This is the Britain that Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron have made. Why has Mizanur Rahman’s sermon “sparked fresh outrage”? Why is anyone upset about it at all? After all, I was banned from Britain for saying that Islam “is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society…” Yet just days after Pamela Geller and I were banned, the British government admitted Saudi Sheikh Mohammed al-Arefe. Al-Arefe has said: “Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight.” So clearly it is acceptable to say that Islam teaches violence and warfare if you’re in favor of that violence and warfare. So no one should be outraged at Mizanur Rahman. They should be giving him banquets and medals.
“London hate preacher’s ‘disgusting’ sermon praising Boko Haram’s kidnap of schoolgirls,” by David Churchill, London Evening Standard, May 29, 2014 (thanks to Tyranny Watch):
A London hate preacher jailed after calling for 9/11-style attacks across Europe has sparked fresh outrage after defending the kidnapping of more than 200 Nigerian schoolgirls.
In videos posted online, Mizanur Rahman praises Boko Haram, the terrorist group behind the kidnapping, for angering the West and suggests it is “not necessarily a bad thing” if they kill non-Muslims.
The clips raise fresh questions about the extent to which Britons, including the young, are being radicalised over the internet. Children can be heard in the background in one two-hour rant.
Scotland Yard detectives are now probing the videos after being alerted to them by the Standard….
Chair of the Home Affairs parliamentary committee Keith Vaz said: “I am deeply concerned by the content of this video.
“No child or young person should be exposed to these extreme views.
Keith Vaz campaigned for Pamela Geller and me to be banned from Britain. So for this addled hypocrite, opposing groups like Boko Haram is just as “extreme” as supporting them.
The Committee recommended in its last report that more should be done to increase funding to counter message projects. It is vital that communities lead the fight against this type of extremism.”
In a video posted last week Rahman, a student of firebrand preacher Anjem Choudary and banned cleric Omar Bakri, says: “People want to make it out as though history began on the day these girls were taken from – sorry I should say these women – were taken from this high school in Nigeria.
“They didn’t do to these girls what the Nigerian government had been doing to the Muslims all these years – they didn’t rape anybody, they didn’t torture, they didn’t murder any of these girls.”
He then rants about the group being “full of good messages”, including its support for al-Qaeda. In another video, he says there is “not any evidence” the group has targeted Muslims or non-Muslims, adding: “I’m not saying it is or isn’t [a problem to kill non-Muslims].”
Violence linked to Boko Haram has resulted in an estimated 10,000 deaths between 2002 and 2013, including attacks on Western tourists and the bombing of churches, mosques, schools and police stations.
Last month’s kidnapping of the schoolgirls sparked fresh international condemnation.
When confronted by the Standard, the preacher, from Palmers Green, north London, said: “On the one hand people are portraying them [Boko Haram] as crazed lunatics who don’t know anything about Islam or society in general. But on the other hand if you actually read their messages they are not trying to destroy society, they are just complaining about the oppression against them and trying to better society.
“Of all of their messages, some are good messages so they are full of good messages. What I’m trying to do is tell people the whole story.”
Rahman was jailed for three years in 2007 for stirring up racial hatred after a protest at the Danish embassy over cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad. During his trial, the Old Bailey heard he had said: “Oh Allah, we want to see another 9/11 in Iraq, another 9/11 in Denmark, another 9/11 in Spain, in France, all over Europe.”
A Scotland Yard spokesman said: “We are aware of the video and are assessing its content.”
What are you assessing? Whether to give Rahman an OBE?
