• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Swedish Parliament removes baroque bare-breasted painting to avoid offending Muslims

Mar 17, 2014 8:18 am By Robert Spencer

Juno“Deputy Speaker Susanne Eberstein of the Social Democrat party ordered the painting, ‘Juno’ by baroque artist G.E. Schroder, to be removed from the guest dining room, where it had hung since 1983….’We routinely change paintings from time to time.'” Yes, apparently every 31 years. The painting, as you can see, is not a piece of pornography, but is in the established Western tradition of nude art, which it would be reductionist and crude to dismiss as salacious. And so here again we see that wherever Islamic law and culture conflict with Western law and culture, it is the latter that must give way — and the Western non-Muslims have so internalized this principle that they take it upon themselves spontaneously to enforce it, even when there are no Muslim complaints.

“Painting with bare breasts removed from Swedish Riksdag dining room,” from UPI, December 19, 2013 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):

STOCKHOLM, Sweden, Dec. 19 (UPI) — A painting of a bare-breasted woman has been removed from the Swedish Riksdag’s guest dining room on orders from the legislature’s deputy speaker.

Deputy Speaker Susanne Eberstein of the Social Democrat party ordered the painting, “Juno” by baroque artist G.E. Schroder, to be removed from the guest dining room, where it had hung since 1983, TheLocal.se reported Thursday.

“We routinely change paintings from time to time,” a Riksdag representative said in response to an inquiry from news agency TT.

A parliamentary source who asked to remain anonymous told TT lawmakers were concerned about the painting’s effects on foreign visitors.

“You have to think of the foreign guests, especially those from Muslim countries,” the source said.

Eberstein said the painting’s removal was also for the comfort of herself and her fellow female officials.

“I think it is more a feminist issue. It’s tiresome [looking at] a bare-breasted woman when I sit at public dinners with foreign guests. I think it feels a little hard to sit there with men who look at us women,” Eberstein said.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: dhimmitude, Sweden Tagged With: featured


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. richard Sherman says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 8:27 am

    You certainly do not want to offend Muslims who revere the SOCIOPATH MUHAMMAD WHO PERSONALLY DECAPITATED 900 UNARMED JEWS….

    • Defcon 4 says

      Mar 18, 2014 at 1:24 am

      I don’t think the psychopath muhammad personally decapitated the Jews of Yathrib — he had the job done by his soldiers, while he watched.

      • Nothosaur says

        Mar 18, 2014 at 9:25 am

        Give me the citation of the Hadith that says that he merely watched.

        • Defcon 4 says

          Mar 18, 2014 at 12:25 pm

          Give me a citation where it says muhahahahamad took part in the head chopping.

        • gravenimage says

          Mar 18, 2014 at 9:37 pm

          Boys, boys—why the disagreement? With the “Prophet” and his “companions”, there’s always plenty of savagery to go around:

          From the Hadith:

          “Then the Messenger of Allah commanded that ditches should be dug, so they were dug in the earth, and they were brought tied by their shoulders, and were beheaded. There were between seven hundred and eight hundred of them…”
          [Ibn Kathir, on Quran 33:26]

          That’s a bit equivocal as to who, exactly, was wielding the scimitars. Here’s early Muslim jurist Tabari:

          “The messenger of God went out into the marketplace of Medina and had trenches dug in it; then he sent for them and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in groups…”

          This implies that Mo supervised the butchery, while others did the actual hard work of head-chopping.

          Here’s my own take on the atrocity:

          http://s478.photobucket.com/user/gravenimageartist/media/BanuQurayza.jpg.html?sort=3&o=2&_suid=139519277522604799021161161363

          I did, admittedly, invoke a small amount of artistic license—not much, though…

    • Huck Folder says

      Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 am

      What offence? WHO complained?

      If it ain’t baroque, don’t fix it!

  2. WandaTheWicked1 says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 8:32 am

    Well, too bad for Sweden then. Based off this, which as far as Martin is concerned was the final straw, our company will NOT deal with sweden in any way, any Swedish companies or Swedish Nationals.
    We can not and will not be a party to th dhimmification of any nation.

    What do we do?
    Multibillion dollar Clean Energy systems, and that’s Revenue, NOT what’s needed in ‘subsidies’ to keep it running–it operates and provides a vast Net Revenue Profit.

