What about the human rights of those he might murder in a jihad attack? Do they have any rights? Apparently they don’t in Sharia Britannia, where opponents of jihad terror such as Pamela Geller and me are banned from the country while open proponents of jihad violence are admitted.
“Free within days, the extremist plotting UK Mumbai-style attack: Fanatic who attended training camp with July 21 bombers will have controls lifted to protect human rights,” by James Slack for the Daily Mail, January 20:
An Islamist fanatic will be freed from anti-terror controls within days despite being ‘determined’ to carry out a Mumbai-style attack in Britain.
The extremist attended a terror training camp in Cumbria with four of the five attempted suicide bombers involved in the London attacks of July 21, 2005.
He repeatedly tried to buy guns in what was suspected as a plot to carry out a mass-casualty attack in the UK, and has also travelled to Syria for ‘training’.
The plotter, known only as ‘CD’, was put under a Terrorism Prevention Investigation Measure (T-PIM) – including a tag and strict curfew – to protect the public in January 2012.
The Security Service say that without the T-PIM there is ‘a real risk CD will seek to revive his plans to undertake attacks in the UK’.
He has a number of associates in London ‘in connection with the attempted purchase of firearms’ and officials say that he would be able to quickly buy weapons.
But the order will be lifted on Sunday under rules introduced to protect the ‘human rights’ of terror suspects.
This is despite a judge ruling that the man has been trained in terrorism and that his ‘views and determination are unchanged’.
CD is one of six fanatics who are due to be released from their T-PIMS by the end of this month.
They also include a would-be suicide bomber involved in the liquid bomb plot to murder thousands by blowing up seven transatlantic planes. Experts estimate the total bill for MI5 and the police to keep tabs on the six suspects once their T-PIM restrictions are lifted could reach £20million a year.
The cases will be raised in the Commons today by Labour’s shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper.
She has attacked her Tory counterpart, Theresa May, for axing Labour’s control order regime and replacing it with the weaker T-PIMS.
Miss Cooper said: ‘Her decision to weaken terror controls means suspects described by the courts as highly dangerous only a year ago will now face no restrictions.’
Home Office officials insist that, to comply with Labour’s Human Rights Act, there was no option but to weaken the rules.
Under the old control order regime, there was no fixed time limit on how long a suspect could be monitored.
But the orders were repeatedly challenged in the courts under the Human Rights Act, with terror suspects claiming their right to liberty, a fair trial and a family life had been infringed. These cases led to the introduction of T-PIMS, which have a two-year time limit.
Believing that a terror suspect remains determined to carry out an attack in the UK is not sufficient for an order to be renewed after two years. There must be new evidence.
Labour, which has obtained new court papers relating to the threat posed by CD and his fellow fanatics, said the T-PIMS regime had left ministers with their hands tied.
The court papers on CD, who is guaranteed lifelong anonymity to protect his rights, show he was identified by the Security Service as a leading figure in a network of Islamist extremists based in London.
In 2004, he attended meetings organised by the jailed fanatic Mohammed Hamid and has attended at least one of Hamid’s terrorist training camps in Cumbria.
In 2006, he had extremist training in Syria before returning to London in 2009, where he was ‘involved in planning a terrorist attack on the UK, probably involving firearms’.
When his T-PIM was renewed a year ago, the judge said: ‘There remains a network. His views and determination are unchanged.’ In November 2008, Islamic terrorists killed 164 people in 12 co-ordinated shooting and bombing attacks across Mumbai, India’s biggest city….

Salah says
“An Islamist fanatic will be freed from anti-terror controls within days despite being ‘determined’ to carry out a Mumbai-style attack in Britain.”
“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
George Santayana
NEVER forget Mumbai.
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/06/never-forget-mumbai.html
mortimer says
While human rights are important and what we are about, the determination and narcissism of jihadists means they will keep coming back until they either murder or are killed by their own hand or the hands of the authorities.
Westerners have to decide whether we can afford having Muslims in our midst.
Charli Main says
Grooming and raping little girls, blowing up women and children on buses and trains, murdering soldiers on the streets, burning poppies, urinating on War Memorials, rampaging down the streets and declaring that British laws don´t apply to them and publically declaring that their religion and way of life will be forced on their host Country with the execution of those that refuse———BUT DON´T WORRY FOLKS. NONE OF THIS HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM.
