“Twitter is really OK with calling for people to be murdered?”
I believe so, as long as they’re conservatives, or anti-Jihad.
mariam rovesays
And that is the irony. When Jihadists threaten to kill, Twitter leaves them alone so they do not come across as islamophobes. But when I fight jihadists on twitter, they banned me and My account was/is suspended for good. Go figure. M
Tradewindssays
I don’t do Twitter. It’s idiotic.
Artie Galvinsays
I agree with you, Tradewinds. Twitter is idiotic.
Tradewindssays
Heh! Well answering the phone is fine SAK but I can’t abide social media like FB and Twitter. I can’t even believe these things exist. Idiotic, right Artie. They’re really anti-social media. There’s no privacy anymore.
Regarding MIT, I think Boko Haram got it wrong about books….
This woman is clearly a security threat, knowledge in the wrong hands can be really haramful & apparently MIT is filled with jihadists ….
Remember Afia Siddiqui fellow MIT alumni?
“In a bag she was carrying, the police found that she had a number of documents written in Urdu and English describing the creation of explosives, chemical weapons, Ebola, dirty bombs, and radiological agents (which discussed mortality rates of certain of the weapons), and handwritten notes referring to a “mass casualty attack” that listed various US locations and landmarks (including the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, the Brooklyn Bridge, and the New York City subway system), according to her indictment.[3][10][20][84] The Globe also mentioned one document about a ‘theoretical’ biological weapon that did not harm children.[15] She also reportedly had documents detailing US “military assets”, excerpts from The Anarchist’s Arsenal, a one-gigabyte digital media storage device that contained over 500 electronic documents (including correspondence referring to attacks by “cells”, describing the US as an enemy, and discussing recruitment of jihadists and training), maps of Ghazni and the provincial governor’s compounds and the mosques he prayed in, and photos of Pakistani military people.[3][9][10][19][20][85][86] Other notes described various ways to attack enemies, including by destroying reconnaissance drones, using underwater bombs, and using gliders.[9][10]
She also had “numerous chemical substances in gel and liquid form that were sealed in bottles and glass jars”, according to the later complaint against her,[3][10][19][20][85][87] and about two pounds of sodium cyanide, a highly toxic poison.[9][16] The US prosecutors later said that sodium cyanide is lethal even when ingested in small doses (even less than five milligrams), and various of the other chemicals she had can be used in explosives.[88] Abdul Ghani, Ghazni’s deputy police chief, said she later confessed that she intended to carry out a suicide attack against the provincial governor.[86]”
gravenimagesays
MIT? Terrifying, KrazyKafir. I wonder if they know what this “fine” employee is up to—or if they would even care?
KrazyKafirsays
Somehow I doubt they would care.
No1says
We’ll probably hear about her being arrested for terrorist activities. Nobody will care because, just as at Fort Hood, we cannot sacrifice diversity just because Muslims are vastly more likely to engage in terrorism than every other group in the world.
KrazyKafirsays
Actually it’s a guy. The photo is misleading.
Boristasays
MIT = Muslims Inflicting Terror
eibsays
Wow. MIT.
Intelligent.
Informed.
And yet, too trusting.
I wonder what this intellectual powerhouse will do with his knowledge.
And I wonder if his instructors understand that they are, in effect, arming a potential terrorist.
laura rsays
robert did you report the tweet? the user can lose their acct. violent threats are not allowed. please report!
Man, that JIHADWATCH guy is the worst of the bunch!
Angemonsays
Quickly, someone call Fiyaz Mujhal! Mahomeddans also post on JW so that tweet officially qualifies as an anti-muslim hate crime!
eboewer@yahoo.comsays
Perhaps Obaid could be more specific about what was said by Robert which upsets her so?
Richiesays
Nothing will happen. Muslims can openly call for murder, but the leftist media will not only never touch them, they will support them
apransays
Why don’t the Islamists call for their god to lynch Mr Spencer cs?
Oops, I forget, Allah asks the muslims to do the dirty job (9:14), that is why it is useless asking Allah to kill somebody. I wonder why Allah can not do what Allah wants, even when Allah makes a promise, it must be with the words “if Allah’s willing”.
What a useless god, except for justifying crimes.
gravenimagesays
“Robert Spencer must be arrested and lynched…”
……………………….
She also wants to murder staunch Anti-Jihadists Daniel Pipes and Geert Wilders. No one may speak out against Islam.
And “arrested”? Clearly, Obaid Karki envisions Shari’ah law in the US at some point—or perhaps she just considers Muslim assassins to be the law.
And why not? If the state is not enforcing Shari’ah, then any part of the Ummah may do so. We’ve already seen informal “religious police’ in Europe enforcing the wearing “modesty” in “Muslim areas”.
How long before they become more violent?
And speaking of Shari’ah, here’s more from Obaid Karki on her Twitter feed, crudely sneering at both Joy Brighton and the US Constitution.
Joy Brighton is a liberal who has come to at least *partially* understand the threat of Islam. Ridiculously, she refers to it as “Shari’ah-ism”—but even this is too close to the truth for pious Muslims like Obaid Karki.