    Their loss.

    • Leith N. Wood says

      Mar 17, 2014 at 3:47 pm

      Bravo! Keep it up.

  3. Philip says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 8:32 am

    Sweden and England is sold off to 17th century savages. Even they must be amused by how easily these people sold themselves off to them, whom they kind of worshipped.

    • Tradewinds says

      Mar 17, 2014 at 8:52 am

      Philip, you mean 7th century savages. If only Islam had begun in the 17th century the world would be much better off. Unfortunately the 7th century is when the Arabian warlord invented Islam. 1400 years of Islamic barbarism and jihad. The ruination of the Middle East region due to Islam. 21st century mass-murdering Jihad. Islam should be abolished as Fascism and Nazism were defeated and abolished.

      • Jon says

        Mar 17, 2014 at 11:48 am

        You mean cavemen. I don’t even believe in evolution.

        • Huck Folder says

          Mar 19, 2014 at 12:11 am

          You mean caveMAN – shortass mo, the pathological, schizophrenic epileptic diddler.

          And that was on his GOOD day!

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Apr 3, 2014 at 12:08 am

          You’re insulting *cavemen* by comparing them to Muslims!

          ‘Cavemen’ had 1/ music (35 000 year old bird-bone flutes, found in a cave in Central Europe, and still playable)

          2/ uncovered women and sculpture (all those well-endowed female statuettes, sometimes dubbed “Venus” figures – most famously the “Venus of Willendorf”

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurines

          and the – 35 000 year old! – “Venus of Hohle Fels”

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Hohle_Fels

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Galgenberg

          This is the earliest known sculpted representation of a human face: carved 25000 years ago. Muslims would smash it to atoms if they could.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Brassempouy

          3/ pet dogs (hey, it was our “caveman” ancestors who domesticated the dog; our association with dogs goes waaaay waaaay back)

          4/ lovely, lifelife, painted images of living beings – for example, the marvellous grottoes of Altamira, Lascaux and Chauvet in Western Europe (there are also, in some of the caves, massive clay *sculptures* of bison, etc), and the myriad rock art – paintings, engravings – galleries of aboriginal Australia, continuously created by generations of artists all the way from thousands of years ago, right on up to the very recent past, and the rock art – paintings and engravings – made by ancient humans in Africa and the Americas.

          Visual arts, sculpture, music, pet dogs and uncovered women – all features of every ‘stone age’ human society of which we have knowledge, and all, all, all anathematised by Islam. Oh, and fermented drinks also seem to have been universal – even Tasmanian Aborigines, cut off for 8000 years from all other humans – used to gather to get high on the fizzy and swift-to-ferment sap of the appropriately-named “Cider Gum”.

          Islam isn’t “primitive human”. It is ANTIHUMAN/ INHUMAN.

      • Rania Kadret says

        Mar 18, 2014 at 12:48 pm

        islam had an amazing civilization back then when you were living in the dark ages, don’t mix Islam with Shiitism

        • gravenimage says

          Mar 18, 2014 at 9:45 pm

          Rania Kadret wrote:

          islam had an amazing civilization back then when you were living in the dark ages, don’t mix Islam with Shiitism
          ……………………………

          What rot. Nothing exemplifies the dark ages like Islam.

          Islam’s “golden age” resulted from its conquest of more advanced civilizations—Persia, Byzantium, Hindu India—which limped along for a while under oppressive dhimmitude until they were finally crushed.

          And the implication that the only uncivilized element of Islam is Shi’ism is grimly laughable—Sunni Muslims are just as violent, barbaric, and uncultured as their Shi’ite coreligionists.

        • Huck Folder says

          Mar 19, 2014 at 12:21 am

          gi: I believe most of the terrorism and funding thereof is by the ‘sunny’ side of mohammedanism, but they are 90% of “the cult of death™”.

          The shite side of the inbred family are scarier looking with their gross flagellation of themselves and their defenseless children, and their serried ranks of barrel chested (steroids?) zombies in Iran.

          RK: “…back then…” Not so hot now? Have you seen ANY of the DISGUSTING bestial photos and videos of mohammedanism in action in Syria – beheading, even disemboweling those they disagree with? SAVAGES!

        • gravenimage says

          Mar 19, 2014 at 7:41 pm

          I consider Sunnis and Shia as pretty much of a piece when it comes to Jihad, Huck.

