According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.
“Jihadis Are Swapping Notes About Sex Slaves On Twitter,” by Rachel Stoltzfoos, Daily Caller, August 13, 2014 (thanks to Twostellas):
After Twitter user and apparent jihadi Abdullah, with the Twitter handle @Mujahid4life, mourned the death of Robin Williams Tuesday, he engaged in a casual discussion about sex slaves.
User @LawofBetsalel captured the exchange:
“Islam allows ‘slavery’,” Abdullah began. “Women can be taken as captives, men can be killed.”When another user asks how many slaves Muslim men can have, Abdullah says “I’m not sure there’s a fixed limit. Maybe @Amreekiwitness knows.”
User @Amreekiwitness, who is dedicated to “raising awareness about the upcoming conquest of the Americas, and the benefits it has for the American people,” was happy to help out with a different question. ”U don’t need to marry a slave to have physical relationship with her,” Amreekiwitness said.
Abdullah disagreed and said slaves do have rights. “Sex has to be consensual and it only applies to concubines,” he said.
And the curious user chimed back in: “whats the definition of concubines? isn’t it the same as a person you own, obvious in Islam they have rights”

Michael Copeland says
“Slavery is a part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is Islam.” Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan , professor, imam and eminent Saudi scholar.
http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6417-slavery-is-part-of-islam-muslims-speak
Beagle says
If I were to say that 20 years ago I imagined the legal merits of sex slavery becoming a news story I would be telling a whopper. But by ten years ago it seemed a certainty. And here we are.
Any comment from the modern feminist peanut gallery? Or just more pap on fat shaming, public breastfeeding, and the Republican ‘war on women’?
Wetwork56 says
Excatly Beagle–To think this moron-in-chief won the election with this campaign slogan shows the ignorance of the average american (or western for that matter) woman at what is truly a war going on in the islamic world.
If not stopped ladies, you had better stock up on the KY Jelly.
gravenimage says
Beagle wrote:
Any comment from the modern feminist peanut gallery? Or just more pap on fat shaming, public breastfeeding, and the Republican ‘war on women’?
…………………………….
All too true, Beagle. I tried Googling “feminists condemn ISIS sex slavery”, and came up—no sh*t—was *this*:
“Op-Ed: Arab Feminists Say Israel Promotes Sexism and Genocide.”
West Bank feminist academics condemn Israel (!) – not Islamists -for promoting rape, sexism, and genocide.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/15486#.U-vR5UZ4SXA
Talk about projection! Civilized Israel is the only state in the Middle East that *doesn’t* oppress and abuse women.
Meanwhile, one recent big campaign by American feminists has been to get people to stop using minimizing terms like “throws like a girl”—I kid you not…
Jan Fourowls says
You know, I still throw and always threw like a girl, kicked the kick ball like a champ before nobody wanted to play that game anymore, but seriously, American, academic, sex-pozzie, post-modernist, Dworkin-Daly radical, lesbian, second-wave, third-wave and all other sorts of feminisms — while occasionally pointing out some problems of the same sort Jesus as reported in the Bible confronted and set right (at least when He was bodily present) about women — have never had the real God in the middle of anything and have always failed and embarrassed intelligent women who won’t give up men, children of both sexes and other non-feminist women any more than we’d give up on God.
The gay rights GLBTQQWTF identity politics movement has somehow among the majority of 21st century “feminists” gotten conflated with Islamic rights because the feminists are too busy pole-dancing with their assorted gender-bending friends to have any brain cells left to think about things like self-preservation and how Islam is the antithesis of that.
Jan Fourowls says
Another point about how methods without the real God in the middle never work, in context of feminism and Islam as practiced in Iran for the past 35+ years, is found in the book, Going to Iran, by brilliant academician Kate Millett addressing Islam and revolution (1982 comments at http://www.amazon.com/Going-Iran-Kate-Millett/dp/0698110951).
