The Islamic State has repeatedly called for jihad terror attacks in the U.S., and boasted that its jihadis are already here. Maybe they are just trying to “strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah” (Qur’an 8:60). But the number of Muslims from the U.S. who have gone to join them in Iraq and Syria shows that they do have support here.
“Law enforcement bulletin warned of ISIS urging jihad attacks on US soil,” by Jana Winter, FoxNews.com, September 17, 2014:
A law enforcement bulletin obtained by FoxNews.com warned that Islamic State fighters have increased calls for “lone wolves” to attack U.S. soldiers in America in recent months, citing one tweet that called for jihadists to find service members’ addresses online and then “show up and slaughter them.”
There will be “a continued call – by Western fighters in Syria and terrorist organizations – for lone offender attacks against U.S. military facilities and personnel,” warned a July law enforcement intelligence bulletin from the Central Florida Intelligence Exchange, a state-run agency that gathers, assesses and shares threat information and works with the Department of Homeland Security. “These threats will most likely increase should the U.S. or its allies attack the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS) in Syria or Iraq.”
In one example cited in the bulletin, a British jihadist encouraged radicals still living in the West to use Facebook and LinkedIn to find and target soldiers.
“You could literally search for soldiers, find their town, photos of them, look for address in Yellowbook or something,” the tweet read. “Then show up and slaughter them.”…
Richie says
Utterly vile, and we know who Obama will side with
islamisdeath says
Don’t be surprised if the regime publishes their addresses.
Jay Boo says
Muzzies are playing a dangerous chess game.
They feel emboldened by politicians who allow the so-called moderate Muslims to look the other way with (not our problem) indifference.
Instead of shame they feel entitled to indignation whenever a politician like Obama frets that this must inevitably be about some Islamic grievance.
Never forget
They are vulnerable as well.
john spielman says
islam is approaching a tipping point when the West’s PC gloves come off and the brass knuckles come on. Just look at Australia and the opinion polls. Soon even the politicians will speak against the “religion of peace”
Bill says
Are you serious or delusional?
islamisdeath says
no I am being sarcastic. “Bill” you are the delusional one.
BC says
When one of them turns up and behads a soldier’s family he will most likely call it ‘domestic violence’
The jihadists are real idiots, announcing their intentions. They seem not to realise that most US homes have guns and people are ready to use them.
I suggest a neighbouhood watch sort of system, where any suspicious looking people are seen the neighbours get their guns and go out and arrest them
Salah says
“These threats will most likely increase should the U.S. or its allies attack the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS) in Syria or Iraq.”
That depends on what you mean by “attack”.
If it means a saving-face attack, then, yes, the threats are going to increase. If it means attack to destroy and annihilate these vermins, then, no, the threats will gradually disappear.
Apparently the masters in the W.H. (the Muslim Brotherhood) do not want to attack and destroy ISIL, their most violent offshoot!!!
Jack Holan says
This is not something new. In the 80s when one of our naval vessels shot down an Iranian Civilian Airliner due to misidentification and radio silence by the pilots; Revolutionary Guard vowed vengeance against the Captain of the ship. The wife of the Captain was given certain instructions on how to change her life pattern to protect herself. However it is believed that a recon group did make it to his house and collected information.
dumbledoresarmy says
Memo to all US soldiers, both serving (on furlough) and Veterans. (And this probably applies also to Canadian, Australian, and British soldiers, and to soldiers from any European country – e.g. Dutch or Danish or German or French – who have done a tour of duty in Afghanistan).
The mohammedan mobsters are within the gates. They intend to do to you – or to your parents, wife, children, friends, if found at home – what was done to Lee Rigby in the streets of London. Or worse.
I hope you have a weapon in your home, and that you have taught your loved ones how to use same. Also, teach some elementary security/ survival skills…just like on base in the sandpits of Iraq and rockpits of Afghanistan. If you don’t have dogs already…get some. Big black ones, that *will* bite if commanded.
That way, strikes me that as and when the caliphate assassins come calling at *your* place, they will find themselves very suddenly and unexpectedly on an express trip to allah’s imaginary bordello.
They really wanna go poke bears? Well, GI Joe, it’s your business to teach them that poking the bear when the bear is “at home” is a reeeally bad idea.