Karki also urges Boko Haram not to release the girls they have abducted and gang-raped. She describes this, oddly, as their “war against the West”. Never mind that none of the victims are “Western”. She pretends that this is all some sort of protest against Shell Oil.
God bless you, Robert Spencer, for continuing to stand fast in the face of these threats.
Holybaconsays
I’m not sure it’s a woman. It is a very strange collection of social media. Also the account tweets what would seem too frequently and repetitively to seem like the product of a female psyche. I think it could be more insidious than the ramblings of some female Muslim fanatic working at MIT. That is the profile they want you to believe. But it’s not believable.
neatysays
According to Google+ account it’s a man….. I use that term loosely of course.
Champsays
Threats of murder and mayhem are all in days work for the mohammedan slave; the unholy quran instructs them to behave like savages, just like their evil prophet moohamhead …
And definitely report this threat to the proper authorities.
TexasMomlsays
A Churchill quote?
Champsays
Churchill? Nope just Champ.
Jeffsays
If you call for Muslims to stop threatening, killing, humiliating, enslaving, and extorting the infidels you are infringing on their religious freedom.
eibsays
We have to ask:
1. do we favor the rights of religious institutions, or
2. do we favor the right of the individual to worship in the first place.
If we weight our interpretation of the 1st Amendment toward the second objective, then we’re safe.
Privilege religious institutions and we’re finished.
eibsays
As a Christian living in a free society, I have the right to say that Islam is profane.
And I do.
And I believe that it is.
Respect my beliefs and all is well.
I really think another civil war could be fought in this country over the Islamization of the society, should it happen.
Now, it may not and we may be spared.
But given the wild-eyed love of conquest I’ve seen in Muslim history, and the enthusiasm many modern Muslims have for re-living the gorgeous past, I’m not so sure.
eibsays
Ida Wells Brown understood that lynching denies and undermines the rule of law. Look at the case against Southern lynching, it can be made handily against the Muslim tendency toward lawless action upon the infidel.
To impose Sharia, culturally or otherwise, is to undermine secular law.
To silence any infidel is indeed to impose Sharia.
PatnCatsays
These comments are unacceptable and this person should be investigated by law enforcement. This type of calling for violence against those who disagree is typical under islam/muslim/mohammedan culture. disagreement = murder
KrazyKafir says
“Twitter is really OK with calling for people to be murdered?”
I believe so, as long as they’re conservatives, or anti-Jihad.
mariam rove says
And that is the irony. When Jihadists threaten to kill, Twitter leaves them alone so they do not come across as islamophobes. But when I fight jihadists on twitter, they banned me and My account was/is suspended for good. Go figure. M
Tradewinds says
I don’t do Twitter. It’s idiotic.
Artie Galvin says
I agree with you, Tradewinds. Twitter is idiotic.
Tradewinds says
Heh! Well answering the phone is fine SAK but I can’t abide social media like FB and Twitter. I can’t even believe these things exist. Idiotic, right Artie. They’re really anti-social media. There’s no privacy anymore.
judi says
No, I don’t do Facebook or Twitter either.
KrazyKafir says
Apparently the Jihadist works at MIT.
https://www.facebook.com/obaidkarki/about
Myxlplik says
Regarding MIT, I think Boko Haram got it wrong about books….
This woman is clearly a security threat, knowledge in the wrong hands can be really haramful & apparently MIT is filled with jihadists ….
Remember Afia Siddiqui fellow MIT alumni?
“In a bag she was carrying, the police found that she had a number of documents written in Urdu and English describing the creation of explosives, chemical weapons, Ebola, dirty bombs, and radiological agents (which discussed mortality rates of certain of the weapons), and handwritten notes referring to a “mass casualty attack” that listed various US locations and landmarks (including the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, the Brooklyn Bridge, and the New York City subway system), according to her indictment.[3][10][20][84] The Globe also mentioned one document about a ‘theoretical’ biological weapon that did not harm children.[15] She also reportedly had documents detailing US “military assets”, excerpts from The Anarchist’s Arsenal, a one-gigabyte digital media storage device that contained over 500 electronic documents (including correspondence referring to attacks by “cells”, describing the US as an enemy, and discussing recruitment of jihadists and training), maps of Ghazni and the provincial governor’s compounds and the mosques he prayed in, and photos of Pakistani military people.[3][9][10][19][20][85][86] Other notes described various ways to attack enemies, including by destroying reconnaissance drones, using underwater bombs, and using gliders.[9][10]
She also had “numerous chemical substances in gel and liquid form that were sealed in bottles and glass jars”, according to the later complaint against her,[3][10][19][20][85][87] and about two pounds of sodium cyanide, a highly toxic poison.[9][16] The US prosecutors later said that sodium cyanide is lethal even when ingested in small doses (even less than five milligrams), and various of the other chemicals she had can be used in explosives.[88] Abdul Ghani, Ghazni’s deputy police chief, said she later confessed that she intended to carry out a suicide attack against the provincial governor.[86]”
gravenimage says
MIT? Terrifying, KrazyKafir. I wonder if they know what this “fine” employee is up to—or if they would even care?
