![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
But "it has emerged that a church in the eastern state of Sabah is also suing Malaysian authorities for barring the import of Christian literature from Indonesia containing the word 'Allah'."
Qur'an 29:46 says: "And argue not with the People of the Scripture unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us and revealed unto you; our Allah and your Allah is One, and unto Him we surrender." This is a one-way discussion, however -- the Muslim is not arguing with, but rather instructing the Jew or Christian, and more importantly, proselytizing. And that is prohibited for non-Muslims under Islamic law. Then, the notion of worshiping the same deity can be used to promote Islam to a non-Muslim, but not the other way around.
An update on this story. "Malaysia reversal on 'Allah' ruling," from Al Jazeera:
The Malaysian government has reversed a decision to ban the Malay-language section of a Catholic newspaper amid a row over the use of the word "Allah" as a synonym for God.
In a surprise about-turn, officials approved the publication permit for The Herald which reports on Catholic community news in English, Malay, Tamil and Chinese.
The internal security ministry gave no reasons for the earlier ban but the unusual delay in getting the permit renewed had followed a warning over the publication's use of the word "Allah", which officials had said could only be used to refer to the Muslim God.
Speaking to Al Jazeera Reverend Lawrence Andrew, editor of The Herald, said he was happy the government had renewed the weekly's 2008 permit without any conditions.
"The renewal process usually takes two to three months but I don’t know what caused the delay this time," he said.
"The government did not give any explanation in its letter."
Print publications in Malaysia require a government permit which is renewed every year.
Warnings
The government has previously warned The Herald, which has a circulation of 12,000 among Catholics, that its permit could be revoked if it continued to use the word "Allah" for God in its Malay-language section.
"Allah" is Arabic for God and means the same in Malay, Malaysia's national language.
Christians in Malaysia have argued that the word "Allah" was used by Christians before Islam.
Andrew said he did not know the reason for the initial ban, which the Herald had appealed.
"It could have been due to any of the articles we have published, and not necessarily the use of the word Allah," he added.
Andrew said people cannot be denied the use of their language, adding that the community is grateful the ban was not imposed.
"It was certainly a good thing for the country as a whole that we can accept one another. We need to be moderate and have tolerance," he added.
Early this month The Herald filed a suit seeking a declaration on the use of the word "Allah" as a constitutional right.
Meanwhile, in a separate development it has emerged that a church in the eastern state of Sabah is also suing Malaysian authorities for barring the import of Christian literature from Indonesia containing the word "Allah".
Sabah Sidang Injil Borneo Church filed the case in Kuala Lumpur earlier this month after six titles for their Sunday school education for children were banned.
Letters from the internal security ministry said the books contained various words that were exclusive to Islam, including "Allah" (God), "Baitullah" (House of God), "Solat" (prayer) and "Kaabah" (The Sacred House).
In multi-racial Malaysia, the government considers religion a sensitive matter and often classify related matters as a security issue.
Not unlike Iran's classification of "moral" offenses as a matter of security in society: What is really at issue is securing the rule of Sharia law.
Posted by Marisol at January 1, 2008 12:07 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
I wonder when this tide of Islamism and Islamization will ebb away?
Happy Gregorian-Calendar Christian Era New Year!
Posted by: John C
at January 1, 2008 12:19 AM
This saga is particularly strange when one remembers the case of that Dutch bishop who wanted to start calling God "Allah". His rationale was that it would improve relationships with Muslims...
Posted by: The Heresiarch
at January 1, 2008 5:43 AM
This shows that Muslims are not really in favor of multiculturalism. They are using western multiculturalism as a way to advance their arabian religion.
Posted by: Crusader
at January 1, 2008 9:24 AM
Allowing the use of the word "Allah" is only a step for their Dawa. They reliezed banning it would be counter productive to their slowly sapping other peoples faiths and religions. Good Grief their Mutliculural Cultist whores in the west must be dancing in joy over this one too.
Posted by: senor doeboy
at January 1, 2008 11:51 AM
"Allah", which officials had said could only be used to refer to the Muslim God." from the article
Why mercy me! I have so many times heard on American TV about how we are all worshiping the same GOD. That we have soo much in common.
I guess this is all just a misunderstanding.
I don't believe that those people would lie to me.
Sarcasm taking hold of entire being, need help!
Posted by: Aunt Bea
at January 1, 2008 2:15 PM
Again , Allah is the proper name of the Islamic God...The Catholic Church ( and other Christian churches) know this and are engaged on some sort of 'back door' excercise in stealth evangelism by way of conflating Allah and G_d together .... sort of like saying "yes sure Allah is the Christian God , come learn about Jesus and the primacy of his message"...get them while their young huh! The Islamic authorities have a right for concern.
Posted by: David Xavier
at January 1, 2008 6:29 PM
Good thing the Malaysians are keeping it pure...Arabically speaking. How far removed from the vast wastelands of Araby are the Malays and yet, Allah, Baitullah, Solat, kaabah, and let's not forget the dirty filthy kuffar...are all now forced upon the Malaysians. Of course, the Iranians have khoda, as well as Allah.
Posted by: Jauhara Al-Kafirah
at January 1, 2008 10:56 PM
'david xavier'
you appear to be oddly upset, even angry, about the prospect of Christians in Malaysia engaging in what you represent as 'stealth evangelism' (with a fevered hint, too, that they are preying upon the vulnerable young).
So I am going to ask you straightout: do you believe that an adult Muslim should be able to leave Islam and to freely choose to join another faith, or to profess no faith at all? No long explanations please: just a plain Yes or No will do.
Let me remind you about that well-known apostate, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, atheist.
Let me also draw your attention to Lina Joy, to Mr Daniel Shayesteh, formerly a Persian Muslim, and his wife, now consciously and actively professing Christians; and to Bishop Patrick Sookhdeo, who converted to Christianity from Islam, whilst studying at University in Britain.
Do you believe that it was OK for Dutch secularists (in the case of Ayaan) or Christians (in the case of Lina Joy, Daniel and Patrick) to explain their beliefs, upon being asked about them? Yes or No?
Do you think it is alright that no formal, legal restriction should be placed upon one human being attempting to rationally explain the content of their belief to another person? Yes or No?
Ayaan, Lina Joy, Daniel and Patrick were not tricked, bribed, or pressured in any way. They investigated their choices, thought about them for a long time, and finally made the decisions that they did, as rational adults. Do you agree that no blame should attach to those who explained non-Islamic beliefs and ideas to them? Yes or NO?
Should Ayaan, Lina Joy, Daniel and Bp Patrick be left free to follow the life path that they have chosen, without fear or impediment and without any legal or social punishment? Again - Yes, or No?
Posted by: dumbledoresarmy
at January 1, 2008 11:11 PM
Islamic scholars are forever promoting "consultation," which means "checking on adherence to shari'a law." Almost invariably, these scholars rule in favor of an interpretation in favor of shari'a law, thus tightening the noose.
Posted by: Always On Watch
at January 2, 2008 8:48 AM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)