The jihadi inside the gate got away with mass-murder at Fort Hood because he was inside the gate, wearing US uniform.
But an allahu akbaring thug who tries to sneak into the home of a US serviceman on leave, might find it a bit more difficult…especially if the serviceman knows that such a thing is to be expected, and has prepared himself and his family.
Jack Holan says
They should also remember when they took the Russian diplomat hostage both recently and in the 1980s (I know you have short memories) the Russian got their Diplomats back within 24 hours without a hair touched on their head. We can also employ the exact same measures so – BEWARE –
Custos Custodum says
The Russians kidnapped the son of the terror group’s leader, then delivered ONE of his testicles to his father.
Smart Guy says
Attacking only soldiers? In a “Democracy” we the people vote for for the leadership therefore everyone in the country is responsible for the foreign policy of the nation. The Irish Republican Party would bomb soldiers if they could, but the policy of terrorism is that any citizen is a legitimate target ! They can and will behead any American that they can get their hands on.
We will end up with the General Shelton solution “The only good moslem is a dead moslem ” and because politicians support the lie that Saudi Arabian Islam is non violent or civilized they will find themselves in the same coffin.
gravenimage says
Smart Guy wrote:
In a “Democracy” we the people vote for for the leadership…
…………………………………..
Why would you put “Democracy” in sneer quotes? I have been disappointed—and worse, in some cases—with some of our politicians, but hardly means that our whole system is a sham. What are *you* advocating?
More:
We will end up with the General Shelton solution “The only good moslem is a dead moslem ” and because politicians support the lie that Saudi Arabian Islam is non violent or civilized they will find themselves in the same coffin.
…………………………………..
Ah…right. As though Americans are about to go on some sort of murderous rampage, slaughtering not just violent Mohammedans but also clueless politicians. Good grief…
mark says
Smart guy?
You need to wake up and smell the roses, our whole political system has been corrupted by money . All three branches of government are complicit in Olama’s election and also their failure to impeach him. America as we know it is being dismantled piece by piece while people sit on their asses and do nothing. We need to get rid of the whole bunch of them and prosecute them for treason. If you know who really runs the world so to speak, you would have to look at “illuminated ones”, they are in control of the four hidden dynasties of the earth. Zechariah 6:5 and Revelation 7:1 when rightly divided will bear this out. So to say “republican or democrat” is moot at this point in American history. Welcome to the NWO New World Order. Just go to the Denver airport its called the New world airport. Look at all of the Murial’s on the walls, all symbols of what is to come. I wish it weren’t true, i love this country and what she once stood for (tears) God help us to wake up !
Jack Holan says
I believe our knowledge of the Bible is imperfect to use as a plan of action at any given moment in time. Now that I’ve put this behind me I also believe the NWO only exists in the minds of several media people and elected (temporary) representatives and the Executive. I am convinced most people in this Great Country do believe in the Judeo-Christian Ethos and do accept the Constitution as our basis of government.
duh_swami says
In a “Democracy” we the people vote for for the leadership therefore everyone in the country is responsible for the foreign policy of the nation.
Nope…I didn’t vote for Obama so I’m not responsible for his foreign policy.
duh_swami says
Showing up at someones house with ill intent is not an original idea. But who it is coming from in this instance is significant.
No soldier or his family should have to take the Molly Norris Option. Instead security up. If such an attack does happen, CAIR better gear up for the backlash that’s sure to follow.
Sovereign Man says
I have a suggestion. Find Muslims’ homes, and expel them before they slaughter us. In my city I have already seen the black banners being flown without fear. The people flying the flags are openly Muslim, with fully covered wive(s) and typically 5-10 children, all being bred for war against us. They are like the larvae of a parasitic wasp planted in a host paralyzed by fear of being called racist.
During the Yugoslav wars Muslims marked the homes of Christian neighbors for death. The entire Christian (indigenous) population of Kosovo has been ethnically cleansed by the Muslims with the blessing and help of NATO and the UN. As the Muslim population of Europe reaches critical mass, expect the Balkan syndrome to repeat itself. The process of the extermination of Western civilization has already begun. It is only a matter of time before neighbor is killing neighbor – logic would dictate that if the survival of our culture and civilization is desired, we had best strike first, while the demographics favor us.
