• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

FBI National Domestic Threat Assessment omits Islamic terrorism

Aug 29, 2014 4:44 pm By Robert Spencer

keystone kops 3According to the FBI, there are “eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam. They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with ‘sovereign citizen’ nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.” Jihad? What’s that? Oh, the interior spiritual struggle for self-improvement? What does that have to do with terrorism?

This is the willful ignorance that, as I show in my book Arab Winter Comes to America, led directly to the Fort Hood and Boston Marathon jihad massacres.

“FBI National Domestic Threat Assessment Omits Islamist Terrorism,” by Bill Gertz, Washington Free Beacon, August 29, 2014:

The FBI’s most recent national threat assessment for domestic terrorism makes no reference to Islamist terror threats, despite last year’s Boston Marathon bombing and the 2009 Fort Hood shooting—both carried out by radical Muslim Americans.

Instead, the internal FBI intelligence report concluded in its 2013 assessment published this month that the threat to U.S. internal security from extremists is limited to attacks and activities by eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam.

They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with “sovereign citizen” nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.

“Domestic extremist violence continues to be unpredictable and, at times, severe,” the report states.

A copy of the unclassified, 60-page National Threat Assessment for Domestic Extremism, dated Aug. 14, was obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. It warns that the threat of domestic-origin extremism was moderate in 2013 and will remain so for this year.

“Domestic extremists collectively presented a medium-level threat to the United States in 2013; the FBI assesses the 2014 threat will remain close to this level,” the report said….

FBI spokesman Paul Bresson had no immediate comment on the report.

One indirect explanation for the omission of Islamist extremism in the report is provided in a footnote to a graphic describing an “other” category of domestic extremism not included in the report. “The ‘Other’ category includes domestic extremist [sic] whose actions were motivated by beliefs which fall outside the eight designated [domestic terrorism] subprograms,” the footnote stated.

The footnote indicates the FBI has separated Islamist terrorism from other domestic extremism.

The Obama administration in 2009 adopted a new policy that substituted the vague term “violent extremism” as a replacement for terrorism.

The graphic showed that domestic extremists killed 43 people from 2003 to 2013 carried out by five categories of terrorists—abortion extremists, black separatists, sovereign citizens, white supremacists, and “others.”

The report left out all references to the April 2013 bombing of the Boston Marathon, which killed three people and injured some 264 others. Two brothers, Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who were motivated by Islamist extremist beliefs, carried out the bombing. They learned the techniques for the homemade pressure cooker bombers from an al Qaeda linked magazine.

The FBI had been warned in advance of the attack by Russian security services that the brothers may have links to Chechen terrorists but failed to act.

The FBI report also made no direct reference to the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, by radicalized Army Maj. Nidal Hasan. The mass shooting left 13 dead and more than 30 injured.

Former FBI Agent John Guandolo said he was not surprised the report did not include any reference to domestic-origin Islamic terror.

“It should not surprise anyone who follows the jihadi threats in the United States that the FBI would not even include ‘Islamic terrorism’ in its assessment of serious threats to the republic in an official report,” Guandolo said.

“Since 9/11, FBI leadership—as well as leaders from Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, CIA, Pentagon, and the National Security Council—relies on easily identifiable jihadis from the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas, al Qaeda and elsewhere to advise it on how to deal with ‘domestic extremism.’”…

Guandolo said the failure to recognize the domestic Islamist threat had allowed domestic jihadist groups and their sympathizers to shape U.S. government create policies that do not acknowledge jihad as the root cause for the current global chaos.

An example, he said, is that the FBI has appointed a domestic Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas support organization leader to an FBI advisory council at the Washington headquarters.

Additionally, the FBI is failing to train agents and analysts on the Muslim Brotherhood network in the United States, Guandolo said.

“The FBI, no matter how diligent its agents are in their pursuit of ‘terrorists’, will never defeat this threat because its leaders refuse to address or even identify it,” he said. “This level of negligence on the part of the FBI leaders and their failure to understand the jihadi threat 13 years after 9/11 is appalling.”…

The domestic threat assessment is the latest example indicating the FBI has been forced by Obama administration policies from focusing on the domestic terror threat posed by radical Islamists.

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R., Texas) said in a 2012 House floor speech that the FBI was ordered to purge references to Islam, jihad, and Muslims in its counterterrorism “lexicon” guidelines for its reports.

As a result, the FBI is hamstrung from understanding the threat of terrorism from groups like al Qaeda that have declared jihad, or holy war, on the Untied States, Gomert [sic] said.

Guandolo, the former FBI agent, said the vast majority of U.S. Islamic organizations were identified in recent U.S. terrorism trials as part of the Muslim Brotherhood, the parent group for the Palestinian terror group Hamas. Thus, these groups are aligned with the same objectives as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, al Qaeda, and others, he said.

“Our FBI is not teaching their agents and analysts this information; they are not sharing it with local and state law enforcement officials; and they are not investigating and pursuing the very individuals and organizations which are supporting and training jihadis in America,” Guandolo said.

