• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK “moderate Muslim” media star Mo Ansar lies about record, supports Islamic supremacists and Sharia punishments

May 15, 2014 10:32 am By Robert Spencer

mo-ansarIt’s a staple of the Islamic supremacist “Islamophobia” narrative that counter-jihadists are, to a man (or woman), uneducated, ignorant charlatans in the game to make a fast buck (as if doing this really were lucrative). The real charlatans, however, are all too often the “moderate” Muslim spokesmen whom the media grabs hold of and makes into stars, so desperate are they to show that they’re not “Islamophobic” and that the true Islam is a Religion of Peace. So in the U.S. we have Reza Aslan, and in the U.K., as the situation there is so much worse in so many ways, they have Mo Ansar.

“Mo Ansar, the bogus Muslim ‘theologian’ who defends slavery and says Muslims discovered America in AD1000… while claiming benefits and appearing on the BBC,” by Milo Yiannopoulos, May 15, 2014 (thanks to Crazy Capper):

Author’s Note: For cost and scheduling reasons the newspaper this report was originally destined for has declined to publish it. (In short, that bugger Nick Cohen got his story out first!) I thought it a shame to waste several weeks’ work, so I have consulted a lawyer at my own expense and, minus a few expurgations, this is what we currently know about Mo Ansar. I have assembled a dossier of dated, documentary evidence for every claim in this report, which is available to other journalists upon request.

  • ‘Community activist’ Mo Ansar is a regular guest on the BBC who presents himself as the face of moderate Islam
  • Yet Ansar is a fantasist and Walter Mitty character who supports slavery and has promoted extremist organisations such as Hizb ut-Tahrir on social media
  • Claims he is an ‘educationalist’, ‘theologian’, ‘lawyer’ and ‘visiting lecturer’ but has no qualifications and has never worked at a school, university or law firm
  • The self-styled ‘expert commentator’ is also under fire for undeclared income from media appearances while costing taxpayers a fortune in unnecessary police protection, benefits and a spurious employment tribunal appeal

Mohammed Ansar, a regular fixture on the BBC’s news and current affairs programming, was engulfed in scandal this week with allegations that he has “sexed up” his CV in order to promote hard-line Islamist propaganda in the media, while presenting himself to producers, researchers and the public as the face of moderate Islam.

“So omnipresent has he become that he seems at times to be Britain’s only Muslim commentator,” writes Nick Cohen in the Spectator this week.

Ansar has appeared on Newsnight, the BBC’s flagship current affairs programme, and last week he tweeted pictures of an afternoon spent with Left-wing comedian Russell Brand at East London Mosque “talking Islam, sufism and philosophy.” He has also appeared on Channel Five, Sky News and many other networks.

I have been looking into Ansar for the past three weeks, and my investigation has revealed that Ansar has fabricated an extraordinary number of jobs, lied about professional qualifications and invented work experience, causing distress and harm to many, misleading the public and most likely breaking the law. He has bullied ordinary members of the public, filed nonsense police reports and failed to declare taxable income. 

Ansar has been billed on television and radio, at his own urging, as an “educationalist,” despite no evidence of higher education qualifications, and describes himself as a “visiting lecturer,” though he refuses to disclose at which university he teaches.

There is no evidence he has any professional teaching or lecturing experience, besides a single talk given at Horndean Technology College in January 2013 to students considering a religious studies GCSE, a few invitations from Islamic societies and one talk at a church.

He has repeatedly and falsely claimed on Twitter to be a lawyer, which is an offence in England and Wales, before admitting earlier this week to Financial Times legal journalist David Allen Green that he was not in fact a qualified legal professional and he “regretted” any “impressions” to the contrary. But Ansar’s publicly made claims speak for themselves:

ASDF

Screen Shot 2014-05-13 at 20.36.49

Ansar has repeatedly claimed to be a “theologian” while possessing no qualifications or job experience in either field. He has no published work in the field.

Even more outrageously, he has claimed on Twitter to be an “imam,” implying spiritual authority for which there is also no evidence. (Ansar does not speak Arabic, according to a community leader who has been following his antics for many years.)

