• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Jihadist released in Bergdahl swap had hand in pre-9/11 al-Qaeda plans, killed first U.S. soldier killed in Afghan war

Jun 14, 2014 8:18 am By Robert Spencer

QATAR-AFGHANISTAN-TALIBAN-UNREST-USObama has said that it is contrary to American principles to keep prisoners in Guantanamo indefinitely without charge. Very well. So why wasn’t Mohammad Fazl ever charged for the murder of Mike Spann? Why was he released outright when it is extremely likely that he will rejoin the jihad in Afghanistan and try to murder more Americans? Will Barack Obama be held responsible for this, or will the mainstream media give him yet another free pass?

“Jihadist released in Bergdahl swap had hand in Qaeda plans before 9/11,” by Danika Fears, New York Post, June 13, 2014:

One of the five Guantánamo detainees released as part of the Bowe Bergdahl prisoner swap had a hand in al Qaeda’s plans just before the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Mohammad Fazl — who was the Taliban’s army chief of staff and deputy defense minister before his detention at Guantánamo — was not directly involved in the 9/11 attacks, but he did play a part in a military offensive aimed at Taliban and al Qaeda enemies the day before the World Trade Center towers were destroyed, according to The Weekly Standard.

Osama bin Laden saw the Sept. 10 offensive as an important part of the terrorist group’s three-stage attack plan, which the 9/11 commission uncovered in the wake of the attacks, the magazine reports.

Fazl was involved in the second part of the plan, which was put into action just after the assassination of Northern Alliance commander Ahmad Shah Massoud — the Taliban’s chief rival — in a suicide bombing.

Fazl joined forces with one of bin Laden’s chief lieutenants, Abdul Hadi al Iraqi, to begin a Taliban offensive against the Northern Alliance, which would strengthen Taliban and al Qaeda power in Afghanistan — and possibly pave the way for a terrorist attack against the United States.

Al Iraqi “stated the Northern Alliance was demoralized after the assassination and [he] met with [Fazl] to immediately coordinate an attack with the Taliban against the Northern Alliance,” according to a leaked Joint Task Force Guantánamo threat assessment of Fazl.

While Taliban leaders, including Mullah Omar, hesitated to back an attack against the United States, al Qaeda believed the first stages of their plan would rally Taliban support, reports the magazine.

Al Qaeda military chief Mohammed Atef “would likely have remembered that Mullah Omar was dependent on them for the Massoud assassination and for vital support in the Taliban military operations,” while mulling over the terrorist plot, the 9/11 commission found.

Self-proclaimed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed recalled Atef “telling him that al Qaeda had an agreement with the Taliban to eliminate Massoud, after which the Taliban would begin an offensive to take over [all of] Afghanistan,” according to the 9/11 commission.

The other four Taliban leaders released from Guantánamo have also worked with al Qaeda on various occasions. These sorts of alliances may have made it easier for al Qaeda to carry out the terrorist attacks, the magazine reports.

“The alliance with the Taliban provided al Qaeda a sanctuary in which to train and indoctrinate fighters and terrorists, import weapons, forge ties with other jihad groups and leaders, and plot and staff terrorist schemes,” the 9/11 commission found.

Despite Fazl’s involvement in the military offensive, several US officials remain adamant that the Taliban 5 pose no threat to American security.

“These five guys are not a threat to the United States,” former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in an interview with NBC News. “They are a threat to the safety and security of Afghanistan and Pakistan. It’s up to those two countries to make the decision once and for all that these are threats to them. So I think we may be kind of missing the bigger picture here.”

“Daughter’s heartbreak at learning Taliban leader responsible for her dad’s death when she was 9 was freed in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl,” by Lydia Warren, Daily Mail, June 13, 2014:

The daughter of the first American soldier killed in the war in Afghanistan has shared her heartbreak at learning that his killer – a Taliban leader – was freed by the U.S in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl.