Walter Sieruk says
The members of Boko Haram and all Muslims for that matter all believe that the founder of Islam, Muhammad, was an actual prophet. Yet it’s not so much the question “Was Muhammad a prophet?” It’s better stated “Was Muhammad a prophet sent by God or was Muhammad a false prophet sent by Satan to lead many people astray?” After all Jesus did warn “Beware of false prophet which comes to you in sheep’s clothing but are inwardly ravening wolves.” Matthew 7:15. The Bible further warns that “many false prophets are gone forth into the world.” First John 4:1. To give the acid test if a prophet, teacher, or religion is teaching truth of falsehoods is if the prophet, teacher or religion has teaching and doctrines that are in according to God’s Word, the Bible. That if a person or religion has teachings and doctrines that are in contradiction to God’s Word then that prophet, teacher or religion is false. As Isaiah 8:20; explains “To the law of the testimony : If they speak not according to the word , it is because there is no light in them.” [KJV] Islam denies that Jesus is the Son of God. This is in contrast to the Bible which teaches that Jesus is indeed the Son of God, John 3:16, 17, and 36. First John 2:22, 23. Likewise. Islam denies that Jesus is God the Son. In contrast to Islam the Bible teaches that Jesus is God the Son. As seen in Hebrews 1:6-8 with emphasis on verse 8. Furthermore, Islam denies that Jesus is God. This is in strong contradiction to the Bible which teaches that Jesus is God. As shown, for example, in John 1:1-3. Romans 9:5. Colossians 1:15-17. First John 5:20. Second Peter 1; 1. Titus 2:13. Moreover, by comparing the Old Testament with the New Testament will further show that Jesus is God, As in by comparing Isaiah 45:22,23. With Philippians 2:5-11. Will show Jesus is God. Also by comparing Psalm 89:8,9. With Matthew 8:23-27 will further confirm Jesus to be God. Even by comparing the New Testament book together will confirm Jesus to be God. As in John 5:22 with Romans 14:12 will show Jesus to be God. The list can go on but this should be enough. The imams and mullahs will try to “explain” this all away by claiming that Christians had corrupted the Bible through time. This claim greatly underestimates the power of God to preserve His Word in time and keep it intact and away from the corruption of men. In conclusion, Muhammad was a false prophet and Islam is a false religion, Proverbs 14:12. John 3:16,17,36. 14:6. First John 2:22,23.
john spielman says
absolutely correct. In addition, St Paul warned about listening to anyone- even an angel, who has a different gospel than the one first preached by him and the other disciples of Jesus. For Satan masquerades as an angel of light (in this case Satan disguised himself as Gabriel, the arch angel, to fool Muhammed)
Jay Boo says
Muslims know it is wrong to kidnap and rape schoolgirls.
That would appear dishonorable.
That is why Muhammad who is without honor decided to invent Islam.
Muhammad gave Muslims a set of RULES and an instruction manual.
Islam is not a religion; it is an EXCUSE.
Jay Boo says
@john spielman
Your comment is concise
@Walter Sieruk
Stop rambling off endless bible verses on the first post
It is rude
The topic is:
UK: Muslim cleric praises Boko Haram’s kidnap of schoolgirls
Jay Boo says
@Walter Sieruk
Are you a very clever troll?
You are serving that purpose on this article and the preceding one whether intentional or not,
richard london says
All you religious guys who want to tell others how to live: Get real, start thinking for yourself, be mature and stop believing in pink pussycats.
Jay Boo says
The topic is:
UK: Muslim cleric praises Boko Haram’s kidnap of schoolgirls
Jay Boo says
in reference to the first post by:
Walter Sieruk
Concerned says
Why is it that the more ‘religious’ people become the more insane they appear?
dumbledoresarmy says
No.
The more *Islamic* an identifying-Muslim becomes, the more insane they actually *are*.
Because the ‘god’ of Islam is Unreason apotheosised.
You may choose to pretend that all gods are that. But they are not. Islam is way out there in a class of its own.
gravenimage says
“Concerned” wrote:
Why is it that the more ‘religious’ people become the more insane they appear?
………………………
How can this poster fail to be embarrassed by his endless bs? It isn’t “‘religious’ people” who are engaging in apologia for kidnapping and brutalizing schoolgirls—just pious Muslims.
That “Concerned” continues to imply that it is just as likely that Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, et al are just as likely to engage in such barbarism is tedious and false.
cheekturner says
This geezer is what you would call a classic uneducated nasty type. His message and that of Boko Harem are identical and classical Islime……profound crap!
