Until May of this year, the Frenchman Dominique Strauss-Kahn, better known to some by his initials DSK, was the influential head of the International Monetary Fund. His arrest in New York City in May of this year on sexual assault charges has been one of the most spectacular and possibly over-reported news stories of 2011. DSK’s downfall has had all the elements of a long-lived scandal: a powerful personality, accusations of a violent and heinous crime, and all brought about by a mere hotel chambermaid. There was more than a whiff of schadenfreude in the media’s accounts that eagerly reported on DSK’s initial detention at Riker’s Island in New York, right down to his daily routine, meals, and even what sort of clothes he had to wear while incarcerated. DSK’s reputation as a womanizer who has had numerous liaisons over the years has done little to help his case.
Of course, it just so happens that DSK’s accuser, a housekeeper at the Sofitel New York, is duly described in many media accounts as a “…very pious, devout Muslim woman.” And it also so happens that Mr. Strauss-Kahn is Jewish. Coincidence? ‘Coincidence’ may be what many have thought up to this point, but it may be time to revisit this assumption.
And here’s why. Six weeks after DSK’s initial arrest, more information is now emerging about DSK’s accuser, a woman who migrated from the African nation of Guinea to the US. And these revelations are the reason why the legal case against DSK is unraveling with such amazing speed. Mr. Strauss-Kahn has in fact already been released from house arrest.
The migrant from Guinea, who came into the United States on an asylum claim in 2004, has apparently lied from beginning to end. Her story that her husband was killed opposing the regime in Guinea and she was forced to flee her homeland was all a lie. She lied about her finances in order to secure public housing. She claimed a friend’s child as her own in order to increase her Federal tax refund. She has had numerous associations with criminals, including her own boyfriend who is now languishing in an Arizona prison. And her own story of her supposed encounter with DSK has changed over the last six weeks, chock full of inconsistencies. In other words, she’s emerged as about the worse sort of witness imaginable for the prosecution.
Probably the most damning evidence to come to light is the fact that, while DSK’s accuser spoke to her incarcerated boyfriend by phone, she is reported to have said, in effect, that “…DSK has a lot of money and I know what I’m doing.” She attempted to hide these intentions by speaking in an African dialect, but apparently the Feds were listening and eventually had it translated.
This is not the first time a Muslim has tried to run an extortion racket against an ‘infidel’, with the only difference now being that the target was a very high-profile one. Many Muslims have long been noted for their intimate involvement in the criminal underworld, exploiting Westerners, running welfare scams, and in general ‘parasiting‘ non Muslims and western society at every opportunity. The case against DSK appears to be but a recent and high-profile instance of ‘stealth’ or ‘legal’ jihad, when Muslims attempt to exploit the infidels’ own laws for maximum advantage.
Why would a Muslim, and a ‘pious, devout’ one at that, be so adept and experienced at lying? Surely Islam has nothing to do with this woman’s pathological lying, and nothing to do with her criminal attempts to extort money from a powerful, rich Jew. Of course.
As jihad-minded and Islamic supremacist Muslims continue to pour into the US and other Western countries, permitted to do so by clueless or complicit authorities, the next attempted shakedown (high profile or otherwise) is but a matter of time. What happened to Dominique Strauss-Kahn will eventually happen again.