Rezali Mehil says
Hello Sovereign Man,
Let us take an extension to your thinking. Suppose the Brains of the host (i.e. the Obama and Cameron Administration) decide that black flag waving is nothing to worry about ( i.e. it is not illegal).
Sovereign Man disagrees – he is so shit scared and paranoid that and decides to take unilateral action. He mind is made up – he goes and eliminates many of those who were peacefully waving those flags in the neighbourhood.
The authorities then either arrests or eliminates Sovereign Man…and there follow WIDE Muslim protests which spread into other kufr countries too… there follows a call (which later changes to mandate) from the authorities for people to hand their weapons in such that a repeat of killing innocent flag bearers cannot happen.
Only the authorities are allowed to defend the people – people cannot do it for themselves..they must remain on the sidelines.
Peoples – for your own safety – please stop this sort of thing from happening – please hand your weapons to the police at your earliest convenience – do it today.
More Later ….
Rezali
kikorikid says
Rezali,
You offer nothing but Taqiyya spew!
You turn Your firearms in. What hubris!
You think we are going to do that on your word?
This is not UK, Australia, Canada. We do not turn our firearms in.
FU!
islamisdeath says
How are things in the ooze today?
islamisdeath says
meant for “Rezali”
Henry says
Common sense tells the rest of us to deport most, or all Muslims for safety’s sake, and to continue with our way of life. This may seem harsh, but as we know, many Muslim’s allegiance is ultimately to the Umma. The Qur’an by word, and by spirit commands Muslims to subjugate, or kill the infidel. Better to deport Muslims before a bloodbath ensues.
Angemon says
How would you go about deporting native citizens?
Jack Holansky says
Only if they voluntarily give up their citizenship or serve in a foreign Army that is is an enemy of the USA
Henry says
Angemon, there’s no ‘reply’ link next to your comment, so posting my response here.
USA Patriot Act 2 sought to address this:
One of the key provisions was this: Stripping Citizenship for Political Associations. Section 501 would seek to strip citizenship from persons for their political associations. It would provide that even activity that is currently legal to engage in – such as belonging to or supporting the lawful activities of a group designated “terrorist” by the Attorney General – would be presumptive grounds for losing one’s citizenship.
Angemon says
Henry posted:
“USA Patriot Act 2 sought to address this:
One of the key provisions was this: Stripping Citizenship for Political Associations. Section 501 would seek to strip citizenship from persons for their political associations. It would provide that even activity that is currently legal to engage in – such as belonging to or supporting the lawful activities of a group designated “terrorist” by the Attorney General – would be presumptive grounds for losing one’s citizenship.”
Punishment for political associations? That sounds too much reminiscent of Soviet Russia for my taste, where “association” with “terrorists” (such as being relative to someone accused of being anti-regime by someone who wanted their job) was reason enough to have the police knocking at your door, and that was the last time someone would hear from you. But I digress.
That law only seems to cover people who support terrorist organizations. How would you go about deporting native muslims who can’t be connected to any terrorist organizations? And where would you deport them to?
Henry says
Angemon, Perhaps it is better to stick to our ideals and values, and not succumb to becoming more like the tyranny that one fears. I don’t hate Muslims, I am however, appalled, and disgusted by Islam. History teaches us that the greater the percentage of Muslims in a society as a minority, the less free it becomes, and violence and intimidation rise exponentially until Muslims are a majority and then the real oppression takes over. I fear this. How does a free tolerant society prevent this from happening when faced by a determined, growing, intolerant, aggressive, and subversive foe from within? I’d be interested to have your thoughts on this, and whether or not you have any ideas on how this can be prevented?
Angemon says
Henry, that doesn’t really answer my question, does it? The reason why I ask people who suggest deportation (be it of muslims or any other demographic) how would they go about deporting native citizens is precisely because I don’t want to live under a tyrannical rule that has the power to kick citizens out of the country not because of something they did but because of what they think. That is a feature of totalitarian governments. Not to mention it would be no assurance that a country would be 100% of jihad terror attacks – what about muslims that, faced with the prospect of “deportation”, falsely apostatize and continue to practice their religion in secret? Or people coming in from countries like the UK or France – if they happen to be caucasian and clean-shaved how would anyone suspect them to be muslims?
