| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Jihad Watch | Robert Spencer | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog |  |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Three of his female relatives were seated next to men they did not know. The British Airways pilot, however, was evidently a firm anti-dhimmi, and would have none of it: when the Sheikh complained, he ordered him and his entourage off the plane.
"Sheikh delays plane over seating," from Reuters (thanks to Hany):
MILAN (Reuters) - A Qatar sheikh held up a British Airways flight at Milan’s Linate airport for nearly three hours after discovering three of his female relatives had been seated next to men they did not know.When none of the other business class passengers agreed to swap seats, the sheikh, a member of Qatar’s ruling family, went to the pilot, who had already started the engine, to complain, an airport official said.
But the pilot ordered him and his traveling companions, the three women, two men, a cook and a servant, off the plane.
Posted by Robert at July 27, 2007 5:36 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
It's a start. Even better would be to kick them out of the Western Hemisphere.
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/nav-commenters.gif)
at July 27, 2007 5:45 PM
And the passengers ought to sue the bloody sheikh for holding their flight up for 3 hours!
Posted by: atheling at July 27, 2007 5:45 PM
Bravo! Rock the Casbah!
Posted by: Wimbledon Womble at July 27, 2007 5:52 PM
Lawsuit in the works as we speak.
Posted by: Elric66 at July 27, 2007 6:03 PM
You said it before I could, Elric
Posted by: Coeurmaeghan at July 27, 2007 6:15 PM
Muslims feel entitled to special treatment. In this case they got special treatment, although probably not the special treatment they had in mind...
BTW, isn't oil-rich Qatar supposed to be "moderate" and "progressive"?
Posted by: US_infidel at July 27, 2007 6:37 PM
No doubt the Sheikh will be complaining that the pilot was a bad dhimmi! A small sign of hope that not all British people are willing to bend over backwards to accommodate the primitive, backward and barbaric customs of Muslims. Too bad this pilot isn’t running the British government. God knows they NEED someone like him.
Posted by: Dan The Infidel at July 27, 2007 6:42 PM
"A Qatar sheikh held up a British Airways flight at Milan’s Linate airport for nearly three hours after discovering three of his female relatives had been seated next to men they did not know."
Oh, the utter horror of having to use an Infidel Airline to go home. What happened to his private, luxurious A-340 or B-777 (all decked out with gold poopers and seating for 10)?
I would guess that BA will be banned from Qatar in no time short. Forget the "Flying Imams" suit.
Posted by: boneshack at July 27, 2007 6:44 PM
Couldn't the women have just breastfed the men?
(Those peanuts get awfully salty.)
Posted by: profitsbeard at July 27, 2007 6:45 PM
Those male passengers should sue the sheikh for racial profiling and sexism.
And why didn't he make the necessary arrangements beforehand, if it's so important? Why leave it up to chance?
I can't believe they were allowed to delay the plane for three hours. Gee, if I made a "royal" fuss about seating, they'd throw me off the plane, lickety-split.
Posted by: Josephine at July 27, 2007 6:50 PM
What happened to his private, luxurious A-340 or B-777 (all decked out with gold poopers and seating for 10)?
Posted by: boneshack
It's in the shop being remodeled. The poopers are being replaced with swiveling models that can be turned to face away from Mecca when the plane is on certain routes. Until now the plane often had to change course during pooping, which led to trouble with the aviation authorities.
at July 27, 2007 7:02 PM
If the passenger is an Al Thani, then he's as corrupt as they come, drinks a lot, bends both ways, and is a heavy gambler.
I've known the family very well in the past... and know what hypocrites they really are.
Posted by: Jerusalem Posts at July 27, 2007 7:02 PM
Here's a picture of the creep:
http://sheikyermami.com/2007/07/27/qatar-sheik-holds-up-plane-over-seating/
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at July 27, 2007 7:08 PM
why didn't this "sheik" buy seats together away from other passengers if he was so paranoid?
