Over at FrontPage Magazine (via RaymondIbrahim.com), I place Egypt’s presidential elections in context:
Egypt’s long awaited and much anticipated presidential elections””the first of their kind to take place in the nation’s 7,000 year history””are here. As we await the final results””and as the Western mainstream media fixate on images of purple-stained fingers””it is well to remember that there is much more at stake in Egypt’s elections than the mere “right” to vote.
While some Egyptians are certainly voting according to their convictions, the fundamental divide revolves around religion””how much or how little the candidates in question are in favor of Islamic Sharia law. In other words, Islamists are voting for Islamists””Abdel Mon’im Abul Futuh and Muhammad Mursi””whereas non-Islamists (secularists, liberals, and non-Muslims) are voting for non-Islamists, such as Amr Musa and Ahmed Shafiq.
Bear in mind that this is not the same thing as American voters being divided between “liberal” Democrats and “conservative” Republicans; rather, this election is much more existential in nature””possibly cataclysmic for Egyptian society. For, whereas both American Republicans and Democrats operate under the selfsame U.S. Constitution, in Egypt, an Islamist president will usher in Sharia law, which will fundamentally transform the nation…