• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

International Business Times piece by Muslim photojournalist: There is nothing in Islam to justify Islamic State beheadings

Aug 26, 2014 3:42 pm By Robert Spencer

IS-beheads-American-Foley-thumb-560x301-3632-550x295“Zaid Al Fares is a photojournalist who moved from Raqqa, his home city, to Turkey following the Isis takeover.” Here he retails more deceptions and detours to try to claim that what the Islamic State is doing has nothing to do with Islam. Why does it matter whether or not what the Islamic State is doing is in accord with Islamic texts and teachings? Among other reasons, because it will help determine how much support the new caliphate will ultimately get from Muslims worldwide, and will serve as an indicator of how much we can expect to see the actions of the Islamic State replicated by other Muslims elsewhere. The blizzard of articles and statements from Muslims and non-Muslims assuring us that what the Islamic State is doing has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam are designed to reassure non-Muslims in the West that they need not have any concerns about massive rates of Muslim immigration and the Muslims already living among them: “Not to worry, folks, your friend Ahmad down at the office will never start acting like those nuts in the Islamic State.” One problem with this is that it prevents authorities from calling upon Muslim communities to teach against the doctrines that the Islamic State acts upon, and to work for genuine reform. And so the door remains open to the possibility that the actions of the Islamic State could be repeated in Western countries.

“Frontline Isis: There is Nothing in Islam to Justify Islamic State Beheadings,” by Zaid Al Fares, IB Times, August 26, 2014:

Whenever the Islamic State, or IS, makes a statement, it claims to be fulfilling the work of god and striving for some kind of religious utopia, free of vice and sin. The militants claim they are messengers of Allah, even when they are beheading people and posting videos on the internet.

Yet, as a Muslim, I reject this out of hand. There is nothing in our religion which condones or encourages the vicious treatment meted out to James Foley and the dozens of other people who have been beheaded and then used as public trophies in IS’s battle for control of Syria and Iraq.

“When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks…” — Qur’an 47:4

“Remember when your Lord inspired to the angels, “I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.” — Qur’an 8:12

“Then they [the Jewish Qurayzah tribe] surrendered, and the apostle [Muhammad] confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. Al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka’b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900.” — Ibn Ishaq 690

Even if there were anything in our religious teachings to justify chopping off an opponent’s head, that particular edict would be patently anachronistic today. At the time of the Prophet, fighting was done with swords and spears, while today’s battles employ the latest weapons. There is no way you can reasonably apply ancient standards of warfare to the reality of conflict today.

A strange argument. Muslims consider the Qur’an to be the perfect word of Allah, applicable to all times and places. So if the Qur’an says to behead unbelievers, it doesn’t matter that there is better technology for battles today. Jihadists consider this is a sacred edict, not a point of battleground efficiency.

Someone wishing to defend IS might point out that, in the Qur’an, it is written: “If you kill, kill well, and if you slaughter, slaughter well”. However the passage continues by instructing readers: “Let each of you sharpen his blade and let him spare suffering to the animal he slaughters.” Thus it is clear that this passage is designed to apply to sheep and cows, rather than people.

This is quite disingenuous of Al Fares in light of the two Qur’anic verses about beheading people that I quoted above.

In reality, IS has no real interest in Islamic religious doctrine. The Prophet Mohammed said that in battle we should not torture the victim, yet the Islamic state clearly does that now. He also commanded us to treat prisoners of war well, but IS does not follow this dictum either. In fact they do exactly the opposite, unless, of course, the prisoner can help them in some way.

In reality, here is a detailed exposition of Islamic theology regarding beheading. Note the copious quotations from Islamic authorities, so conspicuously lacking from Al Fares’ piece. And as for torture, Muhammad oversaw the torture of Kinana of Khaybar, a Jew whom he thought was in charge of the treasury, when he invaded that oasis and massacred the Jews there. This is recorded by Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad’s earliest biographer. And as for treating prisoners well, Islamic law allows for them to be either freed outright, ransomed, enslaved or killed, depending on what is best for the Muslims. The Islamic State made its judgment in accord with those choices.