Screen Shot 2014-05-13 at 23.12.16

unnamed

He has no historical expertise or qualifications, but Ansar has made the eyebrow-raising claim that Muslims were trading with Native Americans “five centuries” before Columbus discovered the continent – an opinion not shared by any mainstream historian.

Ansar has also been revealed as the man behind at least one anonymous “sock-puppet” account on social media, through which he has supported his own opinions and even had conversations with himself in order to give the impression of support for his views. He also used the account, deleted after it was exposed by journalist Jeremy Duns, to attack prominent media personalities, in order to raise his own profile.

In emails, Ansar called Duns’ allegations “nonsensical” but did not deny that he was responsible for multiple pseudonymous accounts on Twitter.

Wild claims and a sexed-up CV
According to court documents, Ansar’s failure to honour a debt to Lloyds TSB – a staff loan – appears to be what kicked off a 36-day employment tribunal and launched him into a career of dishonesty and special pleading in the early 2000s.

He did not repay the money he owed, and when his manager launched a compliance investigation he accused that manager of “racial discrimination,” “victimisation” and “harassment.” He later accused the bank of “tampering” with data files, a claim rejected outright by the judge.

Many appeals later, after numerous failed allegations of bias against the chair of the Tribunal from Ansar, the case was thrown out by the Supreme Court before three Lord Justices, including Leveson, at massive cost to the taxpayer.

In an earlier appeals judgment, the judge noted that Ansar found it difficult to take instruction from female superiors, had undertaken “sloppy” work for the bank and had lied in a letter pertinent to the case.

There was also evidence of “deliberate falsification of assets” by Ansar, said the judge, who noted that Ansar was “a forceful personality” who “manipulated circumstances for his own benefit.”

Screen Shot 2014-05-15 at 03.06.43

His disputes with the bank “escalated to higher levels … as a consequence of his unwillingness to heed guidance and advice form his managers,” the judgment continues.

Ansar has claimed to be a “marriage counsellor,” without substantiation, but with serious consequence.

In July 2013, a woman on Twitter confronted Ansar, claiming that he had some time previously told her to stay with a man who had beaten and raped her. Ansar denied giving such advice until the woman threatened to publish documentary evidence of his advice. He demanded the woman stay quiet, citing “confidentiality” concerns.

20130721-113547

A Twitter-fuelled fabricator
Some time around 2010, Ansar changed his manner of dress, assuming a more “Islamic” style, and began tweeting in earnest. He reinvented himself as a Muslim “community leader.” There is scant evidence, however, that despite varying claims from Ansar about his “decade,” “15-year” or “two-decade” career in activism, that his “work” consists of anything but tweets.

He has claimed to be the founder of the Hampshire Independent Equality Forum shortly after that time. This is not true. He was briefly the chairman in May 2010, before a messy dissolution of the organisation owing to “internal difficulties” and the removal of minutes from its website at Ansar’s insistence.

Community Action Hampshire declined to discuss Ansar when approached. Indeed, they could not put the telephone down quickly enough. Via other means I have obtained a copy of these minutes, which are available to interested journalists on request.

By 2012, Ansar was calling himself the “Muslim Bishop of Southampton” on Twitter, and claiming that he had been offered an Archdeaconship if he converted to Christianity. (He has also claimed that he was invited to become a trustee of a transgender charity, for which there is also no evidence, about which he refuses to answer questions.)

BnS2bbsIYAA0axW

He has claimed to be a “chaplain” in both prisons and colleges and to have worked for PREVENT, a government counter-terrorism initiative. There is no evidence for either claim, and Ansar has declined to provide any when challenged.

Screen Shot 2014-05-15 at 02.40.29

Ansar now claims to be a “theologian” and an “educationalist” but there is no evidence he even has a university degree and certainly no formal qualifications or published research in the theory of education or any kind of religion. He has repeatedly refused to respond to requests for information about his academic achievements.

Historian and author Tom Holland has repeatedly challenged Ansar to declare his qualifications. Ansar has responded only by deleting tweets in which he makes educational claims.

