Via 10news.dk, translated from EB:
Please send this inspiration to your politicians. Our countries are receiving far too many immigrants — mainly Muslims (including jihad terrorists) — because international conventions force us to. So why not just quit the conventions?
International commitments must not jeopardize the Liberal Party’s proposal for a new immigration policy. The party is ready to terminate international conventions, if necessary.
According to a preliminary proposal for a new immigration policy from the Liberals, as Ekstrabladet (newspaper) has obtained.
The paper, entitled “An open Denmark – for those who can and will!” the Liberals write that conventions are not unchangeable, but an expression of political negotiations and compromises.
“Therefore, we must first challenge and discuss the scope of the Conventions and in exceptional cases decide that we should no longer be bound by international obligations if it leads to unacceptable results. This could require a denunciation of that Convention,” it says in the paper from the Liberals. …
Monday the Liberal Party’s spokesman, Inger Støjberg, launched a suggestion that one should be able to make different demands on immigrants depending on whether they originate from the U.S. or Pakistan. …
“The Liberals wants laxer immigration rules for people from countries ranking high countries the UN Human Development Index, and the list of visa-free countries.”
Angemon says
While at first this seems like a reasonable, sane request, it’s dangerously deceiving because it relates to nationality and it doesn’t account for factors like religion. Who would you rather have as a neighbour: a pakistani christian like Imran Masih, serving a life sentence for allegedly burning a quran, or an american muslim like Mark Dunaway, who flied the ISIS flag on his house? Are an Indian hindu and an Indian muslim equally capable of fitting in Danish society? Look, the problem is not with immigration itself, the problem is with muslim immigration. Look at what’s happening in the UK and France. The problems stem from importing large numbers of people with a preconceived notion of what a perfect society is like. People like that aren’t going to arrive in Denmark and go “OMG, this is paradise, I’m going to kiss the ground I step on every day and thank allah for winning the jackpot”, they’re going “Freedom of religion? Women going around without cosplaying a tent? This is hell on earth, and i’m not going to rest until I impose sharia or die trying”.
Charli Main says
“the problem is not with immigration itself, the problem is with Muslim immigration”
Absolutely correct—-Indians, Sikhs, Chinese, Jews, West Indians et al are not trying to shove their religion, laws, language and culture down the throats of the host nation that has given them a home and the chance of a new life.
Muslims don´t immigrate–Muslims invade, under the guise of immigration
dumbledoresarmy says
And many Muslims invade whilst crying “victim” as they flee their ever-luvvin Muslim bruvvas and sistas who are trying to kill them…or as they flee places like Myanmar where they have pzzed off the locals by constant low-level and medium-level bad behaviour…but when soft-hearted countries take in these Muslim “refugees” (as Australia did when we took in Muslims fleeing the mess that Muslim mayhem had made of Lebanon, and as the US and Kenya have done with Muslims fleeing from the mess that Muslim mayhem made of Somalia) they soon find out that the Muslims exhibit not a particle of gratitude and indeed, behave like an invading army, treating their hosts with aggression , deceit and contempt.
I don’t want even *one* mohammedan amongst the 4500 refugees Australia has agreed to take from Syria and Iraq. The Christians and the Yazidi are far and away the most in danger, so *every one* of those precious 4500 tickets-to-life should be given to Christians and Yazidi.
Charli Main says
@DDA
If history repeats itself and it usually does, most of these “tickets” will probably be given to ” terrified” Muslims fleeing Kurdish persecution and Yazidi atrocities.
NOBODY plays the ” suffering victim” card better than the Allah Akbar brigade. Why, they will probably even have Palliwood produced videos to back up their case.!!!!!
Michael Copeland says
The muslims’ “preconceived notion of what a perfect society is like” – Sharia – is not arrived at by free choice. It is instructed, and it is compulsory. Departing from it amounts to leaving Islam – apostasy – to be punished by death, carried out vigilante-style without penalty by anyone (Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller”, o8.1, o8.4).
Myxlplik says
This is a huge step in the right direction. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I think Nicolai Sennels is on the right track, quantify scientifically, psychological issues, which as a population Muslims have a tendency to posess. Link the psychological disorders to cultural and religious doctrine then, you will be able to say that you are screening for public safety, like any other malady. It’s totally fair game to screen people for health problems, and mental health is a medical issue.
This would basically classify Islam as a potential mental health issue, and a threat to public safety, without saying you discriminate against Religion.
Effectively this would end Islamic immigration, in my opinion.
Myxlplik says
Nothing is going to happen in Western culture unless Liberals are on board. Once they are, then compromises can be made, rational policies and verbiage will be produced to fix the problem.
Me says
unfortunately, the Denmark Liberals I think are what people in the States might call free market supporters — they are not Liberals in the American sense
Jay Boo says
What part of “We are being butchered under the banner of no god but Allah” don’t they understand.
Are these coexist liberals so narcissistic and vindictive against Christianity that they would pollute all of Europe out of spite?
sujith says
No , they are just plain dangerously moronic or ignorant or just cowards who do not wish to face the truth
Kepha says
Sujith, I’m afraid that Jay Boo is probably right.
