The ever-clueless Daily Mail calls this a “Nazi-style” vision, when it is all based on tenets of Islamic law. The prohibition on church bells: “Such non-Muslim subjects [of the Islamic state] are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they…are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays…” — ‘Umdat al-Salik o11.5
And as for the red collars, Abu Waleed didn’t invent the idea that Christians and Jews in Muslim lands should wear distinctive marks. Even before Iran became Khomeini’s laboratory of the new Islamic state, in some areas of Iran Jews were made to wear distinctive yellow patches on their clothing as late as 1950. Distinctive dress for Muslims and Jews was first mandated over a millennium ago by the Caliph Ja’far al-Mutawakkil (847-861).
Shave heads? That, too. Some ancient dhimmi regulations stipulated that Christians “had to shave the front of their heads above their foreheads.”
All of what Abu Waleed says awaits dhimmi Brits is part of Islamic law. And the always-ridiculous Daily Mail calls it “Nazi,” certain that it is a twisting and hijacking of the Religion of Peace. Good luck with that.
“‘Infidels must wear red collars and shave heads’: ‘Nazi’ vision of Muslim Britain from Imam who ran ‘Isis’ barbecue in Cardiff park,” by Abul Taher and Nic North, Daily Mail, June 29, 2014:
A radical hate preacher linked to the ‘brainwashing’ of three Welsh young jihadis fighting in Iraq and Syria has outlined his chilling vision of a Nazi-style, Islamic state in Britain on video, describing how non-Muslims will be forced to shave their heads and wear a red sash, in a land where the ringing of church bells is banned.
Abu Waleed, 35, a leading preacher for a group banned last week for incitement to terrorism, was seen earlier this month at a barbecue in the Welsh capital where the banner of the Isis terror group – the Al Qaeda splinter group which the trio are fighting for – was flying.
According to friends, former students Reyaad Khan, Nasser Muthana, both 20, and Muthana’s 17-year-old brother Aseel were seen handing out leaflets for a group closely linked to Waleed outside a Cardiff mosque seven months ago. Khan and Nasser appeared on an Isis recruitment video this month.
Jobless Waleed – whose real name is Shahid Janjua – lives in a council house in Hounslow, West London, and claims benefits for himself, his wife and three disabled children.
His group Need4khilafah, whose leader is Anjem Choudary, the firebrand who once led the Al-Muhajiroun group – banned after the deadly July 7 terror attacks in London in 2005 – dreams of the flag of Islam flying over Big Ben.
In the films, he calls for the Queen to wear a burka and brands the Duchess of Cambridge ‘a whore’.
The videos were recovered by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), an American anti-extremism monitoring group.
In the most recent film, made last January, Waleed rants: ‘The kaffir [non-believer], when he walks down the street, he has to wear a red belt around his neck, and he has to have his forehead shaved, and he has to wear two shoes that are different from one another.
‘He [the non-believer] is not allowed to walk on the pavement, he has to walk in the middle of the road, and he has to ride a mule.’
He adds that Christians can have their churches, but not ring the bells. ‘The kuffar [kaffir, plural] can have their churches, but they are not allowed to ring the bell . . that is, my dear brothers, the Islamic state.’
The preacher adds that when Britain becomes Muslim, a Christian must open his house and accommodate a Muslim at all times, giving up his bed and sleeping on the floor.
In an earlier video, of a lecture that was delivered in April 2011, Waleed is far more inflammatory.
He tells the male audience: ‘What is the nightmare on Downing Street? The nightmare on Downing Street, my dear brothers, is when the door of 10 Downing Street is kicked down by one muwahid [Muslim], and the Caliph [Islamic ruler] he walks in, and establishes the sharia.
‘The nightmare on Downing Street, my dear brothers, is when one muwahid pulls a rope, and he raises the banner of “there is no god but Allah” above Big Ben.
The nightmare on Downing Street is when one muwahid flies a helicopter all the way to the top of Big Ben, and he removes those numbers and he replaces them with Arabic numbers.
Abhorrent: The hateful video message by Abu Waleed, who lives in Hounslow, west London
‘That is the nightmare of Downing Street, my dear brothers.’
He says that under a British sharia state, non-Muslims will pay a tax called jiziya for protection.
He continues: ‘We are the ones who want to work for the sake of Allah, to establish the manifestation of Islam, and make sure David Cameron comes on his hands and knees, and gives us the jiziya.’
He then says that the Queen and Kate will be forced to wear veils….
Reality Check says
“UK jihadi: Under Sharia, Infidels must wear red collars, shave heads, etc.”
What??? Including the women???
Angemon says
Especially the women. Pious muslims don’t want to kidnap a non-muslim sex slave on the street only to find out they have undesired hair on their faces or somewhere else, like a 9-year-old girl.
Woody Oaks says
Under Sharia infidels must pack heat and aim for the turban.
richard Sherman says
Aim for the body…they are hollow between the ears…to paraphrase Churchill, they are all just rabid dogs
voegelinian says
The Pact of Umar also stipulates that dhimmis cannot own or carry weapons.
pdxnag says
The incessant agitation of a someone bent on Islamic conquest is just too insufferable to allow to remain in the country. Banning a group is useless. Deport the agitators to their Islamic hell hole of choice. They have chosen to leave you no alternative. (Sooner rather than later.)
Michael Copeland says
UK journalists, uneducated in Islam, persist in presenting these matters as if they are the personal hatred of the individual “hate preacher”, and thus nothing to do with their alleged Nice Peaceful Islam. As Robert Spencer (to whom I am indebted for knowledge) points out, Abu Waleed has not dreamt up these details from his own fund of hatred. He is articulating the Pact of Umar (Caliph successor to Mohammed), which defines the conditions under which Christians are permitted to exist, as second class citizens with restricted rights, in a muslim society. It is orthodox basic Islam.
