Bruce Bawer has a terrific piece in FrontPage today, “Notes on ‘Counter-Jihad,'” that succinctly sums up the insanity of our Orwellian age. Here’s an excerpt:
Back in the day, anti-Communists had a similar problem. I”m old enough to recall the obloquy heaped upon them by bien pensant types — professors and high-toned journalists who considered active, vocal opposition to Communism the most lowbrow of pastimes. Yes, whereas today”s counter-counterjihadists act as if jihad is a figment of counterjihadists” fevered imaginations, the anti-anti-Communists (a label they wore with pride) at least acknowledged — albeit in a bland, bored way — that Communism existed. Sometimes they even admitted that it wasn’t all that terrific. But by focusing their animus on anti-Communism, and remaining all but silent about the evils of Communism itself — indeed, by insisting that the very application of words like “evil” to Communism (Ã la Ronald Reagan) was infantile and hyberbolic — they drove home the idea that overt anti-Communism was worse — by which they meant less intelligent, less sophisticated, less worldly — than Communism itself. Indeed, even as self-identified Communists in America and throughout the West held positions of trust in the academy, government, the arts, and elsewhere, anti-Communists came to be viewed as fanatical, paranoid conspiracy theorists who, in the phrase of the day, saw “a Communist under every bed.” Even now, the Hollywood Ten, a group of directors and screenwriters who in 1947 were cited for contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions about their Communist Party affiliations, are considered heroes of American freedom, even though it is a matter of public record that all ten of them turned out, in fact, to be Stalinists, dedicated to destroying American freedom; meanwhile, director Elia Kazan — a former member of the Party who “named names” because he recognized Stalinism as a genuine menace to American freedom — is still remembered as a fink.
So it is today with Islam. The “counterjihadists” are the villains — the hysterics, the fools, who see a Muslim under every bed, with a bomb in his turban. Meanwhile the good guys are the counter-counterjihadists — the journalists, activists, and others who make a career of slamming Islam’s critics, whom they frequently represent (especially over here in Scandinavia) as “conspiracy theorists.” For just as the anti-Communists of yesteryear were viewed not as sober, well-informed students of life behind the Iron Curtain but as obsessive, ignorant haters, we counterjihadists are viewed not as people who”ve read the Koran and studied Islamic societies and subcultures but as semi-literate morons and bigots — and, according to one particularly noxious meme that has spread far and wide in the last couple of years, mindless disciples of what our enemies caricature as the mad ramblings of Bat Ye”or. (Never do any of these mud-slingers ever try to explain why so many writers and scholars around the world — people with a variety of professional and personal backgrounds, and with long records of thinking for themselves and of observing the world with their own eyes — all chose, apparently more or less at once, to become, supposedly, disciples of the same person.) It should be a matter of national shame for Britain that when its government banned Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from its shores, it was doing the bidding of the counter-counterjihadists of Hope Not Hate — who, despite their manifestly Stalinist methods and sympathies, are treated by U.K. authorities as reliable ideological gatekeepers, even as the truth-telling Spencers and Gellers are tagged as anathema.