Guandolo said former FBI director Robert Mueller testified to Congress that he was unaware that the Islamic Society of Boston was the organization behind the radicalization of the Tsarnaev brothers. “That tells you all we need to know about the FBI’s leadership about the threat here in America from the Islamic Movement—they are clueless,” he said.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: FBI, Useful idiots, willful ignorance Tagged With: featured


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jovial Joe says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 4:57 pm

    This travesty of a threat analysis makes even Britain appear an exemplary foe of Islamic terrorism. Utterly disgraceful. Obama should be ranked the number one ‘domestic threat’.

    • John C. Barile says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 5:08 pm

      I heartily agree. I’m appalled and disgusted.

    • john spielman says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 6:20 pm

      such govt INTENTIONALl denial of an islamic jihadist threat is not only disgraceful, it will be seen as TREASONOUS once another attack occurs on our soil!!!
      to NSA SPIES reading this; please notify your boss Eric (the Black Panther excuser) Holder

      • kikorikid says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 7:52 pm

        What a time in History. OK, Some argue there are no Jihadis, some
        argue they are an imminent threat. There are, supposedly, dozens of
        Hezbullah (Sleeper Cells), led by Qubts Forces Cadre from Iran, as well
        as ISIS Cells, already in the U.S.. 9-11 in about a week. If they are
        here they will feel compelled to launch “Victory” attacks on 9-11.
        It is what they do.

    • Huck Folder says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 11:30 pm

      “That tells you all we need to know about the FBI’s leadership about the threat here in America from the Islamic Movement—they are clueless,” he said.”

      No, John Guandolo, NOT clueless. If they don’t have some inner sanctum of true patriots, standing on guard for America – against all enemies DOMESTIC and foreign – then they are the fifth column, traitors, nothing less.

      • Shane says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 10:17 am

        Yes, Obama is aiding the enemy with this treasonous policy, plus, he is helping the enemy enter the country illegally through our southern border by not securing it.

      • Alice says

        Aug 31, 2014 at 12:36 am

        One wonders what the FBI, et al., really think vs what they are allowed to say. FBI Underground?

    • cliffface says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 1:48 am

      Who am I ?
      I run a tax exempt foundation that sends students to radical Wahhabist madrassas in Saudi Arabia.
      I wanted to bomb Assad because he is not like me.
      I provoke Russia and China when ever i can.
      I have done my best to not impede ISIS or Boko Haram’s progress in establishing Islamic caliphates.
      I have called to reduce the US armed forces to be a size that would only be capable of defending local assets.
      I have made it so Islamic jihadists cannot be offended by being linked to Islam.
      I have forced through policies that enable terrorists to operate freely while at the same time i have ensured that US national security services cannot perform any counter jihad operations.
      Can you guess ?
      First correct answer wins a new house in Kenya and all the virgins you can carry.

      • PeterB says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 4:45 am

        Barrack Hussein Obama.

        • cliffface says

          Aug 30, 2014 at 6:45 am

          PeterB I was practising taqiyya about the prize.
          But you were honest.

  2. KrazyKafir says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 5:07 pm

    LOL A lessen right out of Erdogan’s playbook, infiltrate key positions in the military and police forces.

  3. Myxlplik says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 5:13 pm

    When I was in little league, I was known as a “whiffer”. Every now and then I could connect, but only very rarely. Until one day one of my coaches discovered the problem, which was as soon as the pitcher released the ball I closed my eyes, so I more or less relying on my memory of the baseballs velocity and path of trajectory to make a hit. Every now and then this actually worked, by some miracle of the mind I could connect, but after I opened my eyes, I was slamming the ball to the fence more or less on a routine basis.

    My advice to law enforcement, let Robert be your pitching coach, and open your eyes. Hitting the ball is easy once you open your eyes.

  4. Joseph says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 5:24 pm

    Several years ago, CAN (Christian Action Network) put out a DVD entitled Homegrown Jihad. In it, they document clearly the threat posed by 35 Islamic jihad training compounds spread throughout this country.

    I guess that pre-packaged threat assessment was too hard for the FBI to understand.

  5. Prinz Eugen says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 5:34 pm

    Comments by our islamo-mnarxist leader have long made it clear that he is Public Enemy No. 1 of the USA — always covers for islam, his anti-Constitutional acts, his anti-Semitic streak, his aid to islamical terror groups — and our CIA and FBI
    offices have been infiltrated by ragheads and their documents whitewashed of all of the centuries of islamic crimes.

    Yet we find almost no opposition from congress, the GOP is hiding somewhere and our “allies” like the UK are all but bowing in servitude to islam. PM Cameron asks islam’s help to fight islam — what a total retard! Did FDR ask Hitler to help smash nazism?

    How much longer can the “opposition” remain silent and the US’s freedoms continue to apply?

  6. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 5:48 pm

    Maybe they couldn’t say it, literally. After all, the FBI is bound by the strict rules Prez Barack implemented on what words can, and cannot, be used in connection with Moslems. Maybe the FBI really knows, but can’t say. Maybe.

    Or maybe the FBI is no better than it was in the run up to 9/11, when they were told what Osama (not Obama) had going, identified his team members and their plan, and the Agency proceeded to fire the messenger for telling them. Could maybe be that, too.

    • Western Canadian says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 12:53 pm

      Seriously, please supply the source that had this detailed info. The threat assessment reports that the white house/bush/house etc were given, did NOT include such information (They are available to the public, and had NO references to aircraft as hate-guided missiles to use in mass murder).

