FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Jihad Watch Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Raymond Ibrahim Robert Spencer
 
« Satanic hug topples Pakistan's tourism minister | Main | Critic of Turkish pro-jihad books at school receives threats »

May 21, 2007

Police, Improperly Clad Women Clash In Tehran

797.jpg

Sharia enforcement turns violent in the Islamic Republic of Iran. From the MEMRI blog, with thanks to Sr. Soph:

Male and female police officers clashed with women who were not dressed according to the Islamic dress code....

One girl who refused to get into the police car was beaten by police, and removed from the area by civilians who were called to the scene.

Posted by Robert at May 21, 2007 3:55 PM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

Iran seems to be somewhat in the grasp of a not so peaceful religion...

Posted by: exsgtbrown [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 4:14 PM

Rock n Roll ain't noise pollution and a woman's beauty ain't sight pollution.

Death to shari'a

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 4:20 PM

Looks like a pretty cute young lady.

(Except for all the blood.)

May Islam dissolve back to the primal slime from which it burbled, Inshallah.

Posted by: profitsbeard [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 5:15 PM

BEHOLD THE PEACE AND TOLERANCE OF ISLAM...

And that's just for dress infringements. Say where is Naseem & other Muslim Posters to explain
'this is due to Cultural not Islamic Misunderstandings.'
WE IN WEST DO NOT WANT THIS STONE AGE DEATH CULT!

Posted by: Morgane [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 5:56 PM

And if the West falls to Islam, this is exactly what will become the norm here. The more you learn about the goings-on in Iran, the more you hate the Carter maladministration for not destroying that vicious theocracy after the storming of the US Embassy in 1979. Nobody has caused more damage through doing nothing than this feckless waster of oxygen who even now continues to haunt us with his lame bromides. So much trouble could have been saved since that infamous date by affirmative action 27 or 28 years ago. And I perish the thought of this being the future of women in the West through our inaction. That violent thugocracy has to go, and its leadership bombed into oblivion.

Posted by: Spirit Of 1683 [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 6:08 PM

What is better than a nice looking woman on a spring day? The self-rightous feeling you get bashing her head-in for Allah.

Posted by: Ruebacca [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 7:21 PM

My wife of 37 years was reading this over my shoulder and came up with the perfect solution.

Here's the polite version:

"Castrate all the Muslim men, and women can wear whatever they want to."

Posted by: Pelayo [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 7:49 PM

Pelayo-

I've been suggesting the 'Loreena Bobbitt Solution' to Muslim women for many crescent moons.

One Night of the Long Knives, and Islam would have a different tenor.

Posted by: profitsbeard [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 8:14 PM

Profitsbeard, my wife is still laughing and it is interfering with "24." Tenor? Falsetto?

Posted by: Pelayo [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 8:18 PM

Is this punish-women-for-allah-day (s)? With this and the paki woman fired for hugging the instructor among a couple of other things -they seem to be socking it to women! The woman in paki seemed to just be happy to live through the jump! I'd even give lil' dinnerjacket a brief hug for getting me through that type of thing alive.

Posted by: nyone [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 9:12 PM

To think that 25 years ago women preferred Khomeini to the Shah ...

Posted by: ProudDhimmi [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 12:23 AM

Pelayo-

At least "24" didn't end with some annoying trick.

They need to go into something more along the lines of cyber-warfare next season, because they've burn out on the big bangs these past few. (And being able to cripple a nation's electronic 'neural net' with a mere code will be available to IT killer-geeks in the days ahead.)

They could go more into a psychologically rich and mysterious area of the 'inner' world (Manchurian Candidate meets Matrix) for which the writers should read Philip K. Dick and John "The 39 Steps" Buchan and look at the old British show "The Prisoner". Injecting some sly wit and interior suspense between the solar plexus punches, LAW rockets, and knee-cappings couldn't hurt.

(And falsetto is exactly what I was thinking of for Islametto.)

