What might have been preached in those Friday sermons? Maybe Jew-hatred and jihad violence? How did “Palestinian” mosques get so full of Misunderstanders of Islam? “Hundreds of Palestinians riot on Temple Mount after Friday prayers,” by Daniel K. Eisenbud for the Jerusalem Post, February 8:
Minutes after concluding Friday prayers, hundreds of Palestinians attacked officers with rocks at the Temple Mount.
The violence came one day after police closed the holy site to Jews to avert another riot, following numerous anonymous threats from Arabs of probable violence should any Jews ascend.
According to police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld, at approximately 12:30 p.m. the group began throwing rocks at police officers stationed there, without provocation.
“Police responded immediately by entering the Temple Mount area and dispersing the rioters, using only stun grenades in order to prevent injuries,” he said.
Rosenfeld added that seven arrests were made after riot police attempted to quell the violence.
“Luckily there were no injuries to officers,” he said, noting that police had preemptively heightened security in the area upon receiving intelligence that the Arabs intended to riot after praying.
“Security assessments were also quickly made to ensure immediately after the riot to prevent any further disturbances in and around the Old City,” Rosenfeld said.
The frequently violent Arab response to Jewish visitation rights to the Temple Mount has a long and contentious history, dating back to when the Wakf Muslim religious trust was given oversight of the holy site following the Six Day War in 1967.
Although the Supreme Court upheld Jewish prayer rights on the site, the court allows police to prevent any form of worship there if they believe such activities will incite a “disturbance to the public order.”
Right-wing Israeli politicians have repeatedly demanded Jewish sovereignty of the area, as well as greater access, to little avail.

mortimer says
so often muslims attack after friday prayers. coincidental? or is this the religion of vigilantism?
JamesonRocks says
As a friend of mine is fond of saying, “a desired coincidence takes a good deal of planning.”
Dallas says
In many areas when Friday “prayers” end, infidels get their kids inside, put up the screens over the shop doors, and get their heads down.
Jay Boo says
THERE ARE NO ISLAMIC HOLY SITES IN JERUSALLEM
NONE
The only purpose Muslims have for mentioning Jerusalem is to pretend that Islam is a religion. They believe they can stake a claim to Jerusalem not on truth but by pushing others out.
While many Muslims gleefully claim that the Holocaust was just a myth they willfully ignore the easily proven fact that The Dome on the Rock Mosque is based on MYTH. There is nothing at all sacred about this supremacist building. NOTHING
Muhammad did not ascend to heaven here (he went to hell in Medina).
Satanic verse reciting Muhammad did not magically visit Jerusalem on a flying horse under the cover night when no one was around to witness it. He turned his back on Jerusalem to face Mecca instead because it was a more politically useful option.
Muslims are so desperate to pretend that Islam is a religion.
Charli Main says
There will come the day, in Britain, when some Muslims will have a vision of Mohammed having a cr*p on the grounds of Westminster Abby and Canterbury Cathedral and they will instantly become holy Muslim sites belonging to Islam.
Christians trying to pray there will be stoned and attacked by Muslims , outraged by Christians trying to defile the sacred Muslim land where Mohammed wiped his arse.
Kristi says
Amen!! I Agree with you!!
Israel Belongs to the Jewish People and NOT for muslims!! Islamic Muslims worship a FALSE god named allah and FALSE prophet muhammad !!
Muhammad is a FALSE Prophet!! He though he seen a god, but, it was Satan ( the devil )! Satan ( the devil ) gave Muhammad FALSE book called Koran ( Qu’ran )!! Satan ( the devil ) Deceiver for muhammad !! So, Muhammad is in HELL now, because he did NOT Take Jesus Christ for in his Heart or mind!!
