning croissants too.

-Stefcho.

Posted by: Stefcho at April 11, 2007 4:54 AM

I googled "pig products" and found that pigs are used in a number of products in the field of veternary and human medicines...benefiting both humans and the human food chain....

....leave it to the Muslims to deny good health and good food.....

...7th century morons....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 11, 2007 7:09 AM

So, when will croissants be banned. At least according to some stories, they were first baked in Vienna to celebrate the defeat of the Ottomans. Surely they are offensive to muslims.

Posted by: schwaben at April 10, 2007 04:50 PM

Schwaben: I believe that no less an authority than the Larousse Gastronomique credits the bakers of Vienna with the creation of the crescent-shaped roll. And the notoriously unreliable Wikepedia notes an alternate claim that they were a Polish creation, inspired by the Frankish defeat of a Muslim invasion at Tours, it also offers the French themselves actually called the delicate flaky pastries Viennoiserie.

Wouldn't it be appropos for such a demand to be put forth by France's Muslim population. But unlike the Brits, the French are a lot less reticent to "offend" and would tell the offended that they can eat Gugelhupf (a shapely cake-baking pan intended to resemble a turbaned head.

I guess if a country can stop teaching the Holocaust in its elementary schools for fear of offending a certain demographic that either denies it ever happened or deems it wholly justifiable it can find a rationalization for not "offending" this same population with the sight of a raisin-studded bun decorated with a cross.

What a stunningly doomed society the UK seems to have become.

Posted by: waterdragon52 at April 11, 2007 7:55 AM

Abdullah wrote:
"I say remove it as it serves no healing purposes. It only invites the anger of God. When I am sick, it He who heals me."

No it isn't. It's the doctors who heal you, you ungrateful bastard!

Posted by: schmegel at April 11, 2007 11:34 AM

“The Brits are giving up a set of testicals [sic] a day it seems.”

Which Brits would they be – the ones whose protests caused this idiotic policy to be swiftly reversed?

“Britain has lost its mind. First it was changing the name the "Three Little Pigs", because it might've offended Muslims (thankfully overturned)…

Overturned by whom? By “Britain”, it would seem. So whose mind has been lost? (Someone who cannot distinguish between a minority of PC/multiculti zealots and “Britain” has little claim to lecture JW posters about other people’s minds.)

“What a stunningly doomed society the UK seems to have become”.

The whole of it?

Posted by: JFGR at April 11, 2007 1:10 PM

Abdullah wrote:
"I say remove it as it serves no healing purposes. It only invites the anger of God. When I am sick, it He who heals me."

paid for by the british government.

abdullah the paedo, you are in the UK aren't you? i sent MI5/MI6 and the british home office your posts, and stated that you are inciting religious and racial hatred, oh and also inciting terrorism. lets hope my taxes actually get used!

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at April 11, 2007 1:37 PM

By the way.. I saw the speaker of the loyalist party March 31 at the WTC. his name is Vto I think. And he named things by name. He didn't have to dance and weave around the topic at all!

He should've been given more time to speak. I and several of the audience shouted and yelled so he got a little more time.

Now here is something I am offended about:

http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/esecuzione-taliban/1.html

View ONLY if you have a strong stomach. THESE are the folks we get rid of Easter buns for??!!!!!

WHERE is the UN? Human Rights Watch? Amnesy [sic]?

Oh I forgot, they're all busy working on "the plight of the Gitmo detainees".

Posted by: Allahfanculo at April 11, 2007 1:54 PM

"I say remove it as it serves no healing purposes. It only invites the anger of God. When I am sick, it He who heals me."

and pretty much failed

Posted by: FedUpagain at April 11, 2007 2:29 PM

Again it's the Devil infested possessed people who cannot stand it. They are leading the way to ban Christ as the Devil puts his spell on people.
Where was the spirit of spreading the Good news now? Is it not the people who don't believe more important to be saved or are we just making the ones who don't want people saved have priority to blind the soul? Shame on all parties involved watch the world being given to Evil as every chest piece will be a victory for evil and every Muslim who has that victory can reflect who really wrote their religion as so much is common, but their are more alliances involved not just other religions who promote anti-Christ victim hood.

Posted by: jesusisthelamb at April 11, 2007 2:31 PM

Dhimmitude should be made illegal in the West.

People who deny the practice of non-Islamic activities should be arrested and charged.

This kind of Islamic imperialism by 3rd hand parties who have insinuated, then inculcated, themselves into positions of authority should be arrested and charged and their pensions revoked.

I am serious. Such people have to be challenged and defeated. Who the hell are they to make decisions on other peoples' behalf?

Posted by: Al.R.O'Ackbar at April 11, 2007 4:52 PM

"People who deny the practice of non-Islamic activities should be arrested and charged."

....they should be exiled to a Muslim country to share their beliefs with those who agree with their beliefs...

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 11, 2007 5:13 PM

...The ban is seemingly the latest example of official bodies attempting to remove the religious message from Christian festivals in the name of policital correctness...

And so, one can infer from this that the real meaning of the phrase "policital correctness" is ...

Posted by: joeblough at April 12, 2007 4:48 AM

""I say remove it as it serves no healing purposes. It only invites the anger of God. When I am sick, it He who heals me."

and pretty much failed

Posted by: FedUpagain "

...Ha!....the muslim god is now slapping the mother and the doctor....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 12, 2007 1:51 PM

I think that Christians, Jews, Hindus, et al. ought to insist that hospitals ban crescent rolls. I'll never look at a croissant in the same way!

Posted by: Sansantiago at April 15, 2007 9:39 PM