Although Leftists and Islamic supremacists, as well as hard-Left governing and media elites, will continue to insist that there is something wrong with opposing jihad terror and Islamic supremacism because of this mass murderer, and will continue to claim that I and others somehow “inspired” him, it has been clear for quite some time that Breivik was not a counter-jihadist at all, and could not have been and was not incited to violence by the counter-jihad movement. And now he has finally admitted that his entire “manifesto” was intended solely to discredit the counter-jihad movement once he committed his murders.
However, don’t expect the New York Times, which put me on its front page for this, or the Daily Mail or any of the other media outlets that blamed the counter-jihad movement for his murders to issue retractions and apologies, or to take any notice of this at all: this article is only in Swedish. No English-language outlets have picked it up at all.
“Breivik wants to deport ‘disloyal Jews,'” a translation of the Swedish article at Expo Idag, January 10 (thanks to Marc):
The terrorist Anders Behring Breivik has sent a letter to the international media. In the letter, he describes himself as a fighter for the “survival of the Nordic race,” and demands a territory for whites in Norway.
Anders Behring Breivik has sent out a letter to the international media that Expo Today has reviewed. He describes the letter as a sort of first step in a “peace negotiation” with his political opponents. In the letter, Anders Behring Breivik to some extent changes the rhetoric from that which he used in his so-called manifesto. He says that he used “counter-jihadist” rhetoric in the manifesto to protect “ethno-nationalists” and instead provoke a media campaign against the anti-nationalist counter-jihad supporters. He calls this a strategy of “dual psychology.”
Anders Behring Breivik claims that he seeks a “pure Nordic ideal.” He argues that the “Nordic race” is being eradicated, and wants to form a Nazi party in Norway like the Swedes’ Party. He mentions several notorious right-wing extremists in Norway whom he wants to lead the party, including Varg Vikernes and Erik Blucher.
“We lost the European civil war (World War II),” writes Brevik, addressing the nationalists who he believes should endorse his “peace proposal.”
Breivik also identifies himself as part of “Western Europe’s fascist movement.” For there to be peace, Breivik believes that “nationalists” should be offered Southwestern Ã˜stfold in Norway to ensure “the survival of native Norwegians and Scandinavians.” Breivik wants to see similar parcels of land distributed to whites in several European countries.
Breivik writes in addition that his love of Israel consists only in its future function as a place to deport “disloyal Jews.”
Anders Behring Breivik also writes that he does not think he will survive in prison, where he claims he has been tortured.
Further proof that Breivik was never a counter-jihadist comes from his recommendation that Europeans should make common cause with jihadists: “An alliance with the Jihadists might prove beneficial to both parties but will simply be too dangerous (and might prove to be ideologically counter-productive). We both share one common goal.” He even called for making common cause with Hamas in plotting jihad terror: “Approach a representative from a Jihadi Salafi group. Get in contact with a Jihadi strawman. Present your terms and have him forward them to his superiors”¦.Present your offer. They are asked to provide a biological compound manufactured by Muslim scientists in the Middle East. Hamas and several Jihadi groups have labs and they have the potential to provide such substances. Their problem is finding suitable martyrs who can pass “˜screenings” in Western Europe. This is where we come in. We will smuggle it in to the EU and distribute it at a target of our choosing. We must give them assurances that we are not to harm any Muslims etc.”