FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Jihad Watch Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Raymond Ibrahim Robert Spencer
 
« University student leaves school after Muslim threatens his service dog | Main | OPEC looks the other way as inflation driven by oil prices causes food riots in Egypt »

May 14, 2008

UK: Second attack on Anglican priest by teenage Muslim thugs

The first time it happened was in March. This time, the good dhimmi who was attacked wants to make sure that no one plays up the religious aspect of the attack -- thereby ensuring that nothing will be done by anyone to try to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again.

"Second attack on East End clergy by teenage thugs," by Michael Parker for the East London Advertiser, May 9 (thanks to Sparta):

A SECOND priest has been beaten up in his own churchyard in the space of just eight weeks in London’s East End — this time over an argument about a football.

The Rector of St Matthew’s in Bethnal Green, The Rev Kevin Scully, was attacked on Tuesday afternoon by three drunken youths who had returned to take their revenge for a row three days before.

He had taken their ball last Saturday after he saw them using a cross on the church as a basketball hoop.

He has been taunted with religious and racist abuse in the past, but believes the beating was more alcohol-fuelled than anything more sinister.

The attack follows the vicious assault on Canon Michael Ainsworth at St George-in-the-East church in Shadwell in March.

But although that attack was treated as a ‘faith hate’ crime, police consider the latest incident as simple assault.

Fr Scully, 45, who was left with two black eyes, cuts and bruises, told the Advertiser: “I’m still a bit shaken up.

“It came out of an incident where some teenagers were using the front of the church as a basketball hoop.

“I took their ball and told them to leave—but they came back on Tuesday, drunk, to demand their ball back and attacked me.”

He recalled: “One of them was instigating the violence.

“I thought the other two were going to stop it, but in the end they joined in.

“Even a passer-by who saw what was going on and tried to intervene got a kicking too.

“I was punched twice in the face, hard, hit again, and kicked from behind.

“I crouched down to ward off the blows before running to the Rectory and calling police.”

Fr Scully added: “My biggest concern was getting the door locked as I thought they might follow me inside.

“But they ran off and I’ve not seen them round here since.”

He branded them “drunken yobs” and said the area suffered anti-social and criminal behaviour.

Mr Scully, however, insists it was not a ‘policing’ problem, but a ‘community’ problem.

“These are someone’s sons, someone’s brothers,” he said. “These people are known in the community.”

“There is a certain racial and religious element to this,” adds.

“I have been and was taunted religiously — and that is a worrying aspect of it.

“But I would not make that a ‘flag of convenience.’

“These are drunken yobs and that is the shame of it.

“They could probably have a very bright future ahead of them if they only did something about it.”...

Yes, of course. If only they did something about it.

Posted by Robert at May 14, 2008 7:20 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

How do I know with some degree of certainty that this item will never be reported by the BBC ?

However, they will not be able to suppress the nature of the "little Jihad" which is going on in England for too much longer.

The appropriate and legitimate response of the indiginous population cannot be far behind that.

Posted by: idiotboy [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 7:36 AM

“I have been and was taunted religiously — and that is a worrying aspect of it."
From the article.

Hold that thought in your mind, Rev. Scully, turn it over and over for a bit, concentrate on the "worrying" part of it and see if you can bring into focus just what it is that might possible be the source of such "worry." Make it into a meditation or prayer, if you must, but stick at it long enough and eventually a light will go on. Good luck.

