Recently in immigration Category

But the Tsarnaev brothers were A-OK. "Pakistani doctor who helped get Bin Laden was denied asylum in U.S., report reveals," by Sib Kaifee for FoxNews.com, May 17:

The jailed doctor who helped the U.S. track down Usama bin Laden was convicted by a tribal court on bogus charges, according to a classified Pakistani government report.

Portions of the voluminous 357-page Abbottobad Commission Report, which has yet to be made public and were obtained exclusively by Fox News, acknowledge Dr. Shakil Afridi’s conviction last year by a government-sponsored Jirga has undermined Pakistan’s credibility. The report calls for Afridi to be given a new trial.

The report also claims Afridi joined the CIA search for Bin Laden five years ago, while he was staying in the U.S. with a cousin. According to the report, Afridi applied for asylum after a terrorist group, Lashkar-e-Islam, stepped up its operations in Pakistan's lawless tribal belt.

Afridi was reportedly kidnapped by the group in 2008 and released after his family paid a $10,000 ransom. After helping the CIA pinpoint the terror mastermind just prior to the 2011 raid in which Navy SEALs killed Bin laden, Afridi was arrested and convicted by the tribal court of colluding with Lashkar-e-Islam.

The State Department declined to comment on the report's claims that Afridi had applied for asylum while staying in the U.S.

The commission report acknowledges Afridi was subjected to harsh treatment in prison, and moved several times to various undisclosed locations by Pakistan’s spy agency. His Pakistani handlers also note his incarceration for a year without judicial process was unfair, according to the report.

In a telephone interview with Fox News last year, Afridi recounted his ordeal in prison.

“My clothes were removed and I was forced by a major to wear old dirty torn rags of an army conductor," Afridi said. "It was difficult to eat food. I had to bend down on my knees to eat with only my mouth, like a dog. I sat on the floor.”

Afridi said he was blindfolded for eight months, and handcuffed with his hands behind his back for a year.

Afridi, who helped confirm the Al Qaeda leader’s presence in an Abbottabad compound, lived for a short period in San Francisco in 2009, according to the report.

“He came to meet my brother and mother, who was not well at that time,” Afridi’s first cousin, a Californian resident and student based in Los Angeles, told FoxNews.com.

It was around that time that Afridi first agreed to work for the CIA, the report said. The deal helped lead to Bin Laden’s death in 2011, and netted Afridi a mere $13,000, according to his statement documented in the report.

Afridi is currently serving a 33-year jail term, and is appealing his conviction. The U.S. has called for Afridi's release, but his supporters say the Obama administration has not done enough to press for his freedom....

Indeed not.

"Mass immigration is making reluctant racists of us all." Yet while Jane Kelly speaks of other problems of mass immigration in this article, mostly it is about how mass Muslim immigration into Britain is transforming British society, and making native English people strangers in their own neighborhoods. I called for an end to immigration from Muslim countries into non-Muslim countries in my book 2008 book Stealth Jihad, and then as now the recommendation was dismissed as "racist."

But Islam is not actually a race, and the problem Kelly delineates in this article are not actually race-based, despite her self-designation as a "reluctant racist." The problem is that Sharia contains numerous elements that are incompatible with the basic principles of free societies, and Kelly is confronted by them several times: the calls for her to cover up, the ban on alcohol on the street, etc. If Britain does not recover the will to enforce its own laws on its own streets, and to demand that all immigrants and native-born Muslims obey them even where they conflict with Sharia, then Britain will be lost, and will certainly become a Sharia state. For the influx of immigrants has not stopped, and no one is calling on them to adopt the customs and mores of their new country.

"'I feel like a stranger where I live,’" by Jane Kelly in the Telegraph, January 29 (thanks to Jamal):

"When you go swimming, it’s much healthier to keep your whole body completely covered, you know.” The Muslim lady behind the counter in my local pharmacy has recently started giving me advice like this. It’s kindly meant and I’m always glad to hear her views because she is one of the few people in west London where I live who talks to me.

The streets around Acton, which has been my home since 1996, have taken on a new identity. Most of the shops are now owned by Muslims and even the fish and chip shop and Indian takeaway are Halal. It seems that almost overnight it’s changed from Acton Vale into Acton Veil.

Of the 8.17 million people in London, one million are Muslim, with the majority of them young families. That is not, in reality, a great number. But because so many Muslims increasingly insist on emphasising their separateness, it feels as if they have taken over; my female neighbours flap past in full niqab, some so heavily veiled that I can’t see their eyes. I’ve made an effort to communicate by smiling deliberately at the ones I thought I was seeing out and about regularly, but this didn’t lead to conversation because they never look me in the face.

I recently went to the plainly named “Curtain Shop” and asked if they would put some up for me. Inside were a lot of elderly Muslim men. I was told that they don’t do that kind of work, and was back on the pavement within a few moments. I felt sure I had suffered discrimination and was bewildered as I had been there previously when the Muslim owners had been very friendly. Things have changed. I am living in a place where I am a stranger.

I was brought up in a village in Staffordshire, and although I have been in London for a quarter of a century I have kept the habit of chatting to shopkeepers and neighbours, despite it not being the done thing in metropolitan life. Nowadays, though, most of the tills in my local shops are manned by young Muslim men who mutter into their mobiles as they are serving. They have no interest in talking to me and rarely meet my gaze. I find this situation dismal. I miss banter, the hail fellow, well met chat about the weather, or what was on TV last night.

More worryingly, I feel that public spaces are becoming contested. One food store has recently installed a sign banning alcohol on the premises. Fair enough. But it also says: “No alcohol allowed on the streets near this shop.” I am no fan of street drinking, and rowdy behaviour and loutish individuals are an aspect of modern British ''culture’’ I hate. But I feel uneasy that this shopkeeper wants to control the streets outside his shop. I asked him what he meant by his notice but he just smiled at me wistfully.

Perhaps he and his fellow Muslims want to turn the area into another Tower Hamlets, the east London borough where ''suggestive’’ advertising is banned and last year a woman was refused a job in a pharmacy because she wasn’t veiled.

On the other hand, maybe I should be grateful. At least in Acton there is just a sign in a shop. Since the start of the year there have been several reports from around London of a more aggressive approach. Television news footage last week showed incidents filmed on a mobile phone on a Saturday night, in the borough of Waltham Forest, of men shouting “This is a Muslim area” at white Britons.