Posted by: profitsbeard [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 1:17 AM

So strange. At a local community college, the Muslimahs escalate the gearing. Their pale, fat faces, cheeks bulging and eyes popping from the iron grip of the shrinkwrapped hijab, seem very sincere as they claim, "This is me."

"You are," one thinks, "proudly following the rules of a 7th century rapist." But the American Muslimah can at least take off the ridiculous costume when reason reasserts itself; the poor woman in the picture cannot, at risk of assault, rape, and death.

Posted by: Marwan'sDaughter [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 1:26 AM

".....my wife is still laughing and it is interfering with '24.'"

Indeed, Pelayo, what would Jack Bauer do about this sort of thing? *LOL* I think we both know the answer to that. Of course, if Jack is busy elsewhere at the moment, then I think it is our duty to take the matter in hand ourselves!

Posted by: One_of_the_last_few_Patriots_left [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 2:23 AM

"To think that 25 years ago women preferred Khomeini to the Shah ...

Posted by: ProudDhimmi"

.....Under the Shah women certainly had more freedom and opportunities....I guess Muslim women prefer to be slaves and to have no enjoyable life...

...Just what enjoyment in life can a Muslim woman have.. beatings? rape? stonings? life in bag? abuse? a husband with other wives? constant suspicion? ...... but they have nothing to worry about, the religious police are there to protect them....

Posted by: exsgtbrown [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 6:36 AM


I've been suggesting the 'Loreena Bobbitt Solution' to Muslim women for many crescent moons.

One Night of the Long Knives, and Islam would have a different tenor.

Posted by: profitsbeard at May 21, 2007 08:14 PM

Bwah ha ha. How excellent! I've been laughing for going on three minutes!

Posted by: Stand fast in the liberty [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 9:50 AM

Male and female police officers clashed with women who were not dressed according to the Islamic dress code....


You'll notice the word "clashed", they mean violently assaulted by the police. When are we going to stop pussy footing about, this is NOT a religion of peace, it is a religion of intolerance, abuse and violence, unless I am missing something in the daily reports of "muslim" violence and suppression. We talk and we talk and we talk, almost like we are hoping that we can change the attitudes of these people. There is no evidence that I have ever found to suggest that Islam is a peaceful religion, sorry and all that but it's true. There is plenty of proof that what they mean by a "religion of peace" is a religion that will bring "peace" by killing anyone who doesn't follow the freakish rules set out by a man whose own wife found it unbelievable that he was a "prophet" (see Aisha: "They lord makes haste to do they bidding", relating to the fact that mohammed wanted to marry his daughter in law but was not allowed until allah "conveniently" told him that the rules that affect every other muslim do not apply to him, the man who is supposed to be the example to all muslims (go figure that one out)).

We talk about the poor young people being turned into extremists by "bad" people. But, in their religon they are not "bad" people they are religious leaders. It's like your vicar standing up on a sunday and telling the congregation to go out and rape and murder in the name of Jesus. Sounds silly doesn't it? Of course it does, because you can't imagine a religious leader like Jesus saying that, the reason being, he didn't. There are many many examples of Mohammeds violence, in fact the quran, mohammeds OWN words state categorically that you must murder and destroy allahs own creation.

I know what I say sounds offensive, but it isn't, it's historical fact. We tend to measure religons by western "christian" values so anything that calls itself a religion, however obvious that it is an invention to control people, is treated with the same respect as a true religion.

Beating and murdering women for not wearing the "right" clothes? Peaceful religion? Don't be stupid.

Posted by: DaveMate [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 3:34 PM

If there is a single muslim who can PROVE what I say is wrong then I will happily retract EVERYTHING I have said. I really mean that. I would love to be wrong, but I suspect there will be no one forthcoming with that proof.

Posted by: DaveMate [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 22, 2007 3:37 PM

The Iranian government is more concerned about women wearing the islamic headcovering than they are about inflation, high unemployment, drug abuse, homelessness, etc. They got their priorities screwed up.

I thought the Iranian people were some of the most educated people on the planet. Unfortunately, they lack common sense.

Posted by: callmeinfidel [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 23, 2007 6:02 PM

Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


Web Site Counter