Members of other sects and religions, such as Christians, are ordered to pay a sum of money known as “jizya,” or forced to enter Islam. Or killed, of course. But this is contrary to Islamic law; the Islamic religion does not impose Islam on non-Muslims, but rather gives them freedom of choice. In the Qu’ran, Allah says clearly “there is no compulsion in religion”. Perhaps the IS founders skipped that bit when they were codifying their creed.

Al Fares is here apparently depending on the ignorance of his readers, for he is here claiming that a Qur’anic command is in violation of Islamic law. For the collection of the jizya from the “People of the Book” is mandated in the Qur’an, and has never been considered by Islamic authorities to be a violation of the “no compulsion in religion” verse: ““Fight those who believe not in God nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by God and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” (Qur’an 9:29). There is “no compulsion” in that: non-Muslims aren’t forced to become Muslim; they’re just subjugated under Islamic hegemony.

In reality, the IS beheadings constitute a systematic attempt to deliver a clear message: that all who disagree will face the most barbaric of fates. This was clear when IS cut off the heads of more than 30 people from the 17th division of the Syrian regime, and displayed them in the most prominent part of Raqqa – on the roundabout al-Naaim or as residents call it “hell roundabout.” Predictably the heads sparked panic among the people of the city, and sent a chilling message to troops stationed at Brigade 93 and the Altabqa airport.

It was also apparent when IS chose to behead well-known activists, such as the young revolutionary Moataz Ibrahim. The militants wanted to send a message to all the activists, even those who are outside Raqqa city: anyone who wants freedom, or a civilized state, will meet this end.

Most notably, when IS beheaded the American journalist James Foley a few days ago, they sent a message to America that it will kill all the Americans resident in ​​Iraq, no matter their background or involvement in the current conflict. There was no religious undertone, or overtone, to the slaughter.

IS might claim that it is acting in accordance with Islam and its slaughter is somehow a force for good. But the world should not be fooled; true Muslims completely reject these ludicrous claims, and our religion provides no basis for their cowardly massacres.

Indeed, the world should not be fooled by deceptive nonsense such as what Al Fares is peddling here. But it so very, very much wants to be fooled.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), Jihad doctrine, journalistic bias, Taqiyya, War is deceit Tagged With: featured


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jaladhi says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 3:54 pm

    Everybody associated with Is;am is a liar and so is this photographer. To call him a journalist will be insulting real journalists, though most of the present day journalists in US are liars and not journalists!!

    • el-cid says

      Aug 27, 2014 at 9:57 am

      I must agree. For 30 years I was “reaching out”. Now, based on the evidence of my interactions I am convinced that either Muslims have actually given up on their religion, or they or their children present a danger to our society.

      The religion perfectly justifies ISIS, Hamas, CAIR, etc. They will convert us, or kill and enslave us. At the end, we will worship and love them just like the other tortured souls who have forgotten what freedom is.

  2. Beagle says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 3:55 pm

    Islamic dissembling editorial directed towards non-Muslims to snooze any potential ‘wake-up calls’ without any significant challenge to the texts and tenants of Islam which give rise to the horror in question number 879,149,442,691 I have read in the MSM since 9/11/01.

    Oddly enough, it’s still not convincing.

    • Beagle says

      Aug 26, 2014 at 3:59 pm

      Tenent, not tenant. Derp.

      • manuel-rafael says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 4:19 pm

        Using religious tyranny as a Genocidal License is an insult to anyone whose brain cells are not D.N.A. related to goat or camel breath: What possible relationship can there be between war and religion?
        The N.S.D.A.P., turned Naziism into a religious ideology, the Eugenics of the “Final Solution” was in fact the replication of the Fatwa for Tehcir Law, totalitarian Sharia Law for all those within the Ottoman Empire (1914-1920) these years left the Armenian-Greek Genocide with over Two Million Dead, by the same methods of decapitation, deportation, relocation and extermination, this was justified by the “ethically cleansed” Judeo Christians; there is no politically-correct way to justify murder, the level of homicide whether in war-time or religious ethnic cleansing are the same but different; war is war that is the way it goes; but religious tortured mass murder is an inexcusable act of murder.
        The integration of religion, the Q’ranic quotes of deceit and deception are an obvious indictment that sex with animals produce the same result.

