The California chapter of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-CA) and United Sikhs will hold news conferences tomorrow to “announce the filing of multiple public accommodation complaints with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) against Boomers! amusement parks, a subsidiary of Palace Entertainment Holdings.”
They want Boomers! amusement parks to change its policy forbidding headscarves on go-kart rides, dismissing safety concerns as “unfounded” and claiming religious discrimination.
Boomers! attorneys might want to familiarize themselves with this case, which makes it abundantly clear that safety concerns are perfectly well founded, and that this action by Hamas-linked CAIR is about supremacism, not equal rights.
“Muslim woman dies as hijab is caught in go-kart axle,” by Bonnie Malkin, the Telegraph, April 9, 2010 (thanks to Kenneth):
The woman, 26, suffered severe neck injuries and went into cardiac arrest after her hijab, which covers the head and neck, became stuck in the kart’s machinery while she was driving at high speed.
Paramedics managed to revive the woman after material from the hijab tightened around her throat and she was airlifted to hospital, where she later died.
Local media reports said that her husband and children were at the track at the time.
Police have opened an investigation into the incident, which took place at the Port Stephens Go-Kart track on the New South Wales midcoast, and have seized the go-kart for forensic examination.
Detective Inspector Peter Fox of Port Stephens local area command told Fairfax news websites that the longer part of the scarf was wedged down near one of the go-kart’s wheel axles.
“[It appears] the scarf was pulled across her throat … from one side of the body to the other side,” he said.
Police said the woman and her family had been holidaying in Port Stephens, a popular coastal town, prior to the accident.
Signs at the track warn visitors about inappropriate footwear and advises drivers that they use the track at their own risk. However, there are no regulations about scarves or head dresses….
Guest says
How these people use and twist our concepts of rights and equality for their advantage! Use them until islam can dominate, then rights and equality and choice disappear before sharia.
moh s hamhead says
one born every minute, … as always insidiously aligning themselves with “genuine” groups/faiths, not “interfaith outreach” on this occasion
Looks like United Sikh s are the patsy s/useful idiots “this time round”
The chances of a turban, acting in the same fashion as a hijab which is already pretty tight to the neck are remote … but it is a valid safety issue
CAIR top of the “special accommodation” stakes yet again.
Saleem Smith says
The hijab is not a garment of Islamic modest. It is more a symbol of Islamic territorial dominance. And every Muslim male knows this.
We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that any Muslim woman attempting to leave the fold of Islam is to be hunted down and killed as an apostate.
>>>>>>>
Should Women Respect Muhammad and His Islam?
Muslims love to claim that Islam has granted women equal rights. Sadly, this is not true. The Qur’an states several times that women are to be granted less rights then those enjoyed by men.
This article will examine the status of women and their rights according to Islam, as well as some of the many disgusting things that Muhammad said regarding women.
The inherent oppression and degradation of women in Islam is abhorrent. For every good thing Muhammad’s Islam says about women, one can easily find a passage referring to women in the most unkindly of lights. Such is the reality of the fundamentally contradictory religion of Islam. One minute Islam is the perfect religion of peace and justice – the next it commands Muslims to maim, murder and subjugate others. Muslim women should learn the truth about Islam, and fast, if they truly care about their daughters and the future of women in general.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In controversial verse 4:34 of the Qur’an, men are told to beat their disobedient wives after first warning them and then sending them to sleep in separate beds. This horrendous verse approves of and even sanctions, domestic abuse. As we shall see momentarily, Islamic theology also permits slavery and rape. No person of sound mind and good heart could believe that this is the wish of god. Islam is nothing more than the mythical cult of a long dead, selfish little mad man named Muhammad ibn Abdullah.
Qur’an, 4:34
Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.
Here is an examination of how other translators render this controversial passage:
Pickthall: “and scourge them”
Yusuf Ali: “(And last) beat them (lightly)”
Al-Hilali/Khan: “(and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)”
Shakir: “and beat them”
Sher Ali: “and chastise them”
Khalifa: “then you may (as a last alternative) beat them”
Arberry: “and beat them”
Rodwell: “and scourge them”
Sale: “and chastise them”
Asad: “then beat them”
According to Muhammad and his Islam, a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s:
002:282 “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her”
The Qur’an permits men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls if they want to do so:
004:003 “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice”
The Qur’an compares women to a field (tilth) that a man is free to use when, and as he chooses:
002.223 “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will; but do some good act for your souls beforehand; and fear Allah. And know that ye are to meet Him (in the Hereafter), and give (these) good tidings to those who believe. ”
Hadith, Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Number 2142:
Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.
Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 1, Book 6, No. 301:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o ‘Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle ?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.”
The Qur’an allows men to marry pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated.
065.004 “And (as for) those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, if you have a doubt, their prescribed time shall be three months, and of those too who have not had their courses; and (as for) the pregnant women, their prescribed time is that they lay down their burden; and whoever is careful of (his duty to) Allah He will make easy for him his affair.”
Islam’s canonical texts record Muhammad the prophet of Islam as being a deranged con man who has betrayed women. Here is some more of what Muhammad said and did:
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 460:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.”
Hadith, Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
“By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel’s saddle.” — Ibn Majah 1854
http://www.faithfreedom.org/
Rezali Mehil says
As usual Saleem Smith talks a lot of kuffar based nonsense. What a waste of cyber space this twit is ….if you hate us so much …why are you still using the name of “Saleem”…..get lost Smith.
“slamic supremacist clothing , symbol blah blah blah.”
You should know that there are a lot of disadvantages to wearing the hijab, jilbab etc. …heat, light, static , cost, fashion, eating, freshening up etc.
There is also an advantage …identity …but not supremacist bullsh*t.
The go-kart firm need to answer if they broke any rules….if not they carry on.
Muslimas like me if they choose to ride a go-kart – do so at my own risk….it is understood.
She died because this was Allah’s SWT wish – not anything to do with the kart.
It is an all important distinction.
May Allah SWT give her all the answers that she needs to be ripped away from her family suddenly and give her rest in the after life.
More Later….
Rezali
Petey says
Since when does Allah want a muslim dead. I thought he just wanted infidels dead. What kind of savage do you worship?
gravenimage says
The repulsive Rezali Mehil wrote, replying to the stalwart Saleem Smith:
Saleem Smith talks a lot of kuffar based nonsense.
……………………………………..
Unfortunately for Rezali Mehil, none of what Saleem Smith has to say is “kuffar based” at all. He is an apostate from Islam, and knows whereof he speaks from personal experience.
More:
What a waste of cyber space this twit is….if you hate us so much …why are you still using the name of “Saleem”…..get lost Smith.
……………………………………..
What grotesque projection. Rezali Mehil apparently has no problem with her vicious coreligionists threatening the lives of Saleem Smith and his fellow apostates, nor does she consider such viciousness to be hate.
She certainly doesn’t want to allow Saleem Smith to warn the “filthy Infidels” about Islam.
More:
“slamic supremacist clothing , symbol blah blah blah.”
You should know that there are a lot of disadvantages to wearing the hijab, jilbab etc. …heat, light, static , cost, fashion, eating, freshening up etc.
There is also an advantage …identity …but not supremacist bullsh*t.
……………………………………..
Good God, what crap. Virtually everything Rezali Mehil has to say here is supremacist gloating about how Muslims are going to take over and subjugate us. She’s the one who is constantly spouting ‘supremacist bullsh*t’.
More:
The go-kart firm need to answer if they broke any rules….if not they carry on.
……………………………………..
What rot. Were this true, then CARE would not be suing the park to get them to adhere to Shari’ah rules.
More:
Muslimas like me if they choose to ride a go-kart – do so at my own risk….it is understood.
……………………………………..
“It is understood”—no, it’s not. Businesses have every right to bar employees and customers who refuse to adhere to safety rules.
More:
She died because this was Allah’s SWT wish – not anything to do with the kart.
It is an all important distinction.
……………………………………..
Funny how “Allah SWT” loves his high body count, especially of Infidels, women, and children. *Ugh*.
It’s also the will of “Allah SWT” when pious Muslims “Honor Kill” their disobedient wives, rape small children, and slaughter Kuffar.
And notice how pious Muslims—even those raised in the West—fail to have even the most basic understanding of logic.
If Muslimahs are regularly injured and killed when they wear Hijabs in inappropriate circumstances, they are still completely unable to see the link between head-scarf wearing and injury.
Mohammedans reject reason as “un-Islamic”.