But hey ! The message is getting through bit by bit in Britistanabad. The Giant is waking, so Islam beware! Your end is imminent in this country and it will no doubt be bloody for you. Hope your raisins choke you.
General_T says
Concerned,
We should just keep religious matters simple – there is but one G-d and it most definately is not the Allah that Mohammad refers to. The evil in Islam is plain to see – Mohammads life exemplifies this evil. Amazing that someone can even “think” that Mohammad was the “ideal” person – what rubbish.
Mr. Spencer,
Thanks for continuing to bring these matters to the fore. I especially enjoy your segments on the Sun News Network. Keep up the good – and essential – work!!
Concerned says
We should keep it even simpler General T. There ain’t no god.
islam is just the worst of a blinded group.
Hopefully within 100 years Humanity will no longer have a use for gods…except in the history books.
Salah says
Will you stop it!
CogitoErgoSum says
Concerned, I’ll support your right to say, “There ain’t no God.” My Christian faith and the laws of my country prevent me from stopping or harming you for doing so. I believe that is good. So why are you so intent on destroying my beliefs and my rights?
Concerned says
I’m not trying to destroy your beliefs my friend, that sounds violent and cruel.
I think of it as trying to liberate you and EVERY religious person on this good Earth from the Matrix of religion.
Have a good weekend.
Cheers.
CogitoErgoSum says
Concerned, I’m glad you are trying to free me from the Matrix (???) but I can free myself anytime I choose. I have the right of free will. Also, why do you think God wants to torture anyone in Hell? I don’t believe there is a single soul in Hell who did not choose to be there…..plus I do not know what choices are provided to a soul after death. You must be very young. May you live a very long life and have the sense to learn a few things along the way.
Dalo says
Isnt that interesting. You think you need laws or a religion to tell you not to harm someone that doesn’t think as you do. Just because your myth doesn’t harm humanity, doesn’t mean you are less misguided
CogitoErgoSum says
And where shall you guide me and tell me what to think, Dalo?
John C. Barile says
Amen. There ain’t no god. For you–as you’ve just banished God from your universe. And since the Almighty respects your human free will, he assents to your choice. For me, you’ve just demarcated Hell. As I say elsewhere–you ask me, “believe in hell, John?” Yes, as both a place–outside of time and place–and as a state of being. And I implore God’s infinite Mercy upon you–I really mean this–and upon me, as well.
No, I’m not judging you; neither am I consigning you to anywhere for eternity. Decide for yourself.
Since I anticipate your response to be derision and mockery, all I can say is–do what you intend to. I gladly accede to your hollow victory.
John C. Barile says
Correction: both as a place–outside of space and time, and as a state of being.
John C. Barile says
Islam–so I’m informed–denies that a man has free will; predestination is absolute. Muslims, as Muslims, think that they have a right to enjoin Allah’s will on you, and that Allah wills the Muslim to mete out His punishments on you–in this world.
John C. Barile says
See, “there is no coercion religion”–except when there is.
John C. Barile says
Correction: “there is no compulsion in religion.”
Richard Sherman says
Sayyid Qtub makes clear that “no compulsion in religion” simply means that infidels are not forces to convert to Islam. If an infidel wants to remain a worthless humiliated dhimmi, he or she is free to remain a worthless humiliated dhimmi. The phrase has nothing to do with tolerance.
Concerned says
Dang. I was about to shot off.
Really? you believe in hell?
A place where you accept it is ok to torture anybody and everybody including your parents for 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 years, for just one sin?
Because remember forever never ever stops.
If your god wants to do that….then your god is a dick.
PJG says
Richard Sherman: I read somewhere that the words “there is no compulsion in religion” were said in the early Mecca time when the Prophet was trying to sound easy-going, while also saying that he and his little band of Muslims should be free to be Muslims. “You have your religion and I have mine”: in other words “bugger off, good man, and leave us alone”.
But maybe Qutb was right.
PJG says
“Concerned” Bugger off, good man, and leave us alone.