      • Robert Spencer says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 4:24 pm

        Tenet, not tenent or tenant.

        • Beagle says

          Aug 26, 2014 at 5:29 pm

          Double derptitude.

        • Champ says

          Aug 26, 2014 at 6:30 pm

          “Double derptitude.”

          You’re funny!!! 😀

          BTW, your comments are always so spot on!

      • Rita's Ghost says

        Sep 5, 2014 at 2:25 pm

        It’s tenet, or the plural, tenets. If you’re going to correct someone, it’s incumbent upon you to at least get it right yourself.

  3. Joe Murphy says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 4:05 pm

    If ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, then the Quran, Muhammad and the Hadith have nothing to do with Islam. Durn it, Islam has nothing to do with Islam!

  4. Champ says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 4:06 pm

    IS might claim that it is acting in accordance with Islam and its slaughter is somehow a force for good. But the world should not be fooled; true Muslims completely reject these ludicrous claims, and our religion provides no basis for their cowardly massacres.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Yeah the world should not be fooled, alright! …not fooled into thinking that IS & Company have *nothing* to do with islam. Of course they do. IS is islam, and islam is IS. It’s all right there in black-and-white in the unholy quran and in the evil actions of devout muslims, ’nuff said …

  5. AnneM says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 4:11 pm

    Where has he been as of late?

  6. john spielman says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 4:13 pm

    what a ridiculous “puff piece ” by IB TIMES! I suggest Robert Spencer send them a copy of his response today and a copy of the Saudi Survey that 90% of local Saudi’s affirm that ISIS is basic islam with out the lies and deceptions in all its violence and behadings!

    • ibn Muslim says

      Aug 26, 2014 at 4:44 pm

      I suggest Robert Spencer go head to head debate with militants in IS. But no, he hides behind a computer screen and propagates islamophobia…

      • Champ says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 4:50 pm

        Get. LOST. liar.

      • SpiritOf1683 says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 4:57 pm

        And I suggest you take off to Pakistan and join your fellow barbarians.

      • wes says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 5:20 pm

        Why would he need to debate the militants in IS? He reports what they say.

        If Spencer is propagating Islamophobia, it’s because he’s reporting the news. Any non-Muslim should have a fear of Islam and all they have to do to develop this fear is read/watch the news. And I’m not referring to just the IS, but anywhere there is a large Muslim presence.

      • Champ says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 5:43 pm

        Apparently “ibn Muslim” is completely blind …

        Robert Spencer does not hide behind a computer, but he serves on the frontline of the anti-jihad movement by speaking the truth about islam and company *publicly*.

        • Jay Boo says

          Aug 27, 2014 at 1:18 am

          Pity poor ibn Muslim

          It is obvious by ibn Muslim’s previous comments that ibn Muslim is a girl and does not pray five times a day.
          ibn Muslim is struggling to pretend to be a good Muslim in front of others while at the same time dealing with the with the certain knowledge that Muhammad was a fraud and Islam is nothing but an empty pathetic hoax.
          The reason that ibn Muslim visits Jihad Watch as a troll is to relieve a guilty conscience of being a Muslim who has no more desire to pray to the unknowable Allah hoax and live trapped in the dismal emptiness called Islam.

        • Jay Boo says

          Aug 27, 2014 at 1:39 am

          ibn Muslim is confused
          Was Muhammad even a prophet?
          Young Muslim Woman Leaves Islam And Tells The Truth About Mohammed

          Islam uses merry-go-round circular logic
          to pretend that Muhammad is a prophet.

        • Champ says

          Aug 27, 2014 at 2:01 am

          Hi, Jay Boo …

          I did a quick research and learned that “ibn” apparently means “son of”? …so that’s why I think this poster is a guy. But you’re right, this could be a woman. In either case he/she is a coward for doing a drive-by and for not responding to the comments. I guess we can always count on pious mohammedans to think they’ve had the final word by posting one nasty comment and then leaving.