Posted by: Eastview [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 7:40 AM

The Navajo Reservation in Arizona has about 200,000 residents and is half the size of England, which has 50 million. That's quite a disparate land distribution. Yet England, under a pact with dhimmi traitors like Blair and the Islamist-loving United Nations, accepts hundreds of thousands of Islamonazis each year. Other immigrants just invade illegally. Number of immigrants taken in by the Navajo? None, unless you show you have Navajo ancestry. Ditto for most non-Western countries.
Can you imagine a group invading the Navajo Reservation, demanding welfare, calling Navajo "kaffir" with a bullhorn, attacking Navajo religious figures and buildings, raping and stealing from Navajo, and calling themselves "Navajo" while disparaging everything about the Navajo, and on and on.
That is exactly what is happening in little England. Just replace the above with English.

http://www.bravenewsworld.blogspot.com

Posted by: Max Publius [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 8:07 AM

On the above post, Someone is bound to say, "isn't that what happened in America, when the Europeans invaded?" Not so fast.
First, this is an analogy. Second, those people and events are in the past, and cannot be changed. The above posted atrocities are currently happening. Third, are you saying decendents who did nothing should be punished by Muslims who suffered nothing (except the microscopicly brief and tame period of "colonialism", sans colonists last century) but have themselves have a long ancestry of butchery against others that the current generation of Muslims has done nothing to rectify, unlike Americans who have bent over backward to rectify the sins of the past?
Fourth, what good will a Sharia Britain yield humankind (we have Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Taliban, etc. as a template), compared to what has been done in the United States? (Internet, moon landing, planes, light bulbs, liberty, freedom of speech, etc.)

http://www.bravenewsworld.blogspot.com

Posted by: Max Publius [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 8:28 AM

The priest receives a BEATING, and then retreats into denial and pretending it's all about drunks.

He ends up protecting his attackers without understanding that he's denying these attackers the justice that they've merited.

Christianity does mandate mercy and forgiveness, but justice is also entwined in the cord that binds any culture.

Is it any wonder that the English culture is dying, with such abject poverty of spirit and cowardice as this priest displayed?

Posted by: David [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 8:58 AM

The British Media will mention that the Anglican Bishop was attacked by so called "Asian Men" the PC language and the obfuscation of relevant facts does injustice to the victims and the general population. Whats more infuriating is the use of terms that try to subvert the definition of the enemy. These attacks will continue this will never stop no matter how much soothing words and warm fuzzy words are used to describe Islam. The fact remains there will be more attacks, more innocent non Muslims will suffer--it is the nature of Islam to kill, murder and bring death, destruction and demean humans to mere murdering machines.

Posted by: savsiv [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 8:59 AM

The shock troops of Islam strike again. This has the taint of a deliberate setup. Easily glossed over in the item above is the incendiary use by these Muslim scum of a crucifix as a basketball backdrop. It's akin to the Muslim filth which occupied the Church of the Nativity a few years back who then set about using the high alter as a picnic table, and various stations of the cross as latrines. Look askance at Muslim, and you'll be pilloried as a "racist", or "Islamophobe". Photograph his Mosque and be kidnapped into the basement there and menaced by Muslim thugs.

We have in perfect display one way in which Islam works so effectively:

Desecrate the symbols of Western religious tradition, and see what happens. If met with non-reaction, good! Islamic intimidation is working, and the sacred supremacy of Islam is confirmed in the vile primitive mind of the Muslim. If Muslim provocation is met with any consequences or resistsnce whatsoever (the priest took their ball after they desecrated a cross) then return and exploit that kaffir response as a pretext to escalate the rape of civilation until it's Islam Uber Alles.

The most hideous thing about it all is the way the decency the West has cultivated after so much hard work by generations is now our Achilles heel. Islam is designed to cynically exploit our hard won tolerance to forward its utterly intolerant agenda. These people need to be expelled, and Islam banned, or eventually our entire humanist cultural edifice will be destroyed. Even those ludicrous "religious hate crime laws" will prove more useful to Muslims than they ever will to us. They are already exploited by Muslims to place themselves beyond critcism, something which no self-respecting Christian or Jew would ever do. But Muslims seem congenitally capable of exploiting everything, of plundering everything, of perverting everything to serve the purposes of their heinous Islam.

Posted by: jsla [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 10:28 AM

“They could probably have a very bright future ahead of them if they only did something about it.”

But they are doing something to ensure themselves a very bright future: as mutaween in a conquered Britain.