The video commentary stated: “From women walking the street dressed like complete naked animals with no self-respect, to drunk people carrying alcohol, we try our best to capture and forbid it all.”

Another scene showed hooded youths forcing a man to drop his can of lager, telling him they were the “Muslim patrol” and that alcohol is a “forbidden evil”. The gang then approached a group of white girls enjoying a good night out, telling them to “forbid themselves from dressing like this and exposing themselves outside the mosque”.

Worse, though, is film footage from last week, thought to have been taken in Commercial Street, Whitechapel, which showed members of a group who also called themselves a “Muslim patrol” harassing a man who appeared to be wearing make‑up, calling him a “bloody fag”. In the video posted on YouTube last week, the passer-by is told he is “walking through a Muslim area dressed like a fag” and ordered to get out. Last Thursday, police were reported to have arrested five “vigilantes” suspected of homophobic abuse....

There are other “cultural differences” that bother me, too. Over the past year I have been involved in rescuing a dog that was kept in a freezing shed for months. The owners spoke no English. A Somali neighbour kept a dog that he told me he was training to fight, before it was stolen by other dog fighters. I have tried to re-home several cats owned by a family who refuse to neuter their animals, because of their religion.

In the Nineties, when I arrived, this part of Acton was a traditional working-class area. Now there is no trace of any kind of community – that word so cherished by the Left. Instead it has been transformed into a giant transit camp and is home to no one. The scale of immigration over recent years has created communities throughout London that never need to – or want to – interact with outsiders.

It wasn’t always the case: since the 1890s thousands of Jewish, Irish, Afro-Caribbean, Asian and Chinese workers, among others, have arrived in the capital, often displacing the indigenous population. Yes, there was hateful overt racism and discrimination, I’m not denying that. But, over time, I believe we settled down into a happy mix of incorporation and shared aspiration, with disparate peoples walking the same pavements but returning to very different homes – something the Americans call “sundown segregation”.

But now, despite the wishful thinking of multiculturalists, wilful segregation by immigrants is increasingly echoed by the white population – the rate of white flight from our cities is soaring. According to the Office for National Statistics, 600,000 white Britons have left London in the past 10 years. The latest census data shows the breakdown in telling detail: some London boroughs have lost a quarter of their population of white, British people. The number in Redbridge, north London, for example, has fallen by 40,844 (to 96,253) in this period, while the total population has risen by more than 40,335 to 278,970. It isn’t only London boroughs. The market town of Wokingham in Berkshire has lost nearly 5 per cent of its white British population.

I suspect that many white people in London and the Home Counties now move house on the basis of ethnicity, especially if they have children. Estate agents don’t advertise this self-segregation, of course. Instead there are polite codes for that kind of thing, such as the mention of “a good school”, which I believe is code for “mainly white English”. Not surprising when you learn that nearly one million pupils do not have English as a first language.

I, too, have decided to leave my area, following in the footsteps of so many of my neighbours. I don’t really want to go. I worked long and hard to get to London, to find a good job and buy a home and I’d like to stay here. But I’m a stranger on these streets and all the “good” areas, with safe streets, nice housing and pleasant cafés, are beyond my reach. I see London turning into a place almost exclusively for poor immigrants and the very rich.

It’s sad that I am moving not for a positive reason, but to escape something. I wonder whether I’ll tell the truth, if I’m asked. I can’t pretend that I’m worried about local schools, so perhaps I’ll say it’s for the chance of a conversation over the garden fence. But really I no longer need an excuse: mass immigration is making reluctant racists of us all.

500 Muslim youths riot in Gothenburg, Sweden, to protect honour against sexual rumours
by Birger Silfverströhm

An enraged mob of young immigrants wanted to beat up a 17-year-old girl for spreading sexual rumors on the Internet. This led to violence and vandalism, and police are now looking for a gunman, who was seen in connection with the riots.

It should have been the beginning of a peaceful Christmas Holiday at a Swedish high school in Gothenburg.

Instead, the school is now guarded by riot police.

Yesterday a furious mob consisting of 500 young immigrants wanted to beat up a 17-year-old girl who had spread sex rumors and photos of hundreds of underage girls and boys on the Internet.

500 youths of predominantly Arab and North African origin in Gothenburg, Sweden

"The one who started this wants chaos. I think it will end with violence," a 22-year-old man in Gothenburg told a newspaper.

And he was right.

Should be caught and beaten

The images and texts that the girl had uploaded triggered rage and a cry for vengeance.

On Facebook, people were urged to gather at the high school, Plusgymnasiet, where the 17-year-old is a student. Here they wanted to beat her up.

The call was heard, and before authorities had time to do anything, there were hundreds of aggressive youths gathered in front of the school.

When the police finally arrived, they had stones and bottles thrown at them, and they had to withdraw. Finally, at the second attempt, the police managed to get through the crowd.

Gothenburg riots: Police on the run...

After that the school was barricaded, and the 17-year-old hidden in the school's basement.

Police looking for gunman

Frustration over not getting to the girl led the lynch mob to vandalize the surroundings. Cars, light poles and other public fixtures were destroyed.

Two people, including a young girl, have also been attacked. The girl was chased in the street until she fell and then was kicked by a large group of outraged people.

Youths of Arab and North African origin beat up teen girl in broad daylight

Witnesses also explained to the police that they saw a gunman during the riots.

In Sweden, where weapons are flooding the streets, the police take this kind of information seriously.

Took shelter in stores

The police had to use horses and dogs to get the group away from the high school.

When they finally succeeded, the group went off to a nearby shopping mall.

Here they threatened shopkeepers and customers, who fled into different shops. Shortly afterward, the police arrived and shut down the whole mall.

New calls for violence

A total of 27 people were arrested during Tuesday's riots.

But it may be just the beginning.

The people who want to get hold of the 17-year-old have not given up. They created a new Facebook group, in which people are encouraged to gather at the school again on Wednesday.

The police are now strongly present in the center of Gothenburg. Plusgymnasiet, which was about to prepare for Christmas, remains closed. The same goes for at least one other of the city's high schools.

Showdown between immigrants

Everything indicates that the hostilities are an internal migrant showdown. The 17-year-old girl has, according to the information available, a Bosnian background.

