There are several Qur’an verses that Muslims who believe in sex slavery — like those of the Islamic State — point to in order to justify kidnapping young girls and pressing them into sexual slavery:
If you fear that you will not act justly towards the orphans, marry such women as seem good to you, two, three, four; but if you fear you will not be equitable, then only one, or what your right hands own; so it is likelier you will not be partial. (Qur’an 4:3)
And:
And also prohibited to you are all married women except those your right hands possess. (Qur’an 4:24)
And:
O Prophet! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries; and those whom your right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to you.
See also 70:29-30. The mainstream Muslim commentary Tafsir al-Jalalayn explains that 4:3 tells Muslims to “marry only one, or, restrict yourself to what your right hands own, of slavegirls, since these do not have the same rights as wives.” The twentieth-century Qur’an commentator Maulana Bulandshahri explains the wisdom of this practice, and longs for the good old days:
During Jihad (religion war), many men and women become war captives. The Amirul Mu’minin [leader of the believers, or caliph — an office now vacant] has the choice of distributing them amongst the Mujahidin [warriors of jihad], in which event they will become the property of these Mujahidin. This enslavement is the penalty for disbelief (kufr).
He goes on to explain that this is not ancient history:
None of the injunctions pertaining to slavery have been abrogated in the Shari’ah. The reason that the Muslims of today do not have slaves is because they do not engage in Jihad (religion war). Their wars are fought by the instruction of the disbelievers (kuffar) and are halted by the same felons. The Muslim [sic] have been shackled by such treaties of the disbelievers (kuffar) whereby they cannot enslave anyone in the event of a war. Muslims have been denied a great boon whereby every home could have had a slave. May Allah grant the Muslims the ability to escape the tentacles of the enemy, remain steadfast upon the Din (religion) and engage in Jihad (religion war) according to the injunctions of Shari’ah. Amen!
This is by no means an eccentric or unorthodox view in Islam. The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that as they waged jihad warfare against infidels, Muslims would take slaves. He clarified what he meant in a subsequent interview:
…Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Qur’an 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point–there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Right around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti activist and politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
…A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up (this man’s) situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?,” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not–she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
“IS reportedly enslaves 400 Yazidi women,” Syria Direct, August 6, 2014 (scroll down), thanks to Blazing Cat Fur:
The Islamic State (IS) allegedly captured more than 400 Yazidi women from Sinjar in northern Iraq Tuesday night, reported pro-Kurdistan news Shafaaq News Wednesday.
“IS distributed the captured women to its fighters in the forests of Mosul and Tal Afar,” reported a correspondent for Kuwaiti news channel Aladalah TV on Wednesday.
Yazidis are a religious minority in northern Syria and Iraq who speak Kurdish.
The kidnappings come in the midst of IS’s takeover of Sinjar, the homeland of many Yazidis in Iraq, which began Sunday, causing thousands to flee the region.
The area had been protected by the Iraqi Kurdish military forces known as the pershmerga, but quickly fell against IS’s attacks.
The loss of Sinjar is the first major military setback for the Kurdish forces in Iraq since IS took over Mosul in June.
Meanwhile, thousands of other Yazidis, fearing violence from the Sunni extremists but unable to flee, are stranded on top of Mount Sinjar, dying of thirst.
Sinjar is located on the northern border of Syria and Iraq.
IS’s capture of the area would allow it to have even greater access between its forces in Hasakah in northeast Syria and Mosul in northern Iraq.
John C. Barile says
May God annihilate the Islamic State and its caliphate.
frederikahere says
AMEN!!!!!!
