:)

D'Souza! Traditional muslims values!

Hey when was the last you have seen that at your place of work in America!

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at May 18, 2007 7:42 AM

My above comment was botched! That why it makes no sense because I am laughing to hard...

D'Souza...no I won't go there.

:)

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at May 18, 2007 7:45 AM

If caught in the act, does the male have to provide 4 witnesses?...

Posted by: exsgtbrown at May 18, 2007 7:52 AM

What exactly is being suckled?

Posted by: TheOmegaMan at May 18, 2007 7:56 AM

suck·le (skl)
v. suck·led, suck·ling, suck·les
v.tr.
1.
a. To cause or allow to take milk at the breast or udder; nurse.
b. To take milk at the breast or udder of.
2. To take in as sustenance; have as nourishment.
3. To nourish as if with the milk of the breast.
To suck at the breast or udder.

Only in the world of Islam...
Just when you think they have out done themselves they ALWAYS come up with something more extreme LOL

Posted by: Jihadtobejoking at May 18, 2007 8:11 AM

this is amazing

we should import this custome over here... there this hot chick in my class and its just wrong for us to be in the same room... unless she suckles me ofcourse

this is a great idea, i only sorry we jews didnt thought of it sooner.

Posted by: Bob at May 18, 2007 8:16 AM

also.....

lets say for the sake of argument that im a muslim worker... working with me in the same room\office some pamela anderson look alike,

now.... if she wont suckle me, does it make her racist and islamophobic and can i sue her for hate crime ??

Posted by: Bob at May 18, 2007 8:26 AM

I'm sorry - but this is the first idea that moslems have ever had that might catch on ...

after all - wouldn't a lot of men like to "suckle" the breasts of their co-workers?

Next Up: New findings from Koran and Hadith prove that all women must submit to all men in Islam ...

Ooops - sorry - old news ...

Posted by: drk at May 18, 2007 8:31 AM

Jay Leno, Jon Stewart, tutti quanti -- don't forget to use this. A month's worth of jokes.

Posted by: Hugh at May 18, 2007 8:37 AM

I can think of a lot of female coworkers I would like to have become "unlawful" to me! :-)~

Posted by: Patrick at May 18, 2007 8:43 AM

Mockery is a powerful weapon.

Unfortunately, there are those who think we must not mock. We must respect, or pretend to respect, and pretend to believe that Islam "is whatever Muslims want it to be" and furthermore, we must believe that there are not merely a handful of the westernized, secularized, rational or close-to-rational Muslims, but that they are all over the place, and we simply have "ignored" them. It isn't true.

Many continue to suggest that we should ignore the nature of real Islam, of what is contained in Qur'an, Hadith, and sira, and instead play Let's Pretend. In that way, they hope, we will not cause offesne to the "vast majority" of (peace-loving, "moderate," put your favorite epithet here) Muslims. Others mistake the benign, westernized exceptions for the malevolent rule. But where has this gotten us? Look at the effort that has gone into encouraging that "Peace Process" between Israel and the Arabs, that has preoccupied so many (Arafat was Clinton's most frequent foreign visitor) ignoring the true nature of the Lesser Jihad against Israel, which required the govenment, and the public, to ignore the fact that no Muslims, especially Arab Muslims, can permanently accept an Infidel sovereign state in the midst of dar al-islam, and that only through "Darura" -- necessity -- , just like those who based their assumptions and made their plans for Iraq, on their knowing, talking to, being impressed by, the most unrepresentative "representatives" (Ahmad Chalabi, Kanan Makiya, Rend al-Rahimn) of Iraq or of what was wrongly taken to be a wider movement of common sense (does plummy-voiced Prince Hassan stand for the primitive masses in Jordan? Does the jovial, port-and-cigars "we're-all-corrupt-men-of-the-world-and-it's-merely-a-question-of-how-corrupt-isn't-it" Prince Bandar truly represent Saudi reality, or aren't these just the Fritzi Hanfstaengls of today, deluding those who have demonstrated that they are dying -- in every sense -- to be deluded.

Posted by: Hugh at May 18, 2007 8:44 AM

and islam is so morally superior to every other religious belief system (at least that's what they think) ....this just proves exactly what islam is.....idiotic

Posted by: eve_anne_gelical at May 18, 2007 8:48 AM

So, that is preferable and morally superior to a woman sitting at a desk, fully clothed, in the same office as other men and women sitting at desks, fully clothed, all working?