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at July 27, 2007 7:11 PM
US_infidel
Good point. Not too long ago, I recall some apologetics for Qatar making the point that Wahabism is no longer their state religion. People also like to point to the progressive nature of the al-Thani family. Well, it's nice to see the veil removed, in a manner of speaking.
ebonystone
That's a hoot! ;-)
Posted by: Infidel Pride at July 27, 2007 7:20 PM
atheling
You are right too. The story goes on
The London-bound flight took off nearly three hours behind schedule Thursday evening and around 50 of the 115 passengers missed connecting flights.Those 50 passengers should file a class action suit against that sheikh.
His companions - 3 women, 2 men, a cook & a servant.
Posted by: Infidel Pride at July 27, 2007 7:23 PM
IP wrote:
"Those 50 passengers should file a class action suit against that sheikh."
The papers should already be drafted.
Posted by: awake at July 27, 2007 7:39 PM
Weren't the female relatives all wrapped up in their bed sheets? If they look like the sheik, I feel bad for the men who were seated next to the cows.
Posted by: 3812Michelle at July 27, 2007 7:46 PM
I have seen a similar thing happen in Saudi ArabiaTwice while flying (once on BA, once on KLM) back to the West. A Saudi husband bought a Business Class seat for himself and a Coach Class seat for his wife. Then after the aircraft took off, he went back and found his wife sitting by, or near, male strangers. He raised hell, obviously working for a free upgrade for his wife. KLM caved. BA didn't.
Posted by: jay at July 27, 2007 7:47 PM
Is there a Council on Italian Islamic Relations? If so, watch the papers for news that a lawsuit has been filed against the airline, the pilot, the male passenger that these girls were seated near, the runway, the portable stairs, the luggage, and just to make sure they weren't being malicious toward this precious sheik, the airliner's engines.
If they want to act like fools, they should be treated like fools. Apparently they can't just board the damn plane and fly to where they're going, they have to be a pain in everyone else's ass.
Posted by: DCWatson
at July 27, 2007 7:58 PM
"Hello ma'am, I see you've been assigned the seat next to me. I also see that your owner/master doesn't like the fact that I'm a man you don't know. So let me introduce myself. I'm ________, your friendly travelling kaffir..."
"...Oh you can't talk to me because I'm not mahram to you. That's okay. Just lift your blouse and I'll nurse on your breasts for a few minutes. After that, you can travel together with me all you want and still be good Muslima."
Problem solved!
Posted by: Provoslavni at July 27, 2007 8:04 PM
One of the reason that JihadWatch is ban by some corporations is that it is list correct as than hatesite. HateWatch did than year long investatiob of Robert and Hugh and they wedsite than they found it met the legal meaning of than hatesite. Some of you need to chechout HatewatchHallofshame. FreedomHouse is than other hate group.
The pilot needed to be fired for his racist att like that schoolbus driver that was fired by his bus Company in Floradia.
at July 27, 2007 8:17 PM
Learn to write in English, will you?
Posted by: atheling at July 27, 2007 8:19 PM
Posted by: ebonystone [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2007 7:02 PM
"It's in the shop being remodeled. The poopers are being replaced with swiveling models that can be turned to face away from Mecca when the plane is on certain routes. Until now the plane often had to change course during pooping, which led to trouble with the aviation authorities."
>> Excellent response! Can't be caught doing our 'bizness' facing Mecca. So all of his airplanes are now in in infidel countries being retrofitted.
Here is a link to all of the 'Ablution' rules set in Hadith. Crazy to think that Muslims should have a 'score card' to ensure compliance with all of these rules.
http://infidelnation.org/DOWNLOADS/Bukhari/004.sbt.html
at July 27, 2007 8:22 PM
If it's Sheik Al-Thani, this could get interesting. He was Sarkozy's guest of honour at the 14th of July Parade in Paris.
The Sheik's son enrolled at the St Cyr military academy.