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/pact-umar.asp
You can even have a lapel badge “Enjoy the conditions of Omar”
http://enjoytheconditionsofomar.blogspot.co.uk/
Jaladhi says
There was time when the sun never set on British empire. Now the Muslims in Britain will eradicate the sunshine from Britain and plunge it in the darkness of Islam.
What are Brits waiting for?? They really wan to see their necks being slit off by Muslims. well that is happening i parts of Britain and yet to no reaction from the British public
duh_swami says
My bed’s as old as the hills, it came with bugs when I got it. I already sleep on the floor, so any Mahoundian who want’s to sleep n my bed for a night or two, is welcome to it. I suggest they bring a can if insect repellent. Two is better…
Frank Tillman says
run these bastards out of England while you can
Guest says
I think the ‘Nazi’ headline could actually be useful: drawing people to read the article and showing that islamic ideology can be seen as fascist.
Foolster41 says
Off-topic, but there’s going to a “house of one” in Berlin, a joint Church/Temple/Mosque. I notice the building has a dome, but no outward symbols of Christianity or Judiasm, so the supremisism of the project is already pretty aparent. Either the Imam who’s involved with this doesn’t know Islam, or is a taquia artist liar. The Imam’s name is Kadir Sanci, and I can’t really see anything about what he believes, or what school of judiprudence he belongs to.
the site is here: http://house-of-one.org/en/idea
“We live in a world where violence in word and deed is threatening the peace that exists within these religions, in the city and in the country as a whole. It is therefore crucial that these religions, in their dealings with one another and with society, help create a citywide culture of nonviolent opposition to ignorance and injustice, and of respect and acceptance for the worth and identity of their fellow humans. In doing so, the faiths will help satisfy the rights and obligations set out in Germany’s Basic Law. With this in mind, the signatories will neither oppress nor harm others. They will refrain from using violence as a means of settling differences, and will not lend financial or ideological support to third parties whose actions run contrary to this culture of nonviolence.”
Well then, that kind of excludes Islam, since Islam innately promotes violence.
voegelinian says
“Either the Imam who’s involved with this doesn’t know Islam, or is a taquia artist liar.”
There’s no “either or” here, for God’s sake. It’s 2014 on the pages of Jihad Watch. Get a grip.
Foolster41 says
“There’s no “either or” here, for God’s sake. It’s 2014 on the pages of Jihad Watch. Get a grip.”
Huh? I know what blog this is and the year it is, and I have a grip. thank you.
I really don’t understand what you mean. Are you saying it’s obviously that the Imam is a liar? I agree that it is much more likely he knows what’s in the Quoran, but considering how many clueless Muslims there are who genuinely think Islam is a religion of peace it wouldn’t surprise me if he did so too.
voegelinian says
I’m not saying it’s obvious. I’m saying we should assume he is a liar, as we should assume all Muslims who are not honest about their Islam are liars.
Semeru says
Mr Spencer
More people are going to sit up and pay attention to the Daily Mail calling it a “Nazi-style” vision, than by quoting some obscure book “Umdat al-Salik”
Semeru says
Umdat al-Salik
BC says
Don’t knock the Daily Mail and why do you? Unlike the more ‘reputable papers it regularly has the courage to print stories about Muslim supremicism aqnd islamism in general.
In fact the parallel with Nazi methods is very apt. March into a country, impose your will by brute force, with mass executions to ensure nobody will resist.
Impose your laws again by brute force, no judicial process, no appeals. Reduce the population to slavedom, exactly like the Nazis in Eastern Europe.
Angemon says
“Don’t knock the Daily Mail and why do you? Unlike the more ‘reputable papers it regularly has the courage to print stories about Muslim supremicism aqnd islamism in general.”
Do they point out how the “islamists” are in fact acting according to standard islamic orthodoxy or do they pass the idea that what the “islamists” are doing has nothing to do with “real islam”?
voegelinian says
Nah, they do everything they can (semi-consciously) to perpetuate and reinforce the TMOE meme (only the Tiny Minority of Extremists are the problem) that is killing us.
KrazyKafir says
Lets not forget the colorful belts Christians were made to wear: The Zunnar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zunnar
KrazyKafir says
Remember the Zunnar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zunnar
Foolster41 says
Voegelinian: “I’m not saying it’s obvious. I’m saying we should assume he is a liar, as we should assume all Muslims who are not honest about their Islam are liars.”
I agree that the assumption should be towards the safer one of liar. But what I said doesn’t mean I don’t have “a grip” on reality if I make a reference to how this guy could possibly be a deluded western convert who doesn’t really know his own religion (just because someone calls themself an “imam” doesn’t mean he’s educated on the Quoran, much like how there are many “biblical scholars” and “pastors” who don’t know the bible). You’d do well to hold back on your confrontational tone.
Free Speech:
“Oh, BTW, all imams are ‘taqiyya artist liars’. Now you know and you can stop equivocating.”
I’m not equivocating at all, and that you claim I am is patently ridiculous. My statement is simply: When a Muslim claims that Islam is peaceful they are either lying or are deluded and don’t know their own religion (and, as I said, I agree with voegelinian’s addition that the former should be cautiously assumed), though we can’t know for certain either way (unless you claim to have ESP?)
Angemon says
Here’s a video of an imam saying he’s not prepared to discuss the quran with Robert Spencer because the quran is Spencer’s field. Just because:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfyXUszMyOk
Jump to 5:10 for the fun part.