  7. Don McKellar says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 5:49 pm

    A document with significant historic value. The insane zenith of political correctness imposed by government at the expense of the best interests and public safety of the populace has now been reached.

    It almost makes you want to smash your head against a wall…

    Even Britian’s Cameron, as misinformed about Islam as he is, went on a long explination of why Islamic “extremeists” who were “warping” Islam were now a major threat to England. Of course they are only the most devout of Muslims, following it exactly as written, but no matter — at least even that buffoon has heard the bell toll in the tower.

  8. jewdog says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm

    What I can’t understand is why we can’t elect people who will shake up these feckless bureaucracies in the FBI, HS and State. Those agencies are staffed by unelected, appointed people, and they live on their own planet, answerable only to themselves. President Kennedy once said that the State Department were prissies with striped pants. Even conservatives leave them be.

    • Don McKellar says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 6:29 pm

      ON TH E CONTRARY…

      The FBI are accountable not to themselves, but the President. The people DID elect a president who shook it up. And in this case, it is for the reckless endagerment of the American people in the name of Political Correctness.

      Here is a piece that points this out very clearly:

      http://wp.me/p1Vbau-40V via @wordpressdotcom

      • jewdog says

        Aug 29, 2014 at 9:04 pm

        Okay, that makes me feel better about the democratic mechanism. At least the FBI can be changed by the President. And I imagine Homeland Security as well. The State Department is more immovable probably, being large – outside of the Secretary of State. And the CIA has a huge staff.
        Could Obama really have made all these changes himself? There are of course the Muslim Brotherhood appointees, so maybe he has. I guess a lot does flow downhill. Be careful who you vote for.

  9. David Bryan says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 6:32 pm

    First of all, stop calling them radical muslims. There’s no radical muslims and there’s no moderate muslims. The sooner people realise that the better, islam is islam and its followers are muslims. They all read from the same hate book, the quran, and follow the same barbaric ideology. Their aim is global domination through intimidation, terrorism and war on all “non believers” .
    There are over 500 passages in the quran about killing the jews and kafirs, this book and the hadiths should all be band in western countries. islam, it’s followers, ideologies and teachings go against everything the west stands for, our laws, our way of life, our customs and cultures.
    Freedom of speech and freedom of religion was not written by our forefathers with islam in mind, they wrote that on the Judean/Christian belief system that our western countries were founded on, NOT with islam in mind.
    If I wrote a book that calls people pigs, beasts, unclean, vermin and to take slaves, how long before this book is band from sale and display and destroyed ? The quran is a hate book, filled with incitement to violence, about killing all non believers, rape, child marriages, paedophilia, FMG, ethnic and religious cleansing etc, it makes Adolf Hitlers Mein Kampf look like a love story.
    There are no radical or moderate muslims, they are all muslims that follow islam through the teachings of the quran, the most unholiest of books ever to be written and printed.

    • Don McKellar says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 8:19 pm

      You are right.

      There are only Muslims on a sliding scale of strict adherance to Islam. Moderate Muslims are near the bottom of the scale while ISIS and Al Queda and all the many, many other movements out there hover around the top. They are only following the texts which exist to a lesser or greater extent.

      Of course, to point out this reality and these facts so that everybody can check and see for themselves is enough to get you banned in modern day Britian. Ask Robert Spencer.

    • Rob says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 8:24 pm

      You’ve got that right! Nicely said.

    • Damian McCue says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 3:37 am

      You are correct. The Muslims who appear to be moderate are normally in countries with a very small minority of that group. It is not until their numbers grow that their true intentions start to be shown. I have seen one individual put that number at 2% while he also provided multiple countries as evidence. He appears to be into something. I guess the Muslims need to slowly build trust in the host population and appear to be harmless as they grow their numbers. Once they hit 2% they start to push their agenda. As that percentage grows they become more emboldened and more radical. Look at how bad things are getting in Britain with just 5% of their population being Muslim.

    • Western Canadian says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 12:58 pm

      The hate filled sewage that are the books of islam should not be banned, but should be EXPOSED, every single minute of every single hour of every single day. Good luck with that, however.

    • kikorikid says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 8:05 pm

      There is only Islam. Islam does not come to assimilate.
      Islam comes ONLY to: Conquer, Submit, Convert, or Kill.

  10. http://islamforbids.com says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 7:01 pm

    Im not sure this is news. Im pretty sure the government has chosen sides.

  11. PAthena says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 7:02 pm

    President Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim manque, I think. He supports the Muslim Brotherhood – when Hillary Clinton was his Secretary of State, her close aide was Huma Abedin, from a Muslim Brotherhood family, and his half-brother from Kenya is a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. He ordered all references to muslim activities, e.g., jihad, so that he named the jihad massacre by Major Hasan at Fort Hood “workplace violence,” what ever that means. So it is no wonder that the FBI does not list Islamist activity under “domestic terrorism,” even with 9/11. Obama is a Muslim apologist. See what Congressman Michelle Bachmann has been saying.

