This is no surprise. Islamic supremacists never, ever take responsibility for the evils perpetrated by Islamic jihadists. They always deflect responsibility to the victims, the Infidels. What is surprising is that British officialdom is shocked by all these revelations — why should they be? This is the situation that for years they have aided and abetted and done everything they could to bring about. This is the Britain of Blair, Brown and Cameron. They made it. They have to live in it.
“Teachers at Muslim Trojan Horse school sent WhatsApp messages claiming Lee Rigby’s murder and Boston bombing were HOAXES, inquiry reveals,” by Matt Chorley and Lucy Crossley, Daily Mail, July 22, 2014:
Teachers at the centre of the ‘Trojan Horse’ plot to takeover Birmingham schools exchanged messages that the murder of soldier Lee Rigby was a hoax, it emerged today.
A damning report into Birmingham schools has unearthed ‘compelling evidence’ of an attempt by a group of hardline Muslims ‘to gain control of governing bodies’, Education Secretary Nicky Morgan said.
The investigation, led by former anti-terror chief Peter Clarke, revealed details of a WhatsApp group called The Park View Brotherhood which also included a description of homosexuals as ‘animals’ with ‘satanic ways’.
Mr Clarke was called in to investigate claims that schools in Birmingham were taken over in a plot to impose hardline Islamic rule. His was one of four inquiries into the allegations.
During his probe he was handed a dossier of more than 3,000 messages posted in the WhatsApp group from April 2013 until it was shut down in March.
Some of the messages suggested the brutal murder of Liee Rigby and the Boston Marathon bombings were both faked.
One post above a YouTube link attributed to someone identified as Teacher L on 24 May last year said: ‘ATTACK ON ISLAM! Plz watch and share ASAP before they remove it!!!!! London butcher incident; It’s is a hoax And this is the link to reveal it.’
A message sent by Teacher C on 19 April said: ‘Watch PROOF! Boston Marathon Bombing is Staged Terror Attack on YouTube.’
The ‘core contributors’ to the group were identified as mainly teachers at either Park View School or other schools within the Park View Educational Trust and all were men.
The report said the group was established by Monzoor Hussain, the acting Principal at Park View, while Razwan Faraz, a former teacher at the school, was allegedly one of the two ‘most prolific’ contributors.
Mr Hussain confirmed that he set up the forum but said the purpose was solely to discuss items that could be included in school assemblies, Mr Clarke said.
He added: ‘A number of topics are discussed, often by a small group of contributors, which reveal the members’ attitudes towards education, homosexuality and gay marriage.
‘There is also an undercurrent of anti-Western sentiment, explicit antagonism towards the British military, a sceptical reaction to news of terrorist attacks (Lee Rigby and the Boston bombings), and numerous links posted to extremist speakers.’
In May last year Mr Faraz allegedly posted a link to a news article about gay marriage followed by the message: ‘These animals are going out full force. As teachers we must be aware and counter their satanic ways of influencing young people.’
CHILDREN TAUGHT NOT TO QUESTION HARDLINE ISLAM
The report by Peter Clarke highlighted revealed details of concerns raised by witnesses about the impact on pupils:
Teachers feared that children are learning to be intolerant of difference and diversity
While good academic results could be achieved by narrowing the curriculum, this meant that young people were not getting a broad education, and instead their horizons are narrowed
There was evidence of young people being encouraged to ‘adopt an unquestioning attitude to a particular hardline strand of Sunni Islam’Mr Clarke found that there had been ‘co-ordinated, deliberate and sustained action’ by a number of individuals to introduce an ‘intolerant and aggressive Islamic ethos’ into a few schools in the city.
This had been achieved in some schools by gaining influence on the governing bodies, installing ‘sympathetic’ headteachers and senior staff, appointing ‘like- minded’ people to key positions and removing heads who were not ‘compliant’ with a particular agenda.
In a statement to the Commons today, Mrs Morgan told MPs: ‘What Peter Clarke found is disturbing. His report sets out compelling evidence of a determined effort by people with a shared ideology to gain control of the governing bodies of a small number of schools in Birmingham.
‘Teachers have said they fear children are learning to be intolerant of difference and diversity. Instead of enjoying a broadening and enriching experience in school, young people are having their horizons narrowed and are being denied the opportunity to flourish in a modern multicultural Britain.