Ridiculous.

Posted by: Josephine at May 18, 2007 9:00 AM

I keep imagining non-Muslim groups here in Canada lobbying for suckling rooms to be installed in colleges and workplaces (including airports). Anything less would be Islamophobic.

Posted by: Josephine at May 18, 2007 9:19 AM

Mohammed and/or later 'scholars' show idiocy.

Bukhari: Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188:
Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun:

“During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys.
They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.”

Volume 5, Book 58, Number 224:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:

That he heard the Prophet when somebody mentioned his uncle (i.e. Abu Talib), saying, "Perhaps my intercession will be helpful to him on the Day of Resurrection so that he may be put in a shallow fire reaching only up to his ankles. His brain will boil from it."

Morons, but morons with 'holy hate' and violence sanctioned by Allah are still very dangerous. A homicidal truck driver with an IQ of 85 can take out a whole gaggle of certified geniuses eating at a sidewalk cafe.

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at May 18, 2007 9:20 AM

7th century bizzzzarro stuff from Islam

Posted by: dennisw at May 18, 2007 9:20 AM

Such paradoxical conclusions are inherent to all religions, but more so with "rule-based" religions such as Islam and Judaism.

Ibn-Rushd, a medieval Moslem philosopher, once opined that, when logic and faith entered in conflict, logic should prevail. Ibn-Rushd was in Andalousia, and when it "fell" to the "Reconquista", his teachings went on to fuel the many bright lights of the Renaissance. In some respects, it rescued the Christian world from much backwardness...

After that, the Moslem/Arab world lost Baghdad and its vast libraries to the Mongols. For comparison, Imagine what would have happened if all that was left of the centers of thought in the United States was Falwell's university...

So, in the Arab world, the remaining center of though that was left, Cairo, was focused on religious matters. Add in a few centuries of inward-looking, mental inbreeding, and you get the fine piece of work that is the Arab/Moslem world of today.

Posted by: Jeha Jeha at May 18, 2007 9:32 AM

There goes my appetite. Seriously, the Hadith is f***ed up. They had to record every whim, every quirk of Muhammed and his companions? The Hadith is the source of all ills in the Muslim world and in the Muslim communities in many non-Muslim countries. Damn!

Posted by: wrathofasma at May 18, 2007 9:33 AM

I think I've finally gotten it-the world just isn't ready for Islam yet. Most people simply can't comprehend its "values" at all. Islam came to the world too early. Maybe in 5000 years or so the world will finally be ready for it all. Perhaps by then man will have mutated to a point where this sort of thing will actually make sense.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at May 18, 2007 9:42 AM

Yesterday, class, we learned that someone in Iran had designed a bicycle with a cage to hide a woman's "uncovered meats." (I am borrowing from Naseem's vocabulary) Today, we are learning, in Jihadwatch 101, that a woman can justify being alone with an unrelated male if she breastfeeds him. We have also learned that a certain form of sex, called 'thighing' is the religiously approved way for a grown man to have sex with a baby in Islamic societies. We are lectured constantly that Islamic societies are morally superior to the societies in the decadent West. No wonder the Muslims in the West want special prayer rooms and require special restrooms where they can perform their religiously approved rituals. After all, even in the morally-inferior West, one would require some privacy to breastfeed another adult or have sex with a baby.

Posted by: maryrose at May 18, 2007 9:54 AM

I keep thinking about that historical Salim.

He was undoubtedly so weirded out by the situation that "the thing that rankled" in his blood probably disappeared for good.

But I have a question about women's anatomy, and I'm not joking here.

I thought only women who were pregnant or who had recently been pregnant could "suckle" someone, in the sense of giving them milk through their nipple.

Isn't that what "suckle" means? (As opposed to "sucking someone's boob"?)

Or Al-Azhar, the Harvard of the Middle East, mean "suckle" merely in the sense of "sucking her boobs" without anything coming out? In other words, can the man and the woman be alone if no liquid came out?

Because if it's just the "sucking" part, irrespective of emissions, then we're invited to believe that an unrelated man only has to suck a woman's boob before he's allowed to be alone with her?

Solomonic!

There must be something here I'm not getting.

Posted by: Matt A. Moros at May 18, 2007 10:18 AM

Matt A. Moros-

It all depends on what the definition of "is" is.