    • kikorikid says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 8:18 pm

      The use of the term “Workplace Violence”
      allowed Obama to remain “Sharia Compliant”. Any use of the
      terms Islamic-Jihadi-Terrorism would have incurred a charge
      of “Blaspheme” and/or “Apostasy” which “Demands” Punishment.
      The banning of these terms is intellectual fascism being imposed
      by a band of “Strong-Arm Extortionist” and supported by Political
      Correctness. Excuse me but I feel a Revolt coming up!

  12. Beagle says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 7:06 pm

    Aside from the obvious omission of the group which makes up 90%+ of the modern terrorist threat, Puerto Rican nationalists? Was this written in 1954?

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 9:27 pm

      Beagle—they do mention “Puerto Rican Nationalists”.

      But do you really believe that it is accurate that they represent “90%+ of the modern terrorist threat”?

      The movement has largely been on the back burner since around the 1970s, and somehow I fail to recall their having pulled off any acts of terrorism to rival 9/11, the Ft. Hood Massacre, or the Boston Marathon Bombing.

      Even the justly infamous shooting incident in the Capitol in 1954 didn’t result in any fatalities. Would that we could say that about Jihad terror…

      • John C. Barile says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 1:14 pm

        Beag didn’t name the 90%+ group, he just didn’t draw a breath before exclaiming “Puerto Rican Nationalists” with obvious incredulity.

        I don’t think he meant FALN at all, Gravenimage–he just juxtaposed Islamic Terror, Inc. with them.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 30, 2014 at 6:17 pm

          Could be, John.

  13. Angemon says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 8:33 pm

    Instead, the internal FBI intelligence report concluded in its 2013 assessment published this month that the threat to U.S. internal security from extremists is limited to attacks and activities by eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam.

    There is no radical islam. There is only islam.

    • Mark says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 4:40 am

      There is no radical Islam

      Radical Islam is the few Muslims who are shot for claiming that Christians accused of blasphemy should be given a fair trial. Violent Jihad is the mainstream.

      • Western Canadian says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 1:03 pm

        Good comic quip, with a grain of truth. Unfortunately, ‘radical’ is the correct term….. it actually, in it’s most basic meaning, refers to those who go to the true roots of their belief system…. A radical Christian or Jew will build a hospital or school, or volunteer to work in them. A radical muslim, will burn the hospital or school to the ground for being ‘unislamic’, and laugh with glee as those inside are incinerated alive….. or lie about and cover for those who light the fire. Sickening.

      • kikorikid says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 8:34 pm

        The “Jihadi” is a Muslim, who the day before, was a “Moderate”
        who decided to answer the Imams call to Jihad. The Imam, in
        his Mosque, calls to Jihad and offers food and roof to Jihadis
        who take refuge in the Mosque

  14. Yaakov Holansky says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 8:38 pm

    It is hard to believe that our law enforcement agencies choose to be ignorant fools. You would think at the very least as a professional that they would pursue the subject matter from all possible sources rather than accept what is being hand fed to them but I guess that a generational issue. Knowing, Israel has had the best success in the area of intelligence on picking up terrorist operatives you would think that they would rely on an Allie. Once again, that would involve thinking. I am very tempted to start my own database and I am serious.

  15. Wellington says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 8:45 pm

    Memo to all FBI personnel: If you actually would assert that Islam, yes all of what that damn religion stands for, is not a threat to America, not a threat to the basic liberties guaranteed by the American Constitution, then you are at best an ignoramus, at worst a traitor.

    Hey, I get job security. I hear you here—–protecting the future of you and your family financially. OK. I get this.

    But you know what, FBI? Your nation is more important than your job security. Even more important than your family. Get this?

    Well then, learn what Islam really teaches, which includes death for a Muslim who converts to another religion, death for anyone who criticizes Islam, the Koran or Mohammed, and no true Golden Rule for all——-in a Muslim ruled-world non-believers are either second-class citizens or dead. This helps to explain in part why CAIR, which no patriotic and informed American should extend any respect to, is on record asserting that it looks forward to the day when the American Constitution is replaced with Islamic religious law (Sharia) as the law of the land over the 50 states.

    It’s the American Constitution or Islam, FBI. Time to choose. Overdue in fact.

    • Bezelel says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 9:37 pm

      I would remind the FBI about that oath they took.

  16. Scott Allen says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 9:13 pm

    Here’s my theory….Would love to hear what ya’ll think of it.

    The US Government knows full well that Islam is enemy #1. But, who are the people in this country involved in sting operations catching terrorists? Who is helping the CIA around the world with intelligence? It’s Muslims who can “walk the walk” and fit in. Can you imagine your average dude from Virginia trying to infiltrate a terrorist cell?

    So, alienating those people would be suicide. After all, part of the governments sales pitch is that by catching these people before something happens, we can keep the prevent Islam from having a bad name and reputation. After all, Islam is a religion of peace (cough, cough).

    So basically, the government keeps up the “peaceful charade” to encourage the participation of these foreign and American born nationals. Because once those guys get pissed at the government and tell the CIA to F off, we’re all on our own and who knows what we could be in for.