To discuss Islam, not atheism.
Jaladhi says
Not a single Muslim is trustworthy or to ever be trusted. All of them are liars, deceitful, cheaters, … They hide the truth about Islam and themselves by lying. They even give religious permission to lie – taqiyya!! The West is just too dumb and deaf to know what they have brought upon their countries by allowing Muslim immigration. Even now there is time to cut off all Muslim immigration and throw out people like this scum who openly express such horrible words. Throw this scum out and never allow him to come back!!
Francesca says
There are Muslims who would never do these terrible deeds. However, they are afraid to speak out against the violent ones because they will pay with their lives for not going along. They just stay quiet in the interest of self-preservation.
tpellow says
The British political parties of Labour, Tories and Lib Dems all appease Islamic interests in the U.K, and censor and ban critics of Islamic interests.
This is becoming ever more blatant in the run up to the May, 2015, General Election in U.K.
Peter Buckley says
Offensive Jihad is not just allowed, but a duty for muslims:
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/p/jihad.html
http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/swordverse.htm
Therefore what Boko Haram did is “sunnah”-it’s “halal”
Post the article to any “moderate” muslims you know, and ask them to explain how Boko Haram are “misunderstanding” Islam.
You can link to theologian Mark Durie’s article on the incident:
http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2014/05/16/mark-durie-boko-haram-and-the-dynamics-of-denial/
Richard Sherman says
Boko haram is precisely following Muhammad ‘s example when he personally decapitated 900 unarmed Jews and then kidnapped and enslaved approximately one thousand Jewish girls and women. That is why every observant Muslim loves boko haram.
James Truesdale says
A pastor in Belfast is all over the news here because he made some comments about the Muslim religion police are investigating his remarks as a hate crime.
Islamisdeath says
Did this man not see Michelles tweet? My God whats the matter with him! Ms. Obama please tweet again evidently some people missed your last tweet! I know your tweets are the answer to ending this whole affair!
Charli Main says
But–but–but folks—- Muslims have made an enormous contribution to British society. Just ask David Cameron and Tony Blair.
Well lets see- there is grooming and raping little white girls and of course chopping up defenceless soldiers in the street.
and then there is blowing up women and children on buses and trains and don´t forget murdering women for refusing to be good little sex slaves for their male masters.
and of course, rampaging down British streets waving placards demanding that those that insult Islam and their paedophile ” prophet” should be publically beheaded.
Ah yes, what would the British do without the enormous contribution that the Muslims have made to the country.
mariam rove says
Muslims have made an enormous contribution to British society…..
Yes. Very true. They are f… it all up on a daily basis. M
dalo says
They must like their kebabs in the UK…
Concerned says
Hi good peoples. Anyone care to post a website they know of that is a muslim apologist site (or just a muslim propaganda site) that people can share comments on?
nacazo says
Probably it doesn’t exist. They are quick to censor anything that doesn’t go their way.
Anyway if you come across one, pass it along.
Bradamante says
There’s Loonwatch. I never post there, so I have no idea how long comments survive there that don’t toe the party line, but they do allow comments.
traeh says
In my own experience, not long. Or let’s put it this way. If you respond coherently too many times, with links to Islamic texts backing up what you say, all your comments on that thread may be deleted.
nacazo says
I give points to Mizanur for honesty.
Most likely, the taqiyya/kitman generator in his brain is having a problem.
gravenimage says
nacazo wrote:
I give points to Mizanur for honesty.
Most likely, the taqiyya/kitman generator in his brain is having a problem.
…………………………..
Nacazo, Muslims only use Taqiyya when they beleive they have to. When they feel emboldened—as they increasingly do now—they drop the mask.
There is also, as Voegelinian notes, the good cop/bad cop phenomenon, where Infidels are “softened up” by pious Muslims like Rahman, then reassured by the Taqiyya artists.
This can “move the bar”, so that Infidels gradually become more and inured to Muslim savagery.