Posted by: Sebastien at July 27, 2007 8:31 PM
Bravo for the pilot! Had he ordered others to switch seats, it would not have been recognized as respect, but as an admission of weakness. In otherwords, submission.
The pilot needed to be fired for his racist att
No, Defender, there was nothing racist about what he did, because (read carefully here) muslims are not a race, and because it is not racist to refuse to meet an unreasonable demand. What you wrongly call "hate" is nothing more than our refusal to submit to muslims trying to force non-muslims to obey their laws.
Lan astaslem! (I will not submit!)
I'd love to learn the imperative form, as in "Do not submit."
at July 27, 2007 9:14 PM
What was racist about the pilot's actions? Please enlighten us.
Posted by: Elric66 at July 27, 2007 9:15 PM
The solution for non-Muslims and Muslims alike is for special, Muslim-only airlines, and all other airlines to be Muslim-free. That should keep the non-Muslims from contaminating, with their free and easy ways, Muslim rules, Muslim purity. And we, the world's non-Muslims, would be better able to control our own security. Of course some Muslims would attempt to sneak on board the airlines of non-Muslims, but at least with almost all of them banned, it would be easier to find and stop the few who tried to get aboard, for whatever reason. And Muslims can be more relaxed, with the kind of atmosphere they prefer -- women segregated, the domestic servants, essentially slaves, stuck one on top of another in a few rows in the back and fed the usual subsistence meals, while the men cavort in the front. Only problem: will non-Muslim call girls still be allowed aboard those private planes that assorted rulers (choose among the Al-Thani, Al-Maktoum, Al-Saud, Al-Sabah, Al-Whathave you) own and use -- those luxuriously-outfitted 747 "private planes" we hear so much about -- or will they, too, be off-limits?
I vote for placing those planes off-limits to all non-Muslms. That includes the pilots. Let only Muslim pilots fly Muslims.
This will also have consequences for the saftey of the Muslim flying public, of course. Better them than us. The problem, after all, was caused entirely by followers of Islam. Let the inconvenienced be the Muslims, therefore, not the non-Muslims, and let those inconvenienced Muslims take their complaints to the source of their woes: Muslim terrorists, acting reasonably upon the texts of Islam.
Posted by: Hugh at July 27, 2007 9:20 PM
Speaking of "acting reasonably upon the texts of Islam"...
Ted Belman of Israpundit was recently a guest on The Michael Coren Show (TV) and, when he said that jihad was intrinsic to Islam, the other guests and the host were quite dismissive of him. They insisted that Islam did not call for world domination (or conquest or something along those lines). I'm pretty sure the guy on his right called him a racist. (I watched the show when it aired but haven't seen it since.)
Mr. Belman has written about his experience and has a link to a tape of the program:
http://www.israpundit.com/2006/
see: Jihad is intrinsic to Islam
Posted by: Josephine at July 27, 2007 9:35 PM
Good for the pilot--and good to see that at least some people in Britain still have a pair of testicles.
Posted by: GetBornAgain at July 27, 2007 9:36 PM
Kudos for the British Airways pilot. I guess when your country is under siege the best thing to do is to kick the enemy off the flight. He did it in the passengers best interest. The sheik probably made a huge issue about the passengers unwilling to swap seats. If those seats are assigned to them, they have a right to keep them. I want to see more unruly Muslims kicked off flights.
Posted by: The Resistance at July 27, 2007 9:42 PM
"I vote for placing those planes off-limits to all non-Muslms. That includes the pilots. Let only Muslim pilots fly Muslims."
great idea, hugh.
While we know they don't learn how to land, we can hope they can at least take off.
at July 27, 2007 9:52 PM
new to posting here, long time reader. Question....
Who the heck is this "defender'oflimflam" guy?
at July 27, 2007 9:57 PM
Dear Mr. British Airways pilot -
Whoever you are, on the off chance that you have stumbled across this thread - I just want to say thank you. We will defeat this thing one man/woman at a time. None of us knows when we will personally be called upon to make a difficult decision, but by making the personal decision that you did - maybe unknowing to you - you have actually set a precedent for all of us to follow. You're a hero for the day.