    Just my theory…

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 9:34 pm

      Um…right. We have to pretend that Islam isn’t a threat, or else all of our wonderful Muslim allies like Anwar Al-Awlaki and the Pakistani government might become “extremists”….oh….wait…

      • Scott Allen says

        Aug 29, 2014 at 9:52 pm

        Definitely not talking about Al-Awlaki or anyone like him….talking about the different Muslims in this country that are on the CIA and government payroll (i.e. law enforcement, Arabic surveillance, sting operations) who we don’t want to alienate.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 29, 2014 at 10:41 pm

          Al Awlaki was long lauded as a “moderate”:

          According to an NPR report in 2010, in 2001 al-Awlaki appeared to be a moderate who could “bridge the gap between the United States and the worldwide community of Muslims.”

          The New York Times said that he was “held up as a new generation of Muslim leader capable of merging East and West.”

          In 2002, al-Awlaki was the first imam to conduct a prayer service for the Congressional Muslim Staffer Association at the U.S. Capitol.

          He was definitely regarded by credulous Infidels in high places as an ally in the war on terror. Oops…

          As for your assertion that we dare not mention the threat of Islam because it might “alienate” Muslims who have infiltrated our security forces, do you realize how crazy this is?

          This would have been like relying on Germans during WWII who would have turned on us if we had dared to say anything bad about Hitler or the Nazis…

    • Uri says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 10:04 pm

      That’s basically true. It’s called “whistling in the dark.”

    • umbra says

      Aug 29, 2014 at 11:20 pm

      This theory does not work for a tree with a rotten root.

  17. gravenimage says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 10:25 pm

    BI National Domestic Threat Assessment omits Islamic terrorism
    ……………………………

    That willful ignorance is getting more willful all the time…

    More:

    According to the FBI, there are “eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam. They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with ‘sovereign citizen’ nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.”…
    ……………………………

    I am not an expert on terror attacks, but I’m not sure some of these groups can even be considered terrorists in the true sense of the word.

    While I’m damn sick of Anarchists breaking out windows in Oakland, I don’t believe that they have been responsible for fatalities since the *turn of the last century*, when it was essentially a different movement.

    Even if you want to include groups such as the Weather Underground, then there still haven’t been serious attacks like bombings since the 1970s.

    The FBI itself sets the high-water mark of recent Anarchist “terrorism” as the 1999 World Trade Organization protests in Seattle.

    http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/november/anarchist_111610/anarchist_111610

    Yes—this was destructive, costly, and stupid—but there were no serious injuries, and *certainly* no deaths—nor did these Anarchists plan for any.

    As much as these idiots p*ss me off, I would consider this more malicious property damage than actual terrorism.

    That this actually targeted the World Trade Organization, and yet there is no mention of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center that, along with the attack on the Pentagon, killed almost 3000 is just bizarre…

    Then there are eco-terrorists and animal rights terrorists, which the FBI says “are one of the most serious domestic terrorism threats in the U.S. today”.

    And yet, they have never so much as seriously injured anyone—like Anarchists, most of what they have done is property damage.

    http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2008/june/ecoterror_063008

    The FBI mentions “increasingly violent rhetoric’, and cites this as the most heinous example:

    “You might be able to protect your buildings, but can you protect the homes of every employee”.

    OK—pretty disturbing.

    But now let’s compare that to threats from Jihad terrorists:

    “Government and citizens alike!…We will not stop untill we quench our thirst for your blood.”

    “Dearborn Muslim calls for killing anti-Islam protesters”

    “Robert Spencer must be arrested and lynched…”

    There are, of course, *thousands* more.

    Somehow, this makes the ELF and ALF rhetoric seem rather tame in comparison…

    To focus on groups who haven’t planned anything worse than protests and property damage while ignoring *plots to mass murder Americans* is utter madness…

    • Champ ✿ says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 12:25 am

      Hi Graven,

      Hey lil’ William was born today! ..and here’s a picture, enjoy!

      https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8fcc310a36&view=fimg&th=1482524748aac25a&attid=0.1&disp=inline&realattid=f_hzgfwwny0&safe=1&attbid=ANGjdJ82ZQm3daGaaM9XBVEvWHk_9c6OK2ZmJvm0V_LFtrjPSE6ptOdL8_oasrmx2jagzXJYs7zgetbGgVP6q6DazVD_fgwxBy33SxrkhhJfPbHgxYV_r4xfgwzW99Y&ats=1409372420715&rm=1482524748aac25a&zw&sz=w1256-h536

      xo,
      Champ

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 12:44 am

        Congratulations, Champ! Best to the proud parents, grandparents, and the whole family!

        • Champ says

          Aug 30, 2014 at 12:45 am

          Thank you, Graven! ♥

      • St. Patrick says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 8:57 am

        Congratulations Champ!

        • Champ says

          Aug 30, 2014 at 1:16 pm

          Thank you, St. Patrick! 🙂

      • Mirren10 says

        Aug 30, 2014 at 9:07 am

        Congratulations, grannie ! How many is that, now ?

        • Champ says

          Aug 30, 2014 at 1:17 pm

          Thank you, Mirren10! …and William is #7! 🙂

  18. Jay Boo says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 10:45 pm

    Truth said,
    “You’re going to miss me when I’m gone”

    The FBI replied,

    “Who’s on first?”

