![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
With opposition from the Sharia Committee. "MPS say: no to genital mutilation, 18 is minimum marriage age, juveniles cannot be punished as adults," by Kawkab Al-Thaibani for the Yemen Times, June 24 (thanks to Morgaan Sinclair):
SANA'A, June 24 — A two-day workshop in Parliament concluded that the minimum marriage age in Yemen should be 18, and the sponsors of both brides and grooms should be punished if they allow them to marry under this age. [...]They further recommended laws banning female genital mutilation.
The workshop covered three main areas: the criminality of juveniles, female genital mutilation, and the minimum age of marriage. These three subjects were chosen because the existing laws concerning them are not specific enough and are often ignored.
This workshop was arranged by Parliament, the Higher Council for Motherhood and Childhood, and the Yemeni Network Combating Violence Against Women known as SHIMA, under the sponsorship of the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), OXFAM International, and Save the Children, a worldwide children's rights organization. Attendees included members of the Sharia Committee, who matches the constitutional laws with Islamic sharia law, Parliament members (MPs), doctors and human rights activists.
“The main purpose of the workshop is to amend the laws that did not provide protection to children,” said Naseem Ur-Rehman, UNICEF's communications director.
Ur-Rehman said that he heard about Nojoud Al-Ahdal Nasser, the young girl who went to court to ask for a divorce from her almost 30-year-old husband. He added that there are many cases like Nojoud's which go unnoticed. “We want to end the silent suffering,” he told the attendees.
In April, after Nojoud’s case was published in news sources around the world, the Safe Maternity Act presented by the health committee failed to pass in Parliament. The act included a minimum age of 18 for marriage, punishment for families who marry their children off earlier and a ban on genital mutilation. The Sharia Committee refused the act because they said that the minimum age for marriage in Islam is not definite. [...]
The suggestion to specify the marriage age faced more objections than the other two subjects addressed during the workshop. Specifically, the Sharia Committee found it difficult to define a specific minimum age of marriage. Hassan Al-Sheikh, a scholar and Sharia Committee member, said that he was confused after what he heard in the workshop. “I am afraid that if we stop early marriage, we could create troubles for young people,” said Al-Sheikh.
Jabr Abdullah, a religious scholar, said that the ability to have sex could start from the age of nine.
Gee, where did he get that idea?
Law professor Ali Hassan Al-Sharafi told the scholars that nothing in the proposal should worry them. He mentioned two main things about adopting a minimum age for marriage. First, he pointed out the dispute among Islamic scholars about the acceptability of early marriage. “This is a good thing to use in our favor; we should consider the most suitable opinion,” said Al-Sharafi. He added that in Islam, there are things considered mobah [neither forbidden nor obligated], which he said would include creating a minimum age for marriage.The attendees objected to the current law that states that the young girl can be married if she is ready for sex. Attendees said that readiness is not measurable, and that young girls are vulnerable to exploitation.
Scholar Al-Rukaihi said that he was really moved when he understood the negative health impacts of early marriage brought up during the workshop, such as obstetric fistula [a common ailment among child brides who give birth that causes permanent incontinence and physical pain]. “Honestly, I was affected by what I saw,” he said.
Another attendee, Huda Al-Yafe’i, the head of the orphan sector in Al-Saleh Social Foundation for Development, said that legislators have to differentiate between early marriage and early pregnancy. “As a teacher, I have seen many girls who go astray and to stop them from marrying is not good.”
Others objected to the idea of differentiating between early marriage and early pregnancy because to control that is not attainable, and marriage is not limited to pregnancy. PM Shawqi Al-Qadhi said that marriage is not only about sex, it is a whole new life for girls who are often unprepared for its stresses.
Attendee Jamila Al-Ra’abi said that early marriage does not solve any problems, but rather creates more. “Early marriages makes lots of orphans, and causes a lot of pain for young mothers,” she said.
According to a study by the Gender Development Research and Studies Center in Sana’a University in 2005 early marriages trigger social, psychological and health problems like obstetric fistula, malnutrition, psychological trauma, maternal and child mortality. Early marriage also increases a girl’s vulnerability to domestic abuse by both the husband and her in-laws. Early marriage forces girls to drop out of school, which dramatically affects the country's development as a whole. Other groups like the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have also condemned the practice. [...]
Despite the fact that most of the PMs said that they did not believe that Yemenis perform female genital mutilation, the Health Survey of the Yemeni Family, conducted by the government in 2003, showed that over 21 percent of Yemeni women are exposed to this extremely harmful practice.
Yemen has five main governorates that still perform female genital mutilation: Hodeidah (97.3 percent), Mahrah (96.6 percent), Hadhramout (96.5 percent), Aden (82.2 percent), and Sana’a Capital Secretariat (45.5 percent).
“I do not think that genital mutilation is rampant, but it is neither forbidden nor an obligation and therefore it is acceptable if we stop doing it to prevent the damage,” said Al-Sheikh.
Genital mutilation has dangerous consequences for female reproductive health in both the short- and long-term, according to the UNFPA and the WHO, among a large number of non-governmental organizations.
Posted by Robert at June 26, 2008 5:39 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
“I do not think that genital mutilation is rampant"-
this when only 96% practice it? Is this guy a clown?
Posted by: sheik yer'mami
at June 26, 2008 7:44 AM
Well, sheik, if it was 96% of sparsely populated governates, then perhaps he might have a leg to stand on.