-XRDC

Posted by: XRDC at May 18, 2007 10:39 AM

Another issue: does the suckling have to be chaperoned?

Posted by: Matt A. Moros at May 18, 2007 10:50 AM

C'mon Nasseem and Abdullah, please explain this one: If I vomit on some muslim trying to suckle me does that make me unlawful? That's probably what would happen if some fat old (or young) ugly muslim tried that on me. I've yet to see just one muslim male that I'd want to be in the same room alone with let alone touch me.

Posted by: never_submit at May 18, 2007 10:59 AM

Bullshit is bullshit, but
The study of bullshit
is Scholarship!

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at May 18, 2007 11:10 AM

Robert, you've classified this wrong.

This isn't appropriate for "Dhimmi Watch" or "Jihad Watch." Doesn't fit in either, you gotta admit.

You're gonna hafta make a third website: "Islamic Weirdness Watch."

Posted by: Matt A. Moros at May 18, 2007 11:52 AM

This has got to be good for mocking Islam. It's a powerful weapon against them. When I see a woman wearing a niqab or burqa I laugh out loud and it gets to them. Funnily enough, when I was approaching one of these women who I'd previously laughed at in a niqab (I could recogize her from the rest of the garb and her general stature and bearing), she flipped the niqab back over her head so that her face was showing when she walked past me. I was gob-smacked.

Posted by: Malta_1565 at May 18, 2007 11:52 AM

Malta_1365 You should have smiled at her at that point. Truth is I am always really nice to Muslim women mainly because I feel so sorry for them, I always smile and chat to them nicely with a little joke, especially when they serve me in stores.

Perhaps she wanted you to suckle her? Sorry couldn't resist. I guess we have just found the Muslim male chat up line?

Posted by: Daffersd at May 18, 2007 12:02 PM

There could have been a great "Leave To Beaver" episode derived from this.

June enjoying the fact that Eddie Haskell cannot just walk in when she is alone in the house. But, now the fatwa and Ward encouraging her to suckle Eddie, "cause he's suck a nice kid." What is she to do.

Posted by: jimbabwe at May 18, 2007 12:27 PM

Malta-1365

Nice. She hadda been smokin' hot!

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at May 18, 2007 12:39 PM

Seriously, who does this stuff!

sigh.

Posted by: mike trivisonno at May 18, 2007 12:41 PM

Jeha Jeha: "Such paradoxical conclusions are inherent to all religions, but more so with "rule-based" religions such as Islam and Judaism."

Sorry, I don't know anything comparable to this in Judaism, or any other religion, much less "all religions". By the way, Judaism, like Hinduism, does not aspire to be a universal religion, much less command jihad in order to impose it on the world.

Also, I don't see anything "paradoxical" in this particular Muslim legal ruling. My only reaction to this news is: "Hooray!"

Posted by: Surak at May 18, 2007 12:46 PM

Matt A. Moros

"Islamic Weirdness Watch". LOL. Good point.

Posted by: wrathofasma at May 18, 2007 12:52 PM

Wow! Them Muslims can find away around anything..this is
So "MO"...Just make it up as you go!

Posted by: Joe Schmoe USA at May 18, 2007 1:31 PM

If Uncle Mo said it then it's good enough for me.

Abdullah, I demand that your sister suckle me next time I see her so that I become unlawful to her. It's a win win situation as I could never marry a prostitute anyways.

lol, you muslims crack me up.

Posted by: William The Crusader at May 18, 2007 1:45 PM

Folks, you just can't make this stuff up.

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at May 18, 2007 2:05 PM

How many times can you suckle? Everytime you run in to the suckled one? After how many suckles before it becomes a habit? Is there a cure for suckers?

Posted by: TheOmegaMan at May 18, 2007 2:32 PM

SAY WHAT?