          Certainly, there are more Sunnis, but Shi’ite Iran is also a huge funder of Jihad terror, just like Sunni Saudi Arabia.

  4. duh_swami says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 8:37 am

    I think it feels a little hard to sit there with men who look at us women,”

    Heaven forbid a man ever look at a woman. You can fix that easily, just wear a burqa and make your guests really happy. You are being inconsiderate forcing them to look at you.

    • Hannelore Valine says

      Mar 17, 2014 at 9:11 am

      Duh_swami, that was exactly my first thought when reading the artcle! Give her a burqa. But then consequently send her to Saudi Arabia when she woun’t feel uncomfortible when men look at her.

    • Northern Virginiastan says

      Mar 17, 2014 at 2:18 pm

      Such prudery in liberal Sweden! Or it the lechery of Muslim men?

      • Ritch says

        Mar 18, 2014 at 9:02 am

        It’s not islamic prudery, it’s simply that they are not used to seeing a female body that hasn’t been mutilated and battered to a pulp. Muslim ‘decency’ is to force women to hide the extend and severity of their injuries inflicted by dirty Muslim men.

  5. St. Michael Defend Us says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 8:41 am

    OT-any fatwas against St. Patrick’s Day?

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 17, 2014 at 2:02 pm

      St. Michael Defend Us

      OT-any fatwas against St. Patrick’s Day?
      …………………………………..

      Oddly, I couldn’t find one.

      But just about *everything* about St. Patrick’s Day is completely Haram: it is a day named after a Christian saint, a celebration of an Infidel nation and culture, a celebration popularized in its modern form by the “Great Satan”, and a holiday frequently observed with the copious drinking of alcoholic beverages, including green beer.

      My husband is in Savanna right now seeing college friends, and will be attending the St. Patrick’s Day parade there, which is only a little less famous than parades in New York, Chicago, and San Francisco.

      I’m doing a bit of the “wearing of the green” myself today. Both my husband and I are part Irish.

      There is no doubt that St. Paddy’s Day, with its shamrocks and leprechauns and green milkshakes can be pretty silly—but it is a fun, happy holiday where anyone can “be Irish” for a day. Anything so fun must be Haram.

      Oh—I just remembered another Haram aspect—shirts and buttons and those goofy green cardboard hats emblazoned with “Kiss Me, I’m Irish!”.

      Begorrah! What could be more un-Islamic than asking unrelated strangers to kiss you?

      • voegelinian says

        Mar 17, 2014 at 2:20 pm

        Green is the color of Islam after all…

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Mar 17, 2014 at 9:32 pm

          So what?

          Ireland and St Patrick are a lot older than Islam.

          I’ll be damned if I stop wearing *green* for St Patrick, or curse the green grass, just because Muslims decided that green was “their” colour.

        • gravenimage says

          Mar 18, 2014 at 2:51 am

          Voegelinian

          Green is the color of Islam after all…
          ……………………….

          Green is also the color of the blades of grass and the leaves of the trees and the color of the sea in its many moods, Hesp.

          I have a freshly brewed cup cup of green tea at my elbow—China Green Tips, to be specific.

          I am just now laying out a palette for a new watercolor painting, and the pigments include Winsor Emerald, Winsor Green, Permanent Yellow Green, and Permanent Sap Green.

          There is nothing intrinsically Islamic about green, any more than Nazi Fascists could claim red and black.

          As far as I’m concerned, we have ceded *more* than enough to Islam already, I’m not going to include a major part of the spectrum, as well.

          Here’s a poem by Shalom Freedman:

          The Greens of These Trees These Leaves

          The greens of these trees these leaves
          The many shades of green-
          Olive green and deep dark green and yellow green
          And greens I see but have no name for-
          So many shades of light and beauty in green
          And I with my eyes loving them all
          And delighted and made happy by them all-

          Wondering why and how God’s world
          Has so so much Beauty
          Just in green alone –
          And being deep in happiness
          At being alive
          And loving them more
          In regretting why and how
          I will not one day soon
          be able to see them again.