Have Mercy says
Instead of asking for intervention from the invisible dude in the sky, question the actions of your government that led to the genocide of Iraq’s religious minorities. For those who elected and supported Bush who obeyed his dual-loyalist cabal into invading and destroying Iraq’s secular dictator that protected those minorities and installed a Shiite Iranian puppet and invited Sunni Muslims from the world over to join the banner of Jihad. Bush left the arsenal that ISIS is using now which he denied the Kurds to appease Turkey and his rich gulf Arab friends of his and his daddy. Bush’s people denied those minorities protection on the ground. The US military went into Christian homes and disarmed them. Then when they were under severe attack, they were denied refugee status while hundreds of thousands of un-vetted Muslims were welcomed. Obama sent in US Special Forces to train North African Jihadists to topple Qaddafi then they were moved into Syria. The US established training camps in Jordon and Qatar to train Jihadists to bring down the secular Asad. Woe onto the Christians and other non-Muslim minorities from the evil that US has wrought. And woe onto Americans in the years to come from the fruits that their government planted in its geopolitical chess game. Americans you have the blood and tears of those poor people on your hands if you do not hold your government accountable.
Bukkdem Jizheads says
Your viewpoint is interesting. But, you are whitewashing Saddam. With the UN Oil-for-Food program, Saddam created a global criminal enterprise, while America punished itself by honoring UN-backed sanctions. Saddam fired on our jets, paid $50K to Palestinian families of suicide bombers, allowed an Al Qaeda branch to settle in Iraq, gassed his people and committed unspeakable acts against citizens.
You imply this is necessary to contain islamism? 120,000 dead in Syria is necessary for peace? No, the example of Attaturk must be used to build a civil society among Muslims.
The Arab Spring, or the neo-con plan of Bush was born of nobel intentions. Obama ruined every possibility of it succeeding; i.e. stomped out the Iranian Green Revolution, pussy-footed over the troops remaining in Iraq, refused to assist Libya in setting up a republic, supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt instead of helping them, again, set up a republic. He washes his hands of the slaughter, rapes, genocide committed by Muslims. He’s made a decade of sacrifices by our military pointless. Afghanistan will revert to the Taliban too, because he “ends” wars instead of winning wars.
Obama engineered this failure. He is the one bowing to his Saudi friends. It’s nauseating they way he’s blocked US energy development for their benefit. He thinks he’s the 12th Imam.
Have Mercy says
And all you said about Saddam, a real bad guy, was irreverent as why it was in the best interest of the American people or even the Iraqi people to remove him. We are all are worst off for it. But thank the flying spaghetti monster that Hamas suicide bomber families are not getting money from Saddam. I guess that they have to get buy on the millions they get from our friends the oil Sheiks. Remind me what Bush did to punish Saudi involvement and Pakistani involvement in 911. Yes, he first covered it up, gave the Pakistanis billions, and then promptly invaded Iraq. I argued the same points with Hugh Fitzgerald years ago. It was a horrible idea then as it is now. You wrote: : the neo-con plan of Bush was born of [nobel] intentions.” I you think that Bush came up with the plan and not his dual-loyalist handlers, I have a bridge to sell you. Also, if you can read people’s mind to determine if their intentions are good or bad, you should take that act to Vegas and make some cash.
The Bush administration began the job and Obama is finishing it. If you think it was misguided good intentions or simple incompetence, I say think again. If one wants result A and then acts in away that can only lead to result Z, he is either a total idiot or he meant Z all along. There are interests here at work that do not coniside of those of teh American people
gravenimage says
There is no doubt that Bush made huge mistakes in Iraq—not least in believing the Muslims were just “ordinary moms and dads” who would embrace Jeffersonian democracy.
But what we have here is yet another apologist for Islam who would like to lay the responsibility for all the bloody crimes of Islam at the feet of foolish Westerners.
The fact is that Islam and Jihad have been resurgent for decades now, and the idea that everything would have been fine in Syria and Iraq now if only poor bumbling George Bush had kept his hands off Mesopotamia strains credulity, to put it mildly.
Have Mercy says
You still believe the yarn that Hugh Fitzgerald used to spin about the neocons blundering into Iraq with the best of intentions, but they failed due to lack of understanding of Islamic doctrines! Research the architects of that crime against humanity known as the Iraq war, their backgrounds, and their connections. I did and what I found did not support Fitzgerald’s assertions. Go ahead and believe that I am apologizing for Islam which I have a great contempt for and for its active believers. Go ahead and believe that it was an honest mistake on poor Georgy’s part. I do not “do” blind faith anymore. I ask questions, I research and analyze. The evidence shows that the US government has and is actively enabling Jihadism though financing, training, and arming Jihadists, by attacking their enemies or denying them aid, and indirectly by covering up and looking the other way as Jihadists perform their prescribed duty.
