| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Jihad Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon vows to be an even better lapdog. The OIC is already the single largest voting bloc at the UN. It's hard to imagine how the UN could become more compliant to its wishes than it is now.
From AKI, with thanks to Sr. Soph:
New York, 16 May (AKI) - Praising the cooperative relationship between the United Nations and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has anticipated strengthening these ties in the years ahead. In a message to the OIC Ministerial Conference meeting in Islamabad, Ban said Tuesday the gathering comes at a crucial juncture. "Instability in Islamic States - from Afghanistan and Iraq to Sudan and Somalia - carries profound implications for international peace and security,"he said.“The OIC, as a leading multilateral institution, is well placed to play a leading role in addressing all these challenges,” said Ban. “I would especially like to commend the excellent cooperation between the Untied Nations and the OIC.”
Posted by Robert at May 16, 2007 7:01 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
The OIC is at present headed by someone who, on the face of it, is perfectly respectable. He was chosen for that, chosen to offer a smoother, more westernized face of Islam, and to avoid the kind of public display of venom that others connected to the OIC, such as Mahathir Mohamed of Malaysia, in that address calling for Muslim efforts to catch up to the West in "science" by which it was clear that he meant only one thing, military technology, and then proceeded to talk about how absurd it was that 1.2 billion Muslims could be held at bay by 6 million Jews (clear implication: pull up your socks, not in order to rival Western culture, to which one could be indifferent or hostile, but only in order to be able to create the weaponry to destroy one's Infidel enemies, beginning but hardly ending with Israel).
That head is Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, a Turkish (prima facie "moderate" therefore) historian of (Islamic) science. In fact, Ihsanoglu is an apologist for Islam, and three years ago told an American audience about how splendidly treated were the "protected peoples" (i.e., dhimmis) under Islam.
I'll find the quote and post it here.
Posted by: Hugh![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/nav-commenters.gif)
at May 16, 2007 8:58 AM
I'll find the quote and post it here.
Thank you Hugh. I would appreciate that.
I appreciate all your posts.
I treasure knowledge and all though I devote a lot of my time to learning of all kinds and keeping myself informed of what is happening in the world, it is never enough. Stuff that interests me is:
HIV/AIDs, Hepatitis, Other bloodbourne diseases, Demographics (including Indian & Chinese using ultrasonics to abort females), Migration, Social Trends of what is likely to happen in 20 years time, The treatment of Women worldwide, Economic trends, the Russian health crisis, the political state of most countries, Islam, History, Ancient Documents, Ancient Civilisations (Greeks, Romans, Egyptians) and cultures, the Seven Wonders of the World.
at May 16, 2007 9:13 AM
Considering their guidebook, the al=Qur'an, there can be nothing but "instability in Islamic states".
It teaches fundmental irrationality.
We need to learn how to contain it, not aid it.
Posted by: profitsbeard at May 16, 2007 10:36 AM
Hugh, since I don't have your direct contact: why don't you teach? Or write books? I'd like you to be my PhD supervisor if possible.
Posted by: exfidel at May 16, 2007 11:21 AM
Hugh
Can you find out and describe the circumstances under which countries like Guyana, Suriname, Mozambique and Cameroon - all of which are 15%
Something tells me that the goings on in the OIC should be covered more at length here.
Posted by: Infidel Pride at May 16, 2007 12:22 PM
Apologies for the misplaced tags in the last post.
Posted by: Infidel Pride at May 16, 2007 12:23 PM
There should be an organization started called ONIC (Organization of Non-Islamic Countries) and it should hold conferences on how to deal with the Muslim countries. I'd nominate Denmark to take the lead in the ONIC.
Posted by: elcordobes at May 16, 2007 1:59 PM
One can not contain islam. It is an all emcompassing way of life. It is a cancer that needs to be destroyed. The long war is a holy war muslims are already fighting. When the West understands that our way of life is about to be destroyed, only then will we use the tactics of WWII. Mass bombings of civilians. It really sucks that a seventh century death cult actually has the rest of us by the balls. We have come so far only to have these primatives taking over. Good bye internet, big cities, freedom, women working, homosexuals, TV, radio. Everything will be lost to a new way of life unless we get it togther and just kill them all. Harsh, yes. Necessary? Definately. Good luck to the West.
Posted by: Phximan at May 16, 2007 3:37 PM
@elcordobes
May I suggest the name "Organization of the Infidel Conference"?
Posted by: Professor PyroSkank at May 16, 2007 7:54 PM
Infidels Anonymous. This is Dhimmi Watch...
Posted by: Wildstar at May 16, 2007 10:06 PM
Instability? Would that be spelled without a "t-b-i-l", but with an "n"?
Posted by: BurkasforHitlery at May 17, 2007 7:49 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)