She created a profile on the Internet where she uploaded more than 200 photos of underage girls and boys, which she, among other things, called 'whores'. She also wrote that they had had sex with other named individuals.

Additionally she called for others to post pictures of individuals, who in their opinion deserved to be exposed as ”whores”.

The 17-year-old has subsequently written that the exposure made some of the girls threaten to take their own lives.

When the girl’s identity was revealed, she chose to disclose the names of those who had sent pictures to her.

But her attempt to deflect attention away from herself failed.

Instead, it made everybody turn against her. The girl is now under arrest and in the custody of Swedish police."

The Swedish newspaper The Local's de-ethnified article: Swedish teens riot over Instagram sex rumours.

At the end of the day we can only have one big wish: that all beings are happy and free from suffering. That people are free from fear and experience the happiness and love that they are looking for. That they are able to fill their lives with meaning and joy by doing good and avoiding harming others.

Criticizing Islam and Muslim culture is like shooting fish in a barrel, but we are not intellectual sadists. We do it for the good of all parties. You can hate the system, but when it comes to living people, you can only wish them good. Systems can be evil, but when people do things that they think will bring them happiness but which actually result in the opposite, they are obviously confused. People act the way they feel, and bad actions are therefore first of all motivated by unpleasant inner states. When people are not able to learn from their own mistakes and therefore react on their self-inflicted pain in destructive ways -- increasing the problems that their actions were meant to solve -- we can only wish them more happiness and understanding of how they create their o.

It is compassion when we try to stop a tradition that forces people to do things that harm themselves and others, setting them on a spiraling journey towards still more unpleasant inner and outer experiences and increasingly drastic attempts to rid themselves from these experiences. No wonder why Islam and so many Muslims completely gave up showing and talking about happiness and love in this life. Also no wonder how the lack of insight into the cause and effect has formed the basis for the Muslims' world famous embarrassing victim mentality.

All this does not mean that we should just sit down and cry for the billions of suppressed Muslim women and their aggressive, insecure and humorless men. This does not mean that we should not defend ourselves using physical force. Sentimentality and pacifism saves nobody when it comes to physical danger. What it means is that we can not hate the human enemies of our values and way of life. It means that we do not need the unpleasant feeling of anger to protect our constitutions, borders, societies and culture.

No religion and no welfare state -- no matter how all-encompassing -- makes men and women not responsible for their own actions or inaction. As citizens in a living democracy, we are a direct cause for the conditions of future generations. Our final goal is to liberate Muslims from their criminal, violent and psychologically harmful religion so that they can start behaving in ways that fill their lives with the contentment and love that they have come to believe only exists after death -- and many therefore are ready to kill themselves to achieve. Until that happens -- if it happens -- Muslim immigration will only be harmful on all areas and levels. Introducing the same strict immigration rules as most Muslim countries have will probably not diminish their happiness much, since they seem to be exactly as dissatisfied here as in their home countries -- probably because human values and mental habits are more important that welfare when it comes to quality of life.

Regarding those who are already here, the only win-win solution is that lack of integration (language, job, abiding the law, accepting no special religious treatment) is so unpractical and economically non-beneficial that the only attractive option is state-paid repatriation to one's family's home country.

Being informed -- sources like JihadWatch.org, TheReligionOfPeace.com, EuropeNews.dk and Dispatch International are healthy antidotes to the ignorant and lying politicians and mainstream media -- and with compassion as our basis, we can push as hard as we want to, causing only a minimum of necessary or unavoidable damage.

We live as freely as we do because common people before us bravely stood up against tyranny. Now it is our turn. Standing by our freedom and values, we can win. In the end, an awakened, self-aware and educated democracy governed by free people is (probably) stronger than hordes of inbred followers of any crazy god or prophet.

Obviously Mercer meant those Middle Easterners who enter the country illegally from Mexico, not all Middle Easterners who come to the United States. And so the uproar is clearly a cynical orchestrated hit for political purposes, like virtually all of the shock and outrage that the Left generates for supposed "gaffes" by figures on the Right.

After all, why exactly are Middle Easterners sneaking in to the U.S. from Mexico? It isn't as if it's difficult in this Age of Obama for Muslims to get refugee status in the U.S. As Pamela Geller noted here: "Christians are in imminent danger across the world, and yet they are being refused refugee status, while Muslim refugee immigration goes on unimpeded. U.S. policy regarding refugee resettlement would shock most Americans if they only knew. The United Nations picks who gets to come to the U.S. as a refugee. The mandate of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) is to determine which of the world’s huddled masses comes to the U.S. as humanitarian refugees. And predictably, this U.N. body is favoring Muslims. Christians from Muslim lands are being refused refugee status."

That being the case, it is more than passing strange that any Middle Easterners at all are crossing illegally into the U.S. from Mexico. And the fact that they do so does raise legitimate questions about their motives.

"Arizona Republican's 'Middle Easterners' comments spark debate," by Tim Gaynor for Reuters, August 29 (thanks to Trita Parsi):

(Reuters) - Remarks by a conservative Arizona Republican Congressional candidate that Middle Easterners' "only goal in life is to cause harm to the United States" have landed her in the midst of a dispute over whether the comments amount to hate speech.

Tea Party-backed Gabriela Saucedo Mercer, who was born in Mexico and is a naturalized U.S. citizen, won the Republican primary on Tuesday to run in an Arizona Congressional district that flanks the border in southern Arizona. She faces Democrat Raul Grijalva, a five-term incumbent, in the November general election.

Grijalva sparked the debate Tuesday when he circulated a video in which the Republican tells an interviewer that authorities in the previous year nabbed 25,000 illegal immigrants who were other than Mexican nationals.

"That includes Chinese, Middle Easterners. If you know Middle Easterners, a lot of them they look Mexican or like a lot of people in South America - dark skin, dark hair, brown eyes, and they mix in," she said in the interview, recorded last year by WesternFreePress.com.

"And those people, their only goal in life is to cause harm to the United States, so why do we want them here, either legally or illegally?" she said....

Grijalva, a long-term opponent of the immigration crackdown, issued a news release on Tuesday denouncing what he called Mercer's "reckless hate speech" and urged everyone who endorsed Mercer to "withdraw their support immediately."