More:
May Allah SWT give her all the answers that she needs to be ripped away from her family suddenly and give her rest in the after life.
……………………………………..
Surely merely wearing a Hijab would not be regarded as as “virtuous” as “Honor Killing” her disobedient children, convincing them to strap on a suicide vest and murder some Infidels, or waging “sexual Jihad” in some place like Syria.
After all, the “Prophet” himself said, “the main inhabitants of Hell are women”…
mark says
So many Muslims will cry discrimination even if the rules they want abolished have been created for their own good. Stiff-necked people are like that. Such persons are scattered all over the Old Testament, parts of the New, and are prominent in the book of revelation particularly.
Mirren10 says
Your attempts at religious/moral equivalence are crap.
How many Jews and Christians are demanding that amusement parks rescind safety rules in order to accommodate **their** religious garb ? None.
This isn’t about being ”stiff-necked”. It’s about mohammedan supremacism.
agung says
Don’t worry, next CAIR will demand no woman can drive go-karts, or cars. So doesn’t matter if women must wear hijab or not. Welcome to United State of Arabia.
Champ says
Woman is strangled by hijab …
A perfect metaphor of how islam chokes the life out of an individual–body, mind and soul.
Peter Largie says
You,as we are here, are being systematically annoyed by these muslims on every aspect of our lives, customs and practices. Our culture being rejected. It is also prime responsibility of anyone planning to make use of equipment, that they are fit and able to use safely such equipment, and that would include their clothing and apparel. The karts were not faulty or defective. The user was imprudent.
You may want to look at a similar case in Montreal. Here: http://www.cjad.com/cjad-news/2014/02/05/woman-who-died-at-fabre-metro-station-died-of-severe-brain-trauma
Roderick MacUalraig says
Good one. Very succinct, and true.
Hope you’re doing well.
R/ Mac
Roderick MacUalraig says
Sorry… that was a RE. to Champ.
devonoagon says
Well, this is common for the course of Islam and women. CAIR suing over the wearing of the hijab, female nurses in Muslim countries not allowed to wash their hands above the wrists out of modesty, etc. Keeping the women covered and hidden is more important then safety. Well, there’s more then one way to commit suicide then with a bomb strapped to their backs.
devonoagon says
Safety be damned when it comes to “modesty”. CAIR suing over the wearing the hijab in an amusement park, female nurses not allowed to wash their hands above the wrists. Well, there’s more then one way to commit suicide then having a bomb strapped to their chests. I just wonder, do they get their 72 virgins from this?
Angemon says
“The woman, 26, suffered severe neck injuries and went into cardiac arrest after her hijab, which covers the head and neck, became stuck in the kart’s machinery while she was driving at high speed.”
Did CAIR prosecute the kart for a hate crime?
David says
These people should all go back to where they came from. If their religion and culture are in conflict with the British culture, then why in the hell did they immigrate to Great Britain? They should go back to the hell hole where they came from, which they seem to love so much.
nothosaur says
No. It is not good. Knowing nothing about this woman, how do you know that she was not FORCED by her relatives all her life to wear garments like this. This vacation may have been one of her only chances to have any fun, and she got strangled.
The amusement park is absolutely right to prohibit head-garments.
The amusement park should sue CAIR for defamation for accusing them of anti-Islamic bias.
gravenimage says
2010: Muslima dies as hijab caught in go-kart axle. 2014: CAIR demands hijabs on go-karts.
They want Boomers! amusement parks to change its policy forbidding headscarves on go-kart rides, dismissing safety concerns as “unfounded” and claiming religious discrimination.
……………………………..
What utter insanity—if this safety concern were “unfounded” then this Muslimah wouldn’t have died after getting her slave rag caught on the go-kart axle.
But what do pious Mohammedans care? They’d much rather have a stack of dead “Awras” than give an inch on Shari’ah supremacy.
And as the response from the brainless Rezali Mehil goes to show, many Muslimas agree as well.
gravenimage says
By the way, this Islamic insanity is going on right in my backyard. One of the Boomers! amusement parks is in Livermore, California, right in the East Bay where I live. Almost nowhere is free of this Shari’ah “terraforming” these days. *Ugh*.
paul says
I thought muslim women weren’t allowed to drive. Maybe Boomers should just enforce sharia law.