The devout Muslim Mohamed Jamal Miah almost certainly didn’t think that his lurid, unwelcome and terrifying advances were in any conflict with his devoutness in Islam, because his Islamic culture had already taught him that women who dressed like Western women and ventured out unaccompanied were whores, and Infidels on top of that, thus having no rights he was bound to respect.
Given the likelihood — indeed, the virtual certainty — that is behavior is a manifestation of his Islamic beliefs and assumptions, it is deeply and viciously (even greasily) Islamophobic for the British authorities to send him to jail. It conflicts with their policy of nonstop accommodation of Islam and the barring of critics of jihad terror and Sharia oppression from entering the country. Free Mohamed Jamal Miah! Make him Prime Minister! Stop the Islamophobia!
“Indian restaurant worker jailed for targeting women walking alone in Exeter,” from the Exeter Express and Echo, February 7 (thanks to Halal Pork Shop):
A FORMER employee at a popular Indian restaurant in Exeter has been jailed for targeting females walking alone in the city.
Mohamed Jamal Miah, 34, was convicted of one sexual assault and two common assaults after his lurid and unwelcome advances left his three victims terrified.
Magistrates told him that custody was the only option and he was given 16 weeks in prison after the court heard victim impact statements from all three woman who said Miah’s actions had left them scared to go out alone.
Described as a ‘devout Muslim,’ Miah had been living and working at the Argee Bhajee restaurant in Buddle Lane, St Thomas, at the time of the offences.
The court heard he had recently moved to the city from Coventry to Exeter but had struggled to adjust to British culture in the five years since he arrived in the UK.
Sentencing him at Exeter Magistrates Court, the bench chairman told him: “There were three separate lone victims. They were female victims and we have heard from their victim statements that the effect on this is all very similar. There was very limited physical effect but the emotional and mental effect on them is longer lasting and that has greatly influenced our view on these offences.
“One offence even occurred when you were on your way to court to answer a charge of assault. Throughout he has not accepted the seriousness of this on his victims. He is unwilling or unable to explain his behaviour.
“Whilst the offences taken in isolation may not result in custody, taken collectively with the pattern of behaviour exhibited by over that short period, these three offences are so serious only a custodial sentence is appropriate or right.”
The first incident that came to the police’s attention took place at around 4.15pm on November 12 on Dunsford Hill .
Prosecuting Lyndsay Baker said: “The victim saw the defendant stood in front of her on the pavement and got to an “uncomfortably close distance.”
“She said hi, believing he may be asking for directions but the defendant said in an aggressive manner ‘you come home with me.’
“He then grabbed hold of her arm and said it again. She believed he was going to force her to go home. The defendant then said ‘you are a very beautiful lady and asked if she had a boyfriend. She responded and said ‘no, I am going home with my husband’ and tried to walk away. He grabbed her shoulder and said ‘no you are coming home with me.’ She managed to struggle away and leave the defendant. When she got home she called the police.”
The second incident on November 26 happened as the defendant was on his way to court to answer charges over the first offence.
The victim was walking to Exeter College along Cowick Street towards Exe Bridges. She first noticed the defendant behind her near St Thomas railway bridge. He started asking her questions and when asked if she had a boyfriend she replied yes. He then suggested they go out shopping or to dinner.
“The victim said she was feeling uncomfortable with the situation and as they neared Bonhay Road he leaned in to kiss her,” said Ms Baker. “She managed to resist but his lower arm made contact with left arm and shoulder. At which point she stood still in front of the defendant and he walked away.
“She was scared and panicked and called her mother who immediately notified the police.”
The third offence happened on November 10 at around 4pm. The 31-year-old victim was taking her dog for a walk along the River Exe. He grabbed her biceps and leaned in to kiss her.
“Although she tried to avoid contact his lips touched the corner of her mouth,” said Ms Baker.
She pushed him away but he grabbed her arm again and started saying “I really like you.” She pushed him away with more force and told him to leave her alone. At this point he finally backed away.
“Only when she discussed the incident with friends did she realise the seriousness of it and she reported it to police on 15 December.
Richard Parkhouse, defending, said: “His marriage ended and he left Coventry and had become socially isolated.
“He was struggling to adjust to British Culture and understanding the relationships between men and women.
“He is a devout Muslim and has lost his good character at the age of 34. This is stigma attached to him for the rest of his life.
“He was at the time employed and had accommodation with his employment. But he has lost this as well.
“He was a man of previous good character.”
Miah will also be on the sexual offences register for seven years.