"This is not a he-said, she-said question of interpretation. Her comments are reprehensible and deserve condemnation from every quarter. Anyone who continues to support her campaign should be asked whether they want someone with her views in Congress," he said in a statement.

[Muslim Brotherhood-linked] Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim American elected to Congress, said he was "disappointed" in Mercer's "decision to inject division and fear" into the Congressional race.

The American-Arab Anti Discrimination Committee, a non-sectarian civil rights and civil liberties group, also weighed into the debate, slamming Mercer's choice of words, which it said "once again exemplifies the bigotry and racism rampant within the Republican party, and politics as a whole."

The nonprofit group called on Republican party leaders, including presidential candidate Mitt Romney, to condemn her remarks and "move away from the politics of hate and fear."

A call to Mercer seeking comment was not immediately returned on Wednesday. In comments reported by the Arizona Daily Star newspaper, she said the video was edited to be misleading and took her comments out of context.

"He (Grijalva) must be scared or something," the newspaper reported Mercer saying at a primary-election night party on Tuesday. "The tactics he's using to smear me as a racist are unconscionable."

And it would be "Islamophobic" to close this loophole, of course. "Polygamous immigrant families to be paid more benefits after Government blunder," by Martin Robinson and Kirsty Walker in the Daily Mail, July 30 (thanks to Kenny):

Immigrants with more than one wife will qualify for extra benefits under reforms to Britain’s welfare system, after an attempt to crack down on the problem backfired.

Polygamous marriages, largely confined to Muslim families, are only recognised in Britain if they took place in countries where they are legal.

Currently, any additional wives can receive reduced individual income support, meaning the husband and his first wife are paid up to £111.45.

Subsequent spouses living under the same roof receive around £40. Under the new system of Universal Credit, which comes in next year, polygamous marriages will not be recognised at all.

Ministers pledged to end the ‘absurd’ benefits regime which has seen multiple wives allowed to claim extra welfare payments.

But a House of Commons Library paper has highlighted a loophole in the rules which will allow additional wives to claim a full single person’s allowance, currently worth up to £71, while the original married couple will still get a married couple’s allowance.

The paper said: ‘Treating second and subsequent partners in polygamous relationships as separate claimants could mean that polygamous households receive more under Universal Credit than under the current rules.’

The Department for Work and Pensions admitted the loophole but said there were fewer than 50 polygamous families claiming benefits.

The first Asian woman to receive a peerage, Baroness Flather, has spoken out widely on the issue of polygamous families claiming benefits.

There are around 1,000 polygamous homes in Britain, the majority of which are Muslim

'Under Islamic Sharia law, polygamy is permissible. So a man can return to Pakistan, take another bride and then, in a repetition of the process, bring her to England where they also have children together — obtaining yet more money from the state,' she wrote in the Mail last year.

'Because such Islamic multiple-marriages are not recognised in Britain, the women are regarded by the welfare system as single mothers — and are therefore entitled to the full range of lone-parent payments. We cannot continue like this....

No, but we will.

As JihadWatch has reported, 100 percent of convicted rapists in Oslo have non-Western background. According to the Oslo police, non-Western immigrants rape because they are brought up with a view of women that makes them more likely to become rapists. It would be more precise to say that they just follow their religion, which allows them to rape non-Muslim women.

In 2010, 51.5 percent of all convicted rapists had immigrant backgrounds:

Translated by Nicolai Sennels, BT July 22: "Every second convicted rapist has an immigrant background":

Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented among convicted rapists in Denmark. More than half of convicted rapists in 2010 have immigrant backgrounds, according to official data from Statistics Denmark. 32 ​​with a Danish background and 27 migrants and 7 descendants of immigrants, totaling 34, were convicted of rape in 2010. In the last seven years, more than one out of three convicted of rape was either an immigrant or a descendant of immigrants: 156 of the 450 convicted rapists since 2004 has an immigrant background. Immigrants and their descendants account for only ten percent of the Danish population.

Gratitude. "'Asylum-seeker' guilty of terror payments," from UPI, July 21 (thanks to Block Ness):

GLASGOW, Scotland, July 21 (UPI) -- A man who lived for more than a year in Scotland as an asylum-seeker was convicted Friday of using illegally obtained benefits to finance terrorism.

A jury in Glasgow found Nasserdine Menni guilty of sending money to Taimour Abdulwahab, who died in a bungled suicide bombing in Stockholm Dec. 11, 2010, The Herald of Glasgow reported. The verdict after an 11-week trial was "not proven" -- a verdict unique to Scotland that is legally the same as not guilty -- on a charge that Menni conspired to kill Swedish citizens.

Menni, who was also convicted of benefit fraud, is scheduled to be sentenced in August.

"Thank you very much, my Lord, for the justice in Scotland," he said as he was led out of the courtroom, addressing the judge.

Menni, an Algerian, and Abdulwahab, a Swedish citizen born in Iraq, got to know each other while working in an auto parts plant in Bedfordshire. Menni was living under an assumed name with false papers that identified him as French, investigators say....

...where, no doubt, they would get jobs and become stable, prosperous, law-abiding members of Italian society. "Italy: Imam and three Syrians arrested for people smuggling," from AKI, July 18 (thanks to Twostellas):

Venice, 18 July (AKI) - Police on Wednesday in northeast Italy arrested a radical imam and three Syrians suspected of belonging to a people trafficking gang that allegedly smuggled illegal immigrants to Italy from the Middle East.

Police believe the unnamed imam from San Dona' di Piave near Venice was funnelling cash from the people smuggling racket to international jihadist groups.

He was already known to to anti-terrorism investigators for his suspected links to such jihadist groups, police said.

The illegal migrants paid "large sums" to the gang to be smuggled into Italy, where some were employed off the books on building sites run by the imam and his brothers, according to police.

If the migrants baulked at paying the sums of money agreed with the gang to obtain working papers, they were threatened and assaulted, said police....

The immigration of non-Westerners, especially of Muslims, has proven to be an economic, social and safety catastrophe. The costs for social benefits and services to Muslim immigrants and their descendants is an unbearable millstone around the European economy's neck. Thousands of cities in Western Europe are cut in pieces by the Muslim parallel societies that are segregating when it comes to language, culture, laws and so some extent also economy. The growing amount of terror, violence and crime coming from this specific population are changing the very basis of our civilized societies: feeling and being safe.

