• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Tunisia: The controversy over “sexual jihad”

Feb 4, 2014 11:12 pm By Robert Spencer

17826

A hoax? Evidence of social blight? A legitimate form of jihad? In Tunisia, the controversy is still roiling. One noteworthy aspect of this study is that when the reports of this initially came out, many Muslim spokesmen in the West denounced the whole idea as an “Islamophobic” hoax. But unless “Islamophobes” have thoroughly infiltrated the Tunisian media, there is no way that could be the case. “Tunisian Daily Al-Shurouq’s Campaign Against ‘Sexual Jihad,'” by B. Chernitsky and R. Goldberg for MEMRI, January 31:

Introduction

At the close of 2012, a tweet attributed to Saudi cleric Muhammad Al-‘Arifi, a member of the Association of Muslim Clerics, in which he allegedly permitted young Muslim women to journey to Syria to have sexual relations with mujahideen fighting the Syrian regime, was circulated on the Internet. The tweet (see below) was construed by many in the media as a religious ruling (fatwa). Al-‘Arifi himself repeatedly denied issuing the tweet, adding that ‘sexual jihad’ was  equivalent to prostitution.[1] Regardless of its authenticity, the tweet sparked a lively debate in the Arab media on the phenomenon called ‘jihad al-nikah’ or ‘jihad al-monakaha’ – literally, jihad via sexual relations (henceforth, sexual jihad) – in which girls ostensibly travel to jihad fronts to provide sexual services to jihad fighters as a way of contributing to the war effort and earning a divine reward.

The tweet sparked an uproar in Tunisia as well, which reawakened last September after Tunisian Interior Minister Lotfi Ben Jeddou said that young Tunisian girls traveled to Syria to perform sexual jihad and returned pregnant after “having sexual relations with 30, 40 and even 100 men.”[2] Following his statement, other Tunisian officials criticized the phenomenon as well: Grand Mufti Hamda Sa’id claimed that sexual jihad is “alien to Islam and we never heard about it even in the Prophet Muhammad’s era when he embarked on jihad.”[3] The Ministry of Women and Family Affairs said that sexual jihad “contradicts the religious and ethical values upon which Tunisian society is based as well as international conventions on human rights to which Tunisia is signed.”[4] The ministry also announced that it would launch “information campaigns” to explain to young women and their families the dangers inherent in such actions, in order to prevent this from becoming a social phenomenon.”[5] The Minister of Women and Family Affairs, Sihem Badi, said that her office was preparing a plan for handling “victims of sexual jihad”.[6] The Ministry of Interior spokesman, Muhammad ‘Ali Al’Araoui, noted that the ministry was working to prevent young women from traveling to Syria for sexual jihad purposes.[7]

Conversely, other senior officials in the Tunisian regime, including the prime minister and an advisor to the Ministry of Religious Affairs, denied that the sexual jihad phenomenon existed and said that Al-‘Arifi’s fatwa had been fabricated by Syrian intelligence in order to blacken the image of the Syrian and Tunisian revolutions.[8] Some Tunisian Salafis also argued that this was a Syrian fabrication intended to distort the image of the regime’s adversaries.[9]

Stormy responses in the Tunisian media ranged from denying the existence of the phenomenon to the charge that the government was responsible for this social blight. Among those who denied the phenomenon was journalist ‘Adel Al-Sam’ali, who repeated the claim that the fatwa story had been fabricated by Syrian intelligence, and added that pro-Syrian channels had circulated false testimonies by young women who claimed to have participated in sexual jihad. Many Arab columnists from other countries, as well as Western journalists, took a similar stance.[10]

Prominent among those who maintained that the phenomenon was real and blamed the government for it was the Tunisian daily Al-Shurouq, which claims to be Tunisia’s most widely circulated independent daily, and prior to the Tunisian revolution it was identified with the regime of former president Zin Al-‘Abidin Bin ‘Ali. In a series of reports and articles, Al-Shurouq described the severity of the phenomenon, which it termed “a disaster,” and quoted religious clerics as saying that Wahhabi ideology was the source of it. The daily accused the regime of causing the problem by allowing the spread of this brand of Islam.

