That means the Obama Administration traded five dangerous jihad terror leaders for a known deserter. Will there be a full investigation this time, or will John Boehner start weeping and punt, as always?
“U.S. concluded in 2010 that Bergdahl walked away,” by Ken Dilanian and Deb Riechmann, Associated Press, June 2, 2014:
A Pentagon investigation concluded in 2010 that Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl walked away from his unit, and after an initial flurry of searching the military decided not to exert extraordinary efforts to rescue him, according to a former senior defense official who was involved in the matter.
Instead, the U.S. government pursued negotiations to get him back over the following five years of his captivity — a track that led to his release over the weekend.
Bergdahl was being checked and treated Monday at a U.S. military hospital in Germany as questions mounted at home over the swap that resulted in his freedom in exchange for the release of five detainees who were sent to Qatar from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo, Cuba.
Even in the first hours of Bergdahl’s handoff to U.S. special forces in eastern Afghanistan, it was clear this would not be an uncomplicated yellow-ribbon celebration. Five terrorist suspects also walked free, stirring a debate over whether the exchange would heighten the risk of other Americans being snatched as bargaining chips and whether the released detainees — several senior Taliban figures among them — would find their way back to the fight….
And in Kabul Monday, the Afghan Foreign Ministry called the swap “against the norms of international law” if it came against the five imprisoned Taliban detainees’ will. The ministry said: “No state can transfer another country’s citizen to a third country and put restriction on their freedom.”
Tireless campaigners for their son’s freedom, Bob and Jani Bergdahl thanked all who were behind the effort to retrieve him. “You were not left behind,” Bob Bergdahl told reporters, as if speaking to his son. “We are so proud of the way this was carried out.” He spoke in Boise, Idaho, wearing a long bushy beard he’d grown to honor his son, as residents in the sergeant’s hometown of Hailey prepared for a homecoming celebration.
The five detainees left Guantanamo aboard a U.S. military aircraft flying to Qatar, which served as go-between in the negotiations. They are to be banned from leaving Qatar for at least a year. Among the five: a Taliban deputy intelligence minister, a former Taliban interior minister with ties to the late al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and a figure linked by human rights monitors to mass killings of Shiite Muslims in Afghanistan in 2000 and 2001.
Questions persisted, too, about the circumstances of Bergdahl’s 2009 capture. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel declined to comment on earlier reports that the sergeant had walked away from his unit, disillusioned with the war. Such matters “will be dealt with later,” Hagel said.
But the former Pentagon official said it was “incontrovertible” that he walked away from his unit.
The military investigation was broader than a criminal inquiry, this official said, and it didn’t formally accuse Bergdahl of desertion. In interviews, members of his unit portrayed him as a naive, “delusional” person who thought he could help the Afghan people by leaving his army post, the official said.U.S. military and intelligence agencies had made every effort to monitor Bergdahl’s location and his health, the official said, through both signals intelligence and a network of spies.
Nathan Bradley Bethea, who served as an officer in Bergdahl’s unit, said in an article Monday on the Daily Beast website that Bergdahl was not on patrol, as some reports have suggested.
“There was no patrol that night,” he wrote. “Bergdahl was relieved from guard duty, and instead of going to sleep, he fled the outpost on foot. He deserted. I’ve talked to members of Bergdahl’s platoon_including the last Americans to see him before his capture. I’ve reviewed the relevant documents. That’s what happened.”…
Champ says
Benghazi, and now this? The list is getting longer. Yes, we have a traitor serving as Commander in chief.
Wellington says
Yes, Champ, Obama is just a disaster. He may not be guilty of treason in the most technical legal and Constitutional sense but, respecting the spirit of things, Obama does push the treason envelope most definitely.
In the final analysis, though, I personally would have to come down on the side of Obama not being a traitor but “only” a monumental fool——-and this is more than bad enough. Really, this man is so limited and is possessed of so many ideas he thinks are good ideas, which are actually bad ideas, that I am hard pressed to think of anyone else in all of American history who has had so much power and and has so ill-used it. In this respect, I would rank Obama #1.
I also find no forgiveness in my heart for all the fools who voted for this doofus for President, especially the ones who did so twice. They represent a bigger problem, by far actually, than Obama does. And the vast majority of them will never learn. They are mired in perpetual ignorance. This does not bode well for America.
John C. Barile says
Hi, guys! We’ve gotten back “one of our own”–except that our own don’t accept him. Our own are being betrayed yet again. Our serving soldiers greeted this announcement with pointed silence.
Vallie says
“This does not bode well for America.”
Surely, it does not.
However, I disagree with you on the President not being a traitor. His every move defines him, and each move is calculated to define. The problem is perception. Those on the left perceive him as a champion of socialist causes, those of us who read perceive him as a champion of the three-card monte. Traitor? Depends on what the meaning of “is” is. Wink…nod.
Jerry says
No qustion HBO is a traitor to the USA who should be impeached,
arrested, charged with treason and upon conviction recive the
ultimate punishment available at law.
How many Americans can face at least one of those who made it
all possible by looking directly at their own mirror?
Shame on you, Americans.
Lonny Watson says
To be guilty of treason, one would have to be an American. Obama is a usurper in the Whitehouse.