And this is obviously going to take one quiet hero, one day at a time, for many many years to come, to defeat this menace.
So again - Mr. Pilot of this flight - thank you for being today's hero and for serving as an inspiration for all of us - for when our personal day will come, as it did for you today and as it undoubtedly will come for all of us, at some point in time...
at July 27, 2007 10:01 PM
defenderofislam
Hatewatch Hall of Shame is written by a fraud, who can't even get his list of non-Islamic terror organizations straight - he lists Algeria's FIS as one of them. Lady Predator has done a good job of thoroughly exposing him as a fraud.
Posted by: Infidel Pride at July 27, 2007 10:04 PM
Note above: FIS= Front Islamic Salvation
Posted by: Infidel Pride at July 27, 2007 10:05 PM
"defenderofislam",
I see you assert above that the BA pilot was "racist".
Since you are apparently an expert on the both the subjects of "racism" and "islam", perhaps you would be kind enough to consider the following quote, and explain away the racism of the creep quoted by Anas bin Malik:
"Volume 9, Book 89, Number 256:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "You should listen to and obey, your ruler even if he was an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/089.sbt.html
at July 27, 2007 10:06 PM
Bravo to this pilot!
Sad to say, I hope he doesn't lose his job over his decision.
Posted by: Vee at July 27, 2007 10:20 PM
Now, then, let's keep in mind that when you brush elbows on the armrest with the person next to you, you're doing so with every other person they've brushed elbows with while flying.
It is imperative to guard the purity of one's elbows.
(Nothing humerus about it.)
Posted by: MarisolJW at July 27, 2007 10:22 PM
The UK needs more people like this guy. If this sheikh doesn't want females sitting next to males, then may I suggest he start his own airline and not try to turn BA into Dhimmi Airways.
Posted by: non-redneck at July 27, 2007 10:49 PM
MarisolJW -- That's funny!
My mother's grandmother was born circa 1880. She often told my mother that "a lady doesn't show her limbs".
She said nothing about rubbing elbows with the great unwashed.
Posted by: Josephine at July 27, 2007 11:04 PM
How do airlines based in muslim countries handle seating?
The guy was probably hoping to move them up, like you said, but the seats were full. He should seat them next to himself if he is that worried about them.
Posted by: Borg at July 27, 2007 11:12 PM
a member of Qatar’s ruling family, went to the pilot, who had already started the engine, to compain...
BA would find it wise to no longer allow Moslems to approach the cockpit.
Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer at July 27, 2007 11:20 PM
Defender,
You are showing your superiority complex again. Remember, Islam is not a race.
When buying a ticket for an airline flight one must choose carefully where one will sit, otherwise the plane could fill up and if one changes one's mind later on, one may not be able to switch seats so easily. In America we call it first come, first served. That goes for you, me and any other Muslims that buy a ticket. I believe that's the rule of thumb in Europe also, being a former Christian continent with ties to the Golden Rule of do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
If the sheik suddenly realized that his family members were female (and how he could forget, I'm not sure, since they are the ones in the Hefty bags) then he's just out of luck, because in America we don't subscribe to YOUR racist view that Muslims get to change seats and do whatever they want when potential dhimmis are around. In fact, I think we might have to sue you for your racist comments here at Jihad Watch.
Poor planning on the sheik's part in no way requires anyone else to give a flying flip.
Posted by: Isabellathecrusader at July 27, 2007 11:21 PM
Who knows what the higher ups at BA will do with the pilot? Promotion of reprimand?
Send a note of support to British Airways to praise the pilot and his decision:
http://www.britishairways.com/travel/askbainter/public/en_gb?source=BOT_contactus
Posted by: Leave Iraq Now at July 27, 2007 11:36 PM
Hugh said
The solution for non-Muslims and Muslims alike is for special, Muslim-only airlines, and all other airlines to be Muslim-free. That should keep the non-Muslims from contaminating, with their free and easy ways, Muslim rules, Muslim purity.