Remember, this kind of “honesty” is only useful if Infidels are sufficiently appalled—and despite the outrage over this ugliness, it must be noted that Mizanur Rahman is still free to incite violence against Britons, and will likely remain so.
nacazo says
ok so taqiyya is no longer needed in (formerly) Great Britain.
gravenimage says
Oh , it will still be used, Nacazo—and believed by large numbers of hopeful Infidels.
But there are also more and more Muslims like Anjem Choudary and Mizanur Rahman, who are upfront about the evil of Islam because they know they can be.
Curious Teenager says
And people think I’m kidding when I say that Islam advocates violence. Today at school, I gave a presentation in one of my classes about Islam. It was an argumentative project and I said that Islam advocates violence, while also showing that many people disagree with me. A lot of the people in my class either didn’t understand what I was saying at all, or they thought I was extremist. I find myself growing more and more frustrated with my generation’s inability to think for themselves. A lot of the comments I received were about my hate for Muslims and me misinterpreting the text of the Qur’an. *sighs*
Wellington says
Don’t give up, Curious Teenager. The truth is often elusive, though on the positive side it is a very stubborn thing. It’s also a great ally that will never desert you. Many people you believe are your friends will leave you in time of trouble, but the truth never will. Never.
I share your frustration with all those out there who, by now, should know better about Islam than they do. Political correctness and multiculturalism (both lies to their core) have indeed brainwashed many human beings, from the very youngest to the very oldest. There is great hypcrocisy involved in all this as well. If Christians worldwide committed only 1/10th the violence in the name of their faith that Muslims worldwide do, those same classmates who criticized you for being a Muslim hater would support you if you were criticizing Christianity. The main reason for this is that Islam is looked upon as a religion for non-Western people and the political correctness/multicultural paradigm (pc/mc) disallows criticism of any culture or civilization except Western culture and civilization. It’s phony to the max but it’s one of the many stupid realities of our time. Your unwitting classmates have fallen into this trap, though they hardly realize it.
Don’t give up. Never give up because the alternative is always worse. Keep at it. You seem to be ahead of the game already for your age. And may I suggest you check in here regularly at Jihad Watch. It is a mine of information on the one major religion which is an eternal enemy of liberty, women’s rights, equality under the law and a truly fine BLT.
You’re doing quite well so far as near as I can tell. Don’t let a setback here or there dispirit you too much. And remember what I said about the truth. It is a constant friend. It will never let you down.
Foolster says
Good words, Wellington.
gravenimage says
Bravo, CT! I understand your frustration, but you may well have planted the seeds of doubt in many of your schoolmates’ minds, who will remember what you said the next time they hear about some Muslim atrocity.
We all know it won’t be a long wait…and they may find that the same old willful denial about Islam being a “religion of peace” makes a lot less sense than what you have told them.
RodSerling says
Curious Teenager,
I’ve studied the Qur’an and many other key Islamic texts. You’re right of course that Islam advocates violence, as any reasonable and honest person who has actually read the Qur’an can tell you. Also take a look at the polls on Muslims’ opinions conducted by Pew and others, e.g., like this one:
http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Religious_Affiliation/Muslim/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-full-report.pdf
Examples:
Blasphemy: 75% of Pakistani Muslims support that country’s harsh blasphemy laws, only 6% of Pakistani Muslims have objections to those blasphemy laws, 18% “don’t know”/refused to respond, see p. 199
In other words, a large majority of Pakistani Muslim support deadly violence, in the form of the death penalty, against people who criticize Muhammad. Only a tiny minority (6%) of Pakistani Muslims say they object to those laws.
Apostasy: 88% of Egyptian Muslims want the death penalty for apostasy, see p. 219.
See the original paper by Pew that I’ve linked, above, for more. Some secondary sources (e.g., Max Fisher, the Economist, and others) have presented erroneous or inaccurate information about that poll. Use the original to get the accurate and detailed information.
dumbledoresarmy says
Well done, kid.
Just hang in there and keep on keeping on. (Are your *parents* on side? Or a grandparent? An uncle or aunt?)