And, as a student of the history of Western political theory, the liberals who would pollute the entire Western World out of hatred for Christianity are in the process of committing matricide.
John Magee says
Who invited Muslims to invade Denmark through an endless migration invasion(and the rest of Scandinavia too) since the 1970’s? Their own government’s that’s who and they still want MORE of them to come. Meanwhile the host countries and the people who live in them bend over backwards to cater to their migrant invader’s every need while fanticizing they are creating the miracle of a future multicultural and diverse Scandinavia where everyone hold hands and lives in peace, love, and harmony. Muslims know Scandinavian will be the easiest and most juicy conquest they’ve had since the time of Mohammed.
Wetwork56 says
Until the Muslim flag (the one in which ISIS showcases) flies over the capital of Copenhagen will the progressive/liberal Danes realize they are no longer in power. This will also continue in all forms of governments that have a predominantly liberal/progressive majority. Then the Liberals/progressives will flee to other countries, only to continue in their endeavor to create their Utopia. In other words, though not physically as damaging as radical Islam is, progressive-ism itself needs to be defeated.
Jay Boo says
The sign that the lady is holding does not pixelate well on my low resolution monitor.
It appears to say: “Islam is Foaming at the Mouth”
That makes sense.
Jay Boo says
When the Muslims tried to force their way into Europe they were pushed back.
Then they came as ‘friends’
Now the ungrateful beggar is the conniving backstabber.
Go figure?
Thomas Wells says
To be enslaved, or not to be enslaved…
dumbledoresarmy says
Dear Danish jihadwatchers, whether lurking or posting:
this is a start, perhaps the start of a paradigm shift.
Get behind it and PUSH, and don’t stop.
And every single one of you who is eligible to vote should turn out to vote, and vote for the most Islamoresistant/ Islamoaware party and politician you can find. Don’t just vote: lobby, get involved, get active.
If you can’t identify any obviously, specifically Islamoresistant politician, whether at local or national level, then look carefully to find those who have been prepared to stick their necks out to a/ oppose antisemitism within Denmark, and b/ recognise Israel’s right of self-defence. There will be *some*, even if only a few. Start with those. Make contact with them and try to educate them some more; because they will “get” what Israel is up against, if they can understand that what is going on is Jihad…If the IDF faltered or failed, which heaven forbid, Jews and Christians and Druze and Samaritans in Israel would suffer the exact same horrors that the Yazidis and the Iraqi and Syrian Christians are suffering today.
And if that connection is made, that reality absorbed, people are on the way to understanding how all the local jihads, all over the world, in Asia, in Africa, in the “Middle East”, in southern Russia, everywhere, add up to global jihad; that the Ummah is, considered as a gestalt, waging war upon all of non-Muslim humanity, exactly as per the instructions in surah 9 of the Quran. And that therefore no more visibly-identifiable members of the Ummah should be admitted, henceforward, into majority nonMuslim lands such as Denmark…because all such members of the Ummah must, from a practical and precautionary point of view, be regarded as Fifth Columnists, jihadis in posse or in esse.
Bezelel says
I remember monkeying around with immigration being on any previous campaign promises.
GP says
How is muslim oppression spread throughout the world you ask? Start by understanding the function of the mosque:
Every single mosque in the world, by definition, is modeled on the mosque of Muhammad in Medina in accordance with the Sunnah. The Sunnah interprets the Qur’an by reporting exhaustively on everything that Muhammad said, did, or consented to. Therefore, his Medina mosque, the first mosque, was a place where he gave judgments, where he decided who would be executed, where he instituted policy—domestic and military— where Jihad war strategies were designed. Consequently, it was a storage place for arms, a military training base, and was where troops were blessed and dispatched.
Wake up and smell the peace people!
pongidae rex says
It is utterly bizarre that as heads of religious minorities in Muslim nations roll in the streets, and minority places of worship in Muslim lands burn, the tide of ‘refugees’ into the West is overwhelmingly… Muslim.
paddy says
Geez…that ugly, miserable dog carrying the placard in the article’s pic. No wonder they cover themselves. Have you seen Somali women…hideous.
dieter621 says
The Danes are starting to see the light. If only our elected officials could we would be better off.
Bill says
Did the U.S. permit immigration from Germany, Italy and Japan during W.W. II?
Did the U.S. permit immigration from North Korea during the Korean War? Did the U.S. permit limitless immigration from the Soviet Union and its satellites during the Cold War?
Islam is not only completely incompatible with classic liberal Western values, it is extremely hostile to classic liberal Western values.
I say stop ALL immigration of Muslims into the U.S. If the U.N. can brand Zionism as racism (an affirmation I completely reject, as I am a Christian Zionist, that is, I support Israeli Jewish control of Israel), then why not speak pure truth and affirm the following: ISLAM IS A SUBVERSIVE, TOXIC, AUTHORITARIAN, VIOLENT, SUPRAMACIST, MYSOGONISTIC, INTOLERANT, RETROGRADE POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FORCE.