As with the Muslim-only hospitals, this should only be encouraged. Muslims have made it clear that their beliefs are incompatible with non-Muslims'. We need to accept and respect their wishes, and keep the line between Muslims and infidels clear and strictly enforced. U.S. and U.K. = Dar al Harb. Qatar = Dar al Islam. They don't belong here.
Posted by: special_guest at July 28, 2007 12:06 AM
Hi sheik yer'mami
Doesn't look like this guy has missed any meals does it? I for one am sick of moslems making their snarky remarks about how fat Americans are.
http://sheikyermami.com/2007/07/27/qatar-sheik-holds-up-plane-over-seating/
at July 28, 2007 12:07 AM
jay said
KLM caved. BA didn't.
Maybe this Sheikh just wasn't smart enough to wait until after the plane took off to start raising his ruckus, and to start pressuring for the Muslim-only free upgrade for his, cough, "servant" and the rest of his entourage.
Posted by: special_guest at July 28, 2007 12:14 AM
How long till British Airways throws the pilot off the plane? Bad dhimmi!
If it's such an important issue to the sheikh, why didn't he book their seats together in the first place? And if he's a wealthy royal, why did he go commercial instead of private? Is the "Flying Sheikh" the sequel to sequel to the "Flying Imams"?
Posted by: perpster at July 28, 2007 12:15 AM
(Part of) the solution:
http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/air-infidel.jpg
at July 28, 2007 12:23 AM
Why did this take three hours?
Was the sheik holding onto seatbacks and crying and kicking and yelling as they tried to drag him off the plane?
Three hours?
Should have taken 15 minutes, tops, with his stored luggage (if that was actually unloaded from the belly of the plane) being his to pick up at the next airport when his later flight arrived.
Three hours for one jackass!
The slo-mo jihad continues in all of its devious forms.
Posted by: profitsbeard at July 28, 2007 1:00 AM
HEART WARMING.
Posted by: M.O.T. at July 28, 2007 2:12 AM
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!
Posted by: traeh at July 28, 2007 4:02 AM
DefenderofIslam - "The pilot needed to be fired for his racist att like that schoolbus driver that was fired by his bus Company in Floradia."
On the contrary, it's people like the sheik who need to be fired, sued, or whatever else it takes to convince Muslims that we have no obligation to cater to their superstitions.
So far, Western countries have been polite (or feeble) enough to make exceptions for Muslims but that is wearing thin. Muslims have worn out their welcome in the West and all their ridiculous complaints and demands should be treated exactly as this fiasco was treated.
My only problem with this situation is that the plane was held up for three hours for a Third World tinpot oil leech. Why?
BTW, what is your opinion of the refusal of government of Muslim countries that refuse to accept Western customs? You are suspiciously silent on this point, the usual Muslim hypocrisy we have come to expect.
Posted by: Deecha at July 28, 2007 4:08 AM
Hugh, you said:
The solution for non-Muslims and Muslims alike is for special, Muslim-only airlines, and all other airlines to be Muslim-free. That should keep the non-Muslims from contaminating, with their free and easy ways, Muslim rules, Muslim purity. And we, the world's non-Muslims, would be better able to control our own security.
Ahhh, can you imagine how relaxing it would be to fly without Muslims or Muslim "luggage" on board!!!
But there is one small problem. The Muslim planes would have to be accompanied by non-Muslim fighter jets, to make sure the planes don't have to make those pesky emergency landings on our highrises.
Posted by: traeh at July 28, 2007 4:09 AM
Marisol, very cute, that humerus line! Got us smiling out here...