Alison Spann was just nine when her father, CIA operative Johnny Micheal Spann, was killed during a prisoner uprising at a compound where he was interrogating Taliban fighters on November 25, 2001.

Mullah Mohammad Fazl, the leader of the prisoners at the compound, ended up in Guantanamo Bay – until two weeks ago when he and four others were switched for U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.

‘My initial reaction was shock,’ Spann told Fox. ‘I was shocked that our president would release five of the most high-risk prisoners being held in Guantanamo in exchange for one American.

‘As a whole, my family was extremely upset and saddened that our government would do something like this, especially in light of the fact that it seems that people in the intelligence community are fairly united in their belief that these terrorists are likely to seek to further harm Americans in the future.’

She said she still cannot understand why the county that her father fought for would release the man responsible for his death.

‘I do not believe that it was the right move by the administration,’ she added. ‘You cannot release someone of such a high caliber within the Taliban community and expect him to suddenly emerge as a peaceful being.’

Her father, who had served in the Marines for eight years before he joined the CIA, was 32 when he died at the Qala-i-Jangi compound near Mazari Sharit in northern Afghanistan early in the war.

Before he left, he had told his daughter: ‘You know people want to kill us and they’re trying to kill us. People like me have to go do the things that I have to do.’

He was buried at Arlington National Cemetery, where then-CIA Director George Tenet said he had given up his life trying to build a ‘better, safer world’.

‘You cannot release someone of such a high caliber within the Taliban community and expect him to suddenly emerge as a peaceful being’

‘To that place of danger and terror, he sought to bring justice and freedom,’ Tenet said. ‘For Mike understood that it is not enough simply to dream of a better, safer world. He understood that it has to be built – with passion and dedication, in the face of obstacles, in the face of evil.’

Fazl had been deputy defense minister and commander of all Taliban troops in the northern Afghanistan region at the time of the September 11 attacks and he had also been accused of personally supervising the murders of thousands of Shiite and Tajik Sunni Muslims, Fox reported.

More than 2,300 Americans have died in Afghanistan since Spann’s death.

Bergdahl returned to the U.S on Friday after his release from five years in captivity in Afghanistan in the controversial prisoner swap with the Taliban.

Bergdahl, who has been recovering at an Army medical facility in Germany since his release last month, ‘will continue the next phase of his reintegration process,’ at Brooke Army Medical Center at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Pentagon spokesman Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby said.

Officials have kept quiet about Bergdahl’s condition to avoid rushing his back into the public spotlight after the captivity and amid a public uproar over the circumstances of his capture and release.

The Idaho native was captured in Afghanistan in June 2009 and released by the Taliban on May 31 in a deal struck by the Obama administration in which five senior Taliban officials were released from detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The Army has not formally begun a new review into the circumstances of Bergdahl’s capture and whether he walked away without leave or was deserting the Army when he was found and taken by insurgents[.]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Al-Qaeda, Barack Obama, Taliban Tagged With: featured


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Charli Main says

    Jun 14, 2014 at 8:32 am

    Nothing new, in the most implacable of enemies ending up, standing together in the face of a mutual enemy, that has dedicated itself to the destruction of both.
    The long established principal of ” my enemy´s enemy is my friend”

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 14, 2014 at 2:01 pm

      With respect, Charlie, I’m not at all sure how “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” applies here.

      It would be more like “my enemy (somehow) presents no further danger, even though he is going to rejoin his comrades and has vowed to continue fighting us”.

      • Charli Main says

        Jun 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm

        Hello Graven,
        I was thinking along the lines of when Stalin´s Soviet Union joined forces with the Allies to fight a common enemy what was intent on destroying both Democracy and Communism.
        Nazism forced two implacable ideological enemies to support each other in order for each to survive the onslaught of a common enemy.
        IE. my enemy´s enemy, is my friend. Perhaps I could have said ” adversity makes for strange bedfellows”
        All the best

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 15, 2014 at 9:00 pm

          Thanks for your reply, Charli—I appreciate it.