However, Hodeidah (Al Hudaydah) & Hadhramout both appear to be among the more highly-populated governates:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governorates_of_Yemen
(Yes, I know it's Wiki, but for stats such as populations figures it should be OK.)
Those poor women.
Posted by: Vee
at June 26, 2008 8:40 AM
Is this guy a clown?
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at June 26, 2008 7:44 AM
Well, yeah! Hello, sheik!
Posted by: darcy
at June 26, 2008 9:08 AM
Wait, I thought that FGM was an 'African Tradition' that has nothing to do with Islam, so why is it happening in Yemen?
Posted by: Abu Allah
at June 26, 2008 9:35 AM
Wait, I thought that FGM was an 'African Tradition' that has nothing to do with Islam, so why is it happening in Yemen?
Posted by: Abu Allah at June 26, 2008 9:35 AM
FGM IS an "African tradition." Virtually all African females, in all countries, no matter what their religion, are genitally mutilated. The misogynist African patriarchy is to blame for this crap "tradition." Read Jomo Kenyatta's chapter on FGM in "Facing Mt. Kenya." Kenyatta extols the practice and says it doesn't even hurt! Yeah right. Also read African-American writer Alice Walker's book on the subject called "Warrior Marks." She went to Africa and interviewed many victims of FGM in countries such as Senegal, The Gambia, and Burkina Faso. She utterly deplores, of course, the "tradition." The real purpose behind FGM is male control of female sexuality, not such stinking BS as "it makes them a woman" crap. The original male who thought up butchering female genitals hated females so much that there are no adequate words to convey this enormous, indescribable, hatred.
As for Islamic countries - yeah, they do it, too. I believe it's in a hadith where Mo the false prophet misogynist cautions of not cutting "too much." Gee, that was thoughtful! (sarcasm). Anyone who can locate this FGM hadith please do, I appreciate it.
Posted by: darcy
at June 26, 2008 10:47 AM
Info on obstetric fistulas can be found at
http://www.endfistula.org/q_a.htm
at June 26, 2008 10:51 AM
Somali women of Kenya, of which Hirsi Ali is one, endure the worst kind of FGC (Female Genital Cutting) called "Infibulation," or Type 3:
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=somali+women%2C+infibulation&fr=ace2&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8
Sudanese women also endure Infibulation.
Posted by: darcy
at June 26, 2008 10:58 AM
This is something for Western consumption. Some UN department with connection to world-bank funds must have promised funds in return for this talk-shop. Declarations of intent are not to be taken seriously.
No action will follow, just like in Egypt recently.
at June 26, 2008 11:28 AM
The Sharia Committee refused the act because they said that the minimum age for marriage in Islam is not definite.
this makes me wounder how many pedophiles are in that country?
at June 26, 2008 1:42 PM
This makes me wounder how many pedophiles are in that country?
Posted by: crusader at June 26, 2008 1:42 PM
Well, since it's A-OK to follow the "perfect" example of Mo, you can bet there are MANY.
at June 26, 2008 5:30 PM
'"I am afraid that if we stop early marriage, we could create troubles for young people," said Al-Sheikh.'
Meethinks the troubles caused would be for old men.
Posted by: CapitalistGig
at June 26, 2008 6:25 PM
Poor girls. Where are the womens' groups now? Oh yeah, they are too busy fighting for a few more cents on the dollar that is distorted on what they don't make over men.
As a women...I find that very offensive. Time to fight FGM NOW!
Posted by: diaphanous
at June 27, 2008 5:13 AM
Darcy - Senegal and Gambia are overwhelmingly Islamised. Senegal is 92 % Muslim; The Gambia is 88.8 % Muslim. Burkina Faso is 50 % Muslim.
Posted by: dumbledoresarmy
at June 28, 2008 1:18 AM
Darcy - Senegal and Gambia are overwhelmingly Islamised. Senegal is 92 % Muslim; The Gambia is 88.8 % Muslim. Burkina Faso is 50 % Muslim.
Posted by: dumbledoresarmy at June 28, 2008 1:18 AM
Hi dda.
Well, Alice Walker wrote her book back in 1992.
Still, it doesn't matter. Virtually ALL African females, *no matter what their religion*, have the cultural pressure to be circumcised. If they don't, no man will marry them, and they'll be outcasts from their tribe.
In Africa, the blame is not on Islam, but on the misogynist African patriarchy. FGM existed in Africa way before any Islam came there.
Really - get Alice Walker's book "Warrior Marks."
Posted by: darcy
at June 29, 2008 9:03 AM
darcy - I'm well aware that FGM is a pre-Islamic custom (e.g. that it's been seen on Egyptian female mummies).
But then Islam doesn't seem to have ever encountered a repressive, anti-woman custom that it didn't like...and seems to have made little effort to end this particular one.
Had Islam invaded and conquered China, rather than India, one wonders whether it would have seized upon, absorbed, and perpetuated, the foot-binding of little girls.
When you say 'virtually all African females' suffer FGM, do you mean that every single African woman, in every tribe, in every country in Africa, is subjected to it? Because the maps of its incidence, that I encountered on some of the links given in discussion threads on this topic, don't seem to say that; they seem to show that it is more prevalent in some countries, less prevalent in others.
I would hazard a guess that even if women 'of all religions' are currently subjected to it, it will be hardest to eradicate it among the Muslims, least difficult to eradicate it amongst the Christians.
at June 30, 2008 1:08 AM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)