Fresh off forbidding Christians to use the word “Allah,” Muslims in modern, moderate Malaysia are objecting to their using Bahasa Malaysia in an Easter pageant. That would be tantamount to “proselytizing,” you see, and Christians are strictly barred from proselytizing in that progressive, forward-looking land.
The adjectives are not sarcastic. Sharia restrictions on the freedom of speech and freedom of action of non-Muslims is exactly where we are “progressing,” and where the “progressives” who dominate government, media, and education are taking us.
“Now, Muslim group complains of Malay language in Easter pageant,” from the Malay Mail Online, April 14:
KUALA LUMPUR, April 14 — Islamist group Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (ISMA) today accused a Seremban church of seeking to proselytise to non-Christians by using Bahasa Malaysia for an Easter pageant.
Claiming that the national language was not commonly used by the Chinese and Indians the group asserted were the main races who practise Christianity, it said the decision to use Bahasa Malaysia was suspicious.
In a “report” on the group’s website, the head of the Seremban chapter Zamani Ibrahim said that while freedom of religion for non-Muslims was guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, the open use of Bahasa Malaysia to promote the event outside the church compound was an abuse of this liberty.
“As one the non-governmental organisations concerned about the construct and faith of Muslims in Malaysia, particularly in Negri Sembilan, we urge the Negri Sembilan Islamic Affairs Department (JHEAINS) to closely monitor this Easter Musical,” Zamani was quoted as saying in the report.
Accompanying the article was a photograph of a bunting announcing a free Easter Musical by the Agape Community Church scheduled for April 18-20. It is unclear if the musical will be conducted in Malay.
ISMA’s complaint is an escalation of the Christian-Muslim tussle here over the Arabic word for God, Allah, which remains unresolved four years after the Catholic Church here won a legal battle to use the word in its weekly newspaper.
The matter remains in abeyance after the Federal Court last month postponed hearing the case indefinitely.
Today’s allegation also appears to be a broadening of the Muslim claims of proselytisation against its followers that was so far premised on the Christian use of specific Arabic words and phrases.All states in Malaysia other than Sabah, Sarawak, Penang and the Federal Territories have enactments that prohibit non-Muslims from using up to 35 Arabic words, but the restriction is specific to proselytisation of Muslims.
Any attempt to promote religions other than Islam to Muslims is illegal in the country, despite the constitutional article guaranteeing religious freedom.Although allegations against Christians for proselyting to Muslims are frequent, it is unclear if any group or individual has been prosecuted for such.
Despite the Muslim’s group assertion that the majority of Christians in the country are Chinese and Indian, however, it is the Malay-speaking Bumiputras from Sabah and Sarawak who form the largest section of the community.
Bumiputra Christians, who form about 64 per cent or close to two-thirds of the Christian community in Malaysia, have used the word “Allah” when praying and speaking in the national language and their native tongues for centuries.
The East Malaysian Christians are also the most affected by restrictions placed on the use of “Allah” in peninsular Malaysia….
the Oracle says
For us Westerners, it would be helpful to point out that Bahasa Malaysia is the standard Malaysian language, and that this rule would require non-Muslims to not use it for Christian or non-Muslim religious activities.
umbra says
Not just any religious activity, but also any activitiy that may be construed to be prostelyzing for any non Islamic faith.
Tommy Peters says
Job’s ‘giveth and taketh’. Would it be a stretch to suggest that Brunei is the first Saudi Arabian branch in Asia and Malaysia is lined up to be the second?
Would it be reasonable to imply that the kingdom’s influence in the region has the blessings of Israel given that a century ago, the sponsors of the Jewish nation gifted Arabia to a Bedouin over the Emir of Mecca?
Of course, it would be preposterous to suggest that the House of Saud governs Arabia at the behest of Israel or even imply that its obedience as a client-state is because Israel is able to micro-manage Job’s biblical ‘giveth and taketh’ construct to keep the kingdom in line, but that’s another story.
Point is, ISMA’s anxiety is a preview of the Saudi expansion in the region and, given the perceived power of the cross and the agitation it creates, the kingdom’s sphere of influence is no more threatening than that of the lion roaring in a zoo enclosure.
dumbledoresarmy says
You wrote –
“Would it be reasonable to imply that the kingdom’s [Saudi Arabia’s] influence in the region has the blessings of Israel given that a century ago, the sponsors of the Jewish nation gifted Arabia to a Bedouin over the Emir of Mecca?
“Of course, it would be preposterous to suggest that the House of Saud governs Arabia at the behest of Israel or even imply that its obedience as a client-state is because Israel is able to micro-manage Job’s biblical ‘giveth and taketh’ construct to keep the kingdom in line, but that’s another story.”
You cover yourself by using the word ‘preposterous’ to rhetorically “frame” your summary of a truly mad conspiracy theory positing that Saudi Arabia is a “client state” of Israel, puppet-mastered by da eeeeevil Jooooz…
but still..
where on *earth* did you encounter such a totally mad – and classically antisemitic – hypothesis in the first place??
And what do you intend to achieve by repeating it here?
mortimer says
Any word, action or PERCEPTION that something or someone questions or criticizes Islam is BLASPHEMY and must be punished by death under Sharia law.
Muslims have no choice in the matter (to even use logic) because Allah has spoken the words of truth through the mouthpiece of a 7th century pedophile and highwayman. What could be more logical than that? What could be worse than disagreeing with Mohammed?
Bamaguje says
Can we also bar Muslims from proselytizing in English, French and other non-Muslim languages?
bernie says
I have read an article about the increasing number of Catholics, Orthodox Christians and other non-Jews in Eastern Europe (especially in Poland) who have started learning Hebrew. I have yet to hear about any Jews complaining about non-Jews learning the language.