As the resistance against Muslim immigration increases among the general public, politicians and undemocratic supranational institutions such as EU and UN constantly work to keep our national borders and social offices open. How can our rulers continue to be so stupid and proud to think that they can create success where everybody failed -- not just in the recent decades, but ever since the birth of Islam 1,400 years ago?

Immigration

Are our politicians stupider than the police allow, and should therefore be prosecuted? What if they already knew and know now that allowing Muslim immigration and the spread Islam is harmful for our national states?

The mass immigration of people from a hostile culture has changed and will change our societies and culture dramatically forever -- and not for the better. Should it be punishable for politicians to continue doing and allowing what obviously and objectively harms our countries? Well, the former Icelandic president Geir Haarde stood trial because of "gross negligence for failing to put financial safeguards in place".

Islam

The Quran and the hadiths, with their many verses telling Muslims to hate, harm and kill non-Muslims, and Islam's substitution of Sharia for democracy and human rights, are against our constitution. Organisations preaching these texts -- and the allowing of such organisations to exist -- is therefore already illegal in most countries. Yes, illegal. Will the bureaucrats, politicians and leaders within the police who gave these organisations permission to operate and who did not act against their obvious criminal activities be confronted with this in court one day?

Well, we will see. Surely several attempts will be made to hold them responsible for the Muslim and Islamic catastrophe that they created by looking away and not living up to their true responsibility.

Watch for much more of this kind of thing to come to cities all over America in the near future. "Nashville police file suit against Kurdish Pride gang members," by Brian Haas (What? Bob Smietana's Islamic supremacist masters wouldn't let him cover this story?) for The Tennessean, June 6:

Metro police on Tuesday filed a civil lawsuit to wrest control of an area in South Nashville from the clutches of the Kurdish Pride gang by banning members from congregating in a 1.47-mile “safety zone.”

The department is targeting 24 of what they call the “worst of the worst” members of the gang, hoping a judge will ban them from publicly gathering in a zone that encompasses part of an area known as Little Kurdistan and includes Paragon Mills and Providence Park. The injunction lawsuit is the fruit of a three-year effort to combat gangs for detectives to build their case and attorneys to try and bullet-proof it from legal challenges. The injunction is the first of its kind ever filed in Tennessee, but a tactic used successfully for years in other states like California.

“Our police department will not sit idly by when a street gang threatens the peace of our community,” said Metro Police Chief Steve Anderson at a news conference held in Paragon Mills, the site detectives say hosted Kurdish Pride gang meetings. “We want to give this park back to the citizens.”

Police say Kurdish Pride members were involved in at least one murder, multiple beatings and shootings, drug dealing, illegal weapons and vandalism. Incidents include the 2006 attempted murder of a Metro Parks Police officer and multiple graffiti messages threatening a Metro Police Gang Unit detective....

Only 43.3 percent of male Somali immigrants and 33 percent of female Somali immigrants in Denmark have a job. It is therefore fair to guess that social benefits from the Danish states finance terror against Denmark. On May 27, two Somali immigrants were arrested for planning terror against Denmark.

Translated from Danish by Nicolai Sennels, Jyllands-Posten, May 30: "Police: Danish millions pay terror":

Every day an average of between 27,000 and 55,000 Danish kroner (4,500 - 9,000 USD) is sent to terrorist organizations abroad, according to the Police Intelligence Service (PET). The donors do not necessarily know that they finance terror.

"It is not easy to find the exact amount of money spent on financing terrorism in Denmark, but it is PET's assessment that 10-20 million Danish kroners are transferred to terrorists annually. PET is working together with other authorities to address the transfer of funds to terrorism," said the head of PET, Jakob Scharf.

Jyllands-Posten recently described how Somali immigrants send large sums out of Denmark every year. ... Danish authorities have determined that 1.4 billion kroner (233 million USD) are sent from Somalis in Denmark to Dubai, from which the money is probably sent to Somalia.

Michael Coren interviews Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels on the four main psychological differences between Westerners and Muslims. Sennels explains that while most Westerners think that anger is a sign of weakness, Muslims are brought up to think that anger is a sign of strength. Among Westerners it is seen as a sign of strength if people are able to meet criticism calmly and with logical arguments and knowledge, while Muslims see it as honourable if they meet criticism with aggression and dramatic behaviour. Thirdly, Western culture teaches people that our lives are mainly guided by ourselves - the way we think, feel, our choices, way of relating to others etc. (so called 'inner locus of control'). Muslim culture on the other hand - with all its outer religious and cultural regulations and powerful male authorities and everything happening 'inshallah' - makes people feel that their lives are governed by outer factors and leaves very little freedom for individual choices and feeling of self-responsibility, resulting in the world-famous Muslim victim mentality. Finally, Westerners are brought up to think that it is 'good' to be open and tolerant and believe in the unconditional equality of all men and women regardless of gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc., while Muslims are taught that they are better, should have more rights, to follow the brutal and intolerant traditions in sharia, and are even destined to rule over non-Muslims.

Sennels also explains why Muslim integration in the West will never happen to the necessary extent: Either they see no reason to integrate, since the Muslim parallel societies and the Western welfare systems will take care of them anyway; or they are not allowed to by their Muslim family and surroundings; or they are not able to live up to the social and professional challenges of our civilized and high-tech knowledge societies.

Sweden's population grew from 9 million to 9.5 million in the years 2004-2012, mainly due to immigration from "countries like Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia". 16 percent of all newborns have mothers born in non-Western countries. Employment rate among immigrants: 54 percent. Price per young unaccompanied asylum seeker: up to 2,300 USD per day. 175,000 new asylum seekers and family reunifications are expected in 2012-2013, which is an extremely high number when compared to the size of the country's population. Magazines and newspapers remove the ability to comment on internet articles related to immigration.

This groundbreaking article was published in the national Danish newspaper Weekendavisen. Read it in order to see why Sweden is of utmost importance in understanding the present and increasing ethnic conflicts in Europe. Due to EU laws on open borders, Sweden - "Europe's sick man" - is a significant security risk to the rest of the union.

