In FrontPage this morning I discuss America’s latest adventure in helping jihadists and Islamic supremacists rise to power:
A
video circulating this week of Syrian rebels shouting “Allahu
akbar” and executing four Assad partisans has horrified many in the
West, but there have been numerous indications before this that the
resistance to the Assad regime is not made up of the democratic
pluralists of mainstream media myth.Not surprisingly, that hasn’t stopped Barack Obama. According to
Reuters Wednesday, he “has signed a secret order authorizing U.S.
support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
and his government.”This will meet with bipartisan support. Gary Schmitt and Thomas Donnelly wondered last week in the mainstream Republican Weekly Standard:
“Why hasn’t President Obama intervened militarily in Syria? After all,
this is a president who issued a directive last year stating that a
“˜core” national security interest of the United States would be to
prevent mass atrocities of precisely the kind Syrian dictator Bashar
al-Assad is now unleashing on his own people. And this is a president
who, to his credit, helped remove Muammar Qaddafi from power.”Schmitt and Donnelly appear untroubled by the fact that the new leadership of Libya is made up of Muslim Brotherhood Sharia supremacists
who, as they impose the fullness of Islamic law upon Libya, will impose
all of Sharia’s legal oppression of women, non-Muslims, ex-Muslims, and
others, and are certain to be no friend of the United States. And now
they want Barack Obama to enable a similar regime to come to power in
Syria. Their call for him to do so didn’t mention the Muslim Brotherhood
or al-Qaeda, of course. Instead, they give the impression that they
accept the prevailing mainstream media myth, that the anti-Assad forces
in Syria are Western-style pluralist democrats, as they were advertised
as being in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia.They aren’t any such thing in Syria, any more than they were in those
other “Arab Spring” countries. John Cantlie, a British photographer,
and his Dutch colleague, Jeroen Oerlemans, were recently kidnapped by
Islamic supremacist rebels in Syria who threatened to murder them unless
they converted to Islam. Significantly, they noted
that where they were held, the rebel fighters were Pakistanis,
Bangladeshis, and Chechens, with nary a Syrian in sight — a clear
indication that jihadis from all over the world had traveled to Syria to
participate in what they considered to be a jihad there: the uprising
against the Assad regime. “As soon as Assad has fallen,” Oerlemans
declared, “these fighters want to introduce Islamic law, Sharia, in
Syria.”Another sign of the jihadist character of the Syrian rebels is the
rampant persecution of Christians. The Christians in Syrian generally
tend to favor the Alawite Assad regime, which despite its repressive
character is still a Ba”athist, generally secular regime that accords
Christians more rights than they would enjoy in a Sharia state. “We”re
too frightened to talk,” one Christian told an inquiring journalist.
“Last summer Salafists came to Qusayr, foreigners. They stirred the
local rebels against us. They sermonized on Fridays in the mosques that
it was a sacred duty to drive us away. We were constantly accused of
working for the regime. And Christians had to pay bribes to the
jihadists repeatedly in order to avoid getting killed.” Another added:
“Anyone who believes in this cross suffers.”