Kate’s another woman (like suiciding poet Sylvia Plath, etc.) made virtually crazy by not harnessing her prodigious intellect to the real God through a true (not man-made) understanding of Jesus Christ. Another of Millett’s books is http://www.amazon.com/The-Loony-Bin-Trip-Kate-Millett/dp/0252068882. Her earlier work, extensively researched, http://www.amazon.com/Sexual-Politics-Kate-Millett/dp/0252068890, started the second wave of feminism.
But there’s no supernatural power, which in its good form only Jesus Christ provides, in any of the theorizing about how to make the world better, whether socialists or globalists or feminists or -ists (particularly Islamists) of any type are trying for what will always be their failed versions of a changed world order.
Centurion_Cornelius says
Dear beagle and Wetworks,
You both have it correct.
These “liberated” wimmen of today are living in a fantasy world of their own creation– total UN-reality. They are breathing in their own noxious vapors.
The modern feminist world has been “all figured out” for them, at least. Western Judeo-Christian men are wicked; pregnancy is a disease to be avoided at all costs, even murdering your own child; America and Israel in particular are evil…the list is endless. All topsy-turvy wild imaginings.
Lo and behold a statement of reality: “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.” Mike Tyson.
Change it to “Every Femi-Nazi has a plan until they are a Muslouid sex slave–they they will wish they ONLY got punched in the face.’
RKM says
It’s been awhile since my hawk has tasted throat wine. The jihadis days are numbered.
Instead of batting aways so many pokes and prods, when the lazy & strong bear of the West wakes up finally from its PCMC slumber, it will be an epic sight.
My sons will finish what I and Martel and Sobieski could not. Go on the offensive, annihilate the totalitarian to the last man.
Beagle says
Optimistic, but the IS has yet to lose a major battle or take significant losses. I have been watching ‘wakeup calls’ snoozed since at least 1993 (first WTC).
RKM says
I am the optimist. I am, but sometimes I give the effect, arguing with certain people in certain venues, that the battle is lost… in order to capture someone’s attention and curiosity into the subject of the Free Man and Woman’s Resistance to Islam.
Yes, IS has been rolling steady, but their resistance has been nil, as the Iraqi Sunnis in uniform fled the battlefield leaving the weapons given hem by the American taxpayer. Birds of a feather.
IS hasn’t been up against the American head-hunters yet. The are some Americans restricted by ROE who abide by ROE (rules of ball-less bureaucrats), Americans restricted by ROE who will get the job done regardless of the ROE, and Americans unrestrained in their hunger to retain human liberty for their children that will exercise a violence of action against the enemies of the US Constitution that is Cro-Magnon in nature. Viking like barbarity.
Ultimately I’m confident, based upon history, that free men and women will surmount.
I think it’s the natural way of things, you can only enslave a man for so long, as Islam or Nazism or any totalitarianism ideology naturally does, before that man will no longer bend his back to the whip, rise, and annihilate his oppressor.
This is what Western & Eastern children, long oppressed by Islam, will eventually do.
I myself am an infidel savage, and so are my sons. The things we’re prepared to do are unspeakable in this forum.
gravenimage says
…that is Cro-Magnon in nature. Viking like barbarity.
I myself am an infidel savage, and so are my sons. The things we’re prepared to do are unspeakable in this forum.
……………………………….
We didn’t have to become barbarians or savages to defeat the Fascists—the assertion that we have to do this to properly oppose the threat of Islam is equally false.
RKM says
Aloha GI,
“We’re not just going to shoot the bastards, we’re going to rip out their living goddamned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We’re going to murder those lousy Hun cocksuckers by the bushel-fucking-basket.”
– The American Hero George S. Patton
I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. Take care.
