• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK Muslima: “Sisters, if you love your sons, husbands and brothers, prove it by sending them to fight for Allah”

Aug 1, 2014 10:03 am By Robert Spencer

RunaKhanAs Britain gallops toward its self-induced ruin, this kind of story will become more and more common. British authorities have taken for granted that all the Muslims in the country are “moderate,” and that those who think otherwise are racist, bigoted Islamophobes. Accordingly, they have done nothing whatsoever to challenge the ways in which Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to make recruits and justify their violence. And so the teaching of jihad has proliferated in Britain. The results will be obvious within a few years.

“‘Sisters, if you love your sons, husbands and brothers, prove it by sending them to fight for Allah’: Muslim mother-of-six facing jail for encouraging terrorism in Syria with Facebook messages ,” by Chris Pleasance, Daily Mail, July 31, 2014 (thanks to Darcy):

A Muslim mother has been told to expect a ‘substantial’ prison sentence after encouraging terrorism in Syria over social media.

Runa Khan, 34, admitted posting a message on Facebook in September, saying: ‘Sisters, if you love your sons, husbands and brothers, prove it by sending them to fight for Allah.’

Khan, a mother-of-six, also posted a a picture of a suicide vest on the site, alongside a message which read ‘sacrifice your life to be in Islam’ in July last year.

On September 13, she sent a series of messages on the social media site describing a path into Syria and the name of a group in the country to join.

Wearing a niqab while standing in the dock of Kingston Crown Court, Khan pleaded guilty to four counts of disseminating terrorist publications between July and September 2013.

Addressing the defendant, Judge Peter Birts QC said: ‘I’m sure you have been advised they are charges of the utmost gravitas that almost inevitably will be met by a substantial custodial sentence.’

Judge Birts allowed Khan to wear a niqab in the dock after her barrister Jo Sidhu QC confirmed her identity.

The court heard Khan, from Luton, sent a series of Facebook messages to an undercover police officer describing a route from Turkey into Syria.

She received details of the route from Mohammed Nahin Ahmed who has admitted spending eight months in Syria fighting alongside an Al Qaeda-linked terrorist group, the hearing was told.

Ahmed and childhood friend Yusuf Zubair Sarwar, both 22, from Birmingham, fled to the country last May after contacting Islamic extremists.

They each pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in preparation of terrorism acts at London’s Woolwich Crown Court earlier this month.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: United Kingdom Tagged With: featured


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Tradewinds says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 10:09 am

    “As Britain gallops toward its self-induced ruin, this kind of story will become more and more common. ”

    UK has truly bitten the dust.

    • VampireJack says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 11:07 am

      NOT on MY watch.

      There are those of us who will NEVER bow down to that false god of mohound.

    • Rob says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 5:50 pm

      No doubt if this Muslim mother was targeted by authorities to relocate her to a Muslim country, she would say:
      ‘Hell no I’m British. I demand my rights!’

      • SpiritOf1683 says

        Aug 3, 2014 at 4:01 am

        And relocation to a Muslim country like Pakistan is what should happen to her and her entire family. We don’t want these here in Britain.

  2. AnneM says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 10:23 am

    Britain imploding .

  3. Jay Boo says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 10:32 am

    Zombie morning

    A call to prayer as living Muslims wake up once again, dead.
    What they call religion is the misery of Mohammad.

  4. Mayla says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 10:53 am

    Yes Britain is imploding and it is responsible for allowing it to happen

  5. Dave Lindesmith says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 10:53 am

    The bottom of Islamic theology approaching the top. These people are death incarnated (zombie) their activity becomes savage at the drop of a word, cartoon or varied theology. Anti-Christ from Revelations riding the 7 horses described!

  6. Ashley says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 11:00 am

    “A call to prayer as living Muslims wake up once again, dead.”

    What an excellent, accurate comment.

  7. SIlvia says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 11:01 am

    Britain (insert any EU country) is worried that a muslma is sending her male kin to die in Syria???? Britain should be worried about the day when they send their kin to FIGHT BRITAIN (insert any EU country) !!!!

  8. Keith says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 11:01 am

    Why was she allowed to wear a niqab in the dock. I thought justice was supposed to be the same for all, so all wrong doers are supposed to be visible in court. Would anyone else be able to hide their identity whilst being tried in court especially for a terrorist related crime.

    • EYESOPEN says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 12:23 pm

      A very, VERY good question.

      • Champ says

        Aug 1, 2014 at 12:36 pm

        Hi, EYESOPEN!! …so good to see you 🙂

    • Oliver says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 1:10 pm

      She was allowed to wear that because HER ATTORNEY ( BARRISTER) CONFIRMED HER IDENTITY.

      Attorneys (barristers, etc) LIKE MUZZIES AND THE USELESS NATIONS, NEVER LIE, DO THEY?

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Aug 1, 2014 at 9:47 pm

        She should have been required to have her face uncovered for the duration of her presence in the court.

        The judge, the jury, and the legal team *need* to be able to see her face and *read her expression* and also to hear her unmuffled voice.