Posted by: Papa Whiskey [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 10:49 AM

....after he saw them using a cross on the church as a basketball hoop.

Are you KIDDING me, using a cross as a basketball hoop..... Thanks not simply anti-social and criminal behaviour.

He has been taunted with religious and racist abuse in the past, but believes the beating was more alcohol-fuelled than anything more sinister.

Open your eyes... you know the truth.... have the courage to say it....

police consider the latest incident as simple assault.

Only a "simple" assault. Wonder what would happen if you tried putting a basketball hoop on a mosque door, then beat up the imam for telling you to stop.

“I have been and was taunted religiously — and that is a worrying aspect of it.

You had better be worried. And if you don't call it what it is and use this incident as a way to bring attention to what it really is, it wont stop, EVER.

Posted by: adobe [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 10:58 AM

Alcohol? Isn't that anti-Islamic? Why were those drunken muslims, not arrested for anti-Islamic behavior and turned over to the local British Sharia court? They should do at least six month penance in the local Sharia jail...

Posted by: duh_swami [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 11:00 AM

ISLAM = Training for Thugs
MUSLIM = THUG

Posted by: credit man [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 11:09 AM

After listening to this 'capon' I wanted to beat him over the head with his own cross!

Posted by: poetcomic1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 11:25 AM

It would be a hate crime if the situation was reversed. But instead, it is a "simple" assault.

Move along, nothing to see here . . .

Posted by: JSobieski [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 11:42 AM

Here's a video posted by a muslim showing a "peaceful" group of muslims being hassled by the police.

They "politely" ask the police to leave THEIR area.
/


From GoV -
Radical Islam Overruns London's Streets

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZNx0xHe0p0&eurl=http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/

Scary.
The comments posted are just as disturbing.

When are the police going to be able to protect themselves?

Posted by: Borg [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 11:59 AM

Somewhat unrelated, but the recent elections in London, where Sultan Livingstone got trounced and Boris Johnson got elected, might be grounds for new optimism at least for London. I doubt that Johnson is a dhimmi in the way the rest of the Tories are.

Posted by: Infidel Pride [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 12:07 PM

Come on guys, it's the UK.

I am sure that these Muslim thugs will sue the priest for allowing his face and body to be in front of their hands. Thus causing bruising to their hands and skuffing of their shoes.

Because it is the UK the courts will award for the thugs and receive alot of money. Really, who was this priest thinking he was standing in front of their fists and kicks.

And because the UK is such a civilized society they will condemn comments like mine while suppressing the report in their media, and while justifying the thugs social reasons. The may additionally ask the priest to not wear clothing on the streets that identifies him as a priest, or otherwards cloak yourself in stealth so as to not affend other muslims that may accidentally find your face in front of their fists.

Posted by: alaskan1000 [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 12:59 PM

This is how it starts. Well, if you ignore the homicide bombers and the doctors attempting to blow up Glasgow airport, and the attempts to blow up planes, and the muslim paedophile gangs in bradford, and the torture of Kris Donald etc. etc. etc.

As usual the press report it as "asian youths".

I know some asian youths, they are Hindus and Siekhs and they don't attack vicars. In fact they are perfectly nice people who will be furious that they are lumped in with the violent animals who did this. The muslim youths who did this.

When will people realise that Islam is a supremacist religion that uses the exact same techniques of violence and deceit to progress their agenda no matter what country they colonise?

Posted by: DaveMate [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 1:33 PM

These "youths" attacked the priest in "self defense"?

Isn't that "in context" for all other Islamic jihadi attacks?

The "drunk" part was taken out of context, for sure.

Posted by: Battle_of_Tours [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 1:59 PM

alaskan1000-

The web is full of idiots mate, but you're going for the golden stocks award with that comment. You obviously know sweet f.a about our society although, for the sake of fairness, I'll point out that you're hardly alone these days.

