It’s not that he wouldn’t. When a group of the “anti-Crest“‘s followers offered to attack U.S. forces in June, he thanked them and asked for Allah to watch over them. On the other hand, al-Sadr does not have to take any present action on a threat for the future, so the sabre-rattling is likely to cost him nothing. For that matter, the chances are good that he may benefit on some level as his sympathizers within Iraqi ranks receive that same training.
“U.S. military trainers could be targets: Iraq’s Sadr,” by Aseel Kami for Reuters, August 7:
BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Iraq’s fiercely anti-U.S. cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has warned that U.S. military trainers will be targets if they stay in the country beyond a year-end deadline for American troops to leave.
The statement from Sadr, whose Mehdi Army militia fought U.S. troops until 2008, follows a deal by Iraqi leaders to allow Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to negotiate with the United States on whether to keep trainers in Iraq after the deadline.
Sadr followers have sent mixed messages on that, but any deal to keep U.S. troops in Iraq, even as trainers, remains a sensitive issue in Baghdad and Washington eight years after the U.S. invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.
“Whoever stays in Iraq will be treated as an unjust invader and should be opposed with military resistance,” Sadr said in a statement published on a pro-Sadr website on Saturday.
“A government which agrees for them to stay, even for training, is a weak government.”
Sadr’s Mehdi Army militia has for the most part demobilized, but U.S. officials say Sadrist splinter groups have continued to attack U.S. troops still stationed in Iraq.
Violence in Iraq has eased sharply since sectarian bloodshed peaked four years ago, but bombings and assassinations are still carried out almost daily by Sunni Islamists, some tied to al Qaeda, and by Shi’ite militas the U.S. government says are backed by Iran.
Sadr himself is now part of mainstream politics and a key ally to Maliki in his fragile power-sharing coalition among Shi’ite, Sunni and Kurdish blocs.
Sadr’s representatives walked out of last week’s discussions on U.S. troops, signaling possible dissension within the coalition.
U.S. and Iraqi officials agree that Iraq’s security forces are capable of taking on internal threats, but say they need training in heavy conventional weaponry like tanks, and in air and naval defenses.
Details of any deal are far from clear, and an agreement would need to pass through parliament, say U.S. officials, who want legal immunity for any residual U.S. military presence.
Sadr has in the past threatened to revive his Shi’ite Mehdi Army if U.S. troops stay, but Sadrist sources have said the militia is riven with splinter groups and internal divisions.