Posted by: traeh at July 28, 2007 4:12 AM
This is a common situation if you fly to Asia by a Gulf hopping airline. The Arabs check in late which already causes delay then they spend another 30-40 minutes arguing and trying to get everyone else to move to accommodate them not speaking just ignoring female Cabin Staff and only talking to males. Then at the next stop because they didnt get what they want they all move around and when boarding passengers want their allocated seats they just ignnore them as if they were not there. Arabs are arrogant,ignorant scum of the earth.
Posted by: Realist at July 28, 2007 7:27 AM
...of course, the sheik had the option of just chartering a jet .... unless he was a cheapskake sheik....trying to impose his will upon the infidels.....or something like that...his female companions should sue the sheik for being so cheap...
Posted by: exsgtbrown at July 28, 2007 9:18 AM
Good to see some spirit of anti-dhimmitude left in a European airline. Yet I only hope BA does not punish the pilot, but I am not optimistic. Typically, the pilot is reprimanded.
In such cases, with troublemaker passengers on board the aircraft, the pilot really is the commander in chief.
The correct procedure is to evict recalcitrant passengers via police, where they are booked, and committed to arrest until they are deported with a big red stamp in their passport denying them the right to re-entry into the country for ever.
The airline should sue the Sheik for restitution of the extra costs it incurred as a result of the delay he caused.
Passengers of the flight should also sue for compensation for financial damages caused by the delay. The police and courts will also impound any assets of the Sheikh to account for detention costs. If he bears no assets with him, he may remain in detention until cash is posted, and the moveables he carries around with himself, such as his watch, Gucci suitcases and designer clothes are auctioned off.
Finally, the Sheik's refusal to have his concubines seated next to members of another sex is a reflection of gender discrimintation. The prosecutor should charge the Sheik and his entourage with public acts of misdemeanour. Until this is all sorted out, they remain in detention. This ought to teach them a lesson in the norms of civility in infidel country.
The passengers who were accosted by the Sheikh and asked to move in order to make place for the Sheik's wives should file legal claims against sexual harrassment on basis of gender discrimintation. The airline ought to help them with the legal procedures.
After the Sheikh is deported, these proceedings may matter little, but it will serve as a warning for others in future.
at July 28, 2007 9:28 AM
Marisol,
Loved that humerus stuff. This evening, I'll drink you a toast with a djinn and tunic.
Posted by: Stendec at July 28, 2007 10:15 AM
This is a little OT but may amuse JW watchers.
An urban myth has been circulating in the UK for several years about a party of our Asian citizens going back to Pakistan, one of whom was an old lady in a wheelchair completely wrapped up in her traditional clothing. The staff at the check-in desk thought she did not look too well and insisted on looking at her closely. She was worse than unwell she was dead, and had been for a day or two. Her family were trying to smuggle her onboard as a passenger to avoid the paperwork and 100% + extra expense of shipping her back as freight in a coffin.
As I said this is all word of mouth and I have no evidence for it whatsoever but be thankful you're sitting next to a living Muslim.
at July 28, 2007 11:05 AM
I would have loved to have been one of the Business class passengers to tell the big fat overfed glutton full-of-himself Shiek, "Nope, I'm not giving up my seat!"
Posted by: darcy at July 28, 2007 11:09 AM
Bloggers on other sites have speculated the three hours delay was caused by having to locate and unload the suitcases of the Sheik. For security reasons, it is not allowed for unacompanied suitcases to contiue the flight, as they may carry bombs.
But the Evening Standard reports that this was not the reason for the 3 hours delay.
"Cabin crew tried to rearrange the seats but passengers travelling together refused to give up their allotted places. The captain tried to mediate but after more than two and a half hours of wrangling he ordered the bulk of their royal party off the plane."
"Police and diplomats from the Qatar consulate in Milan were also called in before the plane eventually took off. The rest of the Qatar party left Milan later on an Alitalia flight."
"Furious passengers whistled and clapped as the row intensified before the captain eventually ordered the women to be escorted off the plane."