Translated by Nicolai Sennels from Danish: "Sweden is Changing", Weekendavisen May 5th 2012 (not online). The perfect storm:

Immigration. Sweden's population now numbers 9.5 million people. It was only eight years ago that the figure reached 9 million. Much of the population growth is due to family reunification for refugees who have obtained asylum. The population in Sweden has skyrocketed in recent years. Last week the Swedish population topped 9.5 million. Since August 2004, the population increased by 500,000. At the same time there has been a drastic demographic change in the composition of the population. The birth surplus for the period 2004-11 was, according National Swedish bureau of Statistics, Statistika Centralbyrån, approx. 137,000, of which mothers born in non-Western countries accounted for about 22,000 births. The rest of the increase in population is mainly due to immigration from non-Western countries, asylum seekers and family reunification from countries like Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia. Labour migration represents only a small part of the increase in this period. Working immigrants from around the world apart from the north were about 50,000 from 2004-2011. The number of permits to one of three forms of refugee status from 2004-11 amounted to almost 50,000, while the number of family reunifications was around 250,000. And the growth continues, especially from Somalia. This is because of a ruling in January from the Swedish Migration Court. The ruling means that it has become much easier for family members who find it difficult to prove their identity to be reunited with someone who is already in Sweden and has been granted asylum.

The decision affects not only Somalis, but in Somalia thousands of family members are already waiting to travel to Sweden, an article published by the Parliament states. The ruling thus annulled a decision a few years ago that put an end to family reunification for people whose identity could not be documented.

A passport can be difficult to obtain in the collapsed state of Somalia, and therefore the Migration Court reversed its decision in January. (Incidentally, according to the immigration authorities, Migrationsverket, in 2009 only 16 percent of asylum seekers carried any identity papers, and in only five percent of the cases was it a passport).

The expected large number of family reunifications has made the Swedish Migration Board apply for additional funding for administration, etc. This year it is applying for an additional 170 million Swedish kroner (24 million USD). It has applied for 341 million dollars for 2013-2014 (49 million USD). Migrationsverket total costs in 2012, including accommodation and food in the pre-asylum phase, is approx. 9 billion Swedish kroner (1.4 billion USD). In its latest Migrationsverket estimates, due to the new ruling of the Migration Court the number of family reunions in 2012 will increase by 18,500 and by 12,000 in 2013.

The total estimate for 2012 is 59,500 family reunions and 53,000 in 2013, which amounts to 112,500 family reunions 2012-2013.

Migrationsverket also expects, moreover, that the number of asylum seekers will increase as a consequence of the new rules. Migrationsverket expects that the milder requirements for identity papers will motivate more asylum seekers to go to Sweden because they know that it is possible for the rest of the family to follow if they are granted permanent residency.

Migrationsverket has increased its estimate of expected asylum seekers by 2,000. It now forecasts that 31,000 people will seek asylum in Sweden, both in 2012 and 2013, which amounts to 62,000 in two years. In 2011 29,600 people applied for asylum in Sweden, which makes Sweden (with its relatively small population) the fifth most popular country in the world among asylum seekers.

Altogether Migrationsverket expects approx. 175,000 new asylum seekers and family reunifications in the years 2012-2013. It is only a small proportion who are granted asylum.

A special phenomenon is the large number of unaccompanied refugee children travelling to Sweden. In 2010 and 2011 Sweden received a total of 5,050 young people who came to Europe. The largest group came from Afghanistan, followed by Somalia and Iraq. Britain, which receives the second largest number of unaccompanied refugee children, had 2,641 applicants, while Belgium had 1,941.

The figure last year was 2,657 in Sweden, of whom most were granted asylum. Subsequently they will be able to get family members to Sweden by using the family reunification rules.

In Denmark, approx. 160 unaccompanied children and adolescents under 18 years old were granted residence in 2011. In Finland, 150 unaccompanied children applied for asylum, which was half as many as in 2010.

Migrationsverket's expectation is that in 2012, 3,200 unaccompanied children and adolescents will arrive in Sweden, compared to, as mentioned, 2,657 in 2011.

The many unaccompanied children, mostly boys aged 15 to - allegedly - 17 years old, are causing problems for the Minister of Migration Tobias Billström (Conservative), because some municipalities have begun to refuse to receive more, although they are quite well paid from the state for each child they receive. The Minister of Migration therefore threatens to force municipalities to accept the young asylum seekers.

If they are under 18 years old, they have the right to live in a special home for young people, and they are entitled to a guardian. Many, however, seem to be over 18 years old, but Migrationverket's employees more or less have to take at face value what the unaccompanied children and young people themselves are saying.

Tobias Billström is now investigating how Denmark, Norway and Finland handle the problems with determining asylum seekers' age. He is quoted as saying that he would like to have joint Nordic procedures to determine the age of young asylum seekers. Denmark uses X-ray photos of the wrist and control of dental status. In 2009, 120 such studies were conducted in Denmark, and in 73 percent of the cases, the conclusion was that the person were older than 17 years. About the same figure is found in Norway and Finland in the cases where there has been age-studies.

According to a recent report by National Audit Office, Migrationsverket pays up to 16,000 Swedish kroner (2,300 USD) per person for each day an unaccompanied child asylum seeker lives in Sweden, including food and staffing, to municipalities that accept children.

The normal price is between 3,000 and 6,000 kroner (440 - 880 USD) per day, but last year Sigtuna municipality sent a bill for an average of 15,800 dollars per person per day. The high figure is partly because the municipality had committed to rental housing that was not used.

As mentioned, Billström has announced that he will force municipalities that refuse to take any more unaccompanied children and adolescents. Even if they are unaccompanied, a significant proportion also have friends or families in Sweden.

General Sören Häggroth from the Government Offices in Stockholm wrote last year in Dagens Nyheter that 55 percent of unaccompanied children who came sought residence in Malmö, and that the total cost is around two billion kroner per year (291 million USD).

In the previously mentioned report by the National Audit Office, it was also alleged that two thirds of all cases of citizenship administered by Migrationsverket department in Norrköping are decided by a single caseworker. The National Audit Office believes that this practice creates a risk of "undue influence and criminal act", meaning that the decisions can be influenced by threats to the individual employee or bribes. This must be taken into account, since it is not possible to revoke a granted citizenship.

The report therefore recommends that there be quality control of the cases.