If you think that your government’s hand is clean vote for establishment candidates or either party in the next election with a clear conscious. Ignorance is indeed a bliss in such a world!
Gunny Roha says
Well Please tell me this , If it was George Bush who caused all the rabid dog murdering and terrorism of innocent unarmed people by Islam since 2003.
Then who’s fault was it before then, because Islam has been butchering the innocent and stealing everything in sight since the year 650 A.D. ??????
Who made them invade Kuwait , while I was there over 100 pregnant Muslim women who had been gang raped by their honorable Muslim invaders committed SUICIDE because. You are a dam Liar
Have Mercy says
Bush and Obama by destroying the secular Baathist regimes in Iraq and Syria (“because they are bad guys”) have pushed the defenseless minorities on the tender mercies of Islamic Jihadists. They are as guilty as if they held those that the Jihadists sawed off their heads with dull knives or gang raped. Those who enable evil share in it. The American government gave Islamic jihadism its greatest victory in centuries after helping them defeat the USSR. Then the US helped Jihadists in the Balkans and the Caucuses.
You do not have to tell me about islamic savagery. I grew up in its shadow and my loved ones were victimized by it. The issue is how can Jihadist savagery be opposed . It was not certainly by destroying Saddam and Assad. It was not by declaring Islam a religion of peace and entrenching those with Jihadist sympathies in the national security agencies. It was not by arming and training North African Jihadists to bring down Qaddafi and then ferrying them to Syria. It was not by setting up training camps in Jordan and Arabia for those murdering raping beasts. The US has played a dirty and bloody game, and those poor souls suffer and die for it. If you cannot or would not allow yourself to comprehend American complicity in causing this human tragedy, that is on you!
Have Mercy says
Oorah, gunny. Apparently, you were one of those great liberators of oppressed Muslims who fought in that epic 100-hour Turkey shoot. You called me a “[dam] liar” without enumerating what were my supposed lies.
Your question “Who made them invade Kuwait” ties nicely with my thoughts on American geopolitical games. Consider this:
1) Why did the Kuwaitis provoke Saddam by demanding their money back after he fought a bankrupting and utterly destructive war against Iran which helped protect all the Gulf Sheikdoms? All the while the Sheiks drained shared oil fields, costing Saddam billions! What would embolden them that much? A promise of 400 thousand jarheads coming to their aid, perhaps!
2) What did April Glaspie, then US ambassador to Iraq, tell Saddam during her meeting with him that might have convinced him that the US would not interfere. Tariq Aziz and others had things to say about that. Food for thought.
3) The US had developed a psych profile of Saddam and knew how would he react if cornered.
4) Did Mr. CIA, Skull and Bones, El Jefe himself, act on principle and to protect American interests in Kuwait as he also claimed to do in Panama? His list of questionable involvements include Iran contra and Latin American civil wars. That is something to consider. I read that Saddam conveyed that he would sell oil to the US for a lower price. This would have been an opportunity to stick it to OPEC. I fail to believe that principle or American interest was the motive. Research the Carlyle group and Bush Sr. involvement with the Saudi royals.
5) Bringing the Kuffar armies and “Elmareenzz ” to Islam’s holiest land was a unforgivable affront to faithful Muslims and was a watershed moment for Jihadist movements worldwide. Nothing crystallized Muslim governments’ military impotence and their subservience to the West as Kuffar boots on their land. What the US did to their Muslim brothers with sanctions was also a very successful propaganda tool.
6) Just the thieves in Iraq were perhaps more than the entire population of Kuwait. So, why the Kuwaitis matter so much that the US was welling to kill millions of Iraqis in their name? Kuwait is historically a portion of the Basra Vilayet annexed by the Britts. Their unification could be viewed as a national cause. Also, speaking of rape, I assure you that every night many thousands of poor Filipino and Indonesian maids as well as boys brought from many lands are being subjected to repeated rape by their Kuwaiti masters. So, when would the Marines be riding in to their rescue or any of the other victims of Islamic sexual slavery?