          And by Jay Mandeville:

          GREEN, A Litany

          green in the midst of drab desolation
          green ‘til the tide in the street overflows
          green that preserves green’s green reputation
          green behind curtains, like cellist & bow

          green on occasions no green is permissible
          green by inversion a negative flame
          green in final disgrace & dismissal
          green where the gravedigger shoulders his spade

          green like the walls of Verlaine’s Belgium prison
          green woods, wolf & poet meeting on equal foot
          green as embroidered on old smoking-jackets
          covered with needlepoint dragons & soot

          green like a murderer gone to the guillotine
          green like the lawns of this land breaking through
          our windows in herbicide frenzy to taunt us
          green like the tarnish on brass tiger shoes

          green the result of choice or of chance
          green though the famished, the hopeful despair
          green that we have no hope of outguessing
          green for which always we must be prepared

        • voegelinian says

          Mar 18, 2014 at 1:33 pm

          I was being sarcastic of course. You guys think that a person — moi — who advocates rounding up all Muslims in the West and deporting them back to their Dar-al-Hellhole cares a quark about their gang colors?

        • gravenimage says

          Mar 18, 2014 at 9:56 pm

          Voegelinian wrote:

          I was being sarcastic of course.
          …………………………..

          Of course I knew that—I think I know your views fairly well by now. I certainly wasn’t chiding you, Hesp—far from it. I was just enlarging on the topic.

          And in that spirit, I hope you had a gloriously Haram St. Patrick’s Day!

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Mar 17, 2014 at 9:29 pm

        Happy St Patrick’s (I was born under a good Irish name from County Tyrone; my father’s direct paternal line goes back to a man who migrated from Ireland to England and then to Australia in 1864).

        Here’s a wonderful rendition of the verse called “The Rune of St Patrick” or else, “The Deer’s Cry”.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJx_Lu4PymE

        Note the line: “Against every cruel merciless power/ that may oppose my body and soul..”.

        You’ll find a translation of the complete text here, followed by other Irish poems in translation.

        http://mockingbird.creighton.edu/english/micsun/IrishResources/meyer.htm

        God bless Ireland and the Irish and deliver them from the Jihad.

    • citycat says

      Mar 18, 2014 at 2:52 am

      Yeah, I’ll give it a fatwa, supposedly St Patrick with his gang murdered the peace loving native Irish who so revered the Earth and had their own revered spaces, which were destroyed by St Patrick and the Christians who went their with him, assuming he existed of course.

      • Defcon 4 says

        Mar 18, 2014 at 12:28 pm

        @citycat

        Didn’t the Irish used to practice human sacrifice?

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Apr 3, 2014 at 12:18 am

          Yes. The general consensus seems to be that they did, though to what extent exactly is not clear.

          http://www.digitalmedievalist.com/opinionated-celtic-faqs/human-sacrifice/

  6. Charli Main says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 8:44 am

    Dear Deputy Speaker Susanne Eberstein, you just don´t get it , do you ???
    The fact that you are a still breathing Kaffir, is deeply offending the Muslims.

  7. Alex says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 9:17 am

    I find all muslims and their tribal, evil, satanic beliefs offensive. Especially genital mutilation, halal killing, jihad, sharia law, muslim marriage between old men and children, violence, rape, their stupid veils, their stinky black long dresses which they wear even in August etc etc. If we have to remove our paintaings to please offended muslims, I suggest we “remove” muslims as most Europeans find them very offensive.

  8. Jay Boo says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 9:17 am

    [Western non-Muslims have so internalized this principle that they take it upon themselves spontaneously to enforce it, even when there are no Muslim complaints.]
    =======

    As a simple courtesy to allow Muslim visitors to feel more at ease I would have to applaud their social graces and kind spirited gesture except for the fact that they overlook the issue of Islam being an intolerant barbaric ideology bent on imposing its supremacist culture wherever it is allowed to spread.

  9. Transmaster says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 10:01 am

    With all of this when I we going to hear about a fatwa on toilet paper after all Mohammad didn’t use it.

    • Defcon 4 says

      Mar 18, 2014 at 1:28 am

      Yes the odd number of stones should be perfectly acceptable to the average musl0nazi.

  10. Prinz Eugen says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 10:18 am

    Good thing John Ashcroft was not involved with this decision — the PC media
    and the Dems would have gone totally off the walls! To make the beheaders
    happy is surely doing God’s work?