Gleaner1 says
Things are so bad in UK now that while we can comment on this story here, if anyone in UK sends a tweet to someone else and the POLICE believe others would find it offensive, you will be interviewed, charged and placed before a magistrate on charges concerning hate speech. As Robert correctly observed, the Police in the UK are now being guided by Sharia, THIS is intolerable.
Paleologos says
Robert,
This is just more grim prophecy sadly playing out from Mark Steyn’s brilliant “America Alone”, wherein he pretty much says the Brits are lost for taking in far too many muslims into the UK womb.
… kind of like Fort Hood for the whole British Empire … sad and suicidal
R/
Paleologos
Elise says
It’s hard to imagine that Islamic crap such as honor killing, female genital mutilation, wife abuse, child marriage and rape are allowed in Britain and that the British are afraid to condemn these deviant Islamic cultural behaviors. What kind of people are afraid to confront the ignorant backwards Muslims? I seem to remember a different Britain when there was a Princess Diana and I believe she would speak out against Sharia and Sharia zones in Britain if she were still alive. Where are the British who dare to stand up to the cowardly people in their government? What kind of lunatics release a terrorist who wants to murder non-muslims? Don’t be like the Germans who looked the other way while Hitler murdered homosexuals, the mentally ill, deaf, mute, blind and retarded people, gypsies, Blacks, and Jews. One can never excuse rotten behavior because of a religious belief.
Semeru says
Elise said
I seem to remember a different Britain when there was a Princess Diana and I believe she would speak out against Sharia and Sharia zones in Britain if she were still alive.
If she was a live today the odds are she would be married to a mohammedan
Bettina says
As a Jew, I have to ask: where Jewish people ever protected from anti-Semitic hate speech? If they weren’t, what happened? If they were, by charges against hate speech, what happened?
rev g says
No Bettina, Jews, nor anybody else, should be protected from “hate speech”. Only speech which has the power to offend needs protecting. Outlawing speech that offends means slowly but surely all speech will end up prohibited.
Likewise, nobody has a “right” not to be attacked. They may have a reasonable expectation of safety, and a right to protect themselves from threats, but that is not the same thing.
Bettina says
Ooops! “…where Jewish people ever protected …” substitute “were” to “where”
Semeru says
Elise
If princess Diana was alive today, the chances are she would be a mohammedan.
Shiva says
Testing
gravenimage says
Muslim who plotted jihad mass murder attack in UK to be freed from anti-terror controls to protect his “human rights”
……………………………………..
As Robert Spencer rightly asks, “What about the human rights of those he might murder in a jihad attack? Do they have any rights?”
The idea that it is a violation of human rights to monitor someone who has *plotted violent Jihad* is utterly insane.
And what about the human rights of those who peacefully warn about Jihad violence, like Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller? Apparently violating their human rights by *banning them from Britain* is perfectly fine, as well.
Suicidal madness.
More:
The extremist attended a terror training camp in Cumbria with four of the five attempted suicide bombers involved in the London attacks of July 21, 2005.
……………………………………..
Shouldn’t Britons be *horrified* that there are Jihad training camps being *run in Cumbria*?
More:
The plotter, known only as ‘CD’, was put under a Terrorism Prevention Investigation Measure (T-PIM) – including a tag and strict curfew – to protect the public in January 2012.
The Security Service say that without the T-PIM there is ‘a real risk CD will seek to revive his plans to undertake attacks in the UK’.
……………………………………..
Even this is really not enough—he should be in prison. But in today’s UK, even this is seen as a violation of this murderous Jihadist’s human rights—how many times can I say that this is insane?
andrewsapia says
I feel so sick. I have always been such an anglophile, it hurts to say it but when he does blow something up they will have deserved it for being so damn stupid. My only hope is that the country will rise up and boot out or lock up the loons that are running the asylum called Great Britain.
dumbledoresarmy says
Why not 1/ strip him of his UK citizenship (for it is clearly meaningless to him; he is a Fifth Columnist, an agent of the Enemy) and 2/ put him on a plane with a one-way ticket to Syria? never to be permitted to return into *any* of the lands of the non-Muslims.
Condemn him to Life (quite probably, short and nasty) in the chaotic predator pit that is the dar al Islam.