Adds the Evening Standard "A BA spokesman said: "The people were offloaded because they failed to comply with safety instructions when the aircraft was taxiing. Two passengers stood up and refused to sit down."
And thus, this is clearly a case where the Sheik should have been arrested.
In other cases of hooliganism on flight, passengers are always detained.
The Italian police should never have let the Sheik and the princesses continue with the next Alitalia flight that day.
Oriana Fallaci you are gone! Just when your country needs you.
Posted by: Hugo Schmidt-Fischer at July 28, 2007 1:00 PM
i think that if i were on that flight i would whisper something in his ear and 5 minutes later the plane would take off.
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at July 28, 2007 1:38 PM
hey read this! has the full story.
"Furious passengers whistled and clapped as the row intensified before the captain eventually ordered the women to be escorted off the plane."
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at July 28, 2007 2:02 PM
aethling
"Learn to write in English, will you?"
LOL!!! your such a spelling "neo-fascist".
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at July 28, 2007 2:06 PM
Seems like they could have their own lear jet to bypass all that contact with the kafir. Of course that would disrupt any potential Dawa sessions.
Posted by: kafir world at July 28, 2007 3:17 PM
Why were the 2 Arabs who interfered with the takeoff not arrested?
Posted by: george_rem at July 28, 2007 4:42 PM
discovering three of his female relatives had been seated next to men they did not know."
How sensitive of Reuters to call them his female relatives. They were all in burqa, how does Reuters know they were his relative, or for that matter females. Could they be his wives? Isnt polygamy illegal in Italy?
at July 28, 2007 5:13 PM
The solution for non-Muslims and Muslims alike is for special, Muslim-only airlines, and all other airlines to be Muslim-free.
Better still. the airspavce should be divided into 'civilised' and 'moslem air space. This is necessary, or else we will have moslem pilots crashing into tall buildings. There will be aircorridoes for thos aircradft that have to cross a proscribed airspace.
I vote for placing those planes off-limits to all non-Muslms. That includes the pilots. Let only Muslim pilots fly Muslims.
See above.
A few months ago, maybe a year, another British pilot threw a couple of Moslems of his plane on a flight from Spain to Manchester. It was still at the airport when this happened.
Posted by: DP111 at July 28, 2007 5:30 PM
Heh heh Spelling Nazis
http://www.bsd.hu/files/images/spelling_nazis.png
at July 28, 2007 5:35 PM
Fred:
As I said this is all word of mouth and I have no evidence for it whatsoever but be thankful you're sitting next to a living Muslim.
Speak for yourself. I prefer to sit next to a dead Muslim than a live one. The dead Muslim cant injure me, the live one can.
And more than anecodotal evidence:
I have heard that BA have been shipping dead people first class rather than in coffins.
Posted by: UK Infidel Lover
at July 28, 2007 5:58 PM
sheik yer'mami, thanks v much, you have the answer to the problem of unsafe and unpleasant airtravel.
at July 28, 2007 6:04 PM
You don't even want to fly on a muslim airliner. I flew on a Gulf Air flight from London to Bombay 30 years ago the flight to the Gulf was quiet civilised the flight to Bombay was a nightmare. The amount of individual hand bagage that was brought on the plane would have broke a camel backs. The spotlessly clean toilets were a stinking hell by the time we reached Bombay. If you want a real horror story read this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudia_Flight_163
The real reason I was told later by a Brit who worked in the traffic control tower was that the passengers we all Pakistani peasants who were on the hadje. It seems that on of these had lit a petrol stove in the back of the plane to boil some water to make a cup of tea, it was knocked over and it started the fire. Planes don't usually land when the control gear is burnt through. The reason the doors weren't opened was that the crew were on their knees praying, thanking Allah for saving them. He said that they were shouting over the radio for the crew to open the door. You have been warned.
at July 28, 2007 7:01 PM
That's what he gets for not being able to afford his own plane.
Posted by: Timur at July 28, 2007 9:01 PM
the 2 princesses were most likely stoned to death when they got home. Temptresses that brought dishonor onto their master!