          🙂

        • Jay Boo says

          Aug 27, 2014 at 2:32 am

          Hi Champ
          ibn Muslim seems to be a hit and run troll.
          At least some of the other trolls attempt to put up a defense of Islam.
          Despite the ibn in the moniker I am certain that ibn Muslim is a girly girl.
          Ever notice how some trolls begin with I am a (fill in the blank) in the first sentence to distract and then segue into their real purpose in a final paragraph.
          At first I suspected that ibn Muslim was not a Muslim but a leftist in disguise and just using the Muslim to distract but I now believe that ibn Muslim is a passive aggressive girly girl who hates her hijab and secretly resents Islam yet she is racked with guilt while she oscillates between fear that Allah can read her thoughts and the knowledge that Islam and Muhammad are a shameless hoax that only leads to a life filled with bitter emptiness where Muslims only joy in life is to act like pious Muslims and vindictively spy on one another.
          She is just another case of typical repressed Phycho – Muslim syndrome.

      • EvaGirl says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 5:45 pm

        Mr. IBN, Why do the terrorist run around with a rag over their face? Maybe Mr. Spencer should hide behind a rag instead of a computer screen. Do you think he would look brave if he hid his face with a red checked rag? Just asking.

      • Wellington says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 8:39 pm

        Robert Spencer is not the person hiding behind a computer screen, ibn Muslim. Rather, you are. Spencer has put his life on the line while trying to demonstrate, to illustrate, to describe, the many iniquities and freedom-crushing elements in Islamic doctrine. The fact that we all know Spencer’s real name and the fact that he has had to take numerous precautions to protect himself is evidence of just how control-freak and totalitarian and disgusting and barbaric Islam really is. It is also evidence of Robert Spencer’s immense courage.

        Doubt me? Well then, by all means doubt me. And here’s how you can do it and prove me wrong: Reveal your real name right here at JW. No one here at JW who knows that Islam is full of shit wants to kill Muslims just because they are Muslims. NO ONE! So, you have nothing to fear (as do those who speak the truth about Islam since Islam a a control-freak death cult that brooks no criticism). If you don’t do what I have challenged you to do, then you are, indeed, a hypocrite, a liar and a coward. If you also don’t understand that I’ve turned the tables on you, then you are quite stupid as well. Your turn, ibn Muslim.

        • Champ says

          Aug 26, 2014 at 8:51 pm

          Bravo, Wellington, great comment!

          But cowards like “ibn Muslim” only deliver nasty drive-by comments and then never return–like a man–and own-up to what they’ve written. Whatta wuss.

      • sidney penny says

        Aug 26, 2014 at 10:29 pm

        Any examples ibn Muslim?

        By the way too many people are frighten to debate Robert Spencer.

        He knows his material backwards.

        One Imam said it was unfair that he was debating with Mr Spencer as he was an expert on Islam.The radio host said aren’t you?

        Especially when Imams conduct Islamic worship services, and provide religious guidance. They also serve as community leaders.

  7. CogitoErgoSum says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 4:20 pm

    Maybe Mr. Al Fares could also explain the concepts of dualism, abrogation, taqyiia and kitman and how they relate to an understanding of the Quran and Islam.

  8. Ratthon says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 4:31 pm

    We dont have to care for anything if were justified by Islam OR NOT.
    Religion wars are exactly about that discussion: what is the core of the religion, how is it done right, what is wrong and what is right, what is true and who are the liars? No one and no group is entitled to give final answers to these questions or a final interpretation of all these effin scriptures. One can be less extremist, less moderate or however we call it, but neither wrong nor right as it is all a question of interpretation and also of a point of view that bases on certain values.

  9. SpiritOf1683 says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 5:00 pm

    They’ree following the example of Mohammed who had 800 members of the Banu Qurayza Jewish tribe beheaded, and their headless corpses and severed heads thrown into a trench.

  10. Jovial Joe says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 5:52 pm

    While granting that many Muslims set out purposively to deceive the kufir – as sanctioned by their perfect prophet – just as common an occurrence (and I would wager so in this case) the Muslim must resort to self-deception thanks to an inability to acknowledge the truly diabolical nature of their Faith. Only a psychopath can see this religion for what it truly is and enthusiastically embrace it all the same (as with all those who support IS).

  11. tpellow says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 6:09 pm

    The pathetic deceptions about Islam have to the point where apologists for Islam are virtually saying:

    ‘Islam is nothing to do with Islam.’