But carry on. Who knows......... The collective idiocy may just start to gather mass and eventually collapse in on itself and the rest of us can go right back to dealing with reality without having to deal with the fantasy constructs of those who don't know any better and thus choose to make it up as they go along.

Posted by: Wishbone [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 2:22 PM

The whole turn the other cheek thing has quite put me off the religion I was baptized into. As a "recovering Episcopalian", I'll be looking around for some type of implement to do some damage. We can not afford to leave important issues like self defense up to well meaning martyrs.

Posted by: MP [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 2:22 PM

While this is going on in England, the Queen is donning a hijab to visit a mosque in Turkey. The shop keeper was nice enough to give her the hijab for free, and they allowed her to go in the mosque wearing a scandalous knee-length dress. Tolerance!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7401599.stm

Posted by: Jan Sobieski [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 2:33 PM

There is a lot more behind this story

First they came for the Jews
And now the Jews are gone

The area known as the East End is many hamlets adjoining the old City of London, the Cockney section famously within hearing distance of the bells of St. Mary-le-Bow church. From the Thames River on the south border to Bethnal Green Road on the north and Aldgate High Street, it is a place now known for theater and tours of the notorious Tower, the home of Sherlock Holmes, the Elephant Man and Jack the Ripper. Always a magnet for immigrants searching for a better life in cosmopolitan London, it was also, at the beginning of the 20th Century, home to an estimated 300,000 Jews, a Quarter with residents from Eastern Europe, Spain and Portugal. With more than 150 synagogues before the start of World War II, now there are only four, all of them at risk, and an elderly Jewish population of less than 3,000.

Now they coming for the Infidels
http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2008/03/prior-to-dog-collar-incident.html

Posted by: InfidelK9 [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 2:39 PM

Please read the article below, I have just pulled it off a paper in England this sort of thing is happening everyday. Notice the difference between what the Muslim gets in punishment and what the aboriginal Brit gets for defending himself, and his Dad. Look at the injuries his Dad suffered and what does the Asian get in punishment 24 compulsory attendance at some center or other where some numb nut will tell him what a naughty boy he has been and if he does it again they might have to take away his knuckle duster, as a real punishment. The Brit defending his Dad with a pool cue, gets fined 1500 pounds plus compensation to his victim of 225 pounds and an extra payment of 15 pounds, for victim support costs what ever that may mean. Mind you he didn't defend his Dad did he it was a revenge attack.
Now I ask you nicely what are you going to do. You are a law abiding Brit. It is not very difficult to work out what will happen too you if you get on the wrong side of these animals. You will be on your own, the police wont defend you, in fact they will prosecute you if you do defend yourself. Its got that loony that they put a guy in jail a couple of years ago because some asylum seeker complained too the police that the man had racially abused him. Nobody saw the incident and the police had to get an interpreter to take the mans report because he couldn't speak English. I have often wondered if he couldn't speak English how good was his understanding of the language, in the first place. I don't expect it was very high because I don't think he had been in the country more than a few months. It doesn't take you very long to get the message if you are white you are in the wrong. The average Brit isn't a Dhimmi, he is just getting more and more frustrated and pissed off, you should hear what gets said in private


A SERVING soldier from Brierfield who used a pool cue in a revenge attack has been fined £1,500 by Pennine magistrates.
Alan David White, of Mansfield Crescent, admitted assaulting Ayaz Abdullah causing him actual bodily harm. He was also ordered to pay costs and compensation totalling £225 and a victim support payment of £15.

Miss Julie Reddish (prosecuting) said Mr Abdullah had been with a group of friends in Brierfield when a car drove towards them, White got out and hit him over the head with a pool cue. The pair had been involved in a row 20 minutes previously in which White had been assaulted by Mr Abdullah.

Mr Mark Irlam (defending) said White had been subject to a number of attacks which police had not taken action on.