‘There has been no evidence of direct radicalisation or violent extremism.
‘But there is a clear account in the report of people in positions of influence in these schools, with a restricted and narrow interpretation of their faith, who have not promoted fundamental British values and who have failed to challenge the extremist views of others.’
Mr Clarke said he ‘neither specifically looked for, nor found, evidence of terrorism, radicalisation or violent extremism in the schools of concern in Birmingham’.
But the report went on: ‘The existence of a common ideological stance among key linked individuals in this enquiry, the taking of control of governing bodies and the implementation of conservative religious practices in the schools where these individuals have influence, means that there can be no doubt that what has happened has been driven by a desire to instil a particular style of religious ethos into these state non-faith schools.’
The report was also highly critical of Birmingham City Council.
It found the authority was ‘aware of the practices and behaviours that were subsequently outlined in the ‘Trojan Horse’ letter long before the letter surfaced’.
The report continued: ‘Officers have conceded that it did not consider carefully enough nor soon enough the question of whether there was a pattern in what was happening across a number of schools.’
Instead, the council was said to have persisted in approaching incidents ‘on a case-by-case basis’.
Mr Clarke’s report is the last of four separate probes into the allegations in Birmingham.
The row was originally sparked by the ‘Trojan Horse’ letter – now widely believed to be a hoax – which referred to an alleged plot by hardline Muslims to seize control of a number of school governing boards in Birmingham.
HOAX UNEARTHED THE TRUTH
School inspections in Birmingham were triggered by a mysterious letter which described ‘Operation Trojan Horse’ – an apparent plot by Muslim fundamentalists to take over the city’s schools.
It was passed to Birmingham City Council, head teachers, teaching unions and media outlets, sparking four separate investigations, two of which – by Ofsted and the Department for Education – have now reported.
Purportedly written as a guide for fellow hardliners in Bradford, the unsigned and undated letter is now widely seen as an elaborate hoax.
But Ofsted has now found genuine evidence of an ‘organised campaign’ to change the character of some schools, while calling for further investigation to substantiate claims of ‘organised infiltration and manipulation of governing bodies’.
Mr Clarke’s conclusions differ from those contained in Ian Kershaw’s inquiry for Birmingham City Council, which found there was no evidence of a ‘conspiracy to promote an anti-British agenda, violent extremism or radicalisation in schools in east Birmingham’.
Mr Kershaw’s inquiry concluded that key individuals were ‘promoting and encouraging certain Islamic principles’ in Birmingham classrooms amid poor oversight from education chiefs.
Last month Ofsted issued a damning verdict on the running of a number of Birmingham’s schools as it declared five failing and placed them into special measures.
The watchdog inspected 21 schools in the city, concluding that a ‘culture of fear and intimidation’ has developed in some schools and, in several, governors exerted ‘inappropriate influence’ over how they are being run.
The five placed in special measures as a result of the recent inspections are Golden Hillock School, Nansen Primary School and Park View Academy – all run by the Park View Educational Trust (PVET), as well as Oldknow Academy and Saltley School. A sixth, Alston Primary, was already in special measures.
The Education Funding Agency has also conducted its own inquiry, publishing highly critical reports on PVET and Oldknow Academy.
Earlier a Labour frontbencher claimed schools in Birmingham are as deeply divided as the Balkans.
Liam Byrne, Labour’s universities spokesman and an MP in Birmingham, accused the government of using ‘divisive rhetoric’ to fuel ‘culture wars’ in the education system….
Yes, surrender is less “Islamophobic.”
slobberingfits says
Perpetually outraged vitims
Wellington says
Two larger lessons loom here for all those who have the capacity to grasp them: 1) The more devout a Muslim is the more that person lives in a world of unreality; 2) The more a non-Muslim believes that Islam is OK and is just another world religion that’s been temporarily hijacked by “a tiny minority of extremists” the more that person lives in a world of unreality.
Jay Boo says
One would think that Tom Petty would chime in with a few comments on this.