It should be noted that the backdrop to the uproar over this issue in Tunisia is the acute tension between the secularists and Islamists in the country. After winning the largest block of parliamentary seats in the elections following the revolution (89 seats out of 217), the Al-Nahda movement, affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, formed a coalition with two secular parties. However, sharp criticism by the opposition and the public of this coalition’s management of the country led, following a national dialogue, to an agreement to form a new nonpartisan government that is expected to be headed by independent MP Mehdi Jomaa, the current minister of industry.[11] The articles on the phenomenon of sexual jihad were tinged with criticism of the Al-Nahda government and apparent nostalgia for the regime of former president Al-Habib Bourguiba, who founded the secular state and viewed the family and women’s status as the foundation for transforming society.[12]

This report will focus on the Al-Shurouq’s article series criticizing the phenomenon of sexual jihad and on ‘Adel Al-Sam’ali’s article in the portal Babnet denying the phenomenon’s existence.

‘Al-Shurouq’ Series Charges: Sexual Jihad Is A Psychological, Social And Economic “Disaster”

In September 2013, following reports that many young Tunisian girls had performed sexual jihad in Syria, the Tunisian daily Al-Shurouq published a series of reports warning about the phenomenon and its implications. The daily claimed that about 100 young girls had traveled to Syria and returned pregnant, and that they and their children now constitute “ticking time bombs,” due to the severe psychological, social and economic implications of this “disaster.” It also claimed that a third of the girls had committed suicide while others had been cast out by their families,[13] and that the authorities were responsibile for this.

On November 21, 2013, the daily published an additional report criticizing those who had denied the phenomenon, stressing once again the claims and testimonies it had presented in its article series.[14]

The Tunisian Authorities Are Responsible For The Sexual Jihad Phenomenon

In its September 2013 reports, Al-Shurouq claimed that the interior ministry was already aware of the sexual jihad phenomenon a year ago, after the family of a 15-year-old girl who had returned from Syria pregnant filed a complaint against several radical Salafis accusing them of pressuring their daughter into traveling to Syria.[15] The daily quoted Tunisian clerics who accused the regime of causing the phenomenon by spreading the Wahhabi ideology that engendered fatwas like Al-‘Arifi’s. For example, Fadel ‘Ashour, a member of the Tunisian Imams Union, said that he intended to file two suits against Religious Affairs Minister Noureddine Al-Khademi, because the latter had defended some clerics who had allowed young Tunisian women to perform sexual jihad and they had returned from Syria pregnant. ‘Ashour claimed to have warned Khademi that Wahhabi ideology was spreading in Tunisian mosques, and added that he intended to launch a “No to Wahhabism” campaign in the mosques. According to the daily, Tunisia’s former grand mufti, ‘Othman Battikh, also  warned about the sexual jihad phenomenon and blamed Wahhabi ideology for it, and this was the reason for his dismissal from his position.[16]

The Jihadis Have Reduced Tunisian Women To A Commodity For Satisfying Their Bestial Impulses

The daily charged Salafi-jihadis, such as Ansar Al-Shari’a in Tunisia, with responsibility for recruiting the young women. It described them as “forces of darkness” and “preachers of backwardness” that exploited the young women’s ignorance on religious matters and their deficient education to recruit them for sexual jihad,  in an attempt to tarnish the Tunisian woman’s status – hitherto considered a symbol of progress – and reduce her to a commodity designed to satisfy their bestial impulses.[17] Citing government and security sources, Al-Shurouq claimed that the girls seduced into traveling to Syria were persuaded that they were doing an act of charity for which they would be rewarded in paradise, and added that the Salafi recruiters received a cash bounty of 20,000 dinars if they managed to recruit a group of young people to fight the “infidels” in Syria and a group of young women to provide them with sexual services.[18]…

There is much more. Read it all.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Tunisia, women's rights in Islam


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Anonymous Coward says

    Feb 4, 2014 at 11:56 pm

    Another example of hypergamy.

  2. mortimer says

    Feb 5, 2014 at 12:05 am

    Most Muslims are more moral and have better manners than their prophet.

    Mohammed is the greatest liability of Islam. Mohammed’s misogyny and pedophilia are unacceptable to most Muslims today.