Ansar declines to clarify at which university he is a “visiting lecturer,” as his Twitter profile claims. There is no evidence he has ever studied or held any teaching or lecturing position at any school or university.

Screen Shot 2014-05-13 at 20.37.04

He claimed in December 2013 to be a “diversity lead in the corporate sector.” But the only qualification Ansar has completed is a “basic training” certificate in equality and diversity four years ago.

He self-published one comment article purporting to represent academic research to a social network in 2013. He published one article in the Guardian newspaper in October of the same year about his experiences with former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson.

Finally, he has repeatedly claimed  to be an LGBT activist. There is no evidence he has done any such advocacy, ever.

Screen Shot 2014-05-14 at 13.14.42

Extreme opinions and dangerous bedfellows
Mohammed Ansar’s brother, Jabraan Azlam, is currently serving a four-year prison sentence for dealing heroin and crack cocaine. Curiously, Mo Ansar has had business interests with his brother: he was co-director of a company called Securum Limited with Azlam.

The company never filed accounts and was eventually struck off, like every limited company of which Ansar has ever been a director.

There is no evidence that Ansar himself is involved in organised crime, although there are questions about how Ansar can possibly support a wife and six children on television appearance fees, unless he is in receipt of substantial state benefits, of which more later.

Yet he freely expresses opinions that will strike most people as shocking.

Despite presenting himself as the face of moderate Islam in Britain, Ansar supports slavery. On 15 July 2012, Ansar wrote: “If slaves are treated justly, with full rights, and no oppression whatsoever… why would anyone object?”

Screen Shot 2014-04-28 at 12.30.30

In a 2013 BBC documentary, in conversation with Maajid Nawaz, chairman of the anti-extremism Quilliam Foundation, Ansar refused to deny that thieves in an Islamic state should have their hands cut off.

He also supports gender segregation at public events and has indicated tacit support for sharia law.

It would appear that his professed “extensive experience in countering extremism” would be better expressed in fact as casual endorsement of extremist opinions: on Twitter, Ansar has explicitly endorsed Hizb ut-Tahrir, the extremist Islamist organisation that gave birth to Anjem Choudary and Omar Bakri and which calls for a global Caliphate.

He has also promoted Hizb ut-Tahrir’s events on social media.

Mohammed Ansar has publicly stated that homosexuality is a sin while praising feminist and Left-wing campaigners he admires.

He has also, bizarrely, spread the pseudo-historical claim that Muslims first colonised the United States of America via his Twitter account. No major historian agrees with this apparently invented historical claim.

On 9 March 2012, he publicly thanked Anas Al-Tikriti of the Muslim Brotherhood, son of wanted man and nephew of Saddam Hussein, Omar Al Tikriti, for the gift of Arabian oudh perfume, which he described as a “simply beautiful gift” from a “dear friend.”

The Muslim Brotherhood’s stated goal is to install the Koran as a “sole reference point” for “family, individual, community and state.”

sd

There is much more here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Moderate Muslims, United Kingdom Tagged With: featured


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. The Aton says

    May 15, 2014 at 11:19 am

    I thought that ‘moderate Muslim’ is a well-known oxymoron.

  2. shrugger says

    May 15, 2014 at 11:29 am

    I’ve worked with a Mohammedan like this. Biggest brown noser I’ve ever seen. Knowledgeable expert in everything that he clearly wasn’t. And depending on who you asked, he was from at least 3 different middle east or North African Countries.

  3. Long Time Reader says

    May 15, 2014 at 12:17 pm

    JW readers might appreciate the Twitter account of Mo Dawah, who caught on to Mo Ansar’s boasts quite a while ago. It’s a hilarious send up. @kingofdawah

  4. jihad3tracker says

    May 15, 2014 at 12:42 pm

    I hope many Jihadwatch readers will take a couple of minutes to thank Milo Yiannopoulos for this lengthy remarkable piece of truth.

    He is certain to get smeared, insulted, threatened with death ….

    We here at Mr. Spencer’s blog can make sure this courageous reporter knows of our gratitude.

