Duuuude. The blase attitude toward the crackdown that the partiers show in this article would likely come to an end with a few lashes. Sharia Alert from modern, moderate Malaysia: “Muslims party on despite religious crackdown,” from AFP, July 26 (thanks to Block Ness):
…A morality crackdown has seen Malaysian Islamic authorities hand out caning and jail sentences for illicit drinking and sex, and launch raids on homes and clubs in the glare of media flashlights.
But for Asyikin, a petite and attractive business executive dressed in a knee-length skirt and strappy high heels, the campaign hasn’t dampened her party mood.
“I couldn’t care less, I’m partying. Religion to me is a personal thing,” she says as she sips a glass of whisky and greets other regulars at the bars and restaurants that line the narrow streets.
Malays, who make up 60 percent of the population, are forbidden to have sex out of wedlock or drink alcohol under the Sharia legal system which runs in parallel to the civil courts in Malaysia.
In an unprecedented case that grabbed world headlines last year, Muslim model Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno, 33, was sentenced to six lashes of the cane for drinking beer.
Kartika’s sentence was commuted to community service after an uproar from rights groups, but three other women were quietly caned under Islamic laws in February for having sex out of wedlock.
Despite the highly publicised cases, every weekend Kuala Lumpur’s top clubs are packed with fashionably dressed youngsters including Muslim Malays — many offspring of the nation’s elite — socialising and drinking openly.
“I’m a bit more wary after all these cases but it doesn’t really affect my mood to go out and party,” says Muaz Omar, a civil servant who goes to pubs with friends to watch live band performances.
“People who drink still do go out because even private parties at home are subjected to raids, there is no longer a safe haven,” says the 35-year-old, who adds that he does not drink himself.
“The religious authorities should not be a moral police. In the religion, if it’s a private matter, then it should be a private thing. There must be a rethinking of the way they act.”
The crackdown has fuelled debate over rising “Islamisation” of the multi-ethnic nation, and rights groups have urged religious authorities to stop acting as morality police.
“We don’t agree with the way they go on, Islam is not about snooping around catching people committing sin,” says Ratna Osman, legal manager from leading civil society group Sisters In Islam (SIS).
Ratna blasted the raids as a form of rights violation and an intrusion into people’s privacy.
“Unless that person is a drunkard and started going around committing crime or causing accidents, then yes, you can punish them because they endanger people and their own life,” she says.
“But if the person commits a sin in a private domain then it is between him and God. If as a Muslim you feel compelled to tell him, it should be done in a compassionate way or to educate them.”
Religious authorities defend their actions, saying they are merely carrying out their duty to ensure fellow Muslims stay away from sin.
“We don’t accept any behaviour that is not condoned by Islam,” Che Mat Che Ali, the head of the Islamic affairs department in Kuala Lumpur, tells AFP.
“Drinking is a big sin. If you are drunk, you are not in the right state of mind, you yourself will suffer and others may suffer too.”
“It’s not just something between the person and God, we have a duty to advise them.”…
And what better advice can anyone give than a few lashes with a cane?