Here’s a link for you to pass to your friends.
http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/54204
It’s an EX-Muslim – one Nassim Ben Iman – in Germany, telling it like it is.
You haven’t said whether you’re a girl or a boy.
If you’re a girl, try to get your friends to read 1/ Brigitte Gabriel, “Because They Hate”, and 2/ Ayaan Hirsi Ali, “Infidel” and “Nomad” (but especially “Infidel”, because a *lot* of it is about her childhood and teen years and it’s told in a way that other girls should be able to relate to) and 3/ Phyllis Chesler, “An American Bride in Kabul”.
richard Sherman says
Sayyid Qtub makes clear that ” no compulsion in religion” simply means that Muslims do not force infidels to convert to Islam. If an infidel wants to be a worthless humiliated DHIMMI, he or she is free to be a worthless humiliated DHIMMI…that is all that phrase means. It has nothing to do with Islam being a tolerant philosophy.
Francesca says
They didn’t RAPE anyone??? Don’t make me laugh. Those girls were raped in the first 24 hours of their captivity – probably multiple times.
jewdog says
Jihad Program for Boko Haram {
Do while forever:
Kidnap schoolgirls;
Infidels protest kidnapping;
Military actions against BH;
Declare defensive jihad;
Call Infidels names (ex. racists);
Kill Infidels;
End while loop; } //end program
citycat says
Oh hi, armageddon, won’t be a sec, just got to finish this tea and biscuits.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim cleric praises Boko Haram’s kidnap of schoolgirls
…………………………………
Why should *anyone* be surprised by this? Everything about this is Islamic—denying children (girls especially) anything but an Islamic “education”, kidnapping Infidels, holding them for ransom or in exchange for Jihadist prisoners, taking sex slaves, rape, forced conversion, forced “marriage”, pedophilia (some of the kidnapped girls are as young as *twelve*, and—of course—murder and attempted murder (they shot several guards and killed a soldier in the course of the kidnapping).
And this last may, of course, get much worse—since the Nigerian authorities have rejected the deal to exchange the kidnapped girls for imprisoned Jihadists, Boko Haram may just start slaughtering them.
More:
“People want to make it out as though history began on the day these girls were taken from – sorry I should say these women – were taken from this high school in Nigeria.
…………………………………
“Women”—even though these girls are as young as *twelve*. And why not? Pious Muslims consider little girls as young as *nine* to be Halal—after all, this is how old little Aisha was when the appalling 53-year-old “Prophet” forced himself on her. *Ugh*.
And notice the over all sneering tone—and why not? As pious Muslims see it, vulnerable Infidels are the natural prey of Mohammedans—and under Islamic law, they are barred from even speaking about it.
More:
“They didn’t do to these girls what the Nigerian government had been doing to the Muslims all these years – they didn’t rape anybody, they didn’t torture, they didn’t murder any of these girls.”
What *utter crap*. One girl who escaped reported that the girls were raped *up to fifteen times a day*.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/boko-haram-329-schoolgirls-stolen-3489356
Shekau himself has said that many of the girls are being sold off as sex slaves.
But then, pious Muslims see nothing wrong with forced sex with captives of “what their right hands possess”, so likely he isn’t denying that these girls were forced to have sex—just that this should be considered rape.
And they have certainly been terrorized.
More:
He then rants about the group being “full of good messages”, including its support for al-Qaeda.
…………………………………
Yup—that’s what Muslims consider “good”. *Ugh*.
More:
In another video, he says there is “not any evidence” the group has targeted Muslims or non-Muslims, adding: “I’m not saying it is or isn’t [a problem to kill non-Muslims].”
…………………………………
Most of the Muslim girls kidnapped were later released when they were found to be Muslims. The ones still in captivity are Christians, or Christians forced to convert to Islam. The idea that Boko Haram made no distinctions is utterly false.
And then note his coy reference to killing non-Muslims—*appalling*, but also not surprising.