Bradamante says
I’m not surprised to hear that this kind of thing happens. A shopkeeper in the Arabic quarter of the Old City in Jerusalem abruptly grabbed me by both upper arms and tried to kiss me. I screamed “What the hell’s the matter with you?!” and pulled away. As I ran out the door, he was calling after me, “What’s wrong? I just think your hair is so beautiful!” I could tell he had absolutely no clue that he had done anything wrong. It was an abrupt introduction to this culture in which men can feel free to violate women’s boundaries. It was over in a moment, but it was terrifying — it felt like suddenly being in some sort of insane asylum where there’s a person who has no idea that I am even a person, and he feels quite certain that he’s behaving appropriately as he’s taking shocking liberties. I ran out of there and was very careful around Arab men for the rest of my time in Israel. But I felt like a fool for having gotten myself into that situation in the first place. That reaction, I think, is something that Islamic supremacists are counting on when they try to convince women that they deserve what they get if they don’t wear hijab.
I can only imagine how terrified these women felt, being physically grabbed by someone who said he was going to take them somewhere. How horrible. I’m glad this one has been put in jail. But we’re dealing with a culture that apparently teaches men that it’s all right to act this way, and we Westerners need to step up and take a firm stand that we’re not going to allow our cultural norms to be violated. I shudder to think that someday, women in England might become convinced that you just have to expect this sort of thing, and that a woman out walking her dog in broad daylight without a hijab shouldn’t be surprised if this is what she gets.
Jay Boo says
It is not the least bit surprising that a shopkeeper in the Arabic quarter of the Old City in Jerusalem would behave in such a manner.
Although Muslim have absolutely no right to even live in the city of Jerusalem they desecrate the Jewish temple with their idol worshiping sacrilegious dome of duplicity.
Muslims who claim that perverted Muhammad has a claim to Jerusalem are like smelly disgusting dogs marking territory.
WHERE IT ALL BEGINS
It all begins with the FIRST LIE the “Profession of Faith”
This is the reason so many Muslim men act like unaccountable whores.
The Islamic “Profession of Faith” is not really meant to praise and worship ‘Allah’.
Allah is just window dressing to entice their inflated ego. Allah is nothing but a cheap stage prop to hide their true intentions.
The Islamic “Profession of Faith” is meant to establish a Muslim’s …
PRESUMPTION OF ENTITLEMENT OVER OTHERS.
boakai ngombu says
yo, Mohamed Miah, females are not chattel. your actions betray lack of knowledge.
you should not be given consideration just because your model of behavior – Muhammad (lately contrived; lusty dude) – found any way to justify his lechery and then found a way to sanctify it in a very human way by manipulating the Allah god (unknowable; the best of all deceivers) to speak base desires.
Charli Main says
Of course, there will be no possibility that this piece of sh*t will be deported, because there will be legions of Muslim Huggers screaming about his Human Rights.
Anyway, what were these white slappers doing, strutting their stuff on the streets of Islamic Britain and filling devout Muslims with lustful desires???
Its time the Muslim Council of Britain ordered David Cameron to pass laws making these sl*ts dress in black bin bags and wear nose rags.
tjhawk says
Adherents of islam are given prerogative to treat others who don’t follow islam in any fashion they see fit. They are not constrained by islam. Many muslims do have human decency, and they restrain themselves. This is in spite of islam, not because of islam.
Salah says
“..jailed for targeting women walking alone”???
One more Islamic contradiction:
Women walking alone…haram.
Aisha sharing the same bed with Ali, with the approval of Muhammad…halah!!!
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2011/04/threesome-in-islam.html
PJG says
“Struggling” to adapt to British culture?
No, it’s the other way round. Britain is struggling to adapt to Islam. Sometimes it gives in, sometimes it puts up a little fight, sometimes it insists on British law, sometimes it insists on Islamic law.
But if they wanted multiculturalism, they have it. Eve-teasing and all.
PJG says
Two of my neighbours are British (I live in Australia). They are middle class women and they absolutely adore the multicultural status of Britain. They were raised as cannon fodder for the PC agenda, or perhpas as parents of cannon fodder; their kids may well grow up as part of a vulnerable minority, given our governments’ rush to fill the country with third-world immigrants. They love Muslims and gay marriage and can’t see the contradiction. They reserve their scorn for Christians and don’t like me much because I’m white and fail to be ashamed of the fact.
I think they’re mad. An English fellow I met told me that this kind of person is eager to demonstrate his/her class credentials; the embrace of PC madness proves they are not “working class”.
Chris says
Why do you keep voting for them then?
This mass immigration from the Third World has been going on since 1948. You had your wake-up call in 1980 or thereabouts with the Satanic Verses riots. All those angry bearded faces screaming “Death to the Infidel!” – never in a million years were they going to become Englishmen.Yet it continued under Mrs Thatcher and increased sharply under Blair who, for once, did not lie when he promised to change the UK beyond recognition. With the support of the British working class he was elected three times.
You now have the chance to vote for a respectable political party that is opposed to further mass immigration. How many MPs do you think they will win?
Secondtonone says
That’s why more and more women are carrying in the U.S. ,to eradicate jerks like this!
exsgtbrown says
The court heard he had recently moved to the city from Coventry to Exeter but had struggled to adjust to British culture in the five years since he arrived in the UK.