The Holy Land of Israel Belongs to the Jewish People and NOT Evil Muslims of Palestine!! Israel is in the HOLY BIBLE, and Evil Palestine is NOT!! God Created Israel for His People in the HOLY BIBLE!! Israel are NOT the terrorists, Evil Islamic Muslims in Palestine are TERRORISTS, and MURDERERS!! Israel EXISTS in the HOLY BIBLE from GOD our FATHER who art in Heaven!! Palestine DOES NOT EXIST in the HOLY BIBLE!!
sudhakar says
who said there is no holy places for Islam and Muslim???? there center place of visitation is HELL. that is where there god is doomed and lives. and all these Muslim will happily visit that place and the only problem is that there is no U turn. Every Muslim is so eager to go that holy place, and that is why Jihad is practiced that they will die quickly to go to hell!!!
Aardvark says
“…the court allows police to prevent any form of worship there if they believe such activities will incite a “disturbance to the public order.”
Mohammedan ‘prayers’ very frequently lead to disturbance of the public order! Best to keep them out of Jerusalem altogether. They have no right to be there.
the court allows police to prevent any form of worship there if they believe such activities will incite a “disturbance to the public order.
gravenimage says
Minutes after Friday prayers, Muslims riot on Temple Mount, stoning police officers
…………………………..
How common is *this*? After Friday prayers, Muslims riot, burn down churches, and murder Hindus and Ahmadis and other non-Muslims in the streets.
God, I hate Islam.
Jimbo says
Earth to BB: End this BS and take the Temple Mount back!
Rob says
Mosques have been built in the West and Imams given visas on the same basis as LDS, Buddhists, Hindus and 7th Day Adventists etc.
We felt that new migrants were entitled to practise their religion and be ministered to in the same way as they had been at home.
We must now admit that with Islam we didn’t get a religion, but an intolerant, religious/political/social system that not only didn’t want to fit in, but actually seeks to destroy us.
All Imams should be registered with the state and their sermons, publications and other proselytizing materials checked before delivered or promulgated.
PAthena says
Do not call Arabs “Palestinians.” Calling Arab haters of Jews and Israel “Palestinians” is history rewrite, a consequence of Soviet propaganda. In Cairo in 1964 Gamal Nasser and the Soviet Union, both haters of Jews and of Israel, founded the “Palestine LIberation Organization” (P.L.O.), whose name shows its Soviwet origins, which came to fame by massacring the Israeli athletes at the Olympic Games in 1972 in Munich. A consequence of this was to call Arabs “Palestinians,” with all the phoney history and propaganda.
In fact, the terms “Palestine” and “Palestinian” had always meant the “land of the Jews” and “Jew” from the time that the Roman Emperor Hadrian in 135 A.D., after having defeated the last Jewish rebellion under Bar Kochba, renamed Judea “Palestina” to forever eradicate all memory of Judea and the Jews – he outlawed Judaism (and renamed Jerusalem “Aelia Capitolina,” “Aelius” being his gens name.
Great Britain after World War I, was awarded the “Palestine Mandate” to be “the homeland of the Jews.”
So the Soviet-based propaganda against Israel, calling Arabs “Palestinian” has the purpose of destroying Israel.
Pedro A. Bigay says
The name “Palestine” was given by the Roman Emperor Titus Flavius Caesar Vespasianus Augustus. Palestine is generally accepted to be the translation of the Semitic name for ‘Philistia’; Palestine-the land of the Philistieim. Israel’s worse enemies.
pkh says
Any stoning that takes place on the Temple Mount is a premeditated attack as there are NO stones on the Temple Mount naturally. They have to be brought in–and they usually are, by the wheelbarrow. These things are well planned in advance. There is NO SUCH THING as a “spontaneous demonstration”
involving rocks or stones on the Temple Mount. Any “news” reports from any source claiming a spontaneous demonstration that includes stoning doesn’t know what it is talking about.
alan says
If the IDF starts shooting these Arab rioters, the riots will stop. The Temple Mount should be out of bounds for moslems. The mosques should be removed stone by stone and the stones dumped in Jordan. If they want mosques they can have them in a moslem country, not the only Jewish one.
sidney penny says
What might have been preached in those Friday sermons?