        In a situation like a court of law, being able to hear someone’s tone of voice and clearly see their facial expression – whether they are the defendant or a witness for either defence or prosecution – is critically important.

        It is farcical to permit *anyone* to wear a mask in a court of law.

        Would we allow a *non-Muslim* defendant to wear a mask that completely covered their face and prevented their voice from being clearly heard??

        • Oliver says

          Aug 2, 2014 at 2:44 pm

          As best I can recall, during GEORGE H.W. BUSH’S ADMINSITRATION, in a massive fraud/terror trial (in I think Texas)- (I think it was a Muslim ” charity’ raising money for terrorist activities, and skimming some ( a lot) for themselves, a GOVERNMENT witness wanted to be “covered’ to protect him 9or her).

          Was (as I recall) not allowed, and the lefties applauded, and the creeps were convicted anyhow– the government dropped him (or her) as a witness.

          However, different rules for Muzzies then humans.

  9. William says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 11:03 am

    In the case of a man who is slowly losing his hair, at what point do you say he is bald?
    In the case of Britain who is galloping toward ruin, at what point would you say she is ruined?

    • Blurb1000 says

      Aug 2, 2014 at 4:01 am

      When he insist to comb his pubic hair over his scull

  10. Jay Boo says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 11:15 am

    Religion does not save those who turn its well to a grave.
    Pray for a cleansing rain to wash away the clinging stain of Islamic faith.

  11. Jay Boo says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 11:22 am

    Muhammad’s song

    What sings a call of duty to prayer hides in his wretched devil’s lair;
    Seduced by lyrics of the ‘prophetic’ liar,
    its song is Satan’s unholy desire.

    • EYESOPEN says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 12:26 pm

      Good one Jay Boo!

    • No Fear says

      Aug 2, 2014 at 4:15 am

      Bingo Boo!

  12. David says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 11:47 am

    “They each pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in preparation of terrorism acts at London’s Woolwich Crown Court earlier this month”. That would mean they have read the Quran thoroughly.

  13. Charli Main says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 12:52 pm

    Will this Muslim POS be deported at the end of her sentence to whatever Muslim shithole she or her ancestors came from ???
    Of course not—-the British taxpayer will continue to feed, house, cloth and pay her to breed more Muslims, to increase the Muslim infestation of Britain.

  14. Oliver says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 1:14 pm

    Personally, I tend to agree with her. ALL MUSLIM MALES, over say 6 or so should go to Iraq; Syria; Pakistan; Lebanon; Afghanistan; Somalia, or some other feces pit, and fight for allah.

    And the women should follow them. Since girls are married at 8 and 9 or so, they to should start young and prepare.

    And, they all should–hopefully–be killed; fighting each other.

    My views.

  15. Champ says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 2:39 pm

    How Sick …

    Urging one’s own children to fight in allah’s evil army is such a losing proposition–not only in this life, but in the afterlife, as well.

    • Oliver says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 7:19 pm

      Champ,

      I agree with you.

      In (I am fairly certain it had been THE WALL STREET JOURNAL )- perhaps a year or a little more ago, a reporter interviewed some Muslim woman (don’t recall which cesspool she was from) whose child had been a homicide bomber.

      She had had ( going from memory so could be a little off) 6 or 7 children, and 4 (as best I recall) had been “martyrs” and, she was quoted as saying that she ” WOULD GIVE ALL OF THEM FOR ALLAH”,
      in the struggle against the infidels (or whoever this particular wacko’s enemies were).

      I found that sickening.

      Considering how westerners cherish and try to do the best for their children (I know, there are exceptions, but I am talking/writing, in the main) this is horrible.

      Let them all die–my view.

  16. Mirren10 says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 3:03 pm

    How islamic.

    If you love your children, husbands and brothers, demand they go off to murder innocents, and blow themselves up.

    • Ashley says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 5:55 pm

      “Khan, a mother-of-six…”

      It appears Runa Khan doesn’t possess much of a maternal instinct…

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Aug 1, 2014 at 9:56 pm

        You don’t get it.

        it’s about human sacrifice, though not to get better crops or a good rainy season, nor even to get victory in war.

        She’s intending at least one of them to be a human sacrifice to buy *her* liberation from the “torments of the grave”.

        You see, if one of those kids offs itself in the process of immolating others on the altar of allah the eater-of-souls, she believes that that kid, that ‘shahid’, doesn’t just get an express ticket straight to “paradise”, she *also* believes that the dead kid, the “shahid”, gets to wangle exemptions from “torments of the grave” (which are otherwise pretty much guaranteed, no matter how “pious” you try to be) for a slew of kinfolk. Of course, as mama, she believes her kid would put *her* at the top of the list of nominees-for-exemption.

        I can’t give the reference but I remember hearing something to the effect that a shahid can win exemption for up to 70 relatives. So if she has six kids and five of them “slay and are slain in the cause of allah”, jihad fi sabil allah, that means that up to 350 of their mohammden relatives (the ones who *aren’t* waging jihad and will most likely die in bed) get an exemption ticket…

        • Champ says

          Aug 2, 2014 at 4:27 am

          You don’t get it …

          Ashley was simply making a joke, so cut her a little slack whydontcha.