KrazyKafir says
Somehow I doubt they would care.
No1 says
We’ll probably hear about her being arrested for terrorist activities. Nobody will care because, just as at Fort Hood, we cannot sacrifice diversity just because Muslims are vastly more likely to engage in terrorism than every other group in the world.
KrazyKafir says
Actually it’s a guy. The photo is misleading.
Borista says
MIT = Muslims Inflicting Terror
eib says
Wow. MIT.
Intelligent.
Informed.
And yet, too trusting.
I wonder what this intellectual powerhouse will do with his knowledge.
And I wonder if his instructors understand that they are, in effect, arming a potential terrorist.
laura r says
robert did you report the tweet? the user can lose their acct. violent threats are not allowed. please report!
richard Sherman says
Dhimmitwitter! Dhimmitwitter!
john spielman says
Dear Robert: Please contact the police and FBI
Angemon says
Man, that JIHADWATCH guy is the worst of the bunch!
Angemon says
Quickly, someone call Fiyaz Mujhal! Mahomeddans also post on JW so that tweet officially qualifies as an anti-muslim hate crime!
eboewer@yahoo.com says
Perhaps Obaid could be more specific about what was said by Robert which upsets her so?
Richie says
Nothing will happen. Muslims can openly call for murder, but the leftist media will not only never touch them, they will support them
apran says
Why don’t the Islamists call for their god to lynch Mr Spencer cs?
Oops, I forget, Allah asks the muslims to do the dirty job (9:14), that is why it is useless asking Allah to kill somebody. I wonder why Allah can not do what Allah wants, even when Allah makes a promise, it must be with the words “if Allah’s willing”.
What a useless god, except for justifying crimes.
gravenimage says
“Robert Spencer must be arrested and lynched…”
……………………….
She also wants to murder staunch Anti-Jihadists Daniel Pipes and Geert Wilders. No one may speak out against Islam.
And “arrested”? Clearly, Obaid Karki envisions Shari’ah law in the US at some point—or perhaps she just considers Muslim assassins to be the law.
And why not? If the state is not enforcing Shari’ah, then any part of the Ummah may do so. We’ve already seen informal “religious police’ in Europe enforcing the wearing “modesty” in “Muslim areas”.
How long before they become more violent?
And speaking of Shari’ah, here’s more from Obaid Karki on her Twitter feed, crudely sneering at both Joy Brighton and the US Constitution.
Joy Brighton is a liberal who has come to at least *partially* understand the threat of Islam. Ridiculously, she refers to it as “Shari’ah-ism”—but even this is too close to the truth for pious Muslims like Obaid Karki.
http://www.joybrighton.com/
Karki also urges Boko Haram not to release the girls they have abducted and gang-raped. She describes this, oddly, as their “war against the West”. Never mind that none of the victims are “Western”. She pretends that this is all some sort of protest against Shell Oil.
Here’s her repulsive Twitter feed:
https://twitter.com/stsheetrock
And her disgusting blog:
http://obaidkarki.blogspot.com/
God bless you, Robert Spencer, for continuing to stand fast in the face of these threats.
Holybacon says
I’m not sure it’s a woman. It is a very strange collection of social media. Also the account tweets what would seem too frequently and repetitively to seem like the product of a female psyche. I think it could be more insidious than the ramblings of some female Muslim fanatic working at MIT. That is the profile they want you to believe. But it’s not believable.
neaty says
According to Google+ account it’s a man….. I use that term loosely of course.
Champ says
Threats of murder and mayhem are all in days work for the mohammedan slave; the unholy quran instructs them to behave like savages, just like their evil prophet moohamhead …
And definitely report this threat to the proper authorities.
TexasMoml says
A Churchill quote?
Champ says
Churchill? Nope just Champ.
Jeff says
If you call for Muslims to stop threatening, killing, humiliating, enslaving, and extorting the infidels you are infringing on their religious freedom.
eib says
We have to ask:
1. do we favor the rights of religious institutions, or
2. do we favor the right of the individual to worship in the first place.
If we weight our interpretation of the 1st Amendment toward the second objective, then we’re safe.
Privilege religious institutions and we’re finished.
eib says
As a Christian living in a free society, I have the right to say that Islam is profane.
And I do.
And I believe that it is.
Respect my beliefs and all is well.
I really think another civil war could be fought in this country over the Islamization of the society, should it happen.
Now, it may not and we may be spared.
But given the wild-eyed love of conquest I’ve seen in Muslim history, and the enthusiasm many modern Muslims have for re-living the gorgeous past, I’m not so sure.
eib says
Ida Wells Brown understood that lynching denies and undermines the rule of law. Look at the case against Southern lynching, it can be made handily against the Muslim tendency toward lawless action upon the infidel.
To impose Sharia, culturally or otherwise, is to undermine secular law.
To silence any infidel is indeed to impose Sharia.
PatnCat says
These comments are unacceptable and this person should be investigated by law enforcement. This type of calling for violence against those who disagree is typical under islam/muslim/mohammedan culture. disagreement = murder