A predictable reaction from Islamabad to the Secretary of Defense’s pointed criticism of Pakistan’s refusal to take on the Haqqani network.
Also predictably, Pakistan is demanding “proof,” and continuing its recent diversionary tactic of accusing the U.S. and NATO of being culpably negligent in ensuring border security, in a situation they portray as analogous to what Pakistan has been accused of for years.
Never mind the attacks from Afghanistan into Pakistan that are organized by Pakistan-based jihadists. Whether it is a crisis to Pakistan depends on which way across the border the attacks are directed. “Pakistan says U.S. warning on militants hurts ties,” by Zeeshan Haider and Qasim Nauman for Reuters, September 15:
ISLAMABAD (Reuters) – The U.S. warning on militants based in Pakistan, blamed by Washington for this week’s attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, works against counter-terrorism cooperation between the two allies, the Pakistani Foreign Ministry said on Thursday.
It was referring to comments by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta that Washington would do whatever it takes to defend American forces in Afghanistan from Pakistan-based militants.
“We believe these remarks are not in line with the cooperation that exists between the two countries,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tehmina Janjua told reporters.
U.S. officials suspect militants from the Haqqani network were behind Tuesday’s rocket attack on the U.S. Embassy compound in the Afghan capital, as well as a truck bomb last Saturday that wounded 77 U.S. force ambers. [sic]
Darn you, Autocorrect…
“Time and again we’ve urged the Pakistanis to exercise their influence over these kinds of attacks from the Haqqanis. And we have made very little progress in that area,” Panetta told reporters flying with him to San Francisco on Wednesday.
“I think the message they need to know is: we’re going to do everything we can to defend our forces.”
After 10 years:
Pakistani officials said there was no proof of such cross-border operations.
The comments are likely to raise tension between the uneasy allies. Relations dropped to a low point after a unilateral U.S. special forces raid killed Osama bin Laden in a Pakistani town in May.
“Pakistan and the United States have strategic cooperation. We hope to discuss these issues in a cooperative manner,” Janjua told a news conference.
Pakistani officials said it was the responsibility of U.S.-led forces to crack down on militants when they enter Afghanistan.
“We are using all our resources to fight terrorism. As far as these issues like Haqqani network launching attacks from Pakistani territory is concerned, has any proof ever been given?” said a senior Pakistani military official who asked not to be identified.
Panetta declined to answer questions about what steps the United States might take to defend U.S. forces. The CIA has had success targeting militants in Pakistan using drones, and has tried to take out figures in the Haqqani network.
A senior Pakistani government official involved in defense policy said the South Asian country, reliant on billions of dollars in U.S. aid, was doing all it could to stop militants from crossing the border to Afghanistan.
Once they are in Afghanistan, they are supposedly someone else’s problem, not Pakistan’s:
“But if the militants are doing something inside Afghanistan, then it is the responsibility of the Afghan and Western forces to hold them on the borders,” he said.
“They let everyone go scot-free on their side (of the border) and then they say Pakistan is not doing enough.”