Finally, I encourage you to read a book by another Marine, War Is A Racket, by Major General Smedley Butler. Also, you can watch speeches and debates with Michael Schauer on the net.
Ohiobelle says
Well said!
Huck Folder says
That won’t happen. But I think civilized men will do that, eventually. I think an excellent start could have been made already. One or two squadrons of oh-so-aptly-named A-10 Warthogs could chew through IS’s ill-gotten gains in a week. They have now become a conventional army, possible prey to a vastly superior conventional army. If they have to mass for an attack, they present themselves as targets. Good.
If the civilized world plays its cards right, this could set islamism and islam back 1,000 years. If the caliph honeypot sucks in all the jihadis and jihadi wannabes, then they are saving the world the trouble of finding them slowly, one by one.
Concentrated in one place, the same fate should be visited on them that they visit on their victims, and wish to visit on billions, with one exception. They should be exterminated, TWEPd, eradicated, but not beheaded like halal tortured animals, even though they deserve it. And this is THEIR idea:
Badih Chayban in his 23 October 2002 article in The Daily Star, Nasrallah said that “if [Jews] all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.”
Huck Folder says
This was a reply to:
John C. Barile
August 7, 2014 at 11:23 am
May God annihilate the Islamic State and its caliphate.
It seems unrelated!
Jay Boo says
Maybe now that there is a cease fire (last I checked) in Gaza the MSM will report on this and their follow-up commentaries will issue matter-of-fact styled opinion pieces so as not to assign any blame with the exception of course to A.B.M. (anyone but Muslims)
The flag appears to read “All Jews” in English. Even ISIS is blaming the Jews it would seem.
somehistory says
Their depravity…so very disgusting. So very difficult to read about. May the Judgment from the True God come soon upon all those who act worse than the worst beast of the field.
John C. Barile says
And to think that this, to an ardent Islamist True Believer, is the dawn of a new Islamic Golden Age–may the Islamic State and those who give it their allegiance speedily go to perdition!
zulu says
ISIS Executes Yazidi Men, Kidnaps Children and Takes Women for Jihad Marriage
http://www.ibtimes.co.in/isis-executes-yazidi-men-kidnaps-children-takes-women-jihad-marriage-606110
Beagle says
*CONTENT WARNING: severed Yazidi head being held by IS mujahid*
Thanks for the link. People need to know about it.
Walter Sieruk says
This above article exposes that many Muslims of ISIS are engaging in the cruel and heinous practice of “Kidnapping young girls and pressing them into sexual slavery.” Such a terrible thing is not only very wrong but its also very much against the teachings of the Bible. In fact , its such an affront that the Bible teaches that those who do this awful thing should be put to death. As it is written
“Whoever steals someone to sell as a slave or to keep them for their own slave must be killed.” Exodus 21:16. [E.R.V.]
Have Mercy says
No, the authors of Islam took sexual slavery of women of vanquished foes out of the Hebrew Bible; like much of the stories and teachings of the Quran and Sunna. Read (Deuteronomy)
10 When thou goest forth to battle against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God delivereth them into thy hands, and thou carriest them away captive, 11 and seest among the captives a woman of goodly form, and thou hast a desire unto her, and wouldest take her to thee to wife; 12 then thou shalt bring her home to thy house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; 13 and she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thy house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month; and after that thou mayest go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.”
If you believe that God that ordered that, then why are you disgusted when those savages do this!!! When they behead children, remember that the beloveds of God, Joshua and David, did that. All this savagery springs from one disgusting swamp that Christians still honor. No man of good conscious would follow that… Yes, true Muslims are savages par excellence, but what is more savage is your government that enables their savagery. All of you who will not denounce the role that the US played are morally responsible. Pray to your savage non-existing deity for his mercy, the victims will get none. Instead help sponsor the survivors to come to the West and lobby your corrupt government who orchestrated this tragedy to open its door to them as it did for countless Muslim zealots.
robaby says
Finally, an honest anti-muslim, by the way concubines is rejected by the overwhelming majority of Al Azhar scholars
Have Mercy says
Show me the Fatwa or you are lier!
dumbledoresarmy says
When precisely was the last time in history that that particular custom was practised by a Jewish army?
