“Until now it has always been assumed that Indonesia was a moderate Muslim country with a democratic government which could be a model for other Muslim states. But increasing violence against groups like the Ahmadiyyah or now against Shiites is a clear warning to Indonesian society.” And to the rest of the world.
On 28th August, two Shiite Muslims were killed by an angry mob, dozens more were injured and the homes of Shiites were set on fire. The violence occurred after the Shiites had been accused of propagating false religious teachings.
The story didn’t come from the Middle East or Pakistan, as one might have expected. The events happened in Sampang district on the Indonesian island of Madura in East Java.
Until now it has always been assumed that Indonesia was a moderate Muslim country with a democratic government which could be a model for other Muslim states. But increasing violence against groups like the Ahmadiyyah or now against Shiites is a clear warning to Indonesian society.
Intolerance is being taught
“Our area will now be free from heresy,” Thohir al-Kaf, a Muslim preacher and East Javan religious scholar told hundreds of people, including children and young people. “But if anyone tries to spread such teachings in Sampang again, than snap him up, put him in a sack and throw him in the canal!”
So the tragedy of 28th August is evidently the result of the hatred that was sown long before. Hundreds of people were involved in hunting down, abusing and killing the two Shiites. Their bodies were covered in wounds made by knives and other blades.
“There’s been Shiism in Indonesia for centuries,” says Professor Azyumardi Azra, an expert in Islam and the Middle East at the Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University in Jakarta. “And until now there have never been problems between the two communities of the kind that we are seeing now.”
According to Azyumardi Azra, this hatred was imported into the country by Indonesians who had studied in Saudi Arabian religious universities, as well as by Salafist groups: “They are the ones who promote a polarisation between Shiites and Sunnis.”
It all began in the 1980s during a conference in Jakarta, when graduates of Saudi Arabian universities called on the then president, Suharto, to ban Shiite teachings in Indonesia. Azyumardi Azra says now, “Suharto took the right decision then when he refused to agree to the demand.”
The consequences of the blasphemy law
In a speech held on Indonesia’s national day in 1964, President Sukarno used an Italian term to describe the political situation of his time: “vivere pericoloso” — living dangerously. It’s a term which well describes the reality for many members of minorities today.
Following the fall of the Suharto dictatorship and the start of the so-called reformasi-era, the persecution and discrimination of minorities has only increased. They are subject to pressure not just in the form of public attacks, but politically and legally as well. Radical groups have for some time been abusing the country’s blasphemy laws to put pressure on people with other religious views.
In West Sumatra, for example, the civil servant Alexander Aan was given a two-and-a-half year prison sentence and a fine of 100 million rupiah (about 8,000 euros) for running a Facebook group called Minang Atheists. He was found guilty of insulting Islam.
In March 2012, Andreas Guntur, leader of a spiritual movement called Amanat Keagungan Ilahi (“Message of the divine glory”) was sentenced to four years for blasphemy.
Members of the Lia Eden group were also imprisoned on the grounds that they had broken the blasphemy law.
And that’s not all: the Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace has just reported that there’s been a noticeable increase in the use of the blasphemy law, which is Article 156a of the criminal code and Article 4 of the Law to Prevent the Practicing of Religion and Against the Abuse and Dishonouring of Religion.