I suspect he is enjoying a breakfast of croissants with Michael Palin and singing that song from the ‘Life of Brian’ called ‘Look on the Sunny (Sunni) Side of Life’
Xero_G says
How ironic is it, that recent events, with empirical evidence including live video of the actual events, coupled with hundreds of eye-witnesses and confessions by the perpetrators, and the bodies of the dead, is considered a HOAX – while the story of an illiterate war lord who lived 1400 years ago, (although void of ANY collaborating historical evidence) who spoke to Angels and flew to mysterious lands on a flying horse named Buraq is NOT a hoax.
tpellow says
Supplementary on U.K.
“Hardline Muslims tried to impose Islam in British city’s schools – government report”
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/07/22/uk-britain-education-extremism-idUKKBN0FR1QR20140722?rpc=401&feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=401
Boston Tea Party says
I think Muslim psychology would be an interesting sub-field of study. With many of these terror attacks, it seems like there’s some major cognitive dissonance, or doublethink, or whatever you want to call it, going on. Many Muslims seem capable of SIMULTANEOUSLY believing that
1. Muslims did not commit the terror attacks, and it was a hoax by Jews and the West to make Muslims look bad…
AND
2. That Muslims were at least partly justified in committing these attacks due to how unfairly they’ve been treated, and that the victims got what they deserved.
It almost seems like there are many Muslims who subconsciously understand that both of these statements are false, but maybe together they could add up to a convincing argument—-one that wouldn’t require them to honestly reflect and acknowledge what their religion is all about.
gravenimage says
I’ve long noticed this cognitive dissonance as well, Boston Tea party.
In some cases it is simple Taqiyya—they are just denying their savagery to lull the credulous Kuffar.
But in some cases they really do seem able to hold two wildly contradictory beliefs at the same time.
The first time this struck me was shortly after 9/11. I was watching cable news and there was a journalist interviewing some Muslim boys and men—this was in indonesia or Malaysia.
One of the men was holding forth in vigorous—even aggressive—terms that 9/11 had not been committed by Muslims. The boys and men in the group were emphatically nodding and shouting their agreement.
But one of the group was wearing one of those hideous t-shirts with a triumphant image of Osama bin Laden looming over the burning twin towers—and no one, not even the journalist, saw fit to mention this bizarre contradiction.
That may have been the first time I saw such an explicit example of Muslim cognitive dissonance, but it certainly would not be the last.
Elise says
Where is the tolerance among Muslims? Why are such liars allowed to teach the children and who is standing up for the British citizens who no longer have freedom of speech? If Muslims can’t handle the self discipline that is required in a free society, they should go back to their own countries where their leaders tell them how to do everything, so they don’t have to use their brains.
Mirren10 says
Wrong, Robert.
They certainly made it, but they don’t have to live in it. *We* do. Camoron, clegg, may, blair, brown, and the rest of the evil, wicked motley crew who brought this sickening scenario about, don’t live anywhere *near* the mohammedan enclaves they have allowed , and indeed actively encouraged, to profilerate.
No, they sit comfortably at their dinner parties in Hampstead, Islington et al, ( where there is never a niqab or burka to be seen, let alone a halal butchery) and pontificate on the dangers of ‘islamophobia’, the wonders of multiculturism, and on how racist, ignorant, islamophobic, and downright xenophobic the chavs are.
If they were to be plonked down in the middle of Birmingham, Bradford, Keighley, or any other British town where the mohammedan infestation has been allowed to proliferate, and be forced to *live* there, on a daily basis, yhey would run, screaming.
But ordinary, British, working class people, are expected to suck it up, and if they dare to protest; why, accuse them of ‘hate speech’, and lock ’em up.
And before all the ‘ schadenfreuder’s, and the US and Europe doom crows who lick their chops at the demise of Europe in the West, weigh in here, spouting about how we have ‘brought it on ourselves’, kindly remember that *millions* of us never voted for this, never wanted this. Besides, look who voted for *obama*, **twice** !!
No, they sit comfortably at theirdinner parties,
Anymore than do the trendy, leftard , middle class, ‘chattering classes’ of Hampstead, Islington and the like. They sit comfortably, chatting over their dinner parties, about ‘islamophobia’, and the wonders of multikulti, whilstcastigating
Sovereign Man says
Don’t worry, Mirren10, the small percentage of us born with functional brains are well aware that stupidity, selfishness, ignorance, and apathy are universal. The natural state of mankind is not peace, freedom, and equality but rather war, tyranny, and oppression. The world we have grown up in, one of relative peace and prosperity, is an anomaly, and it will soon come to an end thanks to the 70% of the population who are (and always have been) shaved baboons.
pumbar says
Well said Jan!
