How far gone is Dhimmi Britannia? This far gone. Under pressure from Islamic supremacist and hard-Left agitation groups, the government bans counter-jihadists such as Pamela Geller and me from entering the country, but it isn’t just the government that is adopting a posture of abject submission before Islamic supremacism: this news item shows that the British people (like most of the American people) have internalized the idea that any negative word uttered about Sharia oppression and jihad violence is “racist,” “hateful” and “Islamophobic.” The Leftist and Islamic supremacist groups that have relentlessly pushed this idea over the last decade bear the responsibility for the wholesale destruction of British and American culture — but I doubt that that troubles them, as that was what they wanted to accomplish, anyway.
This is an Islamic phenomenon, and can only be stopped if it is confronted as such. Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that “retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law.
The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders. Iraqi women have asked for tougher sentences for Islamic honor murderers, who get off lightly now. Syria in 2009 scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but “the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour ‘provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.’” And in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that “Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values.”
“North East England: Honour-Based Violence Unreported Due to Racism Fears,” by Ludovica Iaccino for the International Business Times, March 28, 2014 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
Honour-based violence and forced marriages in communities across the North East go unreported because victims are frightened of being branded as racist, a report by ITV News Tyne Tees has revealed.
Probably it isn’t the victims who are afraid of being branded “racist,” but those who report the crimes.
Honour-based violence is a form of domestic abuse which occurs when victims, mainly women, are punished, very often by their relatives, if they bring shame upon their families.
Claire Phillipson from Wearside Women in Need said that while the number of people approaching her for help is alarming, what is more worrying is the number who are not.
“I have no doubt that all over the North East [England] first, second, third generation English young women are being forced into marriage,” Phillipson said.
“Schools and communities are keeping silent about it, because they are concerned that they would be called racist, islamophobic,” she continued. “They don’t quite know where the line between culture, religion and human rights should be drawn.”
According to Domestic Violence London, the abuse is not only perpetrated by men: “Sometimes female relatives will support, incite or assist” the organisation said.
“It is also not unusual for younger relatives to be selected to undertake the abuse as a way to protect senior members of the family. Sometimes contract killers and bounty hunters will also be employed.”
One of the women interviewed by ITV explained she had been sent from Pakistan to the UK in order to marry a man much older than her.
“My family said they would kill me, they would shoot me. That’s what would happen, if I didn’t do it.
“When I complained about it, my brother and sister tried to make me touch electrical sockets with wet hands, to electrocute me, and make it look like an accident,” the woman said.
According to the Halo Project,there are approximately 12 reported honour killings per year in the United Kingdom.
This does not take into account the many people who are taken abroad and whose whereabouts are unknown.
Out of the 5000 honour killings that occur around the world each year, about 1000 happen in India and the same number take place in Pakistan, according to international digital resource centre Honour Based Violence Awareness (HBVA).
Salah says
“My family said they would kill me, they would shoot me. That’s what would happen, if I didn’t do it.”
Education and Protection of Muslims will lead to the final destruction of Islam.
We can do the first part.
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/12/perfect-man-of-islam.html
The state must do the second.
ralph3796 says
Many non-Muslims and even many Muslims, think of Islam in the traditional religious sense of sacredness, intentions, spirituality, peacefulness, goodness, giving, loving, etc. In truth, Islam is not such a traditional religion. Islam is a ‘stand alone’ {only one of its kind} because killing unbelieving men, women and children, are not only permitted in Islam, but is actually demanded by Allah {Muslim God}. In Islam, Allah is not love, {he could be merciful, at best. A Christian would say ‘who needs mercy without God’s love?’} In Islam, total obedience to Allah is demanded, irrespective of rationality. Followers must unquestionably, even be prepared to kill a human, to protect this Allah because a ‘human life is meaningless’ {Ishaq: 676 – After killing the mother of five little sons, Muhammad said, “as meaningless as two goats butting their heads”} Instead humans are precious in Christianity and God calls us to value and respect human life, as God loves every human being, irrespective of race, creed, colour, nationality, etc.
eib says
Quote:
Followers must unquestionably, even be prepared to kill a human, to protect this Allah because a ‘human life is meaningless’ {Ishaq: 676 – After killing the mother of five little sons, Muhammad said, “as meaningless as two goats butting their heads”} I
end
Only a demon would say that human life is meaningless.
Only the demon-possessed would use such words as models of virtue.
Islam is profane.
Mohammed is a false prophet. Indeed.
Kepha says
I only partly agree. In all societies, the punishment for treason is death; so Islam is in one sense not a “stand-alone”.
However, you are right in that Islam condones a lot of things that Christianity or Judaism might find abhorrent. We Christians have Peter’s instruction to hold our wives in honor as joint heirs of the grace of life, and Paul’s instruction to love them as Christ loved the church (Ouch! I am a Christian man who believes very firmly that Christ truly died on the cross for our sins, and was truly dead for those three days)–and NO instructions on how to beat them.
I believe that this article should wake us up to how the real enemy we Westerners have is a sellout and fundamentally disloyal leadership.
citycat says
No, i don’t have any sins that Jesus died for.
Omar says
It’s a gift.
