![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88:
Narrated 'Ursa:The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
Posted by Robert at January 2, 2009 4:35 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
The perverted ideology of Islam and the sick child molesters the Mohammedans.
http://www.islam-watch.org/Amarkhan/Anal-Sex-Approved-by-Allah-Prohet-Muhammad.htm
at January 2, 2009 8:38 PM
"The Pedolphile Prophet", that's more like it.
Posted by: champ
at January 2, 2009 10:02 PM
Oops..."Pedophile"
Posted by: champ
at January 2, 2009 10:04 PM
He said islam approves of marriage with a one year old child. I'm sure she said yes when asked.
And the guy who was 80 married a 14 year old because he wanted children. Selfish. What happens to his kids and his young bride when he dies shortly? He should have had his kids with his other ten wives. So they would have a chance to grow up and know the father. The guy is now 84 and the child is maybe one year old. Heading for poverty and destitution.
And half the villagers have had a wife or daughter die because of marriage too young. And yet they continue. Why not, plenty more girls to be had, right? Move on. Just like buying a goat.
What a sick, selfish religion.
Posted by: Borg
at January 3, 2009 9:48 AM
Sick men in the West are marrying babies in mosques behind closed doors. Men go out and we think he is with his daughters, yet these girls are their wives. Satanic is Islam. Girls die and are enslaved inside of the minds of the women who have the vaginas cut out so the religion of the Arabs should be nailed inside of the brains of Africans who were created by Allah to be slaves to Arabs. Tabari 11:11. Notice, not one had a hadith. Qurans is evil Arab imperialism.
Posted by: tilly
at January 3, 2009 10:16 AM
From the video @ 3:45
Nigerian Imam Sani states:
“If the state government accepts it, there will be uprisings, there would be violence, I am sure there would be violence coming from the Muslims saying that “NO, we will not accept this. We would rather die than accept something which is not a law from allah. A law from you, allah gives us this freedom to marry at any age."
ISLAM . . . BELIEVE IT OR ELSE
Posted by: miira
at January 3, 2009 1:39 PM
One of the interesting things about this documentary, which went out on UK TV channel 4, the other night, is that the Iranian free-lancer who made it could not bear to mention that the southern half of Nigeria was predominantly Christian. On at least four occasions she indicated that the resistance to implementing the new minimum marriage age laws was a problem in the north 'where islam is strong.' At no point did she mention Christianity being strong in the south. Why not? I honestly think it would have stuck in her Muslim throat.
Ramita Navai did not avoid the fact that it was islamic leaders who were defended the appalling state of affairs concerning underage marriage but he did not explore the fact that the religion sanctions it to any great extent. The relatively 'liberal' mulllah she gave the greatest time to expressed the opinion that Islam's commitment to the health and welfare of Muslims trumped its allowing of underage marriage. I'm unaware of this rationalist approach being particularly widespread or acceptable in pious Muslim circles. She was keen to stress it was as much a cultural phenomenon as much as anything else, one preserved by conservative religious groups, leaving the question of whether it was a problem with the religion itself solely in the hands of the above mentioned mullah.
She also failed to mention that it is a problem in many Islamic countries, giving the impression that it was a local northern Nigerian issue. Just focusing on the problem of the fistulas associated with immature girls going through childbirth: this is a serious health issue in Yemen as well. I wouldn't be surprised if it was also common throughout the sahel.
One disturbing thing about the documentary was the way that it showed how these apparently emancipated and westernised, Muslim female journalists, while attempting to draw attention to problems in the Muslim world, carry out a damage limitation exercise as far as islam itself is concerned. It's something noticeable with several of them who appear on British TV current affairs programmes.
Posted by: wallyUK
at January 3, 2009 6:44 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)