Posted by: george_rem at July 28, 2007 9:23 PM
Infidel Pride may-be in your racist mind you think HateWatchHallofShame is than faud. Many schools and libraries block JihadWatch as than hatesite.
Posted by: DefenderofIslam at July 29, 2007 2:21 AM
Damn.. If I'd have set next to those moofti hotties.. I dunno.. I mighta felt the EXTREME URGE to *grope* and *fondle* them right at take-off..
Who KNOWS.. Maybe I could've talked one of them into joining the Mile High club.. :-)
Mmmmhhh.. Mile High Club....
D-oh!!
I don't like hairy women!
Posted by: Allahfanculo at July 29, 2007 4:39 AM
DefenderofIslam
In the last or second last general-election in the UK a candidate standing for the right wing British National Party (of which I am not a member) put out an election leaflet saying the Muslims in a British city were entirely responsible for a riot. He was prosecuted for incitement to racial hatred and though the judge agreed that the statement was entirely true, it was still likely to cause racial hatred and therefore illegal. You'll be glad to know that he was jailed for a year.
So you see in British law “hate speech” now includes telling the truth about anything bad Muslims - or to be fair any other minority - does.
at July 29, 2007 5:26 AM
"The solution for non-Muslims and Muslims alike is for special, Muslim-only airlines, and all other airlines to be Muslim-free."
Why not? The British government is said to be considering plans for an all-muslim prison, after a series of attacks on jailed Islamic terrorists.
at July 29, 2007 7:52 AM
ok people, let's not get "off-topic". the question is, some fat arab bloke got thrown off a plane. discuss.
at July 29, 2007 11:02 AM
....as I looked into this story, I noted that the Sheik and his three concubines just day shopping....Apparently they flew to Italy just to go shopping....
....Now if you are rich enough to go flying to a foreign country just to go day shopping, you should be able to just charter a privated jet with no infidel passengers to worry about....
....I was curious as to what they purchased in Italy that may have been unavailiable in their home country.....
....I (and others ) may have noted certain items we take for granted may not be availiable in Muslim stores in Muslim countries (due to religious police harrassment or 7th century rules or just plain ignorance), items such as tampons, perfume, toilet paper, silk nighties, real tobacco, fine wines, or banned cds ....
....and then I thought maybe the sheik was a wolf in sheeps clothing...he may have been a courier delivering secret plans to some Islamic Jihadist....
....as my mind was whirring about, I thought about the three concubines, were they afraid of the other non Muslim passengers, were they afraid of being mugged, tortured, raped, or afraid of being forcibly converted into Christianity during the flight, or were they afraid the Non Muslims passengers were actually frequent readers of JW and just might ask questions that the three women would have difficulty answering with honesty....
...I thought of many questions that could have been asked...
Posted by: exsgtbrown at July 29, 2007 11:13 AM
I suggest the pilot resort to defenstration next time. Much more satisfying than simply having them escorted off the plane.
Posted by: Lepanto at July 29, 2007 2:14 PM
It's encouraging to read that the passengers refused to change seats because of a lack of planning from the sheik and his entourage.
Many thanks to the British Airways pilot for putting an end to the situation in the proper manner. By the cross of Saint George, this kind of thing must be stopped. :)
Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at July 30, 2007 9:25 AM
The apprehension of the sheik and his concubines is totally understandable from an islamic perspective. The koran is a manual of sexual slavery, licentiousness and pedophilia, all epitomised by islam's prophet.
You see, they were simply extrapolating islamic
values onto their fellow passengers of "Abrahamic faith".
Muhhamad's rape of 9 year old Ayesha is well known. His arousal by/copulation with his daughter-in-law, Zainab is well known too.
I was wondering whether there are any reliable accounts from any sources regarding his behaviour with a) his mother b) his daughter.
Anybody ?
at July 31, 2007 1:43 AM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dhimmi Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)