    • Will Doohan says

      May 16, 2014 at 2:08 am

      I agree J3T.
      Mr. Yiannopoulos, if you’re reading this, know that your efforts are appreciated. It’s risky taking on these bastards, but it must be done.

  5. eib says

    May 15, 2014 at 12:49 pm

    He is no “theologian.” Islam has no theology.
    He is a liar.
    Nothing more.

  6. Buraq says

    May 15, 2014 at 2:27 pm

    Much like Islam: lots of claims and nothing to back them up with.

    Clown!

  7. GODBLESSTHEKUFFAR says

    May 15, 2014 at 3:58 pm

    Mo has gone fishing according to his twitter account ,for a new career.

  8. tpellow says

    May 15, 2014 at 5:16 pm

    Also in U.K:-

    “POLICE ACT TO STOP RADICAL ISLAMIST ‘BULLIES’ INTIMIDATING ORDINARY MUSLIMS INTO NOT VOTING”

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/05/15/Police-Act-to-Stop-Radical-Islamist-Bullies-Intimidating-Ordinary-Muslims-into-Not-Voting

  9. Mirren10 says

    May 15, 2014 at 5:47 pm

    Good for Milo Yiannopoulos, on his work in ferreting out all this nauseating, disingenuous crap, but is anyone **really** surprised ? I am certainly not.

    mohammedans lie. It’s their default setting, and I would never trust **any** mohammedan, as far as I could throw a grand piano.

  10. Kepha says

    May 15, 2014 at 7:00 pm

    I accept that there are Muslims who want to hold off on jihad against me for a long, long time. However, the whole meme of “moderate Islam” (as opposed to “fundamentslist Islam”) represents the wishful thinking of liberal Westerners and nothing more. It is d–d embarrassing to hear one of self-assured, wise-in-hi-own-conceits talking heads expatiating on this meme.

  11. Angemon says

    May 15, 2014 at 7:02 pm

    “Look me up on Wikipedia”

    LMFAO!!!

  12. mortimer says

    May 15, 2014 at 8:01 pm

    Philosopher, Prof. H. Frankfurt, wrote that “Bullshitting is not exactly lying, and bullshit remains bullshit whether it’s true or false. The difference lies in the bullshitter’s complete disregard for whether what he’s saying corresponds to facts in the physical world: he does not reject the authority of the truth, as the liar does, and oppose himself to it. He pays no attention to it at all. By virtue of this, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.”

    A bullshitter like Ansar is only interested in advancing his agenda which the triumphalism of Islam.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      May 15, 2014 at 11:36 pm

      Exactly.

      Getting a really solid grasp on the concept of BS as defined by Mr Frankfurt, and *then* realizing that Mohammedans are BS artists extraordinaire, is *essential* for learning how to deal with said Mohammedan BS artists.

    • Anushirvan says

      May 16, 2014 at 1:12 pm

      A while ago, I had actually quoted Harry Frankfurt’s book you mentioned within the context of the Syrian conflict and the way Western leaders have tried to bullshit their way through in order to try to get public opinion on their side. Which was posted on tundratabloids on 02/09/2013:

      http://tundratabloids.com/2013/09/political-bullshit-deconstructed.html

      The final conclusion goes like this:

      being disingenuous = trying your hardest to APPEAR sincere while knowing that you ARE NOT sincere

      or simply put, feigning sincerity

      POLITICAL BULLSHIT DECONSTRUCTED

      Obama’s and Cameron’s Narcissistic Bullshit Circus and the Syrian conflict

      “With regards to Obama’s eagerness to meddle in the Syrian conflict, the sustained efforts to browbeat the war-weary American public into acceptance of another war is taking on a life of its own. It has turned into a ridiculous Narcissistic Bullshit Circus. First off, we need to clearly define the term bullshit in order to analyze the problem. The next excerpt is taken from the essay ‘On Bullshit’ by Harry G. Frankfurt (pages 63 to 67) and demonstrates the problem at hand :

      “Bullshit is unavoidable whenever circumstances require someone to talk without knowing what he is talking about. Thus the production of bullshit is stimulated whenever a person’s obligations or opportunities to speak about some topic exceed his knowledge of the facts that are relevant to that topic. This discrepancy is common in public life, where people are frequently impelled – whether by their own propensities or by the demands of others – to speak extensively about matters of which they are to some degree ignorant.

