Earlier on Pajamas Media (via RaymondIbrahim.com) I discussed how Ron Paul appears to be ignorant and naÃ¯ve when it comes to the goals of the jihad: ignorant because his statements are not based on accurate knowledge and naÃ¯ve because he thinks they are — more to the point, because he takes al-Qaeda’s propaganda at face value:
Among other qualities, a good presidential candidate must be knowledgeable and able to think outside the box; equally important, he must not be naÃ¯ve or gullible “” certainly not swallow everything the enemy says hook, line, and sinker.
During the recent Republican candidate debate, Congressman Ron Paul exhibited his ignorance and gullibility when the panel was asked “Do you plan to decrease Defense spending, to balance spending, or do you believe high spending is essential to security?”
After Paul explained how he was “tired of all the militarism that we are involved in,” and his plan on cutting back, he said, “But we’re under great threat, because we occupy so many countries”¦. The purpose of al Qaeda was to attack us, invite us over there, where they can target us”¦. but we’re there occupying their land. And if we think that we can do that and not have retaliation, we’re kidding ourselves.”
This is, of course, an old and well known narrative.
By questioning Paul, however, Rick Santorum exposed the latter’s problematic foreign policy approach:
On your [Paul’s] Web site on 9/11, you had a blog post that basically blamed the United States for 9/11. On your Web site, yesterday, you said that it was our actions that brought about the actions of 9/11. Now, Congressman Paul, that is irresponsible. The president of the United States “” someone who is running for the president of the United States in the Republican Party should not be parroting what Osama bin Laden said on 9/11. We should have “” we are not being attacked and we were not attacked because of our actions. We were attacked, as Newt [Gingrich] talked about, because we have a civilization that is antithetical to the civilization of the jihadists [full transcript here].
After rejecting Santorum’s thesis, Paul made his fatal blunder:
Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda have been explicit “” they have been explicit, and they wrote and said that we attacked America because you had bases on our holy land in Saudi Arabia, you do not give Palestinians fair treatment, and you have been bombing — [audience booing] I didn’t say that. I’m trying to get you to understand what the motive was behind the bombing.
This exchange clearly revealed Paul’s lack of knowledge concerning the nature of the enemy. It’s one thing for some Americans to believe that the source of all conflict is the United State’s presence in some countries, it’s quite another for a potential president to think, and speak, this way.
Ironically, Paul even contradicted himself: minutes earlier, when discussing the need to cut back on the military, he complained that we had a military presence in 130 countries “” bringing to mind the question: if U.S. military presence is the source of problems, why haven’t these countries lashed out?
But what’s worse is Paul’s naivety “” that he would actually swallow and regurgitate verbatim the propaganda al-Qaeda has been dishing for years, to wit, “Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda have been explicit “” they have been explicit, and they wrote and said”; and “I’m trying to get you to understand what the motive was behind the bombing.”
Did it ever occur to the Congressman that al-Qaeda could be, um, lying?…