Robert you know the answer.It is what they were reading at the Mosque during Friday prayers and what the preacher was reading from.
No wonder someone tried to ban it.
They were reading from the Quran
It is about hate, other things like inciting violence, insulting other religions, promoting religious enmity, disturbing public tranquility, promoting on ground of religion feelings of enmity- ( see below)
The real issue raised by the Petition was not what Muslims believe about the Quran but what behaviour patterns the Quran inculcates in its votaries vis-à-vis the unbelievers.
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/pref1.htm
Let it be realized by everybody concerned that India has always been and remains, the citadel of the most bigoted and bloodthirsty zealotry of Islam. The historical reasons for why it is so, are many. I do not have the time to detail them here. The main reason may be told. Islam in India has been what it has been because India has continued to stare at Islam as its greatest failure. Islam in India has never been able to relax, as it could do in countries which it converted completely. And it will not relax till Hindus learn to knock out its ideological fangs which are rooted in the Quran.
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/chi1.htm
Muslims in India have often sought shelter under Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) for preventing every public discussion of their creed in general and of their prophet in particular.
Quite a few publications which examine critically the sayings and doings of the Prophet or other idolized personalities of Islam, have been proscribed (banned) under Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code , as a result of pressure exerted by vociferous, very often violent Muslim protests.
Little did they suspect that the same provisions of the law could be invoked for seeking a ban on their holy book, the Quran.
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/chii4.htm
Now the summary of the petition to ban the book-but read the whole thing:
2. The respondent (Government) is a public authority having in terms of Section 95 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, read with Sections 153A and 295A Indian Penal Code, a public duty to forfeit to the Government every copy of a book,
which incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.
3. The Koran, also spelt as Quran, the so-called religious book of the Muslims the world over, written originally in the Arabic and available throughout India in the original Arabic or in its translation in Urdu, Bengali, Hindi, English, etc., is ex facie guilty of each one of the above offences.
4 For example, (see the many examples given in chapter 4)(one quoted by the London beheader of Lee Rigby)
5 The book promotes religious enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities in India.
(see the many examples given in chapter 5)
6 The book insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.
(see the many examples given in chapter 6)
7 While the Koran abounds with saying which incite violence, insult the religious beliefs of other communities and even exhort the Muslims to kill and murder non-Muslims, the problem is aggravated by yet another fact which has been true in the past and is universally true in our own times that unlike other communities Muslims are, and even fresh converts tend to become, highly orthodox people and follow the sayings of the book with a fanatical zeal with the result that whichever country has their sizable number amongst its population can never have peace on its soil.
(This was said in 1985 and it is still true today 2014!)
8. The offending expressions contained in the Koran and quoted in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 above are not so offensive in their translation in which they are so quoted as they are in the original verses in Arabic or in Urdu, the very sound of whose inimitable symphony not only sends the Muslims to tears and ecstasy but arouses in them the worst communal passions and religious fanaticism which have manifested themselves in murder, slaughter, loot, arson, rape and destruction or desecration of holy places in historical times as also in contemporary period not only in India but almost all over the world.
gravenimage says
Sidney Penny, I don’t believe the best approach is to try to ban the Qur’an.
Firstly, free speech is our greatest tool in opposing Jihad and Shari’ah—it is no coincidence that it is Muslims who are trying to restrict freedom of speech under the guise of “blasphemy” laws and “hate speech” laws. I don’t believe that we as Infidels should work to restrict speech.
Secondly, I believe that as many Infidels as possible should be reading the Qur’an, Hadiths, and Sira, so that we can educate ourselves about the savagery of Islam. If the Qur’an was banned, Muslims would keep reading it because they don’t care about flouting Kaffir laws, but it would become unavailable for people like you and me.
I think the Qur’an needs to be *exposed*, not banned. Robert Spencer has done a great deal of excellent work in that regard.