| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Jihad Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Yet another outrage
Bad dhimmi! Do not associate Islam with violence! Only Muslims are allowed to do that!
"Egypt seizes German magazine over Islam portrayal," from Reuters (thanks to all who sent this in):
CAIRO (Reuters) - Egypt ordered the confiscation of a special edition of the German magazine Der Spiegel about Islam on Tuesday that the government says insults the Muslim Prophet Mohammad, Egypt's state news agency MENA said.Information Minister Anas el-Feki said the decision "comes in the context of defending Islamic values and standing firmly against those who try to insult the prophet, the Islamic faith, and religions generally," MENA reported.
"We are for freedom of the press, but we cannot permit religions to be insulted," MENA quoted Feki as saying.
It said that Feki had ordered copies of the March 25 special edition confiscated because it contained "a number of images and phrases insulting the prophet, peace be upon him."
MENA said that the edition, whose cover it said bore the headline "Allah in the West," included paragraphs quoting a "German orientalist" as saying that Islam called for violence and terrorism.
Shock horror! Why, no one, but no one, would ever get the idea that Islam has anything to do with violence and terrorism were it not for those pesky Orientalists!
Posted by Robert at April 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Muhammad mirrors Islam.
Cartoonist draws Muhammad mirroring Islam.
Muslims mirror Muhammad by wanting to kill Cartoonist.
All in a days work of being a Muhammadean 'nut' case.
Posted by: champ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/nav-commenters.gif)
at April 2, 2008 2:36 PM
You can't put the rabbit back in the hat..............you can't close the barn door after the horse has escaped..........you can't re-skin the snake...............you can't stop people from thinking.
Posted by: tanstaafl at April 2, 2008 2:39 PM
"We are for freedom of the press, but we cannot permit religions to be insulted," MENA quoted Feki as saying."
ReligionS? Does this mean he would defended Christians from being insulted? Ill have to ask some Christian Copts and get their opinion.
at April 2, 2008 2:40 PM
Velvet Hammer had an interesting take on all of this and showed that an Egyptian Newspaper actually PUBLISHED the MO CARTOONS!!!
Talk about hypocrites!
Cheers
Posted by: Doctor Bulldog at April 2, 2008 2:48 PM
Doc,
I understand that the editor of that Egyptian newspaper was prosecuted; it figures. The editor characterized the Motoons as "silly."
Posted by: John C at April 2, 2008 3:04 PM
Doc,
I understand that the editor of that Egyptian newspaper was prosecuted; it figures. The editor characterized the Motoons as "silly." No cheer in Egypt, I'm afraid.
Posted by: John C at April 2, 2008 3:05 PM
Doc,
I understand that the editor of that Egyptian newspaper was prosecuted; it figures. The editor characterized the Motoons as "silly." No cheer in Egypt, I'm afraid.
Posted by: John C at April 2, 2008 3:07 PM
You couldn't make it up if you tried!
The SPIEGEL has been qite vehemnt in its condemnation of FITNA, so its just a nice piece of justice that they themselves get banned.
However, one columnist has spoken for FITNA - and today there is a feature by Ibn Warraq:
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,544465,00.html
... unfortunately in German.
He ends his article with these sentences (I translate):
"Wilders ought to be celebrated as a courageous individuum - a hero of our times - who dared to stand up against Islamofascism."
(Original:"Wilders sollte als mutiges Individuum gefeiert werden - ein Held unserer Zeit - der es wagte, gegen den Islamofaschismus aufzustehen.")
at April 2, 2008 3:09 PM
"defending Islamic values"
ok, I got my laugh for the day!
Posted by: R_not at April 2, 2008 3:15 PM
More insults, more mockery. Much more effective, much more humane, than missiles.
Posted by: Henrik at April 2, 2008 3:38 PM
"We are for freedom of the press, but we cannot permit religions to be insulted," MENA quoted Feki as saying.
The above is an OXYMORONIC statement.
The is no freedom of the press when being offended is viewed as a crime.
Hear that Mr. Government?
Hate-Speech is not a crime!
Most "hate-speech" might be insane drivel, but respond to it through civilized methods of debate and reason.
Using the legal system to prevent others from "offending" you is moving away from democracy, liberty, and freedom of speech.
Stop PC now!
Posted by: Monkeywho at April 2, 2008 4:21 PM
"We are for freedom of the press, but ..."
== == == == ==
I am SO TIRED of the inevitable "but".
Freedom of speech is great, BUT (when you speak ill of Islam, freedom doesn't apply).
Freedom of the press is wonderful, BUT (when you print cartoons {cartoons for goshsakes!} that might cause a laugh at ol'Mo's expense, well, forget the freedom part).
Freedom of religion is a good thing, BUT (we can't be letting Muslims reject Islam, now, can we? In that case, freedom is a BAD thing).
Tell Islam to get its BUTs out of my civilization.
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at April 2, 2008 7:50 PM
Robert, please use the 'ticking turban Mohammed' cartoon image for every story like this. The old maxim that a picture tells a thousand words has never been more appropriately employed. And since he (Mo) is the prime inspriation for all this rage, it's only fair to make illustrate the point in a way no one can ignore.
Posted by: alexon at April 3, 2008 1:59 AM
...,and religions generally"
Reluctantly added but not meant. I'm sure they don't give a hoot about "other religions", but add it as if to say "we are offended by anyone who insults your religion also".
Death threats are reserved for Islam.
A violent satanic cult that needs to be protected with death threats cannot be a religion.
Robert, I know you can spell and I am not trying to get at you, but please correct the heading.
Posted by: Dsinc at April 3, 2008 9:04 AM
Information Minister Anas el-Feki said the decision "comes in the context of defending Islamic values and standing firmly against those who try to insult the prophet, the Islamic faith, and religions generally," MENA reported.
"We are for freedom of the press, but we cannot permit religions to be insulted
I feel what he really means is he cannot permit is religion to be criticized or held up for observation where people not involved in the cult of Islam must see it for the farce it is
at April 3, 2008 12:30 PM
re the 'ticking turban' cartoon.
I only wish there was some way I could write to Kurt Westergaard and tell him how much I like his cartoon of Mohammed ha-Meshugga.
I wish there was a safe way I could send Mr Westergaard a little something to help him pay for a weapon, ammo and a good quality bodyguard.
Posted by: dumbledoresarmy at April 6, 2008 4:08 AM
How can anyone be accused of insulting old mo? It's like being accused of insulting Stalin or Hitler. The facts about this man muslims call a "prophet" are there for all to see. If he wasn't a monster then his followers wouldn't use violence to silence criticism, they would let it run off like water off a ducks back. I follow no religion but I am reminded that you don't see Christians murdering people when someone insults Jesus.
Violence is always the first resort of those who know they are wrong. It stops them having to take part in an argument they know they can never win.
Posted by: DaveMate at April 7, 2008 3:05 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)