  19. Appalled By The World says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 11:17 pm

    Maybe, just maybe when the next 9/11 type attack happens and Oblahblah clearly says and does all the wrong things afterward THEN we will finally be rid of him and the most disgusting regime this nation has ever had.

  20. Hal says

    Aug 29, 2014 at 11:30 pm

    If they had the guts to lists Muslims they would have to list the one in the WH

  21. Guest says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 12:08 am

    “They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with ‘sovereign citizen’ nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.”

    Unbelievable. The BIGGEST terrorist threat doesn’t even make the list. They are sacrificing security on the altar of political correctness, a theme all too common in our time. You’d think after 9/11, and the countless other terrorist attacks and threats on US soil, not to mention the global madness right now due to jihad, people – and especially the government – would be cognizant and on watch for terrorism. But such is the blindness of our times, that we pretend it doesn’t exist. We ignore its speeches, its rallying calls, its threats, its violence and its murder – because it would be ‘racist’ (or insert another PC call-out here) of us to utter the name of the ones whose goal is to kill and subjugate the rest of us; something they have said time and time again, and we have ignored time and time again.

    This blindness has affected the West on all levels, right from the top down. Why can’t they just realize what’s in front of them? Why must they continually say these terrorists have ‘nothing to do with Islam’, when they are all Muslim and acting according to commands in the Koran? Do these leaders speak from ignorance or deceit? Why don’t they pick up a Koran and read it? This lunacy will be written down in history books and people will wonder what in the world happened – that is, depending on who will write those books.

  22. Peter says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 12:19 am

    The FBI is compromised. It was complicit with the Boston Marathon Bombings.

    Hear no evil, speak no evil, and see no evil may be politically correct, but it does not mean that there is no evil and that it is not dangerous.

    The Federal Bureau of Islamization can now join the Internal Repression Service, the Department of Submission, and the Department of Delusion (etc.) as Obama’s contribution to fantasy-based Big Government.

  23. SallyA says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 12:27 am

    @ right side bar to this Robert Spencer article Newsmax shows “Judicial Watch: ‘Imminent’ Terror Attack Warning on US Border.” The RS article suggests when the US knows, the warning will not be acted on. Living in the US feels like being in a 3rd world country where the dictatorial government walls itself off from the people so that bad guys they support with big guns can be gunning for us any time they want. Terrible when it happens anywhere in the world. Never expected this level of threat on US soil or a government on the bad guys’ side.

  24. RonaldB says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 1:11 am

    I’m thinking it’s not so hard to make the contents of such presentations available to FBI agents and other law enforcement officials.

    For example, I would think Robert’s “Arab Winter Comes to America” contains a lot of material that would be used in a counter-jihad presentation.
    http://www.amazon.com/Arab-Winter-Comes-America-Truth-ebook/dp/B00IHGU388/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1409373761&sr=8-1&keywords=robert+spencer

    Add to that the Center for Security Policy’s Muslim Brotherhood in America series,

    http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/the-muslim-brotherhood-in-america/

    which gives a detailed expose of the methods and extent of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration into the US government.

    Neither of these sources covers the latest, the rift between al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, loosely allied with Iran, against Saudi Arabia, which has funded most of the heavy infiltration into universities and the government. No counter-terrorism training would be complete without some tools on using the different Muslim sects to act against each other.

    It should be taken as a given that the Obama administration, aided and abetted by a thoroughly corrupt Republican establishment totally besotted with the money they are getting from Saudi-affiliated sources.

    But, its not necessary that knowledge of Islam and its fundamental principles and practices should be presented by a government-paid lecturer. That information can be largely obtained in a few readily-available sources.

    So, it’s established that any law-enforcement official who wants to can find out almost all he needs to know about Islam from materials easily available in the US. The next question is how to get around the roadblocks thrown by the Obama administration against proper actions to take against likely terror activities. Again, these roadblocks are completely supported by high Republican officials, up to and including John McCain, the 2008 Republican Presidential candidate.

    Perhaps investigators can play a sort of Aesopian double-speak, using political correctness against itself. When they intercepted the communications of Major Hassan, the Fort Hood shooter, with Awlaki, the Jihadist, instead of reporting that Hassan needed to be investigated for radical Islamist inclinations, they could say that he is disgruntled because he felt that minorities were being promoted into the places he deserved. Who’s going to argue against investigating an army officer on that basis?

    So to summarize, it’s not all that difficult to picture competent law enforcement agents obtaining their own knowledge of radical Islam for a grand investment of perhaps $25 each. Once they know the layout of the land, they could initiate needed actions on the basis of bogus claims which the politically correct could not challenge.

    Not exactly the best world imaginable, but a whole lot better than the possible alternatives.

  25. Godfrey Kemal says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 3:22 am

    This is beyond “Theater of the Absurd” – insanity in policy making taken to heretofore unknown places. Radical Islam off the FBI’s radar screen from domestic terrorists.

    Apparently Muslim Brotherhood has already made inroads into policy making or else gross incompetence. I cannot think of a third, I hope it is just gross incompetence presmably that is easier to fix!

    To quote a bad infomercial : STOP THE INSANITY!