You don’t have to accept it.
Aardvark says
Kepha said: ” In all societies, the punishment for treason is death…”.
But not the UK.
Blair, Straw and their cronies removed the death penalty for treason. This was just before they allowed tens of thousand of mohammedans into the country, in an attempt to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity’. See http://alturl.com/or7mo for details.
And I don’t think the two events are unconnected. I think they knew that they were about to commit treason, and took precautions to protect their own necks.
So before they are brought to trial – and they will be – we must restore this penalty, as it is the only one fitting for their evil deeds.
Chabuco says
“Schools and communities are keeping silent about it, because they are concerned that they would be called racist, islamophobic”—
Terrorism works. The “islamophobia” industry, supremacist Muslims and their International Socialist comrades have blood on their hands, they tried to silent voices of dissent… and they have managed to succeed, for the most part, can’t deny that, otherwise you wouldn’t have stories like this every week.
Elise says
Why should the religious beliefs of the abuser or abused be relevant? Abuse and murder are terrible
eib says
Why?
Because in the case of honor violence, religious beliefs sanction every drop of blood spilled.
Islam is profane.
Mohammed is a false prophet.
Offended?
I’m much more offended by Jihad and the Muslim treatment of women.
Mirren10 says
Did you actually take the trouble to **read** the article, or did your PC/MC indoctrination just immediately kick in ?
”This is an Islamic phenomenon, and can only be stopped if it is confronted as such. Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that “retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law”
Got that ? In **islamic law**, there is no penalty for **murdering one’s own child** !!
So the ‘religious’ beliefs of mohammedans are **very much relevant**.
Can you name one single other religion, anywhere, **now, in this century**, which declares the murder of one’s own child to be **lawful** ?
Try and slough off your indoctrination, and start using your comprehension, and your critical faculties.
Bengt says
More and more people in sweden are reacting to the term “honour killing” and the most leading sites nowadays call it: shame violence, shame killings and shame culture for obvious reasons. I personally find the term honour in this context extremely offensive and misleading.
cartimandua says
Honour killing, disgusting term. Murder of a woman by a man of her own family. Murder. There is no honour. But there sure as sheit is killing. Murder. Disgusting filthy murder done by men who cannot stand their women to be free. I have an idea. Every man convicted of this serves double time. Never to be let out. Ever. I’ll be happy if my great grandchild takes his corpse out. Bloodthirsty? No he should have been drawn and quarterted. If this bastard had tried this in his own county, show us what might have happened? Get these bastards out of the Free World. ASAP
Jay Boo says
Bengt
That is good news
Ayaan Hirsi Ali said “Call it by its name”
Jay Boo says
Cowardice
Parents are suppose to PROTECT their children.
MUSLIMS WAKE UP
If the IMAM tells you to harm your children behead him and his followers.
fair_dinkum says
family values..
fear. intimidation. threats. beatings. 1st from their own families, then from their new husbands’family.
obey or die.
gravenimage says
True, Fair Dinkum—that’s *exactly* what “family values” are in Islam. *Ugh*.
Charli Main says
” Honour Killings”??? If ever there was a misnomer, honour killings is it.
These are Islamocides carried out by sick, mentally deranged Muslim sub-humans.
maxpublius says
I disagree. No one these days is afraid of being called an Islamophobe, as it clearly has become a hollow accusation. Indeed, most intelligent people now agree that violence is an inherent part of Islam, and that the Islamic world is horrendously bigoted, hateful and retrograde in its thinking.
Rather, people are afraid of being individually targeted for harassment and death by murderous Muslims and the majority of the Islamic community which supports them. That is why people are silent. The world has not yet learned to deal systematically against Islamic terror as it did with nazism and communism.
Carolyn says
And I’m afraid I disagree with you. Even our president takes the side of Muslims and has said that in any question he will take the side of Islam. Bloomberg, when speaking on the subject of the mosque near the World Trade Center, said with tears in his eyes, that it would disgraceful if it were not allowed. Obama said, in Cairo, that the US is the largest Muslim country.
With the exception of Obama, I believe that the prevailing
theory is that if we are nice to them, they won’t kill us. And not individually, but as a country, as a society. Major Hassan, who was a terrorist who killed and wounded many at Ft. Hood, wasn’t called a terrorist. His jihad was called “Workplace violence.” And not by individuals, but by an entire government. In fact a commanding General in the army said that it would be a shame if Hassan’s act damaged diversity in the military. He said that it was better that those people were killed and injured than that it damaged diversity.
“Diversity” whatever that is is the prevailing principle of our government and Islam is it’s goal. Not individually, not one by one, but as a whole. Our entire country is in danger not only from Islam, but from our own government.
gravenimage says
I also have to disagree, max. In this “politically correct” time, there are *many* people who would deny any amount of threat to avoid being considered “intolerant”—even of being intolerant of absolute evil.
gravenimage says
UK Islamic honor violence goes unreported: Schools and communities fear accusations of “Islamophobia”
………………………………….
Actually, I fear that Islamic violence of all stripes is going unreported on just this basis.
How much suffering is being thus enabled, both now and in the future? Suicidal madness….