On this occasion, he had been returning home from a shop when he was approached by a group of Asian males and hit in the eye by Mr Abdullah. He suffered a black eye, was taken home by his father, the police were contacted and Mr White was told there was nothing that could be done unless they had the assailant's name and address.

White and his father went out to see if they could track down the men and came across them in Chapel Street. They again contacted the police and their car was surrounded by the group. White's father was hit, White got a pool cue from the glove compartment, got out of the car and hit Abdullah to force him away from the car.

"It was clearly excessive. Had he punched him, he would have pleaded not gulity and said he was acting in self-defence. Because of the use of a weapon, he has entered a guilty plea. His father was nearly unconscious and sufferd a fractured jaw and broken nose," said Mr Irlam. "It was sheer frustration at the total lack of action in previous incidents. He offers his apologies to the court, the police and his victim for his actions."


• In a hearing last month, Mr Abdullah admitted assault by beating and was ordered to attend an attendance centre for 24 hours.

Posted by: Holger Dansker [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 3:04 PM

Some here pointed to the American Indian analogy, which is not too far off the mark. But the Indians couldn't stop us, they were weak and divided besides lacked the necessary info and worldview to cope with our comings.
But on the other hand, western governments like th UK actively aid and abett these mohammed monsters, all the while having the power to stop them all and give the parasitical jihadist there the boot in days if they had a will. SO in a way we are worse than the Indians who couldn't stop us cause we have the power and the knowledge but are too caught up in political expediency and correctness to mobilize. I mean, they are so snotty that they would rather have their country over-run by Pakis than be associated with the BNP

Posted by: Dumbo [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 3:46 PM

I saw a much worse case on the web in the last 3 days but have lost the link. I think it was a comment posted on a press report (In the Daily Mail?) on the Jimmy Mizen murder.

A London(?) girl said that after her teenage brother had a fight in school with an "Asian" boy he was attacked by the boys relatives. He was scarred for life and left with an ear hanging off and it was only people running to help that stopped him being killed. Apparently the police had mobile phone records of the "Asians" being called up and said they could (would?) be prosecuted. However the Crown Prosecution Service did nothing and the gang got clean away with it.

Anyone else see the report and get the details of time and place? Someone needs to write to an MP about this.

NOTE; Jimmy Mizen 16 year old Catholic Altar boy killed in a breadshop last weekend after refusing to fight what the police and MSM described as a "young male". It took them 3 days to admit they are looking for a Turk - don't use the "M" word.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 3:47 PM
"It was clearly excessive. Had he punched him, he would have pleaded not gulity and said he was acting in self-defence. Because of the use of a weapon, he has entered a guilty plea. His father was nearly unconscious and sufferd a fractured jaw and broken nose," said Mr Irlam. "It was sheer frustration at the total lack of action in previous incidents. He offers his apologies to the court, the police and his victim for his actions."
Posted by: Holger Dansker

Pathetic British system of ‘justice’. As Charles Dickens once said: “The law is an arse”.

In this case the quip fits.

Posted by: Battle_of_Tours [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 3:54 PM

The correct quote is that “THE LAW IS AN ASS” but I like yours better. It is not just the British judicial system that is an arse or an ass, it is all types of judicial systems when they labor under P.C. Constraints. When I was young I was told that the legal system functions best when it is cheap quick and justice is seen to be done. With this P.C. Crew that are running the show the whole affair is clanging to an expensive halt. The fact is that you are not going to get justice because these people who do the judgeing forget that people come before the courts because Their broke the law, reneged on their obligations to society. They broke one of the modern versions of the 10 commandments The Judges now don't ask did he break the law not fulfill his obligation to society but was his human rights abused which is a totally different thing. Here is a classical example out of the papers today


Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe is making a legal bid for freedom on the grounds his human rights have been infringed, it emerged yesterday.
The 61-year-old, who butchered 13 women and tried to kill at least seven more during a five-year reign of terror, believes he is sane and should be released from Broadmoor top security hospital.
In an extraordinary twist, he is being represented by a female lawyer, Saimo Chahal, who will argue that the Home Office disregarded his human rights because they failed to fix a tariff for his sentence.

