Over at Stonegate Institute today (via RaymondIbrahim.com), I discuss some of the semantic games, key phrases, and convenient omissions that the mainstream media rely on to uphold the traditional narrative that Muslim violence is anything but a byproduct Islamic intolerance. Here’s a snippet:
Blurring the Line between Persecutor and Victim
Now consider some MSM strategies. The first one is to frame the conflict between Muslims and Christians in a way that blurs the line between persecutor and victim, for example, this recent BBC report on one of Boko Haram’s many church attacks that left three Christians dead, including a toddler. After stating the bare-bone facts, the report goes on to describe how “the bombing sparked a riot by Christian youths, with reports that at least two Muslims were killed in the violence. The two men were dragged off their bikes after being stopped at a roadblock set up by the rioters, police said. A row of Muslim-owned shops was also burned”¦” The report goes on and on, with a special section about “very angry” Christians, till one all but confuses victims with persecutors, forgetting what the Christians are “very angry” about in the first place: unprovoked and nonstop terror attacks on their churches, and the murder of their women and children.
This is reminiscent of the Egyptian New Year’s Eve church bombing that left over 20 Christians dead: the MSM reported it, but under headlines like “Christians clash with police in Egypt after attack on churchgoers kills 21″(Washington Post) and “Clashes grow as Egyptians remain angry after attack”(New York Times)””again, as if frustrated Christians lashing out against wholesale slaughter is as newsworthy as the slaughter itself; as if their angry reaction “evens” everything up.
Dissembling the Perpetrators’ Motivation
The second MSM strategy involves dissembling over the jihadis’ motivation. An AFP report describing a different Boko Haram church attack””which also killed three Christians during Sunday service””does a fair job reporting the facts. But then it concludes with the following sentence: “Violence blamed on Boko Haram, whose goals remain largely unclear, has since 2009 claimed more than 1,000 lives, including more than 300 this year, according to figures tallied by AFP and rights groups.”
Although Boko Haram has been howling its straightforward goals for a decade””enforcing Sharia law and, in conjunction, subjugating if not eliminating Nigeria’s Christians””here is the MSM claiming ignorance about these goals (earlier the New York Times described Boko Haram’s goals as “senseless–”even as the group continues justifying them on doctrinal grounds). One would have thought that a decade after the jihadi attacks of 9/11″”in light of all the subsequent images of Muslims in militant attire shouting distinctly Islamic slogans such as “Allahu Akbar!” and calling for Sharia law and the subjugation of “infidels–”reporters would by now know what their motivation and goals are….