And do you seriously believe that *any* modern Jews anywhere are going to revive it? (By the way, as I recall, the soldier who captured the woman, could *only* take her as a wife, not as a concubine or slave; furthermore, if he decided he didn’t like her, he had to **let her go free and clear** – I quote from the next verse which you omitted – “thou shalt not make merchandise of her”…BIIIG difference from Mohammed and Islam, right there).
Anyway: modern Israel most assuredly is *not* doing anything of the kind; in fact, even ordinary in-combat/ post-conduct mass rape of “the enemy’s women” of the kind that has accompanied many wars, has been singularly absent from modern Israel’s wars of self-defence.
I observe you claim, also, that David “beheaded children”. Chapter and verse, please. Because the *only* reference to David beheading anyone, that I am aware of, is in the account of him beheading Goliath after he had defeated him in battle. And I do not recall any verse saying specifically that Joshua beheaded children.
So why are you in so eager to engage in moral equivalencing of the Jews with the Muslims, and the TaNaKh with the Quran? As if Muslim bad behaviour is “caused” by its plagiarising of *some* Hebrew texts and therefore Islam must be blamed on da Joooooz?
Incidentally, the Hadiths themselves contain the claim that the Jews of the 5th and 6th century AD were **not practising** stoning for adultery. (Doesn’t that tell you something, like, just perhaps, that the way the Jews read their scriptures might actually be very different from the way that the Muslims read *theirs*??? Not to mention that there is a great deal of stuff in the Hebrew scriptures that is worlds away and light years ahead, morally, of *anything* in the Quran.)
It’s the *Muslims* – not Jews – who kidnapped those Yazidi women and, a couple of months ago, hundreds of mostly-Christian girls in Nigeria. It’s Muslims who are kidnapping and raping and force-“converting” girls and women – even married women, and minor girls – from among the Coptic minority in Egypt and the Christian and Hindu minority in Pakistan.
And none of that has anything to do, realistically speaking, with the contents of the most archaic portions of the TaNaKh, and a whole hell of a lot to do with the Quran, Sira and Hadith and the deplorable example of Mohammed, slave-raider and caravan-robber.
Have Mercy says
The point was that Islam’s sacred tests were plagiarized from the disgusting books of the Hebrew Bible. Yahweh is the prototype for Allah in all his pity, wrath, genocidal mania, cruelty and cosmic tyranny. “…Worship me, love me, do what I say or I shall burn thee with the fires of heaven, drown thee in the waters of the deep, send plagues and famine against thee, and I shall smote thee, and if all of that fails, I shall send my chosen ones against thee, to slaughter thee, butcher thine children, and behead thine women and goats, or is it to screw them… I forget. A whole universe to run, you know. ” Do you not see the madness?!!
It is a moral equivalence between Allah and Yahweh. Your post is misdirected and misguided. I know very well the crimes of Muslims in the here and now. My point is that all men of good conscious must cast out those semitic deities and their belief system to the rubbish dumb of history. Humanity must be freed to stop the suffering.
Was David in the text better than Muhammad? He killed entire peoples in the name of his deity and robbed them while he was a refugee and wiped up Jebusites because he wanted Jerusalem. You cannot win that argument. Your sacred texts are truly the swamp where Islam drew its poisonous teachings.
But then how can you in a clear conscious worship and defend such a make-believe monster and criticize Muslims. You either be enlightened and cast out the murderous myth or languish in moral turpitude. Your god is not better than theirs. Stand for moral clarity by abjuring all such murderous myths as many have done so! Courageous atheists from Muslim backgrounds are taking to the Internet to denounce Islam. Join them in brotherhood. Let both the bible and Quran burn. Let Islam be laughed out of existence. Give no Muslim a call to say” but your god in the bible ordered the same thing.”
Jihad is a problem that cannot be eradicated while both the Church and State in the West give tacit support to Islam.
gravenimage says
“Have Mercy’s” ludicrous assertion that is it necessary to destroy Judaism and Christianity in order to discredit *Muslim* savagery is absurd.