As for the enemy within, muslims are part of the problem but not the whole problem. They have enablers, supporters and apologists helping them. What those people did amounts to nothing less than treason.
Henry says
Right now the Jewish citizens of Europe are self deporting themselves with good reason, they are being attacked, and threatened by the Muslim population. Good, productive members of society with every right to remain there fleeing because Europe will not act to protect them. It is not inconceivable for this to happen here in America in the near future. In fact the process has already begun.
Angemon, I did not arrive at the notion of deporting Muslim citizens lightly, or in an offhanded way. The idea of rescinding the rights of others is repellent to me. I do however, also recognize that tolerating the intolerant past a critical point becomes suicide. I do believe it is apparent that if left unchecked, the stealth Jihad we are facing will lead to a catastrophe of epic proportions, and I don’t think its inconceivable that we may see times so desperate that not having taken this measure to have prevented them will come to be seen as folly. Where to deport to you ask? I suppose countries of origin, and for offspring, the country of origin of parents, or grandparents. Of course this wouldn’t eliminate Jihad terrorist attacks completely, it might though save our civilization.
I would remind anyone that Islam is not a religion, but a political, and military doctrine – a tyrannical ideology hell bent on conquering the world. The enemy is not now at the gate, but amongst us, determined, resourceful, and relentless.
Geert Wilders stated that it may be necessary to deport millions, with the Muslim population growing and strengthening, while the native Dutch become weaker that option will not always be possible. I’m all ears to any solutions, or suggestions on how best to effectively defeat the Jihad without having to resort to deportations.
Geert Wilders had this to say 6 years ago, i think it still holds relevant, and has become if anything, even more pressing:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/12/geert-wilders-at-facing-jihad-conference-in-jerusalem-if-there-would-have-been-no-israel-islamic-imp
Our freedom is vulnerable, and like Ronald Reagan said, it can disappear in a generation. We need to do something.
Angemon says
Henry, you wrote:
“Where to deport to you ask? I suppose countries of origin, and for offspring, the country of origin of parents, or grandparents.”
What if those grandkids, or great-grandkids, only had american citizenship? What would happened if the countries of their grandparents or great-grandparents simply said “they’re not our citizens therefore they’re not our problem”? Also, where would you suggest deporting a native american convert to islam who can trace his lineage back to the pre-columbian era?
You also wrote:
“Geert Wilders stated that it may be necessary to deport millions, with the Muslim population growing and strengthening, while the native Dutch become weaker that option will not always be possible.”
I never said I was against deportation (not on the way it’s set up today – you’re in another country, you break the law, you get kicked out), and I said several times that native converts of western countries should have their citizenship stripped when they go and join terror groups abroad. What I am against is giving a state power to do away with its citizens based on what they choose to believe, be it religion, politics or something else. That is a trait of totalitarian systems.
gravenimage says
The vicious Rezali Mehil wrote:
Hello Sovereign Man,
Let us take an extension to your thinking. Suppose the Brains of the host (i.e. the Obama and Cameron Administration)
…………………………….
How grotesque. Muslim Rezali Mehil does not appear to realize that free Westerners don’t regard their elected officials in such a manner—*ever*. They are public servants, we are free to speak out against them, their policies, and their shortcomings. If we respect a leader—and not just the office—we may choose to follow them, but even then we do not consider them infallible.
And we consider ourselves free individuals—not members of an interchangeable “host” as pious Muslims do.
More:
…decide that black flag waving is nothing to worry about ( i.e. it is not illegal).
…………………………….
How are these the same things? This Muslimah assumes that anything she can get away with in the West will fool the Kuffar—but she is wrong. Many of us know all too well what the Black Flag of Jihad portends.
Besides, her implication that no Western nation will take action re the black flag has already been proven false:
“Netherlands bans ‘ISIS flag’ after anti-Semitism surge”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/netherlands-bans-isis-flag-after-anti-semitism-surge
More:
Sovereign Man disagrees – he is so shit scared and paranoid that and decides to take unilateral action. He mind is made up – he goes and eliminates many of those who were peacefully waving those flags in the neighbourhood.
…………………………….