      Closely related instances arise from the widespread conviction that it is the responsibility of a citizen in a democracy to have opinions about everything, or at least everything that pertains to the conduct of his country’s affairs. The lack of any significant connection between a person’s opinions and his apprehension of reality will be even more severe, needless to say, for someone who believes it his responsibility, as a conscientious moral agent, to evaluate events and conditions in all parts of the world.

      The contemporary proliferation of bullshit also has deeper sources, in various forms of skepticism which deny that we can have any reliable access to an objective reality, and which therefore reject the possibility of knowing how things truly are. These “antirealist” doctrines undermine confidence in the value of disinterested efforts to determine what is true and what is false, and even in the intelligibility of the notion of objective inquiry. One response to this loss of confidence has been a retreat from the discipline required by dedication to the ideal of correctness to a quite different sort of discipline, which is imposed by pursuit of an alternative ideal of sincerity.

      Rather than seeking primarily to arrive at accurate representations of a common world, the individual turns toward trying to provide honest representations of himself. Convinced that reality has no inherent nature, which he might hope to identify as the truth about things, he devotes himself to being true to his own nature. It is as though he decides that since it makes no sense to try to be true to the facts, he must therefore try instead to be true to himself.

      But it is preposterous to imagine that we ourselves are determinate, and hence susceptible both to correct and to incorrect descriptions, while supposing that the ascription of determinacy to anything else has been exposed as a mistake. As conscious beings, we exist only in response to other things, and we cannot know ourselves at all without knowing them. Moreover, there is nothing in theory, and certainly nothing in experience, to support the extraordinary judgment that it is the truth about himself that is the easiest for a person to know. Facts about ourselves are not peculiarly solid and resistant to skeptical dissolution. Our natures are, indeed, elusively insubstantial – notoriously less stable and less inherent than the natures of other things. And insofar as this is the case, sincerity itself is bullshit. “

      End quote.

      The very essence of bullshit attaches a high value to the emotional aspect of wanting to appear sincere outwardly, which is basically its main goal. Bullshitting is essentially driven by the projection and preservation of a certain self-image in public. Frankfurt’s description of the process is actually reflected in everyday reality, particularly in the lives of snooty teenagers and equally snooty university students in their late to mid twenties, who are generally not hampered or bothered by the pursuit of objective knowledge that could serve as a fundament to base their world views on.

      The mobilizing “quality” of bullshit is to rally the masses with emotions as the sole underlying virtue to any action taken, objective scrutinizing of reality is not part of the equation. When we think of both categories, bullshit doesn’t seem to be all that odious on the surface. Alas, bullshitting can also deliberately morph into something altogether more ominous, when essentially juvenile bullshit turns into a deliberate strategy with which adult politicians try to deceive the general public. In other words, bullshit can turn into an explicit propaganda exercise. What appears to be a narcissistic exercise based on politicians puerile and desperate want to be perceived as sincere, is actually a way to draw the general public into a larger scheme, by appealing to the better nature of the public in order to gain general acceptance for ill-conceived ideas, such as meddling in the Middle East’s uneasy equilibriums.

      Bullshit as such can only have an effect on those members of the general public who themselves attach high value to the emotional content surrounding such issues, whilst at the same time overconfidently deciding that any realistic knowledge of the issues at hand is surplus to requirement with regards to our understanding of them. Most of us are de facto NOT ME experts and we bank on our politicians to make the right decisions in the world theatre, and whether the MSM are feeding us the necessary knowledge in the process or not becomes superfluous that way, which is exactly what politicians are banking on themselves. Bullshit is ultimately designed to elicit an immediate emotional response from the public, and not a rational one, which invariably takes more time to conceive.