        • Ashley says

          Aug 2, 2014 at 3:08 pm

          Thanks, Champ! Guess my attempt at sarcasm missed its target. 🙂

        • Champ says

          Aug 2, 2014 at 3:46 pm

          You’re welcome, dear Ashley! xo

      • Mirren10 says

        Aug 2, 2014 at 12:46 pm

        I think most wild animals, and domestic animals, have more of an maternal instinct than many mohammedan females. 🙂

        Did you see that clip dda posted (can’t find the thread just at the moment) of the mohammedan female in a slave rag, who brought her son to an **Israeli** hospital to receive treatment for his heart condition ?

        The reporter asked her if she would want him to become a ‘shahid’. She was all for it. This after the **Israelis** had spent God knows how much, **healing** her child.

        • Oliver says

          Aug 2, 2014 at 2:53 pm

          Mirren, In my view, that is (almost) comparable to the Palestinian Arab bitch (nicest term I can use for her, without being censored)– whose had ACID thrown in her face (I believe by her father; if not, her brother) for ” bringing dishonor” upon the family.

          She went to an Israeli clinic for facial reconstruction; they treated her; ( FREE OF COURSE); then, her father (or brother) said, for the family to forgive her, she had to blow up Israelis/Jews.

          She went to the clinic WITH A BOMB, to blow it up. The same clinic that gave her a face.

          (Thankfully, nothing went off).

          Being interrogated, she said that she hates Jews and Israelis and would kill as many as possible–for Allah.

          After her family disfigured her and Jews/Israelis tried to help her.

          Sick bastards. My view…

        • Ashley says

          Aug 2, 2014 at 3:17 pm

          Oliver…I was unaware of that story. Wow…just wow!

          Here are the details for those interested:

          http://www.snopes.com/politics/israel/eldad.asp

        • Ashley says

          Aug 2, 2014 at 3:28 pm

          It “appears” this woman was burned in an accidental gas explosion and not by her family. Nevertheless, she was intent to become a suicide bomber and detonate herself at the very burn clinic where she received extensive treatment by compassionate Israelis.

          I agree…”sick bastards.”

  17. joeb says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 4:53 pm

    So what happens when they’re sent to fight for Allan in Bradford, Manchester, London, and Luton?

    Dave, are you still there..? Well, the Prime Minister seems to have hung up. How strange!

  18. apran says

    Aug 1, 2014 at 6:03 pm

    Why didn’t the muslima herself go to Syria to engage the sex jihad? LOL

    • Aardvark says

      Aug 1, 2014 at 7:10 pm

      For the same reason that the Imams don’t strap on suicide vests and turn themselves into flying mincemeat.

  19. SpiritOf1683 says

    Aug 2, 2014 at 3:55 am

    The solution is simple. Round up the family, strip them of their British nationality, as they’re not really British, and deport them to Pakistan. If any place could do with spring cleaning, its Luton.

  20. Mackykam says

    Aug 2, 2014 at 5:29 am

    Payback for England having chosen to side with muslims against the Jews.
    Payback for having divided the Palestine Mandate lands, Jewish patronage, and given it to muslims.

    • chanah says

      Aug 2, 2014 at 7:32 am

      Yes it seems that way, may UK wake up before it’s too late, and for once bless Israel in public

  21. sidney penny says

    Aug 2, 2014 at 9:24 am

    “Addressing the defendant, wearing a niqab

    Judge Birts allowed Khan to wear a niqab in the dock after her barrister Jo Sidhu QC confirmed her identity.”

    What kind of judge is he where he cannot see the face of the defendant and relies on the counsel of the defendant to identify her!!!

    Britain gone mad.

    OH, it might have been a Sharia court in Britain.There are a few around.

  22. BC says

    Aug 2, 2014 at 9:33 am

    This shows how Muslims love death. The ‘normal’ instinct of a parent is to protect one’s children. The instinct of Muslims is to send them to be ‘martyred’
    Of course as countless examples show, the way that Muslims parents behave towards their children if they show signs of deviating from the path of Islam eg, becoming too Westernised, is to kill them

  23. Mirren10 says

    Aug 2, 2014 at 3:39 pm

    @ Oliver & Ashley.

    Yes, these two examples, (and I’m sure there are *many* more) illustrate, for all who have eyes too see, and ears to hear, the *fundamental* humanity, compassion, and sheer * decency* of the Israelis.

    Contrast and compare, indeed.

  24. wolfgang says

    Aug 31, 2014 at 8:35 pm

    Maybe that filth will come to Australia and go live around the big Mosque in Lakemba then she can live in the land of sunshine and sing all at the snack bar while winging her way down Sydneys CBD……I am sure the PC crowd will welcome her.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • OLD GUY on Al-Qaeda Calls on Jihadis to Kill Non-Muslims With Poisoned Coronavirus Masks
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.