Posted by: mustang65 at May 18, 2007 3:01 PM

Muslims are really progressive with - There is hope for the Demonicrats Inside Indonesia 67 - Penis enhancements
Jan - Mar 2002 Penis enhancements
Popular with sailors and miners, but not necessarily with their women
Terence H Hull
Men in some areas of Indonesia have a long history of inserting or
implanting various objects in their penises. The origin of the practices
is unclear, but some writers say that they were copied from Chinese
traders who visited the islands, while others argue it is an indigenous
innovation related to the use of other forms of amulets and inserts for
medicinal and spiritual purposes. The objects used range from the very
simple (the implant of ball bearings under the skin), to the magical (the
use of specially selected semi-precious stones), or the elaborate (gold
bars - called palang - or rings inserted through the glans). Historians
have documented these practices in some detail, most notably in the
annotated bibliography prepared by Brown, Edwards and Moore in Penis
implants in Southeast Asia (1988), and Tony Reid's Land beneath the winds
(1988).
Reid cites Pigafetta's 1524 traveller's tale to describe the Indonesian
palang as having 'spurs' requiring intercourse to be commenced with the
penis in a flacid state, and finished only after the penis has again
become soft, to allow the woman to manoeuvre the palang in and out safely.
Early reports of inserted bells or implanted balls begin with the 1433
report of Ma Huan, a Chinese Muslim who found the practice in Thailand.
Bells were found around Malaya to as far as Makassar.
While these might seem odd and esoteric practices long relegated to
museums or Ripley's Believe It or Not, recent research is finding that the
use of inserts is spreading rapidly among working class men in the
Southeast Asia and Melanesia. The modern manifestations of inserts and
implants are important because they may cause vaginal wounds, inflammation
and infection among the partners of men attracted to these practices. They
can also cause permanent damage to the males, particularly when the
cutting involved is carried out under unhygienic conditions.
For some years I had been hearing of penis inserts in Indonesia, but like
most middle class Indonesians I dismissed the stories as being little more
than sensationalist rumours or fillers for slow news days in tabloids.
Eventually though the growing number of reliable sources suggested that
there might be something worthy of further research.
In February 2000 with colleagues from the University of Indonesia I
examined the records of a random sample of over 700 men undergoing
pre-employment checks for work in the shipping, hotel and banking
industries. This was an exploratory attempt to determine the likelihood of
obtaining information on male reproductive health issues from conventional
clinic records. It was found that one percent of the applicants for
shipping industry jobs had some form of penis implant. Since most of these
men were young and inexperienced this might be taken as a minimum
prevalence among sailors. In the course of our enquiries we found that the
practices were more widespread and varied than we had imagined.
Variations
The difficulty of determining the exact spread of various penis
augmentation practices lies in the fact that they are inspired and
implemented in a highly informal way. It appears that groups of working
class males living in isolated circumstances are quite likely to discuss
and attempt these practices. Interviews reveal a variety of practices
designed to 'augment' the penis and enhance masculinity.
Basic inserts - ball bearings.
Workers in forestry, fishing and mining industries apparently take
ball-bearings from machinery, boil them and soak them in antiseptic, and
then insert them under the skin of the penis, about a centimetre back from
the glans. Interviews in Jakarta, Yogyakarta, and the Philippines have
also indicated that overseas contract workers in Saudi Arabia use the
extended residence in highly controlled environments to experiment with
implants.
Plastics - Tops of toothpaste tubes
Throughout Southeast Asia and Melanesia reports are emerging of prisoners
inserting objects under the skin of their penises. The picture to emerge
is one of boredom and isolation focussing attention on discussions of
masculinity (kejantanan) and dreams of future possibilities to 'conquer'
women. Prisoners while away the hours scraping tooth brushes into sharp
instruments to pierce the penile skin, and melt down the caps to form
small balls for insertion.
Silicon
Among transvestites throughout Indonesia the use of silicon implants to
accentuate lips, cheeks, breasts, and other parts of the body is popular,
and easily available through salons as well as some medical practitioners.
There are some reports of Indonesian men, both straight and gay, using
silicon implants in their penises, though this is probably less common
than the use of ball bearings. In the Philippines silicon is used to
create 'humps' around the shaft of the penis.
Semi-precious stones and gold - Investing objects with power
Throughout Southeast Asia inserts using precious stones, metals or pearls
are regarded as providing special powers to men. In Indonesia the
traditions of susuk implants support such thinking.
From ad hoc interviews I have found that men use the devices before
marriage, but remove them when they settle down with one woman. Why, if
the purpose is to please a woman? One explained: 'You can't really be sure
about these things - what if something went wrong? You wouldn't want to
take a risk with your wife.' Indeed, doctors and sex workers do report the
occasional accident when a ring or stud or other sharp object is left in a
vagina, or where women have suffered cuts or severe pain from men's
experiments.
Interviews with social workers and commercial sex workers suggested that
upwards of ten to twenty percent of regular clients of brothels have
either penis implants or holes in the glans or skin of their penises. The
holes may be normally for rings or studs, but during intercourse the ring
is replaced by a piece of horsehair or the strand of a stiff-leaved plant
which is tied and clipped off to a length of three or four centimetres as
a 'tickler'. The putative reason for the practice is to 'please the
woman', and men with inserts argue quite strongly that 'women love it'.
However in the absence of systematic interviews with the lovers of such
men, the testimony of commercial sex workers may be regarded as a useful
commentary on the practice. Many of the women who earn their living from
sex regard the use of inserts and ticklers as both strange and
discomforting. One respondent recalled how one man using horsehair had
caused her to bleed, while another reported great discomfort. She laughed
at the idea that the devices were to 'please the woman'. 'That is what
they say, but actually they only want the woman to reach orgasm before
they ejaculate. It is a sign of their manliness (kejantanan)to have such
control.' At the same time some women report the practices as being
pleasurable.
Demystification
Informal but persistent attempts to understand the practices of genital
cutting and the use of inserts and implants among Indonesian men indicate
that what we are seeing today is not the resurgence of tradition. Rather
these are largely attempts to come to terms with sexualities based on
gender relations emerging from rapid modernisation.
Workers in isolated camps who rely on their peers for information on 'what
women want' are easily convinced that implants may make them attractive to
lovers. Young men who see peers attempting the operations to insert stones
or plastic balls, and hear the bragging afterward are easily swayed to try
the practice themselves. They do not hear clinical evidence of damage done
to sex organs, and they definitely do not hear women's stories of pain,
discomfort or infection. From the viewpoint of men and reproductive health
the response to penis implants must be based on education and the
demystification of large areas of sexuality.
The Indonesian Health Department regards any talk of penis adornments as
esoteric, sensitive and obscure. Reproductive health service providers do
not recognise the problems associated with genital cutting and the use of
sexual accessories because such things are quickly dismissed as immoral.
Whatever the moral arguments though, the practice of penis inserts appears
to be spreading because men's sexual education is incomplete and isolated.
Lower class men in particular are likely to experiment with implants, not
because their sexual needs are any different from other men, but because
they are the groups most likely to experience isolation from women in
their occupations.
Terence H Hull (terry.hull@anu.edu.au) is Senior Fellow at the Demography
and Sociology Program, Australian National University, Canberra. This note
is based on a longer article written with Dr Meiwita Budiharsana to be
published in the journal Reproductive Health Matters. Much of the
information collected here was generously provided by colleagues in the
ANU and internationally. Particular thanks go to the doctors and staff of
the Klinik Baruna in Jakarta, and to Dr Sarsanto W Sarwono and Dra Ninuk
Widyantoro whose work in Timika and other sites in Indonesia has revealed
a range of behaviours normally hidden from routine medical practice.

