In FrontPage today I discuss how Ahmadinejad’s visit to Egypt shows again why the Muslim world will never be united “” except in hatred of Israel.
the first visit to Egypt
by a President of Iran since the founding of the Islamic Republic of
Iran in 1979. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad arrived in Egypt Tuesday to
an enthusiastic welcome from Egypt’s President Mohammed Morsi and top
Egyptian officials. Yet underneath the kisses and expressions of mutual
regard, the visit revealed yet again how deep the divisions are in the
Islamic world — and why Sunnis and Shi”ites may only be able to unite on
the basis of their mutual hatred of Israel.
Then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said of the Islamic world in January 2007:
“There’s still a tendency to see these things in Sunni-Shia terms.
But the Middle East is going to have to overcome that.” Rice’s
statement, of course, was staggeringly naÃ¯ve, and manifested a deep
ignorance of the region, as well as of Islam. No one should be surprised
that six years later, Sunnis and Shias still haven’t “overcome” their
tendency to “see these things in Sunni-Shia terms,” and chances are that
in six hundred more years, they still will not have done so, for the
Sunni-Shi”ite divide goes back to the earliest days of Islam, and yet in
fourteen hundred years has not burnt itself out, but still rages today
as fiercely as ever.
And so it was that as Sunnis and Shias war against each other in Iraq
and Pakistan, the Shi”ite President of Iran touched down in Sunni Cairo
and was almost immediately scolded by Ahmed al-Tayeb, the Grand Sheikh
of Al-Azhar University, the foremost institution in Sunni Islam, for
Iran’s meddling in Bahrain. Almost seventy percent of Bahrainis are
Shias, but the king and the ruling elites are Sunnis, and in Bahrain’s
version of the “Arab Spring,” the “pro-democracy” protesters were Shias
who wanted either closer ties with Iran or for Bahrain to be annexed
outright by the Islamic Republic, in line with Iran’s claim that it is
actually an Iranian province.
But al-Tayeb told Ahmadinejad to back off, and to recognize that
Bahrain was a “sisterly Arab nation” — i.e., within the Sunni Arab, not
the Shi”ite Persian domain. And according to a senior al-Azhar cleric,
Hassan al-Shafai, al-Tayeb and Ahmadinejad quickly began squabbling
about Sunni-Shi”ite theological disagreements. His assessment of the
meeting was far from positive: “There ensued some misunderstandings on
certain issues that could have an effect on the cultural, political and
social climate of both countries. The issues were such that the grand
sheikh saw that the meeting “¦ did not serve the desired purpose.”
However much he got mired in theological issues with al-Tayeb,
however, Ahmadinejad still had another hope for Islamic unity: mutual
hatred of Israel. “The political geography of the region will change,”
he asserted, “if Iran and Egypt take a unified position on the
Palestinian question.” He expressed the hope that the people of Gaza
would allow him to pay them a visit: “If they allow it, I would go to
Gaza to visit the people.”
Why wouldn’t they? Iran already crosses the Sunni-Shi”ite divide to fund Hamas; billboards in Gaza proclaim:
“Thanks and gratitude to Iran.” The Sunni-Shia split, according to
Islamic tradition, goes all the way back to the death of Muhammad.
According to the Sunnis, he left no instructions as to who should
succeed him. According to the Shia, he chose his son-in-law, Ali ibn Abi
Talib, who was then passed over three times as caliph, leader of the
Muslim community, until finally he got the job, only to be assassinated
five years later. When Ali’s son Hussein was killed at the battle of
Karbala in 680, the Sunni-Shi”ite split became definitive, with both
sides considering the other heretics and violence remaining a constant
of their interaction.