This week’s Glazov Gang features our hero along with Michael Hausam, writer at IJReview.com, Monty Morton, a conservative entrepreneur, and Ann-Marie Murrell, the CEO of PolitiChicks.com. The Gang gathered to discuss the Left’s romance with Hamas, analyzing the media’s moral equivalency about a death cult and the target of its terror. The guests also focused on why Jews are not allowed to defend themselves, a U.S. administration’s betrayal of Israel, a Radical-in-Chief and the Islamic State’s killing fields, Jews fleeing France, and much, much more.
Jay Boo says
Interfaith Dialog
Maybe the Left are correct .
A Muslim led Interfaith Dialog might solve this issue?
Let’s see how it works out in the real world.
Tom Trento introduces the following video clip of an Interfaith Dialog gone wild.
neko b. says
WOW! a MUST see…
thanks for sharing.
The Levite says
A very interesting article….
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/08/13/Palestinian-Leader-in-Miami-Boasts-about-Conquering-American-Jews
gerard says
The Bible is the word of God.
The Koran is the word of the Devil.
That’s it.
Joseph says
Equating Hamas with Israel: “Makes my head explode.”
Judi says
Excellent show as usual Jamie.
Uncle Vladdi says
Liberals are slanderous masochist CRIMINALS.
Liberals love to pretend that life is just too “complex” for any of us fallible, helpless and so potentially dangerous victims to ever be able to understand cause and effect, so to them cause and effect don’t really exist, because, when all facts can be spun as opinions, it gives them the false relativistic right to pretend their entirely fact-free, subjective opinions are the “diversely opposite equals” to conservatives’ objective facts; it gives them the false ‘right’ to remain irresponsibly wrong.
In fact, lefties always sound retarded (hence, the accuracy of such terms as “leftardation,” “libtarded,” etc.) BECAUSE all they’re ever really doing is trying to think up alibi-EXCUSES FOR THEFT, so of course their language has to employ all the critical thinking logical fallacy evasions, distractions, deflections, euphemisms, and metaphors (i.e: lies) in order to sell it to sane people, (and all crimes are forms of theft); i.e: “Wealth Redistribution” and that of course requires lies, like I just said, most often in the form of evasive metaphors and euphemisms (like for the best instance example, the term “Wealth Redistribution” itself)!
Most of their sub-sequent forced predeterminism and group-rights idolatry is also only an excuse to “defensively” either do nothing, or to enjoy a perpetual excuse attack others first, even if only by having the false right to delinquently force their own self-reliant responsibilities onto groups of “privileged/guilty” (innocent) others.
And of course they’ll always try to co-opt the largest gang, the government, into helping them with their wealth dedistribution theft schemes.
Liberal ‘psychology’ is very simple: commit any and all crimes, because the ends (enriching them selves) justify the means (screwing over others first, before and “because” those others will inevitably try to screw them over too, anyway)!
Like all criminals, they want to have false rights (like, to our stuff) without any responsibilities (like, for having to earn or otherwise pay for it)!
It actually starts with masochism – they feel compelled to inflict the worst-case scenario them selves, because then they can pretend to themselves that they had control over it. Criminals turn mere negligence
(accidents, mistakes) into criminal negligence all the time, by adding their own backwards false pride confession of intent to it: “Screw you, I MEANT to do that!”
That’s what “progressives” always do – they rush in first before some other fools can beat them to it!
There is no crime or perversion a liberal won’t instantly Submit to or immediately compromise with, all the while claiming they are doing so by just being “practical” about it. They call it ‘Realpolitik.’
And cowardice loves company, too… which is why their band-aid therapeutic “solution” to every “eternal crisis” is always to form a bigger gang! It explains “Globalism,” too.
To them, if something CAN go wrong, then so it WILL go wrong, SO they must make sure to cause it so they can control the amount of resulting wrongness, since preventing it completely is “impossible.” This immorality of despair is what they call ‘ethics.’
ALL libertine “liberals” are CRIMINALS too. After all, their entire pre-emptively defensive idolatrous alibi-excuse creed pretends there are no evil crimes nor evil criminals, because we’re all just helpless victims of predetermined force (products of our environments, victims of society, slaves of allah)! Whee! The Devil’s greatest trick is to pretend he doesn’t exist – after all, he’s really only ever a helpless victim, too!
PeterB says
In my opinion, the real core issue for the American left (and ignorant), is that the truth of Islam is so opposed to basic freedoms and rights, that we can’t imagine that any religion is still so intrinsically violent and oppressive today. Even John Locke addressed Islam in terms of our own philosophical religious discourse and he was still naive regarding the depth of immersion and the oppressive traumatic effect literal Sharia Law enforcement has on their society. Our founding fathers followed John Locke and envisioned Muslims wanting to come to America to be free and assimilate, but even for them it was still ambiguity on the depth and breadth of lost social and mental capabilities that Islam stifles.
Then there is the reality, IMO, that we cannot misuse the term Muslim or Islam. Every Muslim can assimilate fully or in part because they can choose to accept or reject any part of Islam they want to. But Islam cannot assimilate into anything because Islam is mutually exclusive of freedom and justice by definition and in practice.
You cannot have darkness in the presence of light, it is impossible. Teh United States will NEVER be able to assimilate Islam in its ideological and practical expression.
But the biggest thing we cannot believe is that when a fundamentalist literalist lifelong Muslim male is given the chance to be free, he refuses, in the exact way a prisoner wants to stay in prison because the change is too great. But most importantly the reward and punishment structure for the male in Islam is expressed sexually and violently on others beneath them.