  12. sdnikko says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 6:33 pm

    Beheading is a legal punishment on the books in Saudi Arabia. That would be the birthplace of this photographer’s religion and prophet. This guy belongs to that group of Muslims who know pretty much nothing about their own religion. Their ideas are shaped entirely by what they want it to be rather than what it is. In fact, this guy would be considered a hypocrite by ISIS members and would be a legitimate target for termination. I discussed this online with a reasonably intelligent ISIS supporter who had absolutely no qualms about listing the kinds of people who can be killed without hesitation; Shia first, with hypocrites coming in a close second.

  13. Abu Najm Rodriguez says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 9:57 pm

    Mr. Spencer,

    Just to clarify something- I am not an ‘Islamic State supporter’. The article of mine that you have referred to in yours is a response to an American Muslim theologian who post facto ceded the academic points I made in my article, as would most any student of Islamic law.

    It would go a long way towards showing that you are concerned with fact checking when writing articles if you were to remove the reference to me as an ‘Islamic State supporter’ in your article.

    I’ve never voiced support for the Islamic State and I’ve never attempted to justify any of their actions. Rather, as a rule, I limit myself to discussing Islamic law and I leave the judgments and verdicts to qualified scholars of Islam.

    I would think that given the very purpose of this website, you would appreciate honest theological discourse from Muslims regarding Islamic law, and not resort to unnecessary labeling or presumptions when characterizing the people or views expressed.

    Incorrectly labeling people and views only serves to drive such discourse underground and it leads to an environment of fear among Muslims such that apologists and dishonest brokers, the froth if you will, rise to the top and are given undeserved credibility. That’s not what you or I want, strangely enough, and for different reasons.

    Thank you in advance,

    Abu Najm Rodriguez

  14. Robert Spencer says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 10:03 pm

    Abu Najm Rodriguez:

    Your piece was sent to me by someone who represented it as an article by a supporter of the Islamic State. I have removed that phrase. Thank you for the information.

  15. William says

    Aug 26, 2014 at 11:11 pm

    “Members of other sects and religions, such as Christians, are ordered to pay a sum of money known as “jizya,” or forced to enter Islam. Or killed, of course. But this is contrary to Islamic law; the Islamic religion does not impose Islam on non-Muslims, but rather gives them freedom of choice.”

    Why is what IS is doing (sorry for so many ises) contrary to Islamic law? Aren’t they giving members of other sects and religion a choice? Pay the jizya or enter Islam or be killed? Does he not recognize those choices?

  16. fair_dinkum says

    Aug 27, 2014 at 2:52 am

    so do these “ludicrous claims” account for what is happening in saudia arabia?
    in iran? afghanistan?

    these parasites are telling us its all in the name of islam.

    ha! it seems the members of the IS interpret islam 100% correctly. any statement to the contrary is bluster.

  17. Anon says

    Aug 27, 2014 at 3:52 am

    Wow, I mean who is doing the MOST WORK to put a stop to radical and/or militant Islam, by education, awareness and military force as necessary, — NON MUSLISMS.

  18. Cindy says

    Aug 27, 2014 at 6:33 am

    There is NEVER a right time to behead someone!!!!!!!! NO people have the right to tell other people that they can not be here or have any place that is their own!!!!!!! Why do they think that the Jews have no right to the land of Israel??? GOD gave them this land, it belongs to ISRAEL, all of it belongs to Israel!!!! They have given part of their land away trying to keep peace. That does not work though because the enemy want s more and more and they want Israel out of the picture altogether. But that will never be!!! Israel will always be the shining star in the middle east. Jesus Christ will one day reign from Jerusalem, praise God for He is good to His people all the time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Champ says

      Aug 27, 2014 at 3:48 pm

      Great comment, Cindy, I wholly agree!

  19. profitsbeard says

    Aug 28, 2014 at 5:04 am

    Who was the first person inIslam to behead people?

    Mohammad.

    Is it sanctified by the Koran?

    Yes.

    Stop lying about Islam and its tenets.

    It is a Death Cult founded by a mass-murderer.

    If Charles Manson were more successful he could have been a new Mohammad.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Mojdeh on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.