          I absolutely agree that our allying with the Soviet Union during WWII—something that still makes me cringe but was almost certainly necessary to defeat Fascism—is a classic example of its kind.

          Maybe I’m obtuse, but I’m afraid I *still* don’t get the reference re this story, though.

  2. Salah says

    Jun 14, 2014 at 9:17 am

    “Will Barack Obama be held responsible for this, or will the mainstream media give him yet another free pass?”

    I would rather ask:
    “Will Barack Obama be held responsible for this, or will the AMERICAN PEOPLE give him yet another free pass?”

    The Power of a Massive Demonstration in Egypt. Will the American people do the same?
    http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-end-of-muslim-brotherhood.html

  3. Brian Hoff says

    Jun 14, 2014 at 10:42 am

    If than Germany solder kill than america solder in than battle can america charge him murder. In war ot hostile action solder doing they duty cannot be charge by the emeny with murder or other criminal charge.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 14, 2014 at 2:12 pm

      “Brian Hoff” wrote:

      If than (sic) Germany (sic) solder kill than (sic) america (sic) solder in than (sic) battle can america (sic) charge him murder (sic). In war ot hostile action solder (sic) doing they duty (sic) cannot be charge by the emeny (sic) with murder or other criminal charge.
      ……………………………………

      Remember, “DefenderofIslam” here is *an American convert to Islam*. Yet all his sympathies are with the Jihadists (and, incidentally, the Nazis).

      In any case, we needn’t have formally charged this vicious homicidal Jihadist with murder in a civilian court—but “Brian’s” implication that we then had no option but to return him to the battlefield to kill *more* Americans is simply grotesque.

      If “DefenderofIslam” wants—as it sounds—these Jihadists to be treated as uniformed soldiers, then they should not be released until the war *is over*—and since Jihadists do not intend to cease hostilities until they have conquered us outright, then I’d say those Jihadists in Gitmo are in for a long stretch…

    • Angemon says

      Jun 14, 2014 at 2:59 pm

      Ugh, more of Brian Hoff’s pathetic attempts at obfuscating the issue at hand. The issue is not whether or not Fazl could, or should, be judged by murder. The issue at hand is that the US government had no problem releasing 5 high-profile islamic terrorists, including someone who we know to have plotted against, and killed, US citizens in exchange for one single person whose actions, in a sane world, would have him judged on court-martial for treason. That deal was basically the RL equivalent of the promotion rule in chess, if the promotion rule allowed to exchange a pawn for 5 higher rank pieces instead of being a 1-for-1 trade.

  4. Joshua 7:8-10 says

    Jun 14, 2014 at 11:03 am

    With a fellow Islamic Socialist controlling the Justice Dept?
    The sheepies dare not act against the police state and the
    media is asleep. Free pass for Obama.

  5. GWhizz says

    Jun 14, 2014 at 12:35 pm

    Remember we can only kill these terrorists in the battlefield. There is no point in capturing them. They deserve to die in jihad and get their reward. The way to kill the enemy is to have them concentrate their forces and destroy them from the air.
    Think of the “Road to Baghdad” in the Kuwait war.

  6. gravenimage says

    Jun 14, 2014 at 2:16 pm

    I had had no idea that the murderer of Mike Spann was among this released quintet of Jihad savages—but sadly, I cannot say I’m surprised…

  7. citycat says

    Jun 16, 2014 at 1:43 am

    I think the battlefield for Islam is the whole world.
    Suburbia is part of the battlefield where they are dangerously breeding soldiers of Allah to fight in different ways, like gradually getting to the critical population ratio to infiltrate, take over and change society into a mosque ridden hell on Earth.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests
  • John on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Vladimir on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Linda McGuire on UK: Muslim stabs two women in Marks & Spencer, one in the neck, cops search for motive

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.