  11. allan carr bryan says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 11:35 am

    One day we might have time travel, then someone can go back and eradicate the pedo Mohammed from history.

  12. zhingisender says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 12:29 pm

    For more paintings of naked women than you can shake a hairy fatwa at see:

    http://conchigliadivenere.wordpress.com/

  13. gravenimage says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 1:44 pm

    Swedish Parliament removes baroque bare-breasted painting to avoid offending Muslims
    ……………………………………..

    Westerners have begun removing their glorious art to avoid “offending” Mohammedans. After all, galleries have already caved, and in a recent press conference including Mohammdans (I forget where, now, but it was covered here at JW) a sculpture of Adam was covered with a drapery to avoid “offense”.

    And now Westerners are actually removing art from their official buildings—their parliaments.

    What does it say when the heart of Western lawmaking censors itself to appease barbaric Muslims? Nothing good. Will such a body then resist the imposition of oppressive Shari’ah law? I certainly wouldn’t count on it.

    More:

    “Deputy Speaker Susanne Eberstein of the Social Democrat party ordered the painting, ‘Juno’ by baroque artist G.E. Schroder, to be removed from the guest dining room, where it had hung since 1983….’We routinely change paintings from time to time.’” Yes, apparently every 31 years. The painting, as you can see, is not a piece of pornography, but is in the established Western tradition of nude art, which it would be reductionist and crude to dismiss as salacious.
    ……………………………………..

    Exactly. And devout Christians of different denominations have created and cherished such paintings for centuries—they have rarely found such work “offensive”.

    More:

    And so here again we see that wherever Islamic law and culture conflict with Western law and culture, it is the latter that must give way — and the Western non-Muslims have so internalized this principle that they take it upon themselves spontaneously to enforce it, even when there are no Muslim complaints.
    ……………………………………..

    Yes—it didn’t take threats of violence or even whines about being offended—this is *preemptive dhimmitude*.

    More:

    A parliamentary source who asked to remain anonymous told TT lawmakers were concerned about the painting’s effects on foreign visitors.

    “You have to think of the foreign guests, especially those from Muslim countries,” the source said.
    ……………………………………..

    But you don’t have to think about asserting Western values in your own parliament. *Sickening*.

    More:

    Eberstein said the painting’s removal was also for the comfort of herself and her fellow female officials.

    “I think it is more a feminist issue. It’s tiresome [looking at] a bare-breasted woman when I sit at public dinners with foreign guests. I think it feels a little hard to sit there with men who look at us women,” Eberstein said.
    ……………………………………..

    Good God. Several things: as other posters have noted, if you don’t want to be looked at by men, a Burqa is the thing for you.

    Secondly, that painting had hung in that room *since 1983*, which was near the height of the feminist movement. If feminists weren’t offended *then*, then the idea that this is a feminist issue is just ridiculous.

    Then, this is a painting *of Juno*, queen of the Gods. Juno is frequently considered *a feminist icon*.

    And what, pray tell, is offensive to feminists *about breasts*? Women—including many in Sweden—have used going bare-breasted as an assertion of equal rights. There is, in fact, a Swedish feminist group called Bara Bröst:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bara_Bröst

    The idea that this painting was removed for feminist reasons is absurd.

    And the *irony*—which should be more offensive to feminists—a painting of a regal bare-breasted woman, or the horrific oppression and abuse of women under Islam carried out by those “Muslim visitors”?

    • Huck Folder says

      Mar 19, 2014 at 12:30 am

      Juno what’s offensive? FGM.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Apr 3, 2014 at 12:39 am

        Yes.

        FGM is beyond vile.

        If one wants a diagram of blasphemy against the human form – against the very house of life – FGM is that.

        I see it as yet another working out in practice of the core Islamic principle of the lust for total domination and the rejection of reciprocity, the zero-sum I-only-feel-I-am-winning-if-I-know-you-are-losing-out mentality. The male not only deprives the female of the capacity for sexual enjoyment, but actually sets things up so that she will experience excruciating *pain* every time he uses her. That is: *he* gets pleasure …while she doesn’t just have *absence* of pleasure, she experiences *pain*. He gets his pleasure NOT from causing pleasure but from *causing PAIN*.

        Other manifestations of the same deadly paradigm are such commonly recorded Muslim atrocities as: gang-rape (sometimes even unto death) of non-Muslim women and girls (whether bought or captured in jihad); the rape of child ‘brides’ that often causes their death; and the rape of the already-dead.

