Here again we see an Islamic jihadist explain his motives and goals wholly and solely in terms of Islam and jihad, and yet study of Islam and jihad have been ruled off-limits by the Obama Administration, even for people in law enforcement and intelligence agencies who are trying to understand the jihadists. It’s a recipe for failure, and disaster.
“Belgian Jihadist Fighting with ISIS in Syria: It’s Nice to See Infidel Blood from Time to Time,” from MEMRI, n.d. (thanks to Pamela Geller). The clip is from March 2014.
revg says
What would his ilk ever do if they succeeded in ridding the world of infidels? Fall back on sharia, and shed more blood of their own kind.
bill says
As everybody knows who pays attention. Far more Muslims are killed by other Muslims who think they are not Islamic enough by their standards, than have ever been killed by Westerners.
If they ever give up killing each other and have time free to concentrate on killing the infidels AKA non Muslims, then we will really have something to worry about.
Larry A. Singleton says
Once again another of these scumbags telling you all you need to know about their “religion of peace”. Take them, their words and their actions and compare them to their Christian victims. And the slimy thing he had to say about Buddhists of all people.
I hear people who have respect for genuinely “moderate” Muslims. I can’t find one scintilla of respect for somebody who is so stupid as to buy into an ideology so easily exposed as a fraud. To base their whole spirituality and belief in such a fatally flawed founder. I keep encouraging people to read Sheikh Abdullah bin Humaid’s article on jihad I found in a Summarized Bukhari and Emmet Fox’s The Sermon on the Mount; and compare the two. What person in their right mind and with any intelligence would choose Islam? They’d have to be the stupidest people in the world.
And they are.
Scratch Taha; the “Mahatma Gandhi of Islam” and you’ll see the flaws:
“we may describe it, (jihad), as a surgeon’s lancet and not a butcher’s knife.” Mahmoud Mohammed Taha (I’m sure there are about 200 million dead people that would disagree with him.)
His book The Second Message of Islam is loaded with slurs against Christian and Jews who failed to “submit to the Prophet as ruler of the community” and “violated a charter of alliance” and who were “punished” by the Mo who “severely restricted their rights”. In other words they rebelled against their dhimmi status and refused to convert or submit.
Same thing with the “moderate” Koran by Maulana Muhammad Ali; In his footnotes he states plainly Islams goal of world conquest. Also loaded with slurs against the “misguided” Christians and Jews”.
In a nice way of course.
Salah says
“What person in their right mind and with any intelligence would choose Islam? They’d have to be the stupidest people in the world.”
You’re absolutely right. But…
You also wrote:
“I hear people who have respect for genuinely “moderate” Muslims. I can’t find one scintilla of respect for somebody who is so stupid as to buy into an ideology so easily exposed as a fraud.”
We must not forget that many of these “moderate” Muslims are Muslims because their fathers and grandfathers had to choose between converting to Islam and death. Many Muslims are Muslims because they were born Muslims, and there is NOTHING they can do to get out of this prison; Muhammad said: “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him”.
Moderate Muslims are hostages of True Muslims. They need help, our help.
jewdog says
I’m glad he likes the food. I think that’s the only real thing he has connected with in his otherwise utterly delusional mind.
You’ll probably be killed fighting for Allah, but the pizza’s pretty good.
Kalliope says
This is what normativeʾIslām looks like.
Diabolically and pathologically evil.
This is why decent people despise ʾIslām.
Unlike demon-possessed Muḥammad, we can tell the difference between good and evil, righteousness and unholiness, God (Yahweh) and Satan.
Bezelel says
I heard him parroting the imams propaganda and of course there was a dash of moral high ground to season the BS.
Reality Check says
When will the press stop calling these creatures “Belgians” or any other adjectives describing a nationality they have nothing to do with it and actually despise to the bottom of their hearts? To this creature, “Belgian” was and still is nothing but a means to an end. He’s as Belgian as I am, which means “not at all” – except that I am totally European, not only in heritage but in affinity with everything that Europe represents.
Reality Check says
Oops! That should have been “they have nothing to do with” and not “they have nothing to do with it”. Sorry – the tablet has its own disadvantages.
Bezelel says
I agree it’s absurd to ID mussies by the country that is hosting them. It is beyond inaccurate, He probably hates waffles!!!