They don't ask the simple question does this make sense?This they can't do because they always talk in jargonese which changes every week and therefore they don't understand it. Here by the way is a classic piece of drivel I found today, I have to laugh because if I didn't I would weep


Deputy Chief Constable Ian Learmonth of Norfolk Police said:
“We work to very high standards and will not tolerate any attempts to falsify crime figures”.
“The constabulary has one of the best-resourced teams of crime recording auditors in the country - a team of three people dedicated solely to monitoring the ethical recording of crime in the county”
“This demonstrates our commitment to accurate and ethical crime recording processes and it is these processes that lead to accurate data.

All that to tell you that they have got three people who can fill forms in correctly. I should bloody well hope so

Posted by: Holger Dansker [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 5:34 PM

Wishbone.....
'you go back to realty and deal with it'...you guys are doing a great job. I would love to see what your procedure on 'dealing with it' and how far your 'realty is from fantasy'.

Posted by: alaskan1000 [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 9:02 PM

If I were one of Rev Scully's parishioners I would be urging him to do a good solid course in some form of *serious* unarmed combat training - any one of the following - wing chun kung fu, jiu jitsu/ judo, karate, tae kwon do, krav maga.

Further training on how to deal with an attacker who has a knife or a gun would also be useful. In fact: every able bodied male and female in the parish should be taking such instruction!

Oh - and install security cameras so that, in case the jihad-minded thugs try it on again, but get soundly defeated by a skilled-up priest, and start wailing about 'racism' and 'unprovoked attack', footage can be replayed to show clearly *who* started things.

I recall being told that the true martial arts masters usually spot trouble coming and evade it; if unable to evade, the chief aim is to damage the attackers enough to be able to escape.

Had this priest had kung fu training, his wannabe attackers would have been down on the ground, one, two, three, in short order, and the priest would have made his escape unscathed.

I think it's about time the jihadi thugs started encountering the strong right arm of the LORD.

Posted by: dumbledoresarmy [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 14, 2008 11:45 PM

dumbledoresarmy

I always like your posts :)

The tragedy here is the fact that a minister/reverend of the church, any church, any religion shouldn't have to learn these things.

Bad sign of the times.


Men of religion, in the past, were afforded respect even if they were not of your faith.


Most religions preach non-violence. Sadly there is one that does not :(

Posted by: Gramfan [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 15, 2008 4:25 AM

Here is the video clip that Borg tried to post of Abu Izzadeen and his friends intimidating the police.

Posted by: watling [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 15, 2008 6:25 AM

".....if only they did something about it"

This begs the more biting response:

".....if only they had a table tennis club"

Pat Condell, Appeasing islam

The small "i" in islam is not an error. I have too much respect for the word "Appeasing".

Posted by: concerned [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 15, 2008 10:36 AM

".....if only they did something about it"

This begs the more biting response:

".....if only they had a table tennis club"

Pat Condell, Appeasing islam

The small "i" in islam is not an error. I have too much respect for the word "Appeasing".

Posted by: concerned [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 15, 2008 10:36 AM

It has been said:"First the Saturday people than the Sunday people(Christians)." The Muslims make it clear that they are after every non-Muslim.Who else,but,a cleric would be a good target. Not that these Muslims don't care who it is they hurt or kill. They do a good job of killing there own.
Sadly,Eurabia is being current parlance. The Brits seem to bend over backwards to be PC.I can see the Queen in a shador!
An old rabbi was being harassed by Muslim thugson a subway. They kept saying: Allah AchBar. One of the thugs had to get off the subway train. He went to the street and was hit by a car. Seems to me that they should be saying Allah achCar. Bad joke,but,I think Allah is telling them something.

Posted by: shalom2u [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 15, 2008 7:44 PM

Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


Web Site Counter