How is waving the Black Flag of Jihad—a specific call to wage violence against innocent Infidels—”peaceful”?
More:
…there follows a call (which later changes to mandate) from the authorities for people to hand their weapons in…
…………………………….
Muslims *love* the idea of a disarmed Infidel citizenry.
More:
Only the authorities are allowed to defend the people – people cannot do it for themselves..they must remain on the sidelines.
…………………………….
Unsurprisingly, Rezali Mehil completely misunderstands this. While in the West—wisely—it is only the authorities who have an official monopoly on the instigation of violence to protect the populace, any individual in a true democracy can act to protect themselves if violence is *instigated against them*. That is, they have the right to protect themselves against attack—including attack by violent Muslims.
More:
Peoples – for your own safety – please stop this sort of thing from happening – please hand your weapons to the police at your earliest convenience – do it today.
…………………………….
As I said, she wants us all unarmed. I can’t think of a better reason for going out and buying a defensive weapon—and learning how to use it.
Henry says
Right now the Jewish citizens of Europe are self deporting themselves with good reason, they are being attacked, and threatened by the Muslim population. Good, productive members of society with every right to remain there fleeing because Europe will not act to protect them. It is not inconceivable for this to happen here in America in the near future. In fact the process has already begun.
Angemon, I did not arrive at the notion of deporting Muslim citizens lightly, or in an offhanded way. The idea of rescinding the rights of others is repellent to me. I do however, also recognize that tolerating the intolerant past a critical point becomes suicide. I do believe it is apparent that if left unchecked, the stealth Jihad we are facing will lead to a catastrophe of epic proportions, and I don’t think its inconceivable that we may see times so desperate that not having taken this measure to have prevented them will come to be seen as folly. Where to deport to you ask? I suppose countries of origin, and for offspring, the country of origin of parents, or grandparents. Of course this wouldn’t eliminate Jihad terrorist attacks completely, it might though save our civilization.
I would remind anyone that Islam is not a religion, but a political, and military doctrine – a tyrannical ideology hell bent on conquering the world. The enemy is not now at the gate, but amongst us, determined, resourceful, and relentless.
Geert Wilders stated that it may be necessary to deport millions, with the Muslim population growing and strengthening, while the native Dutch become weaker that option will not always be possible. I’m all ears to any solutions, or suggestions on how best to effectively defeat the Jihad without having to resort to deportations.
Geert Wilders had this to say 6 years ago, i think it still holds relevant, and has become if anything, even more pressing:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/12/geert-wilders-at-facing-jihad-conference-in-jerusalem-if-there-would-have-been-no-israel-islamic-imp
Our freedom is vulnerable, and like Ronald Reagan said, it can disappear in a generation. We need to do something.
Rezali Mehil says
For me this is a true example of dar-al-Islam and dar-al-harb.
Imagine if you will kufr soldiers de-enlisting – or choosing to leave the services as soon as they possibly could – with pressure ensuing from the wife and especially the wailing little daughters.
Please daddy – please …”do you have to go to work today…in that uniform? …I’m scared the bearded men will take (or send ) me and mommy away!!!!! ..please..and then she starts to cry changing to Wailing”.
It is a dastardly strategy – pulling the heart strings of little scardy cats…but it could be effective.
Time will tell how many servicemen leave …
More Later …
Rezali
kikorikid says
Rezali,
Mohammed was a mentally-ill murderous brigand-rapist who
founded a cult based on Totalitarian/Supremacist ideology that
operates under a veneer/façade of religiosity. Rez, you are one
of Mo’s boys and will get to paradise as soon as we can arrange it.
gravenimage says
More from the repulsive Rezali Mehil:
For me this is a true example of dar-al-Islam and dar-al-harb.
Imagine if you will kufr soldiers de-enlisting – or choosing to leave the services as soon as they possibly could – with pressure ensuing from the wife and especially the wailing little daughters.
………………………………..
How is this a “true example” of *anything*. when it only exists as a fantasy in this delusional Muslimah’s mind?
Certainly, this isn’t like any military families *I* know.
More:
Please daddy – please …”do you have to go to work today…in that uniform? …I’m scared the bearded men will take (or send ) me and mommy away!!!!! ..please..and then she starts to cry changing to Wailing”.