  26. Smart Guy says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 3:32 am

    The FBI should go on strike.
    If they will not go on strike then they deserve no respect from
    “We the People” in fact their refusal to go on strike proves that they are co-conspiritors with the traitors and have become traitors themselves for obeying orders.
    The Nurenberg principal is that if you obey a criminal order then you are just as guilty for obeying the order as your superiors are for giving the order.

  27. Johnd says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 3:46 am

    Its just like the Rotherham scandal in England where the muslim perps were described as Asians. The politicos in both countries just want to convey the example of not commiting ‘thought crimes’.

  28. paddy says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 4:37 am

    Does anyone in America really give a fig what the FBI think? Ordinary, educated Americans know full well that muslims are the real menace at home and abroad.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 6:43 pm

      I think we *have* to care, paddy. These are the people—along with the CIA, TSA, and Homeland Security—who are *supposed to be keeping us safe*.

      This isn’t something that even the most informed citizenry—which is *hardly* universal here, to put it mildly—has the legal mandate or the resources to pursue.

  29. PeterB says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 6:27 am

    Well the FBI did let the Tsarnaev brothers go, so it looks likethey have deliberately excluded Islam as a cause of violence and terrorism. On Obamas orders. However Bush deliberately didn’t implicate Islam either. Heck, he made famous the oxymoron “Islam is a religion of peace.” But while Bush was probably ignorant of the intrinsic violent and backwards nature of Islam, Obama is very conscious of what he is doing. Deep down I hope upon hopes, that Obama is making the Muslims in western civilization happy, but behind the scenes, the FBI and NSA are actually monitoring Islamic terror gangs more than anyone on that list.

    I can hope right? But if I was president and had to figure out how to avoid muslim riots and Americans attacking every Muslim they see, but also fully investigate the Islamic terrorists, I’d appear to be naive to Islam’s goals and intentions, give them a false sense of security, and then disrupt the terror cells and plots silently and stealthy.

    Sadly, Obama is leading the west down a path of self destruction on an epic scale. He is allowing Islam to grow silently here in the USA and also to wreak havoc on the world, but he also is staying silent and allowing the corporate takeover of our representation by paying the Democrat and Republican politicians to work more for the corporate interests than the peoples safety and security. The national debt has increased, the gap between rich and poor has widened, and the safety of the world has been jeopardized more than any president ever.

    But we can see that Islam and the corporate takeover of our politicians has a clear link if you understand the politicians economic reasons for keeping Saudi Arabia and the global oil economy on the petro-dollar. I am sure that the Saud Royal Family has made it clear that if America wants to continue with the monopoly on Saudi oil to maintain the value of the US dollar, Islam will not be implicated in any human rights violations, violence, terrorist acts, or wars.

    IMO this is why all politicians, both Dems and Repubs are silent. Therefore all media , academia and government agencies are silent. They avoid and dare not proclaim to the world that we stand for human civil rights, freedom, justice, equality, separation of church and state, freedom of speech, press and religion. Just don’t force false or extreme speech, press and religion on children or a captive audience.

    I wish our Founding Fathers could have foreseen the need for Separation of Corporation and state. I wish the Republican party was moral enough to tell the the citizens what Obama is doing to America and the world. But the Repubs have openly convinced the Supreme Court to rule that a corporation can buy representation as if it was a voting human being, that a corporation can have a religion and can claim freedom of religion to avoid corporate law and human law at the same time.

    If we can make it to the next election, I some candidate has the golf balls to stand up for no taxation without representation and representation is by default, only for living human individual registered voters.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 7:00 pm

      Peter B, there’s some good stuff in your post. I have to take issue with this, though:

      But if I was president and had to figure out how to avoid muslim riots and Americans attacking every Muslim they see, but also fully investigate the Islamic terrorists, I’d appear to be naive to Islam’s goals and intentions, give them a false sense of security, and then disrupt the terror cells and plots silently and stealthy.
      …………………………………….

      For one thing, I *don’t* believe that the way to avoid Muslim riots is to publicly kiss Muslim butt and to pretend that Islam is not a threat.

      Certainly, this has not worked for Europe…

      And then the idea that if Americans knew the truth about Islam that they would be out “attacking every Muslim they see” is just completely false—very few in civilized democracies ever act this way.

      In any case, the idea that the reason our “leaders” cannot tell the truth about Islam is because of the (supposed) savagery of *their own citizens* is just calumny.

  30. Charles Martel says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 7:04 am

    Isn’t it amazing, disturbing and disgusting that millions of ordinary American citizens now understand the threat that political Islam poses and that those who are charged with protecting the country are clueless? NerO and his apologists should be removed from office for treason and sedition but all we do is talk and blow in each others conservative ears. I’m fed up with the cockroaches in government (with rare exceptions) and the 45% of the progressive scum who support them. They have orchestrated the demise of our country. If there ever was a time for a second revolution, this is it!

  31. NDB says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 7:45 am

    By edict of King Barry and apparently 51% percent of Americans agree with the way things are being done… twice. Bootleg NFL gear stands will soon be replaced with rubber backed prayer rug and felafel kiosks… you will have to go to Macy’s to get the good ones.

  32. duh_swami says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 7:59 am

    I dunt need no stinking lists. I’m on their list several times.
    I’m some kind of desperado. I must be stopped before I struggle into a sitting position and do something rash.