Jay Boo says
Mirren10 you’re eye-catching title of “Wrong, Robert” is very appealing.
There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with Robert but you’re approach – at first glance- appears to be a bit of condescending one-upmanship.
Robert, after all has done the (hard work) in writing the article.
We all are merely the students not the other way around.
pumbar says
I think Mirren10 is trying to tell you that the situation portrayed here at JW is nothing that the average Brit wished for. It’s a mess in the UK, we don’t deny it. We just don’t like our faces rubbed in it; that’s a guilt that Robert Spencer is guilty of too.
I think she’s trying to say that coming on JW to read a load of anti-British rubbish is counter productive to counter-jihadists in the UK. We don’t need to read this when we’re trying to get our country back.
The pro-EU political class have sold us down the river here. My kids will have to live with the consequences. The last thing we need is someone laughing at the lights going out on one of the beacons of civilization. If it’s left to me then it won’t.
Jay Boo says
pumbar
I agree that Mirren10 made some good comments.
I don’t dispute that — “The pro-EU political class have sold their citizens down the river” — in the least
I don’t see that Robert is suggesting that he disputes that either.
If there is anything in this article that you believe implies that Robert is claiming the British as a whole are responsible, please parse that part out in quotes because I am not seeing it.
Mirren10 certainly made some good comments about the British, working class people vs their leadership however, I don’t see the link back to the article .I don’t see her listing in quotes as what she is actually objecting to in the article itself. The intro that Mirren10 used “Wrong, Robert” almost appears as some sort of strawman stepping stone sales pitch to what is to follow.
ecosse1314 says
Very good Mungo….I liked that and so very true
Richie says
I’m surprised they didn’t just blame the killings on the Jews- thats what Muslims and leftists usually do when discussing their 9/11 conspiracy theories
Arjay says
Okay you piece of Muzz-sewage. I’ll buy it. Yea, that was a “hoax”… Lee Rigby run over by a car and then beheaded in London… and TENS OF THOUSANDS OF WITNESSES to Muzz-sewage brothers bombing the marathon.
Sure. It is all a hoax. So if I “buy this” then guess what you can “buy” you sleaze… all the bombings Israel is doing is a hoax. Not happening.
So why then are muzz-sewage “complaining” about the IDF sending their worthless selves to hell?
All a hoax.
Jay Boo says
Never underestimate the power of Islamic Willful Ignorance Arjay .
Some Muslims even claim that Muhammad was a prophet and is deserving of respect.
I kid you not.
How freaky is that?
Someone should make a film about this willful ignorance and call it something like, “The Innocence of Muslims” part II
Michael Copeland says
Here are the roundabout descriptions, and translations.
“people with a shared ideology”: muslims.
…a common ideological stance …conservative religious practices… a particular style of religious ethos”: Islam.
The Inspector found “a determined effort to gain control….”. That is what Islam commands muslims to do.
The Inspector found “no evidence of direct radicalisation or violent extremism”. This is the cognitive dissonance, the disconnect that blinds and handicaps. They find Islam, but they do not find “violent extremism”. The government’s own definition of “extremism” in its “Prevent” strategy (a free download) fits Islam like a glove. Because Islam’s basic command, “Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them”, is violent this means that Islam itself is “violent extremism”.
See “Extremism: “There is a problem within Islam””:
http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6183-extremism-there-is-a-problem-within-islam
David Smith says
Muslims have no problem believing Muhammad split the moon in half, that he flew to ‘heaven’ on a flying donkey, that he spoke to an angel etc etc… but when it comes to the murder of a British soldier on a London street… that’s just too far. There’s no possible way that could’ve happened. It goes against all laws of nature.
Oh how hilarious.
Jaladhi says
Just goes to show taht all MUslims are liars – just plain liars. Forget this taqiyya business which elevates lies to some higher level in Muslim eyes!! When will the non-Muslim world admit it start calling spade a spade??
pumbar says
Sorry I can’t reply Jay Boo to you but the comments section just won’t let me do it.