    Mohammed is an embarrassment to Muslims.

    • fair_dinkum says

      Feb 5, 2014 at 4:47 am

      i agree that muhammed is a liability/catch 22..
      i really dont know what most moslems think though, i just know how it manifests itself in death and torture on a sickeningly daily basis.

      i have a theory that the reason moslems cant depict muhammed is that he was also, physically, a very ugly, twisted looking prophet. early portraits seem to support this. (and the oversensitivity). … however.

      who cares what these moslima’s do?
      they may well die, be killed by an angry mob quoting this sura or that. they will be exposed to polio and other inoculation diseases. they will spread std’s and every now and then, 1 or 2 ‘men’ will get carried away and strangle, beat, rape and punish a woman to death. (see if the new moslima cartoon character steps in..no?) and what is the story about travelling without men? or doesnt it apply?

      and its a sunni / shia conflict.. if caught by the other side.. there will be no mercy, only more atrocities. and surely iran are propping up the govt soldiers.

      a week ago we were listening to rants about palestine being next and Israel had better beware. but syria will burn for a while yet. and this may become more protracted. not ending anytime soon.

      i hope iran rattles its sabres at the sunnis in syria. the escalation would be fantastic and would ensure that it is kept going.

      and thats only good for the west. make sure we supply weapons only and leave them to it.

      • Mumia W says

        Feb 5, 2014 at 11:15 pm

        What about Christians living in Syria?

  3. Buraq says

    Feb 5, 2014 at 8:26 am

    In any society where morality, common sense, logic or just a plain sense of decency are ignored to make way for the arrogant imperatives of Islam, there can only be one disastrous outcome. These clowns will be infected, and will infect 1,000s, and the 1000s will go on to infect 100s of 1,000s who will go on to infect millions with a disease for which there is no cure.
    Is this bad?
    No, because the ensuing human disaster will serve to warn millions of Islam’s destructive effect.

  4. Bezelel says

    Feb 5, 2014 at 10:34 am

    When I try to share info about islam, such as this article, with the complacent / uninformed, I am met with dis-belief about the absurdity known as islam.
    Many refuse to even look at the evidence, claiming it is too gruesome and seem to prefer to ignore the progression of this social disease known as islam. There is no way a sane person can justify their behavior yet soooo many who claim to be sane will make excuses for islamic atrocities. I wonder how far do they have to go before it’s noticed?

    • islamisdeath says

      Feb 5, 2014 at 12:51 pm

      They themselves will have to experience islam head on before they will pay any attention. Even then they might decide its just a random act perpetrated by someone who happens to be muslim even if he justifies his behavior by quoting the koran.

      I was at a very large party during Christmas err ah Winter Holiday and was totally amazed to discover that No One knew that the evil minions of satan who hacked Lee Rigby to death were muslim and shouting Allahu like madmen the whole time. Seems the CNN segment they watched didnt mention it. They just thought a crazy Brit did it!!!!!!!

      • CornHolio says

        Feb 5, 2014 at 6:58 pm

        A lot of the mainstream networks that covered that murder, and the “manifesto/confession” of the guy who killed Rigby, played that piece of tape very coyly, and very cowardly.

        They didn’t edit any of his statements out, they just had a reporter doing a voice-over about the background details of the murder, speculating all the while about the possible motive, talking right over the killer’s explanations for why he had just killed him!

        I couldn’t believe it. If you watched that coverage, you’d come away with no idea at all why these two people killed this man. You would as likely assume it was football hooliganism as anything else.

        And the network CAN claim it did nothing wrong. They did not mute the man out, they just played the announcer’s voice so much higher, that it was practically impossible to make out what the killer was saying. You just assumed, listening to him talking in the background, that what he was saying was not relevant to the issue.

        “Not relevant”.

  5. eib says

    Feb 5, 2014 at 10:50 am

    God, protect the women of Tunisia.
    The men never will.

  6. Defcon 4 says

    Feb 5, 2014 at 12:07 pm

    “…Prophet Muhammad’s era when he embarked on jihad.” That would be the jihad of the inner struggle right? The jihad to make friends across the aisle, to keep physically fit and balance a busy schedule.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests
  • John on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Vladimir on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.