Posted by: George_Jihad at May 18, 2007 3:07 PM

Gotta' love self-parody. I would really like to attend an islamic discussion group on this particular point of sharia. Wonder if there are specific shia/sunni schools of thought. Is there a wahabi viewpoint?

Posted by: MP at May 18, 2007 3:11 PM

This is their idea of tempering sexual energy? Holy freakin crap! Coming from the great race that brought us the zero. Pardon the pun.

Posted by: mustang65 at May 18, 2007 3:25 PM

The zero is from Sanskrit mathematicians, as is a good deal of algebra. Don't swallow and regurgitate the Muslim claim to Hindu and Chinese and Greek achievements; mere transmission is not the same thing as invention.

Posted by: Hugh at May 18, 2007 3:37 PM

Hey, wait a second people! You all have it ass backwards! Something was lost in the translation. It is the MAN who has to suckle the womans' breasts to become her foster child. The other way round makes no sense.

Posted by: george_rem at May 18, 2007 4:46 PM

truth. is. stranger. than. fiction.

Posted by: s at May 18, 2007 5:09 PM

Can we get some Video up on MEMRI please? Enquiring minds want to know.

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at May 18, 2007 5:11 PM

Robert & Hugh: seriously, the translation is bad. I think the woman has to "breastfeed" the man.