  33. Thinking From First Principles says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 8:04 am

    Failure to label Islamic attacks within the US as “domestic terrorism” is probably logically correct.

    They are acts of war by the Ummah.

    We don’t need law enforcement to be handling “criminals.”

    We need Congress to wake up and recognize the openly declared war upon us by the Ummah and the allegiance of all Muslims to the Ummah …

    We will not defend ourselves properly without this recognition.

    The existence of the IS is now a step forward in educating the world to the reality of Islam unrestrained (I followed some links yesterday and one article had a picture with four men holding a naked woman face down at the end of a medical table. They had cut her throat open and were bleeding her out into a steel medical pan. Post that on billboards for the world to see).

    We need to get that message out – the IS is Islam unrestrained. Pure Islam, implemented without restriction. Not radical, not extreme, not distorted. Just by the book without skipping anything.

    Just like our “domestic terrorists.” Soldiers of Allah undertaking acts of war as part of the Ummah. It’s a DoD issue, not a law enforcement issue.

    • Uncle Vladdi says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 6:43 pm

      “Terrorism” is only another word, or a synonym, for “extortion.”

      Extortion is always a crime.

      ALL MUSLIMS ARE CRIMINALS.

      ALL muslims are criminals: by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an, which tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-muslims, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being muslims.

      So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.

      ALL muslims are criminals, as being members of the ancient, ongoing global extortion racket called islam. In sharia law texts, muslims are SUPPOSED to be regarded as threats (as “objects of fear”) by all the
      unbelievers, whether or not the individual muslim has itself actually committed any crimes.

      That’s why we have laws against simply being a MEMBER of a crime-gang or ‘criminal enterprise’ because their membership endorses the inherent threat. Threats are crimes in themselves: they are psychological attacks, also known as intimidation, bullying, coercion, duress, harrassment, activist agitation, extortion, and “terrorism.”

      And even any “only” attempted crimes are still considered by civilized people to be crimes.

      Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

      “I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

      – Muhammad –

      Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

      And they’ve acted on it, too: according to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of “holy” lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders (that’s OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far – it’s a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too)!

      So, simply and precisely because of their “THOU SHALT KILL!” cultural indoctrination, muslims are still from between four and several hundred times more likely to engage in murder and all other crimes, than everyone else in the world!

      So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

      Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

      “God told us to commit these crimes!”

      (Capisce?)!

      😉

      We should simply BAN ISLAM – because everything muslims pretend to consider “holy” is already a crime!

      ;-(

      The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims.

      So, if and when you consider islam to be a “religion,” you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

      Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.

      • Dave J says

        Aug 31, 2014 at 12:48 am

        You are 100% correct.

        If we cannot bring ourselves to even name the enemy that has openly and repeatedly declared war on us we are doomed. If we have “no strategy” we should appreciate our vulnerability to a well armed and well funded enemy that has a very detailed strategy and is in the process of implementing it while we sleep.

  34. Rick Fanning says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 9:44 am

    Stupid FBI doesn’t have a lick of sense. They’re a joke, just like the real NCIS who some shipmates and myself made fools of!

  35. Louise from Canada says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 11:46 am

    I came across this sentence not to long ago and I think at this time it is very much appropriate: “WHEN YOU WANT TO INTRODUCE A LIE, YOU HAVE TO SILENCE THE TRUTH.”

  36. Sam says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 2:55 pm

    We are doomed by our own people, LIBERAL IDIOTS NOT ISLAM.

    • Uncle Vladdi says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 6:39 pm

      Liberals ARE muslims – both are masochistic criminals who pretend everyone is a victim, as cover for their crimes: victims of society, products of their environments, slaves of allah.

  37. Uncle Vladdi says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 6:37 pm

    Everyone in the government and its agencies – FBI, CIA, etc – who allowed this to happen without challenging it, are traitors to rationality and civilization, who opted to protect their careers and pensions over the lives of all the Citizens they are sworn to protect.

    They are also all willing, complicit accessories, enabling all muslim crimes.

    http://unclevladdi.wordpress.com/2014/08/30/theyre-maybe-islam-ist-or-islam-ish-but-defintitely-not-islam-or-muslims/

  38. Uncle Vladdi says

    Aug 30, 2014 at 6:46 pm

    ROBERT: WHY STILL PRETEND THERE’S A SEPARATE “RADICAL” CATEGORY?!

    WE BOTH KNOW THERE’S ONLY ONE QUR’AN, AND ONE ISLAM!!!!

    😉

    None of these crimes aren’t being carried out by putative “radicalist extremist militantists” – no: they’re all being committed by ordinary, devout, MUSLIMS!

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 30, 2014 at 7:11 pm

      This isn’t something Robert Spencer is pretending—he’s pointing out that this is something others are either pretending or are willfully naïve about.

  39. James butts says

    Aug 31, 2014 at 1:57 pm

    my name is James butts I live in Meriwether County Georgia.Will Someone please contact me asap. my life has been threatened numerous times.. my family’s life has been threatened numerous times.. will someone please send some investigators down to investigate the law enforcement in this county…

    threatened citizen,

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • OLD GUY on Al-Qaeda Calls on Jihadis to Kill Non-Muslims With Poisoned Coronavirus Masks
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.