I’ve noticed that Robert has reported much more hardly against the UK since he, and Pamela Geller, got banned. Whilst I understand a fair bit of this, I don’t think it justifies a lot of American bile against us in the UK. Mirren is rightly pointing out that there is a very vile anti-British theme on here that hates anything to do with Europe.
The noble Mirren10 just wishes that she might go to JW and not be greeted by a wall of hatred against her, and my homeland?
pumbar says
If that’s possible??
Mirren10 says
Actually, pumbar, I wasn’t referring to anything as dramatic as that !
When I made the comment, ”Wrong, Robert”, I was referring to Robert saying:
”This is the Britain of Blair, Brown and Cameron. They made it. They have to live in it”
And pointing out that in fact, it is not the traitorous scumbags who brought all this about **who have to live in it**, because they have carefully insulated themselves from mohammedan enclaves, but the ordinary Brit, who actually **does** have to live in it, having neither wanted it, nor done anything to bring it about. Aside from the fools who voted Labour, of course.
”I’ve noticed that Robert has reported much more hardly against the UK since he, and Pamela Geller, got banned.”
Well, I can’t say I have. I think Robert merely takes the opportunity to remind us all, and underline, the fact that he and Pam Geller were banned from the UK, whilst that traitorous bitch may blithely let in jihadists, and Sheiks who ranted about murdering us all. A point that **should** be constantly underlined, and **never** forgotten.
”Mirren is rightly pointing out that there is a very vile anti-British theme on here that hates anything to do with Europe.”
Actually, no, I’m not. There **are** a few commenters here who flap their gums about Britain and Europe deserving all we get, but I certainly don’t think there is anything here that amounts to ”a very vile anti-British theme on here that hates anything to do with Europe.” Such commenters are pretty easily despatched with some cogent comments on the state of affairs in the US.
”The noble Mirren10 just wishes that she might go to JW and not be greeted by a wall of hatred against her”
Thanks for the ‘noble’ description, but I certainly don’t see myself as such ! And I **don’t** feel there is a ”wall of hatred” against Britain, or Europe. As I said, it is just a few commenters now and again, who are pretty easily kicked into touch.
I see JW as a haven, where I can learn more, from others, and share ideas with people who are far more erudite and clever than myself, such as Wellington, dda, graven, et al.
But thanks for your comments. pumbar, appreciated.
Mirren10 says
Of course, the person I **should** have mentioned, first and foremost, is Robert himself, who created this website.
I first came here at the time of the Ground Zero mosque travesty. I was so horrified at the very idea, I googled Ground Zero mosque, and one of the sites that came up, was JW.
I lurked, I read Islam 101, and Blogging the koran. I finally plucked up courage to make my first comment in, I think, August of 2010. I have learnt so much, not only from Robert, but also from the multitude of brilliant commenters
pumbar says
Jeez, just come across this. Yep, fair enough, I was only trying to tell a number of posters how anti-UK they were being. I only attempted to be honest and have a spat at anyone who was anti-English. The Noble Mirren phrase was a bit of trolling; sheesh. Whatever gets you through your lifetime (before you get beheaded by either the idiots or the zealots).
gravenimage says
pumbar, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller don’t hate Britain.
Instead, they and other Counter-Jihadists are fighting to *save her*.
I agree with Mirren that those who natter on about Britain—or France or Sweden or the Netherlands—*deserving* this Muslim barbarism are not just disgusting, but are also woefully short-sighted.
Not only would the fall of Britain or Europe be horrifying in and of itself, but a fully Islamized Britain and Europe would also be utterly disastrous for America, Canada, Australia and the rest of Dar-al-Harb, as well.
I have said as much here many times.
pumbar says
Thank you Gravenimage. I don’t look back at the responses on this board as much as I should do. I appreciate what you are saying but you must remember that I am watching my entire civilization disappear past me whilst I listen to my children and family tell me that everything is fine. I don’t get to disappear to the woods and load up on .22 and baked beans. I work in IT, LOL.
ed says
the woolwlich killers were never charged with terrorism
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim teachers in Islamized public school claimed London and Boston jihad murders were hoaxes
…………………………………
Of course, if Islam is allowed to develop and even greater strangle-hold on Britain, these same Muslim teachers won’t be saying that these vile Jihad attacks were hoaxes—instead, they will be handing out candy and openly celebrating them.