Mac
harbidoll says
I don’t think that cartoon of a jew (Israeli) sitting in his armchair blowing up gaza with his remote insulting. color me racist or whatever.
tom says
What does everyone think what will happen if Isis lay their hand on nuclear weapons ?
beatlejuice says
If they get their hands on nuclear material it will be really bad news. They will attempt to use it. They already have some low grade radio active material that they have stolen from the local hospitals. However It doesn’t make a good dirty bomb. Al Qda is the one to watch because these groups actually tell you what they are going to do. They actually follow scripture so they have a kind of recipe book. If the west refuses to listen and close their eyes to it all it will be our fault. Politicians need to wake up. IS has demonstrated to the world that what is happening is primarily a religious war. Tactics and geopolitics is only strategy of this religious war. I saw Obama’s speech when he launched limited attacks on IS. It took him awhile to say Christians. Americans often ask why they hate the west. It should be clear by now that they hate the west because we are the infidel. Plain and simple. I think Americans can understand this concept. It will be hard to convince the world now that Islam is a religion of peace. It is Islam o fascism and they don’t hide it. The moronic left is still being apologetic about their motives and calling them terrorists. People don’t join terrorist groups unless there is a higher calling. The calling is Islamic world domination.
Peter Buckley says
Hilarious. How embarrassing for “moderate” muslims. No doubt they’ll be able to demonstrate that these jihadists are misunderstanding their religion. Can we get a reaction from a “moderate” in the US to explain? What’s that? The sound of tumbleweed……
Islam dying of shame…….
Jaladhi says
Oh, the moderate Muslims will out right deny that these jihadis are Muslims. As for shame Islam and Muslims have no conscience and no shame!! If they had any shame, Islam and Muslims would have died right in seventh century!
Peter Buckley says
“It could be argued that educated Muslims should be ashamed of themselves for supporting Muhammad and his Islam, for it is the responsibility of the individual to thoroughly critique Islam from all available points of view before deciding to support such an unjust and violent ideology. Having supported Muhammad’s Islam and having attempted to convince others to do the same is the only thing in all of my life I am truly ashamed of having done. To remain a Muslim one must ignore all of Islam’s evil commandments and deny the fact that Islam in totality is a violent and unjust religion. Muslims are too fearful to dare to question Islam for real so they lie about it to themselves and others…..”
http://www.considerationsofacanadianex-muslim.org/conclusions.html
The Internet will destroy Islam:
“With the advent of the internet and the reality of human development, people can no longer be silenced by killing them. As Ali Sina has said: “Despite its bluster, Islam is extremely vulnerable, as darkness is to light. Islam is a tall tower of lies. Islam will be dismantled by the pens of ex-Muslims.” Let’s now join hands and voices and kick the feet out from underneath the sick cult of Muhammad’s Islam and watch it hit the ground and smash. It is time for a grassroots movement. If you care about these issues, stand your ground and let your voice be heard. Those in opposition to Islam are simply speaking the truth for the right reasons. The rule of thumb is – NEVER “support” Islam or its “causes.” Muslims have been misled by Muhammad and they want your sympathy and support to help further their cause. Do not compromise your own integrity and your own concerns. It won’t help them, or you, in the long-run. The best thing that you can do for a Muslim is to creatively enlighten them with the facts about this evil ideology disguised as a religion. The seed of doubt will inevitably bear fruit over time within the honest individual. Islam has deeply damaged the minds of many who call themselves Muslims. Since Muslims are taught that the world is basically their enemy and that only they are pure and true, they typically isolate themselves and often become dangerous due to Islam’s teachings. In truth, Muslims get victimized by Islam – it retards their personal and spiritual development.”
http://www.considerationsofacanadianex-muslim.org/conclusions.html
The Internet will destroy Islam:
http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Wood/islam_beheaded.htm
Jan Fourowls says
RE: INTERNET — IMPORTANT FOR U.S. CITIZENS AGAINST SHARIA – If you want to retain your freedom to comment online without Islamist taqiyya claims of hate crime inciting their terrorism, please write and/or call your elected leaders in the U.S. Congress to oppose Rep. Hakeem Jeffries’ H.R. 3878 and its companion bill, Sen. Ed Markey’s S. 2219.