In fact, pious Muslim butchers would be only too happy to second “Have Mercy” on that whole destruction of Judaism and Christianity thing…
Does she really believe that if Judaism and Christianity disappeared tomorrow that Muslims would as a result stop enslaving their victims?
And the best “Have Mercy” can do is cite something that was reported to have happened *three thousand years ago*.
Never mind that abolitionists cited Jewish and Christian scripture in support of ending slavery.
The fact is that *no* Jews and Christians are enslaving people—nor are they calling for it, nor are they citing their scriptures in support of it.
Would that we could say the same about pious Muslims…
Have Mercy says
The priority is of course destroying Islam’s hold on humanity. However, I cannot help but wishing that all so called Abrahamic religions hold on mankind is also lifted forever. I debated many Muslims when I was a devout Christian and watched a ton of their propaganda videos. They keep dredging all the filth that in the Hebrew bible as a defense mechanism. Now as an atheist I call them on their barbarity without having to devote any time to defending that crazy mythological monster, Yahwah, or the supposed atrocities that his chosen people carried out on his command in that book of fairytales. Since most Muslim converts are former Christians and Muslim preachers use the bible extensively as a propaganda tool, I say that a belief in those Hebraic myth is a prerequisite for falling for Muslim lies and presents a difficulty in questioning their belief in a God who would order and condone such barbarity.
You are trying to create a straw man argument as to what I actually said or believe. All I want is for humanity to collectively climb out of the Abrahamic swamp. As a secular humanist I hold collective contempt for all such belief systems, and a specific contempt for Islam.
Yes, some abolitionists were Christian clergy and some were humanists. Remember, slavery was endorsed by both Catholics and Protestants for centuries. Successful abolitionism was a product of rationalist thinkers of the Enlightenment who criticized slavery for violating the rights of man, not because God hated slavers. In fact slavers pointed to scripture as endorsement for slavery, citing the example of all pious biblical figures who were slave masters. Also, St Paul admonished slaves to submit to their masters. Read http://www.evilbible.com/Slavery.htm for a list of some such passages.
I would not make such bold statements: “The fact is that *no* Jews and Christians are enslaving people” What do you call modern human trafficking? Admittedly, organized crime gangsters and cartel members are not alter boys or temple cantors, but many of them are confessionally Christians and Jews. Those who pay to violate the trafficked women are children include religious people. You might be shocked by the scale of slavery in the Western hemisphere and even in the good old US of A- Read about it sometime! The good news is that most faithful Christians and Jews are not so pious as the take the bible literately, but such is a product of secular humanism prevailing in Western culture after centuries of barbarism.
sirius says
They do what Mohammed and his gang did. Nothing new!
Richie says
Islam lacks any redeeming qualities.
Their idea of ‘Heaven’ is getting 72 virgins to rape for all eternity- they carry their violent fantasies even to the afterlife
mary_gonzales says
I think it is not too hard to fight the jihadist..just do the same way they treat of us. If they killing, we kill back..if they behead, we behead back..if they push us to flee..we can push them back.. if they bombing us, we bomb them back..and of course blow up the leftist head too and disbanded the UN and the human rights as they are useless..
gravenimage says
Islamic State enslaves 400 Yazidi women
……………………………….
Yes—taking slaves and sex slaves is perfectly Islamic. I didn’t know that I would see this in such a naked form in my own lifetime…
More:
And also prohibited to you are all married women except those your right hands possess. (Qur’an 4:24)
………………………………
This is the “sanctity” of marriage in Islam—it is perfectly fine to seize a woman married to an Infidel, because her marriage is not recognized by pious Muslims. The husband can be driven out or butchered.
I’m sure quite a few of these Yazidi women were married—reportedly they range in age up to about thirty-five. Most of their husbands—and children—were probably either slaughtered or are now stranded on Mount Sinjar with the other cornered, starving Yazidi refugees.
More:
O Prophet! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries; and those whom your right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to you.
………………………………
*This* is how pious Muslims see it—that slaves and sex slaves are *assigned* to them by their foul “god” Allah—that it is sacralized to attack innocent people, and rape and enslave them.
God, I hate Islam.