More:
When confronted by the Standard, the preacher, from Palmers Green, north London, said: “On the one hand people are portraying them [Boko Haram] as crazed lunatics who don’t know anything about Islam or society in general. But on the other hand if you actually read their messages they are not trying to destroy society, they are just complaining about the oppression against them and trying to better society.
…………………………………
“Better society”—of course they are—in Islamic terms. And what makes for a “better” Muslim society than terrified Infidels, sex slavery, forced conversion, and sacrilized rape and pedophilia, all in the name of imposing Shari’ah law? For pious Muslims, it doesn’t get much better than that…
More:
“Of all of their messages, some are good messages so they are full of good messages. What I’m trying to do is tell people the whole story.”
…………………………………
Of course, Rahman would spread Boko Haram’s “good news” in Britain itself if he thought he could get away with it—and hopes that time won’t be too far off…
Edward Cline says
“So no one should be outraged at Mizanur Rahman. They should be giving him banquets and medals.” And we’re not outraged. Nor surprised. Aside from banquets and medals, perhaps Vaz and his ilk should recommend that he be granted an audience with the Queen, awarded a lifetime gift card to the halal Subway shop near his residence, a place in the Prime Minister’s cabinet as chief censor of British publications, carte blanche rights to fondle Kate Middleton in lieu of “groomed” schoolgirl (we wouldn’t want the Pakistani groomer to get into trouble, would we?), and funds to establish a committee to replace Nelson atop the Trafalgar Square column with a statue of Osama bin Laden.
duh_swami says
What’s the point of posting when my posts are eaten by the system and lost in space somewhere.
Mirren10 says
Are you logged in, duh swami, or do you post with your email address only ?
If you post just using your email, the posts go into moderation, and there is often a lengthy time lapse before they’re published.
Don’t give up, I love your posts ! 🙂
Jay Boo says
@duh_swami
I have noticed that if I forget to sign in it wipes out the post.
If you have a long post, it is safer to write it in word and then copy and paste.
raylanfear says
Boku follows Wahhabism along with Qatar, Saudi Arabia, worse form of violence in Islam. Where is the condemnation from the so called “moderate peaceful muslims?”
How can anyone tell the difference between a peaceful so called moderate Muslim, or peaceful Mosque in America today, because of “Taqivya”?.
A small college out in Claremont California called “Bayan Claremont” now offers a degree in Islamic Studies for the future leadership of Muslims in America. One wonders just what is being taught there besides the basic Islam agenda.
On their webpage, they list their faculty and listed is Ism Suhaib Webb. Somewhat shocking as he joined Al Qaeda and worked right alongside of Anwar Awlaki. To refresh your memory Anwar Awlaki was an American born terrorist who incited English speaking Muslims to commit terrorist acts. He preached to 3 of the 9/11 hijackers and was linked with Nidal Hassan who committed the Fort Hood massacre of our soldiers. Awlaki was a main recruiter for Al Qaeda and preached a hateful ideology and incited violence against America.
He had our own government fooled for years, using “taqivya” (The practice of concealing one’s beliefs and using any form of lying, deceit, misleading, half-truths, considered legitimate my Muslims to further the growth of Islam.) Anwar Awlaki was an Iman and preacher at a Virginia Mosque (we now have over 2400 Mosques and even one being constructed in Idaho.) Certainly not all Mosques breed terrorists, but it only takes one to accomplish a 9/11 again. Our own government invited him to speak to members of Congress and our military officers and offer them advice as he was thought at the time to be a so called “moderate Muslim”. Anwar Awlaki, the leader of Al Qaeda was killed in a drone attack by President Obama, executive order on 9/2-/2011.
Now the “clone” of Anwar Awlaki is teaching he future leadership of Muslims in America. How is this allowed? Why he was even allowed to return to our soil? Why he was not arrested? He apparently has convinced the government that he is a moderate Muslim. (Will we ever learn from the tragedy the lessons of 9/11?)
Ayaan Hirsi Ali perhaps said it best, “Violence is inherent in Islam” It must be noted that Ayaan has won every single debate on the subject as to whether or not Islam is a religion of peace. It is not. She speaks from experience as a former Muslim, and speaks out against radical Islam and Sharia Law and women’s rights. She has been accused of hate speech and has death threats on her life, merely for telling the truth.