        And it has frequently been recorded that Mohammedans, when conducting pogroms against non-Muslims (such as the Armenians, Bulgarians, and south Sudanese Christians and animists) not only raped women but **cut off their breasts**.

        During the 1967 assault upon the Jews of Israel, Martha Gellhorn recorded that one group of Arab Muslims who captured a Jewish girl typist **cut off her breasts**. (Mutilation of the genitals of captured non-Muslims is a frequent theme in the histories of Jihad whether written by Muslims or by surviving non-Muslims; breasts of women are cut off and their genitals mutilated, male genitals are cut off and stuffed into mouths of the corpse, and – in the accounts of jihad from places as far apart as India and Bulgaria – Muslims are recorded as ripping open the bellies of pregnant women, violating the womb in order to drag out the dying infant from its dying mother and mutilate it separately. All of this smacks of an obsessive black-magic-style occultic attack on and hatred of life itself).

        Wafa Sultan in her book “A God Who Hates” said “Allah hates women”.

        At bottom, when one looks hard and steadily at Islamic practice throughout history, one is forced to conclude that the infernal allah of Islam hates *life itself*, it hates everything that lives and grows.

  14. Mirren10 says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 5:54 pm

    http://politoskop.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/susanne-eberstein-juno-schrc3b6der-riksdag.jpg?w=230&h=225

  15. thomas_h says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 6:19 pm

    It is only a matter of time the exponentially growing moslem sector of Sweden will demand incorporation of crescent in the Swedish national banner and the Swedish multi-culti rulers will oblige pointing out that swedish flag must reflect the cultural diversity of Swedish population.
    After that it won’t be long the number of moslems settlers will be so large that they will demand removing the Cross from the Swedish flag and the rulers of Sweden will, correctly, point out that Sweden has long ceased being a Christian country and the Cross, while representing nobody, offends the moslem majority.

  16. Reality Check says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 6:35 pm

    Given the lechery of Muslim men, I am surprised Sweden is trying to please them by removing such a picture from the wall. This is what riles me the most – Muslims are the most lecherous men in the world, yet they are paradoxically the ones that can literally kill you on suspicion of immodesty.

  17. sfortne says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 9:48 pm

    Maybe now, Muslim men will not be so tempted to rape hundreds of little Swedish girls now that this nude photo has been taken down. Ludicrous!! Wake up Sweden!!

  18. Scott M Sykes says

    Mar 17, 2014 at 11:05 pm

    Tell the pedophile prophet people if they don’t like the art to go back to their sandbox and slavery.

  19. Defcon 4 says

    Mar 18, 2014 at 1:26 am

    But I thought slave women were supposed to be bare-breasted according to islam0nazi dogma? Obviously, the woman depicted is not a revered, sacrosanct muslimah, so what’s the beef?

  20. voegelinian says

    Mar 18, 2014 at 1:38 pm

    My father, a professor of English lit and well versed in history, told me that some famous personage of history (whose name escapes me) remarked about Vatican art the amusing cognitive dissonance of its “acres and acres of nude flesh!”

  21. Rune Wessel says

    Mar 18, 2014 at 2:00 pm

    I see, the Swedes want to be enemies ig western culture. So be it.

  22. artist says

    Mar 18, 2014 at 2:39 pm

    If you coming to somebody house (country), you are living by rules of your host. If you don’t like the rules, you are going back were you belonging.

    We all will be minority and will be living under Mohamed law soon,if we not stop it now.

  23. Kattsand says

    Mar 18, 2014 at 3:22 pm

    Some years ago, in the swedish pariament they had an exhibition called “Ecce Homo”, and they didnt care at all about protests from christians. Now, there are muslims instead, and the parilament think it was much more important to care about what they think…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecce_Homo_%28exhibition%29

  24. dumbledoresarmy says

    Apr 3, 2014 at 12:44 am

    The “Femen” and the “Bara Broest” folks should protest in relays outside the Swedish parliament until Juno in all her glory is restored to her proper place.

    And the Swedish Democrats should hold an in-house screening of Theo Van Gogh’s and Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s film “Submission”.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Shaman on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • gravenimage on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Boycott Turkey on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.