I bet he hasn’t put much effort into adjusting to British culture…
EYESOPEN says
“The court heard he had recently moved to the city from Coventry to Exeter but had struggled to adjust to British culture in the five years since he arrived in the UK.”
*************************************************************
Well, if he has been unable to adjust to British culture in 5 years, it doesn’t look as if he is going to be able to. Ship him back to whatever muslim hellhole he came from.
So, his marriage “ended”, did it? I guess he’ll have no alternative but to turn to jihad to get those promised 72 virgins. (To be perfectly honest, he makes a rather pathetic figure. I know women would be frightened by his unwanted approaches. Looks like he’ll have to brush up on his “pick up” lines. “Hi sweetie. Do you come here often?”)
So this is another way that muslims are the first victims of islam. This guy does not even know how normal men and women are supposed to behave towards one another. Believe it or not, there is actually a minuscule part of me that feels sorry for him as a human being. Imagine being that socially crippled that you had no idea how to interact with other people – particularly those of the opposite sex .
And before Lemon-Lime/voegelinian gets all over me for having a shred of human sympathy for a fellow human being who is a rather pathetic figure, that does not mean that I condone his behavior – or his presence in Western societies, not as a muslim anyhow.
Marbran says
The sad part is that these men are thinking the same thing: “Ahmed, I just do not understand why western women refuse to be normal…” as he’s throwing a stone at a woman buried to her neck.
dumbledoresarmy says
Once his sentence is served, strip him of his UK passport (if he has one) and deport him. He’s a liability, not an asset.
He had no intention of adapting to British culture; he was a Muslim, doing hegira (migration-invasion) to spread and impose Islam (see ex-Muslim Sam Solomon’s excellent book “Al Hijra – the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration” for a spine-chilling account of this tactic; also see another ex-Muslim now-Christian, Patrick Sookhdeo, the case study “Islam in Britain” and the densely scholarly “Faith, Power and Territory” analysis of the way in which the Ummah goes about islamoforming any territory into which they go).
Boot him.
All Britons reading and posting here should at least write to their MPs and to their Foreign Minister, Immigration Minister, and Prime Minister and *demand* that people like this be deported instanter. And for good measure, ask – very pointedly – why this creep was permitted into the UK in the first place, and demand that Muslim immigration-invasion be halted, ASAP.
Look, you may believe that this will do no good at all. But at least: say it. If a million letters to this effect start landing in the in-trays of every last British MP and member of the House of Peers every single time mohammedan immigrants commit crimes that are directly due to mohammedan behaviour patterns and mohammedan cult practices that have been inculcated into said mohammedans from childhood, it just *might* start to sink in.
And that goes for the rest of us in *our* countries, when the same sort of garbage happens *here*: Australia, NZ, Canada, USA, France, Germany, Netherlands, you-name-it.
It’s exhausting, because it will mean a *lot* of letter-writing to apparently little effect, but it is the bare minimum that can be done. (And all of us could do with carefully reading and re-reading the book “Getting Through”, which exists in both a US-specific and an adapted-for-Australia edition): see the blog “Citizen Warrior” for more.
Charli Main says
Oh my !!!! you have got me dreaming DDA !!!
But that’s all it is. The British parliament is run by rabid Muslim huggers and controlled by the Muslim Council of Britain.
As you already know, just one word or act in Britain, deemed to anti- Islamic or anti-Muslim gets you to see the inside of a British prison. That’s how much control the Muslims have in modern Britain.
David “its nothing to do with Islam ” Cameron´s main priorities at present are how to get 75 million Turks into the European Union and to turn London into a global centre for Islamic finance.
The good news though is, the Muslims haven´t, as yet, found a way to stop people dreaming.
R.C. says
Flooding Britain with Muslims is a result of Cultural Marxism. This is what is had with Godless Satanic Islam–there are no good Muslims–everyone who follows the Qur’an is evil! These Muslim dogs live as if it were the seventh century!
doreva says
in our Western culture, there are people who “defend” the “dirty old man” sometimes, saying things like “even dirty old men need to be loved” and say that to admonish women and girls who are reacting negatively to the advances of the “dirty old man”, which proves that misogyny definitely is a “multi cultural” phenomenon…however, the fact that the perp in this Exeter case made the women afraid to go out alone (Magistrates told him that custody was the only option and he was given 16 weeks in prison after the court heard victim impact statements from all three woman who said Miah’s actions had left them scared to go out alone.) shows that he is in fact the one being persecuted by “islamophobia” for actually he was just showing the women how to behave and feel like proper women. if my statement makes no sense whatsover, then welcome to the upsidedown world of “islam is a religion of peace”. ha ha ha
shortfattexan says
These ladies were lucky that all they got was “unwanted advances”. If the guy truly was a “devout Muslim” as they are claiming, he would have tried to behead them.