Immigration puts a lot of financial pressure on the Swedish welfare model. It takes several years before the immigrants who are granted asylum or family reunification to become employed and self-supporting. The employment rate for persons born in Sweden is 68%, while it is 54% for people born outside Europe.

Employment rates are lowest for women, and Minister of Integration Erik Ullenhaug from the liberal People's Party announced last month that he plans to change the rules for maternity leave, the so-called parental insurance entitling to a total of 480 days leave during the child's first eight years of life.

These rules are enforced in a way that allows families coming to Sweden bringing children to be entitled to 480 days leave per child under eight years. Since the families often have several children, it may take several years before these women go to a language school, let alone take a job. Erik Ullenhaug believe that this is part of the cause of women's poor integration. Yet he has not made any specific proposal, but he's already been accused of discrimination for introducing special rules for immigrants.

It is remarkable that the great migration - more than any other Western country, measured in relation to its population - does not provoke a debate in Sweden about how much the country can accept and support, while ensuring a proper integration. Overall, Migrationsverket expects approx. 175,000 new asylum seekers and family reunifications in the two years 2012-13. Although not all are granted asylum, it will not take many years before Sweden has a population of more than 10 million people.

But even weak attempts to discuss these developments could easily cause the author to be called 'xenophobic' or 'racist '. Even though the immigration critical party, The Sweden Democrats, came into parliament in 2010, this tendency has not changed, although they try to raise the issue. Quite the contrary. Recently, the party was not allowed to have a debate in parliament about the large influx of unaccompanied asylum seekers.

In April 2012, a member of parliament from the Center Party, Staffan Danielsson, spoke out in Svenska Dagbladet:

'This issue is seldom discussed by the established parties. Of course I am for an open and generous immigration and refugee policy in Sweden, but I think it is legitimate to discuss why unaccompanied refugees into Europe so often choose to come to Sweden. We know that our resources for receiving them are constrained, and if developments in Afghanistan or Somalia go in the wrong direction, the influx could rise significantly.

I am convinced that it is important to have a calm and objective dialogue on the questions that I ask, and it will ultimately benefit the continued commitment to a high acceptance of refugee reception, rather than the opposite,' said Staffan Danielsson.

Last week also, the newspaper Dagens Nyheter gave space for a debate article by Danielsson.

The result was that Danielson was heavily criticized, including by his own party's spokesman in migration issues, Fredrik Federley. Federley said that if you had to discuss unaccompanied children, it should not include a discussion why there are so many who come to Sweden, but why there are not even more coming to other countries in Europe.

The Swedish media treats the issue very discreetly. The media are eager to avoid negative publicity on refugee / immigrant issues, according to the latest issue of the Swedish Journalists Federation magazine.

In this particular issue, several articles discuss how to avoid so-called net-hatred on media websites. If there is a possibility to comment on articles, there is a widespread tendency for people to discuss immigration issues. Therefore, many magazines and newspapers remove the ability to comment on stories related to the topic.

Actually it was a Moroccan imam who said that all Muslims should leave France. Dutch-language article here (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur).

Clearly Omar al-Haddouchi is a greasy Islamophobe, and probably a racist to boot.

Remember: under Barack Obama, Christians in imminent danger across the world are refused refugee status while Muslim refugee immigration goes unimpeded, as Pamela Geller documented here.

"Indonesian living in NJ church avoid deportation," by Samantha Henry for the Associated Press, April 6 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

HIGHLAND PARK, N.J.—Inside the New Jersey church where he now lives, Saul Timisela recounted Friday how as a Christian youth leader, he fled his native Indonesia after finding the desecrated corpse of his brother-in-law following an attack by anti-Christian extremists that destroyed their city.

Timisela, who has been ordered deported from the United States, has been given sanctuary by The Reformed Church of Highland Park, hoping that federal legislation sponsored by New York and New Jersey lawmakers will give him the chance to reapply for asylum.

"We're here (to) have a good life. We came to the U.S. to have a better life," Timisela told a group gathered at the church for an event marking Good Friday.

"This is not making up a story. This is the truth," he said, speaking through tears. "We're lucky we (didn't) get killed at that time," he added, referring to the burning of churches and other attacks on Christians on his native Ambon Island following the fall of longtime dictator Suharto in 1998. "God blessed us."

The 45-year-old Timisela and his wife have been sleeping in quarters he jokingly calls "5-star accommodations," in a small room within the church, with access to the church's cafeteria for meals. They don't travel outside church grounds, however, as another parishioner was picked up recently by immigration officials following a Sunday service. Two other Indonesian Christians facing deportation have since joined Timisela in the church, granted sanctuary by the Rev. Seth Kaper-Dale.

Ross Feinstein, a spokesman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said all three men have gotten final deportation orders. He said Timisela was first given the order in 2006 and offered voluntary departure but failed to leave. He was again ordered to surrender on March 1 of this year, but failed to do so, Feinstein said. Now Timisela is considered an immigration fugitive.

"Immigration fugitives -- individuals who ignore the direction of an immigration judge to depart the country -- are an enforcement priority for ICE," Feinstein said....

U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, who attended the event Friday and is sponsoring the bill, said hundreds of Indonesians fled the island nation between 1996 and 2003, when more than 1,000 churches were destroyed by anti-Christian extremists in the majority Muslim nation.

The U.S. government allowed many Indonesian Christians to come to America on tourist visas in the chaotic aftermath of the fall of the Suharto regime. Many worked, established lives in the U.S., and had American-born children.

Things changed after 9/11, however, when men between the ages of 16 and 65 who had entered the U.S. on temporary visas from predominantly Muslim nations were required to register with the U.S. government or be classified as terrorist fugitives.

Indonesians of all religions -- hailing from the world's most populous Muslim nation -- were required to register. Many did not expect to face deportation back to Indonesia as Christians facing persecution, but found themselves in legal limbo as they had surpassed the time limit for applying for U.S. asylum.

Maloney emphasized her bill would not grant them amnesty, but allow Indonesian Christians caught in that limbo to reapply for U.S. asylum.

"Americans of all faiths and creeds simply cannot stand by and watch these brave men and women be ejected wholesale from the United States due to a narrow reading of immigration law," Maloney said. "This is not the America we know and love."....

Around three quarters of Arab youth want to migrate to countries out of their region due to rising unemployment in Arab states, an Arab League official said.