Follow the link to the Arabya site, and scroll down to the comments, some are in English, and it seems that I am right in my suspicion:

i do not know or can understand what is more important to be alone with him in one room to work nothing more or just we want to make propaganda for something is really nothing . how come the woman show her breast to milk him to be allowed to stay with him alone in one room to WORK not more

Posted by: george_rem at May 18, 2007 5:16 PM

This is almost as funny as the article on how Muslim women marry trees to prevent dilution of family funds (and the negatives associated with marriage to a Muslim man).

Posted by: JSobieski at May 18, 2007 5:35 PM

So, if, before we were married my wife and I...and, while we were, I...

I can't help thinking that if this line of "reasoning" is followed to its "logical" conclusion I'm going to end up my own Grandpa.

Posted by: USBeast at May 18, 2007 6:25 PM

As a single guy, I am not an expert on breast feeding but isn't the milk only on tap beginning with pregnancy and lasting until the child is weened? Does this mean that only new mothers can work with men? Or is the use of hormones envisioned? Is there a minimum volume of milk required per male co-worker? I think this all needs to go back to committee. Has human resources been consulted? Do women get extra pay for this job related duty? What about male employees who are lactose intolerant?

Posted by: Saul Wall at May 18, 2007 7:27 PM

Islam Is SO Devil Religion
Islam is so so so devil and dangerous religion in all world islam
want to destroy jews and christians and destroy all things islam destroy our countries in middle east islam destroyed lebanon and egypt and iraq and all east and will destroy the west if we dont wake up quran said to muslims to kill us in (altawba 9: 29) he said : ( Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (altawba 9: 29) )
and many many verses as this terror verses as :
( O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding. (alanfal 8:65)) and :
(The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;(almaida 5:33) )
if you want more about this aweful religion you must visit this sites :

http://quranandbible.com/
http://answering-islam.org
http://www.jihadwatch.org/
http://geocities.com/a_true_picture_of_islam
http://www.terrorists-suck.org
http://www.faithfreedom.org/
http://apostatesofislam.com/
http://www.islamreview.com
http://www.investigateislam.com
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/
http://www.americansagainsthate.org
http://www.september11news.com/
http://www.blessedcause.org/

and in arabic :
http://islameyat.com/
http://info.islamexplained.com
http://alkalema.us

Bible Apologetiecs :

http://www.carm.org/
http://www.biblequery.org/
http://christiananswers.net/
http://answers.org/
http://answersingenesis.org/
http://bible.ca/
http://www.gotquestions.org/index.html

is there any religion teach the follower to hate and kill others?? is there any religion teach the follower to lie ???? to marry with four ???? to beat the wifes ????? to bomb in others??? to stole ????
any one saw 11/9/2001 in USA any one saw how they kill in Iraq and Afghanistan and in all world ????any way to know more about this devil and

dear sisters and brothers American dont say its not facts dont say we mus respect islam dont be indulgent whith islam and muslims really they want to destro as as they destroyed middle east american dont know arabic the languge of Islam so they dont know the facts os islam as us arabian christians american people are so kind and they believe any thing ....you must dont believe propagandas of muslims here really they are liar and bad people ....they want to take america from us and destry it as they destroyed east

you must know that : THE PROBLEM IT IS IN THE TEACHING OF QURAN AND MUHAMMED SPEACH NOT IN OSAMA BEN LADEN AND IN THOSE PEOPLE YOU CAN OPEN THIS SITES TO KNOW THE DEVIL TEACHING OF ISLAM IN QURAN AND IN SPEACH OF MUHAMMWD

wake up dont belive muslims propaganda they are so so liar

God bless and save America in Jesus Christ name

Posted by: adel4jesus at May 18, 2007 11:56 PM

SerbInfidel-

Ali Bubba(!)

LOL!

(May the fleas of a thousand camels infest his gaza strip.)

Posted by: profitsbeard at May 19, 2007 1:59 AM

I'm laughing too hard.

Posted by: joeblough at May 19, 2007 4:26 AM

After more than 1400 years the ME Muslims no longer have Christians to contend with, so they can now apply Islam to its fullest effect.

I perceive a Bible would do them a lot of good.

Posted by: ofcourse at May 19, 2007 1:48 PM

I am speach-less..

Posted by: Islofob IS-1 at May 20, 2007 12:11 AM

Wait -- wait -- where does the goat diapering come in?

Posted by: Marwan'sDaughter at May 21, 2007 5:12 PM