      Conversely, any member of the general public who either understands the very essence of bullshit or the nature of ME history and geopolitics, or even both, will naturally display the utmost disdain for such puerile emotive attempts to rally the general public’s opinion to the cause of politicians, i.e. the unnecessary involvement in Syria’s horrendous civil war. Such is the nature of the average Counterjihadist in fact, that any PC/MC issue thrown at him can be swiftly disassembled by him as mere poppycock, humbug, hot air, and yes, bullshit. Like for instance the ruse that “Islam is a religion of peace”, the ensuing detection of “moderate Islam”, the distinction between “Islam and Islamists”, the differentiation between “Islam and Jihadi extremism”, and the likes.

      Contrary to the average PC bullshitter, who has a high stake in the preservation of his self-image and the survival of PC/MC, moral relativism, and the mollycoddling of Muslims by infusing every debate on such matters primarily with emotional flimflam, the Counterjihadist builds a discourse solely on what is readily available as objective and verifiable knowledge of facts and realities with regards to the subject of Islam and ME geopolitics. The very intent of this would be, first and foremost, to BE as genuine, truthful and rationally correct as is possible with regards to those subjects, and NOT to merely APPEAR sincere to boost the ego and to consequently further an egotistical goal, like narcissistic bullshitters do for whatever purpose they see fit. And thus, Counterjihadists are de facto Islamorealists primarily concerned with enlightening the members of the public, above all !

      The last few days it has become readily apparent that our politicians, like the Obamas and Camerons of this world, are desperately trying to ‘bullshit their way through things’. In fact, the childish desperation reaches further than previously imagined, they actually wanted to rush their decisions through solely on emotional grounds, with or without consent of their respective parliamentarian institutions. Every citizen in the West should think of our politicians’ behavior. If bullshitting is primarily the characteristic of the naive, the uninformed, the juvenile, the insecure, the narcissistic, the arrogant or even the plain stupid and has become an integral part of mass deception of the general audience, then we can conclude that Western politicians don’t really take the voters in high esteem at all.

      By projecting their own crude line of thinking on the public’s imagination to have it rally to their cause, politicians are actually insulting our intelligence, time and time again. To enable shifting the focus toward emotional content to support politicians’ self-righteous “sincerity” with, any objective background info on the situation in Syria has to be omitted from the public consciousness. Thus, the citizens of the West can only turn to Counterjihadist bloggers in order to unearth the underlying truths and realities of this particular conflict to harness the correct intuition that we would better stay out of it.

      Such is the juvenile nature of PC/MC politics in the West that it desperately keeps denying the fundamental realities accessible by all in the ever expanding Interconnected Age. Go figure ! How stupid can you get ?”

      • William Doohan says

        May 18, 2014 at 3:18 am

        Excellent post

  13. enwhitenment says

    May 16, 2014 at 12:16 am

    He seems to have jumped on the bullshit bandwagon just like that pork belly bludger from Australia “Bobby Cerantonio” aka “musa”.
    It seems that when you are a useless waste of space with no intention of ever getting a job or supporting your own family that you are more than qualified to jump on the jihad bandwagon & wait for the donations to roll in.

  14. Eels says

    May 16, 2014 at 5:38 am

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/bigdaddymo?_mSplash=1

    People are waking up though, this is funny. A spoof of his resume/CV.

  15. John Stefan Obeda says

    May 16, 2014 at 1:26 pm

    Why is Mo not deported? Why is a lot of taxpayer’s money wasted because of his lies? Just as it is true that we are our worst enemy, so it seems that it is also true that the U.K herself is her worst enemy. So it is true with other countries that have sleeping leaders. . . . God the Father Who sent the Word made flesh into the world to be our Saviour from our sins have mercy on our country in spite of so many leaders sleeping while the enemy does his dastardly work in front of our blind face. We must pray and work.

  16. PJG says

    May 16, 2014 at 7:09 pm

    What became of his “friendship” with Tommy Robinson, who seemed to be tricked into taking him at face value? Still chums?

  17. dumbledoresarmy says

    May 19, 2014 at 4:32 am

    I wonder just how many other mohammedan “spokespeople” in the west would turn out to be like this bloke, were they *thoroughly* investigated?

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Infidel on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.