The bill through the back door of policing “hate speech” would potentially criminalize all of us commenting here and shred as if never written the Constitutional freedoms of (and from) religion and free speech.
S. 2219 and H.R. 3878 would serve as enforcement legislation to UN Resolution 16/18 — to which President Obama in agreement with Organiz[s]ation of Islamic Cooperation (formerly Organization of Islamic Conferences), the confederacy of 56 Islamic states, purposed to bind Americans in 2011. (The reported low likelihood of passage of this legislation appears to be just more taqiyya/kitman.)
Also the claim that this legislation (still in committee) was inspired by the anti-semitic 2014 Kansas killings, while they are of course horrible, is more taqiyya. There’s already more than sufficient legislation in the U.S. to police against and protect to the extent humanly possible against anti-semitism and other legitimate hate crimes. S. 2219 and H.R. 3878 are attempted legislation’s chilling effect to silence us from speaking the truth about Islam and to give a Shari-like ground for punishing us if we do speak out and violent Muslims claim subjectively that our
speech was to them so hateful that they were incited to violence
— because intolerant Muslims cannot tolerate fair critique or honest reporting about Islamic terrrorism or even what the Quran says.
Walter Sieruk says
The Bible teaches “Whoever steals someone to sell as a slave or to keep them for their own slave must be killed.” Exodus 21:16. [E.R.V.] That is how must God hate such a heinous practice
Lisette says
King James Version of Exodus 21:16.
And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
A man not a person, so women are not included. Below more references:
“He who kidnaps a man, whether he sells him or he is found in his possession, shall surely be put to death.
– New American Standard Version (1995)
And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
– American Standard Version (1901)
Any man who gets another into his power in order to get a price for him is to be put to death, if you take him in the act.
– Basic English Bible
And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall certainly be put to death.
– Darby Bible
And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he shall be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
– Webster’s Bible
And he who stealeth a man, and hath sold him, and he hath been found in his hand, is certainly put to death.
– Youngs Literal Bible
And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
– Jewish Publication Society Bible
Jaladhi says
Oh these scumbags can never be called human beings!! They should all be transported to Mo/allah’s paradise brothel!!
Richie says
I think we may come to a point where leftists- even western feminists- defend Islamic slavery, and will claim not to defend slavery so would be ‘racist’
gravenimage says
Jihadis are swapping notes about sex slaves on Twitter
……………………………………
All of this kidnapping, rape, and slavery is *perfectly* Islamic.
And these pious are using Twitter to “swap notes” on this atrocity—something most Westerners associate with nothing more malicious than air-headed gossip about celebrities.
More:
User @Amreekiwitness, who is dedicated to “raising awareness about the upcoming conquest of the Americas, and the benefits it has for the American people,” was happy to help out with a different question. ”U don’t need to marry a slave to have physical relationship with her,” Amreekiwitness said.
……………………………………
I think we can see what “benefits” Islamic conquest would bring to the American people—including having their wives and daughters used by the “faithful” as *sex slaves*. *My God*…
robaby says
“Islam is the only religion that divenly sanctifies concubines ” REALLY???! Have you read the bible?
The following passage shows that slaves are clearly property to be bought and sold like livestock.
However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)
The following passage describes the sickening practice of sex slavery. How can anyone think it is moral to sell your own daughter as a sex slave?
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl’s owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT)
medina says
This was man’s law, not God’s.
Jan Fourowls says
What Christians call the Bible’s Old Testament including Exodus as written many centuries before the Quran was in parts descriptive of immoral conduct, not prescriptive, and showed God continually and progressively leading the chosen people toward a higher ground of morality — not that they were at all perfect because even by the time of the Bible’s New Testament, the earliest Christians were exhorting repentance of sins because “all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.”
Islam and the Quran instead are prescriptions to sin and sin big by Muslims against non-Muslims (Christians and Jews especially, and also females). As if Satan hates God’s people, the Christians and Jews, with a special grudge against the female through whom the Jewish Jesus Christ was born as the world’s Savior, and wants to annihilate them. Hmmmmm…..