The mainstream news has no idea that this man “Ism Suhaib Webb” is now at Bayan College, nor do they care. Also on the staff, is Alam Al Marayati, who has defended terrorist acts and the groups that carry them out?
Perhaps this college should be investigated, since they are using our tax money to support their agenda. What is your thoughts America? Please comment.
gravenimage says
Yes, Bayan Claremont looks pretty creepy, Ray. I live not far from Zaytuna College in Berkeley.
Here’s Bayan’s syllabus:
http://bayan.us.org/courses/
I don’t see an “Ism Suhaib Webb” listed among the faculty, though.
Certainly, Suhaib Webb has a prominentnasty on-line presence.
No doubt these “Islamic colleges” bear watching—as does “Islamist” infiltration of university “Middle Eastern Studies” departments.
dumbledoresarmy says
And here’s some other nastiness that the mohammedans have been up to in the UK recently.
1/ Putting up a sign telling dog-walkers to go somewhere else because the area is “a Muslim area” and Muslims “don’t like dogs”.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/muslims-dont-like-dogs-dont-walk-them-here-police-probe-sign-in-east-london-park-9458867.html
“Police probe sign in east London park saying ‘Muslims don’t like dogs…don’t walk them here'”
“…Police were today investigating a sign telling pet owners to stay out of an east London park because “Muslims do not like dogs”.
The warning, in Bartlett Park, Poplar, said: “Do not walk your dog here! Muslims do not like dogs. This is an Islamic area now.”..”.
and (this one’s actually really creepy)
2/ KILLING SWANS, which are a protected species and, moreover, are deemed to be property of the Queen.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/swan-killer-caught-red-handed-stuffing-decapitated-bird-into-his-rucksack-9457592.html
Hasan Fidan, 46, was arrested after angler Bob Morris handed the photo into police, showing Fidan at a beauty spot in Hildenborough, Kent.
Police are believed to have found the swan, chopped into pieces and jammed into Fidan’s freezer when they traced him to his home in Tonbridge.
Mr Morris, 64, who runs a rod-making firm in Dartford, said: “I was about 200ft away when **I saw this man in a red jacket jump over a fence and grab a swan and sit down on it.
“He then took a knife off and cut its head off at the bottom of the neck**
{nota bene – this is halal slaughter – and this mohammedan would just as *readily* do the same to a non-Muslim *person*, given the opportunity, I’ll BET – dda}
“I was stunned, I couldn’t believe what I was seeing.”
He added: “It was a very unpleasant incident and left me quite shaken, but I managed to get the photo which helped get him caught.”
The rest of the story is simply mind-boggling, because this mohammedan poacher and animal-cruelty practitioner got away with the equivalent of a slap on the wrist; he was punished **far less severely** than the full letter of the law should have allowed.
“Until 1998 it was considered treason to kill a swan.
“Today, under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 it is an offence to kill, injure or harm a wild bird **and can carry a fine of up to £5,000 and six months in prison.** {my emphasis – dda}
“The Queen still retains the right to ownership of all unmarked mute swans in open water, but only exercises her rights on certain stretches of the Thames and surrounding tributaries.
{I’ll bet the thieving mohammedan knew that; this is not about hunting for the pot – because ducks or any other bird would do as well – this is a deliberate insult to the Queen personally and specifically as well as to British law in general – dda}
“On Tuesday at Sevenoaks magistrates’ court Fidan was fined £110, with £85 in court costs and a £20 victim surcharge, after he admitted to killing the swan on March 18.
Mr Morris said: “How can they justify giving him a fine of just £110? You get that for dropping litter or not cleaning up after your dog.””
Yes. One wonders what would have happened to a non-Muslim who did the same. I wonder whether any *have*, in the past ten years or so; it might be interesting to check, and see what sort of punishment was handed down, as compared to the mere slap on the wrist that this vile mohammedthug was given.