Manama: Around three quarters of Arab youth want to migrate to countries out of their region due to rising unemployment in Arab states, an Arab League official said.

"Due to their poor participation in society and politics and to rising joblessness, 70 per cent of the Arab youth want to migrate out of the region," Khalid Al Wahishi, director of Population Policy and Immigration at Arab League, said.

Empower the youth

"We at Arab League have been warning member states at all our meetings to empower the youth. Unemployment, alarmingly high at 26 per cent, poor participation of youth and illiteracy are major hindrances to population policy development and implementation," Al Wahishi told delegates at a gathering of population experts from member-countries in Qatar.

The ratio of youth in the population of Arab countries is very high and requires efforts to empower them and raise their participation in politics, he said.

"The changes taking place in some Arab countries clearly show that it is the youth of these states who have played a leading role in the reforms movement," he said, quoted by Qatari daily The Peninsula on Tuesday.

Unemployment

According to the official, the Arab League has been arguing for several years that there was an urgent need to tackle the problems of unemployment in member-states and to empower the youth and raise their participation in society and politics.

The 13th meeting of the heads of national councils and committees of the population in Arab countries in Doha, opened on Monday, is bringing together delegates from Arab League and global agencies concerned with population to review the outcome of political and social developments, population and youth issues in Arab states.

The delegates will also discuss the demographic situation in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and review the activities of national population councils and committees in 2010.

Please pass this excellent idea on to your politicians:

"Western countries should reward immigrants for integration. The better the integration, the more rights to welfare and social benefits. Immigrants who become part of the community should also have the benefit of being part of it.

Language skills, education, participation at the labor market, adherence to the law and adequate support for one's children's education and their adherence to the law should give points.

Immigrants who can not fend for themselves nor earn enough points to get the community to take care of them should be offered financial help to return and rebuild in the home country (repatriation).

This is good pedagogy, healthy economy and logical immigration policy."

If he had timed it better, he could have gone shopping with Abu Qatada. A dismal update on this story. "Hate preacher wins human rights payout... even though he shouldn't be here at all," by Chris Greenwood and James Slack for the Daily Mail, October 1 (thanks to Twostellas):

A banned extremist who made a mockery of Britain’s border controls is now likely to pocket £5,000 in compensation because immigration officials could not speak his language.

The High Court ruled yesterday that Sheikh Raed Salah, described as a ‘virulent anti-Semite’ in the Commons, could claim compensation for unlawful detention by immigration officers.

They had seized the pro-Palestine hardliner – who should never have been allowed into Britain in the first place – to have him deported.

But immigration staff failed to explain to him ‘in a language he could understand’ precisely why he was being detained – a technical breach of the rules. The preacher cannot speak English and officials failed properly to translate what was happening, the court ruled.

As a result – even though the Home Secretary had legal powers to hold him – he was unlawfully detained for 34.5 hours, until proper explanations were given to him about what was happening in Arabic.

So, can an American arrange this free room and board and compensation? If they speak lots of "English" English? I've got my eye on some things in the Hammacher Schlemmer catalog...

At one stage, an immigration officer had tried to use an ‘app’ on his iPhone to give instructions to the extremist.

But he did not give Salah, 52, all the information required to make his detention lawful, Mr Justice Nicol decided.

Salah can now formally apply for taxpayer-funded compensation. The likely pay-out is between £4,000 and £5,000 – or about £150 for every hour he was held.

Michael Weiss, of the Henry Jackson Society think-tank, said the case was an ‘embarrassment’ for UK Border Agency officials.

‘I find it scandalous that someone like this is getting damages and is being paid with British taxpayers’ money,’ he said....

Western politicians are free to pick and chose -- or take them all:

Crime

The basic goal is to fight immigrant crime with all means possible.

1) Illegal immigration is, yes, illegal, and should be punishable.
2) Criminal immigrants without citizenship must be deported.
3) All who are voluntarily involved in the use of Sharia courts must be punished.
4) Law and order must be imposed by all means in areas where the country's laws are challenged by Sharia, high crime rates and resistance against authorities.
5) Religions and religious teachings that preach hate, suppression or violence must be outlawed.
6) Religious organisations must declare and be able to prove that they do not preach teachings or condone religious books that incite criminal acts.
7) Immigrants must at arrival declare that they will support the country's constitution and follow the country's laws.
8) A main function of the EU should be to protect Europe against illegal immigration.

Culture

The basic goal is to protect and support the country's original culture and values.

9) Immigration from non-Western countries must be stopped. Time-limited working contracts should still be allowed.
10) Religious buildings that do not belong to the country's original culture should not be dominant (no minarets, no loud calls to prayer).
11) Religious customs (e.g. Islamization) that are not connected with the country's original culture should not be allowed in the public sector.
12) The state should actively protect and support the country's culture and values.

Integration

The basic goal is to make the lack of will or ability to integrate so unpractical and economically non-beneficial that repatriation will be the only attractive option.

13) Immigrant women should be informed about their rights to divorce, women's shelters, family planning and police protection.
14) Immigrants should pay for their own integration programme. The programme should include education in democracy, human rights and women's rights. It should also include information about how to support one's children's integration and education.
15) Immigrants should pass tests on the language, history, and politics of their new country. Immigrants should pay all expenses for language training and examination.
16) Repatriation (state-paid emigration and resettlement) should be offered to all immigrants from non-Western countries.
17) Immigrants should be able to support themselves economically.
18) Immigrants should earn their right to free medical care, to economic support for education and to social benefits. Immigrants must pay their own interpreters.
19) Immigrants who do not speak the country's language at an acceptable level must pay for special education for their children, because the parents are not able to support the children's schooling.
20) Refugees should be offered safety, food and medical care in refugee camps close to their home country. A Western level of living standard in Western countries for refugees is far too expensive and not necessary.
21) The country should put a much greater effort in fighting benefit fraud and tax fraud (both of which are widespread among immigrants).
22) The country should improve possibilities for the protection of women and their children who are fleeing violent family members.
23) Immigrants should put down a large deposit when entering the country. The deposit will be used to pay fines, taxes, expenses in connection with deportation, etc., if the immigrant breaks the rules of the country.

More suggestions? Please send them to: nicolaisennels@gmail.com