Well, duh. Of course, my entry isn’t so much inaccurate as it is an extended smear, and it has only gotten worse since I wrote that in March, replete with whole sections full of guilt by association, unsubstantiated attacks, etc.
And it isn’t just me, of course. In varying degrees, every anti-jihadist and every Islam-related and jihad-related topic comes in for the same treatment.
The bottom line is that anyone who cites Wikipedia, or simply uses Wikipedia, as a reliable source for anything does not realize the lengths to which some people will go to make sure that the truth does not come to you.
The “littered with inaccuracies” story is here.