……………………………….
“The bearded men will take me and mommy away”—what does this mean?
In Islam, it is perfectly Halal for Muslims to take the women and girls—even little girls—of Infidels as sex slaves.
We’re seeing this in the Islamic State with Christian and Yazidi women, and by Boko Haram in Nigeria with Christian school girls.
*This* is what this vile Muslimah is gloating over—the wives and daughters of American servicemen being taken as sex slaves in their own country.
More:
It is a dastardly strategy – pulling the heart strings of little scardy cats…but it could be effective.
……………………………….
It’s dastardly—but Rezali Mehil heartily approves. And why not? She approves of all Islamic savagery.
But she is wrong—military families *are strong*. The idea that military wives would fall apart at the first threat is utter bullsh*t.
Another thing she fails to understand—no surprise—is that not all soldiers are men. In quite a few cases, these Jihad thugs would not be facing a (supposedly) cowering wife and kiddies, but a husband and father.
More:
Time will tell how many servicemen leave …
……………………………….
Actually, it is Muslim armies that typically cut and run—not brave Infidels.
Undaunted says
This is much more than it seems. Forget IS threatening from afar. There are countless thousands of Muslims already here in the US willing to attack soldiers. And they will, no doubt, because soldiers are such easily identifiable targets. But for the less bold jihadi, the one who doesn’t quite have what it takes to stalk and kill a soldier ~ a soldier who very well may be a bad-ass motherfucker ~ there will always be even more plentiful targets; people who walk around with their heads up their asses as they stare into their social media devices; ear-phones shoved into their aural canals so, in order to be “cool”, they can’t tell an “allah-hu-akbar” from a “gesundheidt”.
There are millions of targets from which they can and will choose.
You are just one of those targets.
voegelinian says
They’re not going to limit their carnage to American soldiers. We must rationally assume anyone and anything could be a target of a terror attack of any size from small to spectacularly horrific; and we must rationally assume any and all Muslims are equally suspect, without burdening ourselves with the responsibility Muslims perpetually fail to shoulder, to try to develop a reliable taxonomy that perforce would unacceptably increase our vulnerability.
voegelinian says
“to try to develop a reliable taxonomy that perforce would unacceptably increase our vulnerability.”
Of course, an actually reliable taxonomy would not increase our vulnerability; but trying to develop one — against all reasonable odds that indicate it is a quixotic impossible endeavor — would.
Jaladhi says
Are we still looking for reasons to eradicate these Muslim jihadis? We just got one but those bleeding heart PC/MC lefties won’t be convinced.
AnneM says
Sadly, they will not be convinced until one of these Islamofacists attacks one of them.
NardsC says
While I sincerely wish that were the case, the fact remains that many polys views are so much removed from everyday people that even should they be attacked personally by muhammedans they would warp that shit to make it seem ‘an isolated incident’ or just another ‘extremist’ totally not following THE ‘religion of peace’.
If they wanted reasons to see this as false there are a shit-ton in the media from around the world and we have sadly seen the way politicians the world over have responded so strongly.
AnneM says
Not surprised. These jihadis are doing what “their god”, the enemy, SATAN, who uses the name “Allah” is telling them what to do.
AnneM says
These fools forget that Americans are ARMED to the teeth. Gun and ammo sales have gone up the last couple of years now.
Jae M says
Is it just me or does anyone else notice they always target unarmed, defenseless citizens, particularly women, children and unarmed men. That makes them huge cowards.
Unapologetic American says
No wonder Imam-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama al-Hawaii ordered the VA (Veterans Administration) to declare veterans are no longer eligible to own firearms, he wants to help his jihadist Muslim brothers slay brave Americans who served their country.
AnneM says
…..Yet there are many vets who OWN guns and ammo, REGARDLESS of what Mr. Obama says.
Jack Holan says
Not with Holder as Atty General unless you you religious Christian Jewish or Tea Party
AnneM says
Look for “civil diobedence” to be practiced more.
Atty Tude says
” PRCS
In accordance with OUR laws it would be murder.”
That’s the spirit. Just roll up and let the Jihadist chop your head off. You’ll be dead, but the pro-Islam liberal faction will be happy that you did not “kill another human being.”