Miss Kelly has sent me an email that she tells me was written by Karin Friedmann, aka Maria Hussain, and was sent out via the moderated Boston Muslim American Society/Islamic Society of Boston e-mail list, regarding the Boston mosque lawsuit:
Evidence: Frivolous Lawsuit was Aimed at Ethnic Intimidation
Boston–May 22, 2007–New court evidence reveals that David Project directors and several attorneys were planning to stop construction of the Roxbury Mosque.
One attorney suggested, “How about simply appealing the building permit and tying things up?”
“Ultimately our interest is based on the premise that”¦people in the ISB are supporters of terrorism and sworn enemies of America and Jews,” said real estate developer Steve Cohen.
The group decided to investigate potential parking violations and other legal technicalities.
On July 22, 2004 David Project director Anna Kolodner started panicking.
“The steel is going up on the Mosque,” she wrote to the group. “We need to have a plaintiff. This is a priority. Please contact any individuals that would consider this role and let us know.”
Using the lawsuit, Kolodner demanded records from the Boston Redevelopment Authority to use for negative publicity.
Realizing that few Americans could care less where the Islamic Society of Boston obtained their mortgage, Cohen discussed creating suspicion by using vague language to question the mosque’s non-criminal foreign “connections.”
“However, the First Amendment will bar any governmental action against the mosque based on these connections – not in the absence of incitement that might lead to “˜imminent action.” So all we are left with is a public relations campaign.”
This admission betrays a premeditated decision to incite hate by using “terrorist” as an ethnic slur to manipulate public sentiment, while their plaintiff sued the city for selling to Muslims.
“The suit itself will have to stick to the narrow constitutional issues, which have nothing to do with the terrorist connections,” Cohen continued. “However, the pr campaign surrounding the suit can strike a different chord: i.e. that the city of Boston should not be subsidizing a mosque or any organization with terrorist connections.”
“We will be much more effective if we let others ask this question than if we do so ourselves,” Cohen strategized.
On September 2, 2004, Anna Kolodner wrote, “Filing the lawsuit will serve to trip the switch on the larger agenda of exposing the radical fundamentalist underpinnings of the Mosque and its leaders”¦We need to develop a media campaign and identify who will be the public spokesperson for the group”¦We need an expert in power point to develop a presentation that can be used with the media, politicians, and community groups.”
That power point expert would turn out to be the notorious Robert Spencer.
Wooo, scary. The notorious Spencer, no less. Wow. It looks pretty damaging, except it’s completely false. I am not a Power Point expert. I don’t use Power Point, and don’t know how to construct a Power Point presentation. I have never supplied the David Project or anyone else involved with the lawsuits connected with the Boston mosque project with a Power Point presentation or anything else.