The Quran by contrast with the Bible and the contextual whole of Islam has always approved and prescribed sex slavery as well as other slavery, and consistently with the Quran today IS is practicing sex slavery (plus rapes, beheadings and crucifixions) in the 21st century. There aren’t any Christian or Jewish people who openly are practitioners of slavery — or any other horrific sadistic crimes against humanity — bragging about it on Twitter as the Islamists of IS are. And if they practiced crimes against humanity as IS is doing right now, as Christians and Jews they’d be contravening all 21st century understanding of their religion.
So shaddup robaby Islam apologist, this isn’t a forum that will indulge you. But on the other hand, we all have the freedom not to read what you write. Keep knocking yourself out if you want to.
Mirren10 says
“Islam is the only religion that divenly sanctifies concubines ” REALLY???! Have you read the bible?
The following passage shows that slaves are clearly property to be bought and sold like livestock”
Does it say anything in the New Testament, about divine sanctification of concubinage ? No, it doesn’t.
In any case, your witless attempts at moral equivalency are easily shot down.
Where are the Jews, whose Holy text is the Old Testament, who are practicing sexual concubinage ? I haven’t noticed any reports of Jews kidnapping 200 young Christian girls, and not only using them as sex slaves, but also as suicide bombers … Nor are there any Jews, that I’ve seen, ravening and raping their way across the Middle East, kidnapping, raping Christian and Yazdidi women, and keeping them for sex slaves.
Any Christians doing the like ? No.
So, robaby, answer me this; why is it only **mohammedans** who are doing this, claiming it is sanctioned in islam ?
Will says
ISIS has made a mistake here as they are showing the true face of Islam before they are ready to “move” in the west and even the western media has noticed albeit unwillingly.
Now all we need is a mass movement from everyman to let the trash we call “leaders” aware that they had better act soon or (in the UK) UKIP will do it for them. Abbott for all the good he has done is still backpedalling about Islam in Australia
Personally(and I guess this will be slammed) I think that if the really nasty , noisy Jihad preachers or those Islamists openly committing violence and blatant sedition and escaping legal censure in the west just suddenly “disappeared” without trace, we would see a whole new willingness of Muslims to control it(after the first 100 riots that is)
Can you imagine just how western governments would act if some other group did their duty for them? Like in sport I always find it ironic and incredibly hypocritical that it is the one who retaliates to violence who is sanctioned, not the primary aggressor.
Islam wages Total War and Total War is ONLY defeatable by Total War.
Beatlejuice says
Everyone is paying too much attention to IS. Keep your eye on Al Qda. Everyone is calling IS an offshoot. They are not an offshoot of anything. They are a a creation of Al Qda. There was no falling out, there was no leadership haggle. There is no criticism of IS by Al-Qda with the exception that they are more brutal. IS has not done anything that is contrary to the Qur’an. Like if Al-Qda cares that IS is more brutal. They were created for a purpose but not just on single purpose. They need to maintain their recruitment momentum. Young people always like something new. They are to focus on the creation of the caliphate. IS is to keep the media busy with certain acts that the west considers barbaric. Makes for good news sensationalism. IS is a distraction with an objective. War is deceit. Al Qda is up to something and it could be something really bad. It will happen either in Europe or in the USA. Why is McCain screaming like a little girl that IS is a direct threat to the USA? Why is Lindsey Graham now crying about America under threat? These two have been kissing Muslim ass for a long time.
Bin Laden promised to kill over 4 million Americans including 2 million children. He is dead now but his followers love him more than they love themselves. The caliphate won’t happen until the USA and Europe are hit with a devastating blow. Israel can’t be attacked until its supporters are weakened. Islam doesn’t care about the Muslim populations in the west. They are sacrificial lambs. IS is smoke and mirrors for Al-Qda with an objective to create the caliphate. My Question is what is Al-Qda up to?